Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment Tool (EFRAT) 
Methodology / Software


  • The detail of this research can be found in;

    Master Thesis titiled "Development of the Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment Tool (EFRAT) and Application to Solvent Recovery from a Gaseous Waste Stream", Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, August 1998. 
     

  • Paper published in the Environmental Science and Technology (Journal) titled "Comparative Environemtnal Assessments of VOC Recovery and Recycle Design Alternative for a Gaseous Waste Stream.", Vol. 34, No. 24, 2000, pp.5222-5228.
  • The waste generated from the chemical and allied products industries have significant negative impacts on human and biotic health, severely degrade the quality of the air, water, and soil in the environment, and costs billions of dollars each year to manage, treat, and dispose. The aim of process design for pollution prevention is to create chemical processes which reduce the generation of waste, and its hazardous characteristics at the source (i.e. within the process). Modern chemical process designs utilize commercial process simulators or other process models to improve energy and mass efficiency, and account for environmental impacts at the source of waste generation and at all levels of the product's life cycle.
  • In this research, a new methodology and software was developed and applied to environmental assessment of chemical process designs. The Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment Tool (EFRAT) is able to evaluate chemical processes in terms of human health effects (carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects on both ingestion and inhalation routes), toxic effects to biota (fish toxicity) and damage to environmental systems (global warming, ozone depletion, smog formation and acid rain). Using the software, the process designer computes environmental partitioning, relative risk indexes and emission rates for each process pollutant with input from process simulator results (chemicals used, equipment type and throughput). EFRAT has been developed in conjunction with other software tools developed in the Department of Chemical Engineering and the Department of Environmental Engineering at MTU which evaluate economic and safety aspects of chemical process designs, and a tool which performs process rankings based on multicriteria assessments.
  • The EFRAT software was used to evaluate a case study involving solvent recovery from a gaseous waste stream (0.5 vol. % of VOCs) containing toluene and ethyl acetate (50/50-wt. % each). This case study involved absorption and adsorption technologies where the environmental impacts from these processes were quantified using the EFRAT software and then compared. In addition to that, EFRAT was used in "Environmental Optimization of Chemical Processes", to find the minimum environmental impacts by varying designs/operating conditions. Different absorption oil flow rates (10 to 800 kgmole/hr) were used to demonstrate this capability. Process composite indexes (average, local, regional, and global process composite indexes) were used to determine the optimum operating flow rate with different weightings on all the 9 normalized relative risk indexes. When the regional or global scale impacts are the priority, the absorption oil flow rate should be approximately 50 kgmole/hr (56.9 gpm) to reach the minimum impacts. At flow rate of 300 kgmole/hr, the local scale impacts will be minimized while at 200 kgmole/hr, the average process composite index will reach its minimum.

  •  

     

    A general methodology/software was developed for the multi-criteria environmental impacts assessment for chemical process designs. This software has demonstrated its ability to prioritize different technologies, configurations, and operating conditions in terms of environmental impacts in the solvent recovery case study. In the future, more case studies should be evaluated using the EFRAT methodology/software, including all of the life cycle stages of goods/chemicals.