The Story Behind The Making or
How Lane Gets Rich From Criticizing Eckankar


     I just recently read Mark's two recent posts (and I am assuming that he is not Mark Summers) and found them quite fun.

     I have been accused of many things in the past twenty or so years, but I have never been accused of "making lots of money" and being "funded by Christian extremists."

     Now it would be very heartening for me to confess that I am really quite rich and that all my work on Eckankar has been a pot of gold for me. But alas such is not the case and I have a much less romantic tale to tell. Since it may explain how and why I wrote about Eckankar in the first place, I will elaborate, in brief, about the history of my Eck investigations.

1. I first learned of Eckankar when I was 17, having seen their advertisements in the market I worked at as a "box boy."

2. From 17 to 20 I periodically read Twitchell's books at the Bodhi Tree Bookstore, which was my favorite haunt in the 1970s. I especially enjoyed reading The Tiger's Fang and The Talons of Time.

3. In the Spring of 1977 I took a class on religious cults and sects at California State University, Northridge, where I was majoring in religious studies. One of the requirements was to write a term paper on a new religious movement. I chose Eckankar as my topic of study, since they were (at that time) heavily advertising on campus.

4. I originally planned to write a 10 page term paper, but a strange coincidence occurred. I was visiting Del Mar (a beautiful town on the Pacific Ocean, where Paul and Gail lived just prior to his death) and happened into a health food store entitled "Kirpal's." Since I knew the owner must be a follower of the late Sant Kirpal Singh, we got in a discussion about shabd yoga in general. He then informed me that Paul Twitchell, founder of Eckankar, was once a follower of his guru. I was curious, since I was in the process of writing my term paper. From that moment on I decided to do some more extensive research on Twitchell's background.

5. I then read almost every piece of literature I could find on Eckankar; this lead me to several key contacts, outstanding among them was Dr. John Sutphin, a Professor of Philosophy and a former Eckankar member, who provided me with a number of excellent leads. I then proceeded to look at Twitchell's early life and his extensive plagiarism.

6. As the semester was coming to an end, I had to present my findings to my Professor. He was duly impressed, as was Jim Peebles (an Eckankar member at the time and my classmate), who was also writing a paper and who later left the group (he also got sued, by the way, the next year by Eckankar).

7. I was pretty naive, so I sent a copy of the report to Eckankar. Subsequently, I received a letter from one of their attorneys (Nichols), who threatened to sue me if I ever published my study.

8. This, naturally, struck my curiousity (please keep in mind that I come from a family of attorneys--my father was a prominent attorney in Los Angeles, and my sister is currently a managing partner of a New York firm). Hence, I was not frightened by Eckankar's legal threats.

9. That following year (1977/1978) I took an independent study class in religious studies at CSUN so that I could do a more thorough term paper on Eckankar's history.

10. This effort led to a number of interesting contacts: Camille Ballowe--Twitchell's first wife; Brad Steiger--Twitchell's first biographer; Dr. Louis Bluth--Twitchell's personal doctor and eventual President of Eckankar; Ed Pecen--Twitchell's confidante and personal bodyguard; and a number of key individuals within the movement. All of these individuals, to greater or lesser degrees, provided me with important documentary information about Eckankar.

11. I also spent weeks in various libraries trying to trace Twitchell's earlier articles. I remember spending 10 hour days in the L.A. public library, UCLA, and other places, researching Twitchell's various pen names, and various articles (many of these findings I have not included in the present book). Eventually, Orion Magazine--which is now defunct--sent me all the original back issues where Twitchell's byline appeared. I also talked with Roy Eugene Davis and the former Editor of the magazine, who once remarked that Twitchell was a fairly awful writer (grammar/spelling mistakes; I never included this in the book, since I am not exempt from the same criticism).

12. My phone bill was extraordinarily high for a twenty year old. It was about two hundred to three hundred dollars a month, I remember (my mother surely remembers). I had a very long talk with a number of Twitchell's associates, including Iverlet, Ballowe, and others.

