Student writing is assessed two ways. A final piece of writing receives a traditional grade based on criteria established when the piece is assigned. I also assess student writing using the New Hampshire Holistic Writing Rubric. This state-established rubric is used to assess student writing samples on the New Hampshire state tests given in the spring to all third, sixth, and tenth graders. A "6" on the NH Holistic Writing Rubric represents the goal we all strive for; most adult writing does not rate a "6"! Students can receive 2's or 3's or 4's and still be earning A' |
THE
NEW HAMPSHIRE HOLISTIC WRITING RUBRIC
as interpreted by Mrs. Weissman's 6th graders |
Adult language can confuse kids. In
the rubric below, the state criteria are printed in orange. The 6th
grade "translation" is printed in black.
|
Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 | Score 4 | Score 5 | Score 6 |
Little or no topic
development
No idea of what the subject is
|
Random and/or weak
topic development
Some idea of the subject, has a beginning,
maybe an end
|
Rudimentary development
of topic and supporting details,
You know what the topic is; some good details; has beginning, middle, and end |
Moderate development
and fluency, has adequate details
Organized well; starts to flow; lots more
details,
|
Fluent, fully developed,
strong details
Writing really flows, has “oomph”,
great description
|
Topic and details
richly developed
Can’t add anything more to improve it
|
Little or no organization
Confusing, out of order
|
Little focus
Gets off subject, hard to follow
|
Limited focus
Stays on topic most of the time |
Focused
Stays on topic; nothing important left out |
Logical organization
Order makes sense
|
Careful and/subtle
organization
Don’t notice how it’s organized, it’s built in |
Few or no details
Uninteresting, just an outline
|
Few details
Don’t know much about characters, setting;
simple description
|
Simplistic vocabulary
Uses boring words, easy words, repeats same
words
|
Acceptable vocabulary
Uses interesting words, might use some similes
|
Appropriate language
Very interesting words, good images, uses
similes, metaphors, etc.
|
Effective and/or rich
language
Lots of interesting or unusual words, vivid
imagery, creates a mood
|
Little or no awareness
of audience and/or task
No idea why you’re writiing or for whom you’re
writing
|
Limited awareness
of audience/task
Not sure why you’re writing
|
. | . | . | . |
Lots of errors in
usage, grammar, mechanics
Terrible spelling, punctuation, grammar
|
Lots of errors in
usage, grammar, mechanics
Poor spelling, punctuation, grammar
|
Errors in grammar,
spelling, usage and mechanics
Spells priority words wrong, has sentence fragments and run-ons |
Some errors
in spelling, usage, grammar, and mechanics
Most words spelled correctly; hardly any
sentence fragments or run-ons; uses different
|
Few errors in spelling,
usage, grammar, and mechanics
Hardly any mistakes, variety of sentence
patterns
|
Control of usage,
grammar, and mechanics
No mistakes
|
![]() |
|
![]() |