The International Conferance and Exhibition
on LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT: Tools for Sustainability
Washington, D. C., April 25-27 2000
.
Screening and Ranking in the Context of Implicit Toxicological Concern: A Comparison of Methodologies and Requirements

D. W. Pennington
ORISE Research Fellow, US EPA, Systems Analysis Branch
National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio

 
Abstract
A large number of methodologies have been proposed to support the relative comparison of chemical emissions in the context of implicit toxicological concern.  Nevertheless, the selection of a methodology typically remains subjective and influenced by resource availability (time, knowledge and money).  To help practitioners address such issues, the results of three extensive studies are outlined in this presentation:
  • The merits and applicability of five categories of methodology are first illustrated with the help of a hierarchical framework and straightforward case study.  The hierarchy is based on the level of representation of the environmental mechanisms (from chemical emission, to fate, via exposure to toxicological potency) and perceived sophistication.
  • A comparison is then presented of two of the more prominent but structurally different methodologies (tiers 4 and 5 in the hierarchy) used in the US.  The WMPT facilitates comparison in terms of key properties using a framework of expert judgment to reflect levels of concern in terms of Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity (PBT).  Toxic Equivalency Potentials (TEPs) account for chemical fate, multi-pathway exposure and toxicity using a multimedia model structure.  Using the same data for 318 organic chemicals and minimizing scenario differences, a strong relationship and parallel support role is demonstrated to exist between these two particular approaches in the context of human health.
  • Focusing data collection efforts can dramatically reduce the time required to compare a large number of chemicals or emissions using the more sophisticated multimedia approaches in the hierarchy.  Based on model insights and a stated trade-off between data needs and error, four straightforward guidelines are presented to help predetermine which degradation rates (air, water, soil and sediment) are likely to be pertinent, hence which can be omitted.  The introduced error is generally less than an order of magnitude for the 318 chemicals when compared to the full human health model predictions, while the data requirements (1272 half-lives) and associated collection times are drastically reduced.


 
 

.
.
Last update: 26/Jan/2000