13. In the Spring of 1978 I finally finished the manuscript, which was originally called The Making of a Cult---but was later switched on the advice of Neil Tessler to The Making of a Spiritual Movement. I turned in for my class credit; it was about 160+ pages, I believe. 14. At that time the Spiritual Counterfeits Project in Berkeley contacted me via Jim Peebles (who was clearly upset with Eckankar); they wanted to utilize my research. I agreed, but wrote a letter to them clearly stating that I did not agree with their slanted approach. All of them at the time were highly professional and their journal still stands as one of the best pieces ever done on a cult from a biased Christian perspective.

15. That summer (1978) I was asked by Professor Mark Juergensmeyer (who was at Berkeley at that time, but who is now a Professor of Sociology at U.C. Santa Barbara) to be his research assistant in India for a book he was doing on the Radhasoamis. During that trip in the summer, my manuscript was circulated informally by a number of Eckists. Eventually one Eckist in Oregon got a hold of it and xeroxed hundreds of copies of it. I got a flood of mail--also because of my address being printed in SCP.

16. Thus for the first two years of its existence, the manuscript was circulated in a photocopied fashion. However, I met Brian Walsh in 1979 at the GTU (he was a graduate student in Consciousness Studies at JFK); he was newly initiated by Darshan Singh, Kirpal's son; I was newly initiated by Charan Singh (I was initiated in November of 1978--months after I wrote the second version of my Eckaankar expose). We became fast friends and he wanted to publish the manuscript, since he had once been attracted to Eckankar and felt that the information should be available to the unsuspecting public.

17. I agreed and Brian put up about 200 bucks or so and published a xeroxed, revised, version of the manuscript; it sold out very quickly. However, since Brian was selling near to costs, no profit was made, except that he could do another larger printing--which he did.

18. In the meantime I was working on my MA at GTU in Berkeley and tried to get a few major publishers interested in the book. Each of them found the work interesting but were scared off by Eckankar's legal threats (a decade later, Garland Publishing agreed to do the manuscript, but had to back off due to the persisting legal threats of Eckankar--it is for that reason that it was advertised by Garland in their catalogs).

19. In 1982 I moved to Del Mar, California. Brian Walsh moved there shortly after me. In 1983 he wanted to publish a legitimate paperback version of the book. He put up 3000 dollars and started Del Mar Press--we both agreed to share the work and eventually start a journal (which we did), called Understanding Cults.

20. 1000 copies of the Making of a Spiritual Movement were published and the book sold steadily for two years, eventually exhausting its initial print run. (By the way, Brian gave 100+ copies for free to an interested Eckist in Lagos, Nigeria).

21. Concerning the profits that were garnered from that print run, Brian Walsh did not make his money back; indeed, he lost a couple of thousand, because we kept giving free copies away to various countries who could not afford to pay the taxes, etc.

22. In 1983 I was contacted by defectors of John-Roger Hinkins' movement; Brian and I started Understanding Cults; the first issue was devoted to J.R.

23. As is pretty well known, I was robbed by John-Roger personally on October 5, 1984; my home/office was completely ransacked and all of my research work (plus names and addresses to our mailing list) were stolen.

24. During the next year Eckankar's international headquarters received a package of stolen goods (items which were taken from my home); Eckankar very swiftly and very professionally sent the materials back to me, knowing that they were being used as a middle-man (J.R. wrongly assumed that I would blame Eckankar for the robbery if they somehow used the stolen material; Eckankar was wiser than that and immediately handed over the materials, which had--by the way--J.R.'s handwriting all over the papers.).

25. We did five more issues of UCSM and closed operations. Why? Because I lost too much money, got tired of repeated death threats, and had to finish my Ph.D. at UCSD.

26. However, there were still lots of people interested in the book, so I (Walsh had moved from Del Mar in the late 80s) published enlarged versions of the manuscript in limited print runs.

27. Finally, in 1992 I contacted Garland Publishing about the possiblity of publishing the book in new, slightly revised version. I signed a contract and they advertised the book. However, as people must know by now, Eckankar legally threatened Garland over the book. Eventually, Garland had to back down since they did not want to get into a prolonged legal battle--especially when the book was not going to make them much money anyways.

28. Thus I decided to "reactivate" Del Mar Press (it was dying a very slow death in the early 90s) so that I could publish a paperback version of Making. It cost about 4,000 to do one thousand copies (including, of course, laser costs, etc.). I put the money up from my teaching salary (I am a tenured professor of philosophy at Mount San Antonio College) and decided to charge 15 bucks a piece for Making so that any extra money could be channeled back into Del Mar Press--finally trying to make it stand on its own legs without me or others infusing money into it.

29. Although it is a bit embarrassing (and does not reflect well on Walsh's or mine's business acumen), Del Mar Press has never made a profit; indeed, I estimate that it has lost several thousand dollars in the past decade. This is due to a number of reasons, but primarily because Walsh and I never really intended to make money. We simply wanted to have a means to get certain information available to the public. Moreover, it was fun putting the whole operation together.

30. As we move into the mid-1990s, I have put most of my other books with signficant publishing firms (Garland Publishing has published THE RADHASOAMI TRADITION and EXPOSING CULTS--which is due out in August of this year); I am currently working on SPOOKY ACTION AT A DISTANCE: EINSTEIN'S ARGUMENT WITH NIELS BOHR AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM THEORY with Aaron Talsky (Harvard University; U.C. Irvine). It should be ready for the publisher in Fall of this year.

     But to underline Mark's claim, I am sorry to report that I have not made any profit on the Eckankar materials.

     However, I have thoroughly enjoyed myself and I think it is a nice impression that Mark leaves when he claims that I have made lots of money. Perhaps I should not have written the preceding, since then my fellow newsgroup readers will think that I live in a big house on the beach (I live in an apartment); that I own an expensive car (I drive a 88 Nissan Sentra--with about 140,000 miles on it); that I hang with the stars in Hollywood and go to the best restaurants (being personally a strict vegetarian, my options are limited); that I am an avid fundamentalist Christian (actually I was raised Roman Catholic, having attended their schools for some 12 years and having taught in the same for five years [Concerning my own religious heritage, I was initiated by the late Maharaj Charan Singh of Radhasoami Satsang Beas in November 1978]).

But I have to burst Mark's high estimation of me.

     Presently I teach five classes a semester (ranging from Introduction to Philosophy; Introduction to Major World Religions; and Introduction to Sociology) and surf two to three times a week.

     But, Mark, you could change my financial status and confirm your suspicion of me very quickly. Just buy lots of copies of THE RADHASOAMI TRADITION from Garland and they will send me a larger royalty check. Best not to bother with Del Mar Press, since we have never made money from that.

     I don't know about the "handlers" you claim I am in contact with. Give me their names and addresses; maybe they can buy me the new surfboard I want.

     Keep up the shredding, however. I don't mind, especially when you make me out to be a financial wizard!

****

     Excerpted from a letter by Dr. Louis Bluth, former President of Eckankar, one-time follower of Sawan Singh, and Paul Twitchell's personal doctor when the Eck leader died in 1971:

Date: June 19, 1980

     My wife and I opened the first Eck class in Sun City, Cal. I personally treated Paul [Twitchell] many times and was the main speaker in Cincinnati when he passed away. Paul was a sincere student in the beginning and I considered him honest. Problems between him and his wife Gail led him to believe she was going to leave him and he desperately wanted to keep her. So when she demanded more money and better living, he started to write things and copy from other books. He [Paul Twitchell] borrowed my books on Radha Soami and copied a large share from them. I helped him write the Herb book and went to Riverside University and took Sanskrit, so basically much of the material is good because it is copied. I confronted him [Paul Twitchell] with what he had done and his answer was "since the author the book said it better than I could I copied it." The trouble is that he never gave anyone credit as to where he got it.

     As far as Darwin {Gross} is concerned, my opinion is that he is a fake as a Master. I don't think that a Master would divorce his wife and seek many other female companions.

Signed:

Louis Bluth, M.D.