Minutes of 163rd
Edinburgh Branch Meeting, IOSH
Craighouse Campus,
Napier University, Edinburgh – Thursday 9 June 2005 - 130pm
SEDERUNT: A
Dick GB Dickson G Millar A Gregory P Gallacher
G Shuman N
Kelly K Lloyd M Grimmer C Shiels D
Sinclair
C Lawson A
James B Morris A Curran R McLean M
Johnstone
M Bancroft L
Young K Shaw A Reid T Sayer A
Milne
J Burt J
Davis K Millar J Hepburn P Brown A Diment
S Brown J
Johnston S Waddell A White S Mambo S
Heeson
S Hunter R
Thomson J Brannigan I Wilson A McLeod
APOLOGIES: Richard Lovering, Vic Stewart,
Graeme Lyall, Steve Boucher, John McMahon, Dick Morrison, Janet Little, Steve
Boucher.
1 Chair: Marion Johnstone took the Chair, welcomed those
present and outlined the safety arrangements.
2 Minutes
of Previous meeting: 14 April 2005:
These were approved – proposed by Brian Morris and seconded by Alan Dick.
There were no matters arising. Noted that the AGM Minutes (May) would go out
for information but would be taken in 2006.
3 Correspondence
3.1 Events
•SiteSafe Scotland/HSE: Consultation Seminars on revising CDM: AIRDRIE: Thurs 16th June; INVERNESS - Friday 17th
June
•RoSPA: Behavioural Safety User Conference: Behavioural
Safety Excellence - Learning and Sharing: 16th June: Manchester
3.2
Information
•Construction
Confederation: Breakdown of Work at Heights Regs – leaflet in PDF – email
Secretary
•Free risk assessment software for an evaluation
period: www.crsrisk.com
•IOSH will, in the next month or so, put a guide
on the web which is a short update to the changes in ISO 14001.
•Branch Support for Dundee
University Fire Safety DVD. Part of the profits from the Nov 2003 Transport
Seminar were being donated to Dundee University who were making a short fire
safety DVD aimed at students. This would be sent out to all Universities &
FE Colleges in the UK. Lorraine Kelly (Rector of Dundee Uni) would appear in
the DVD and we would invite her to a special showing of it.
3.3 Job Spot
•Part time H & S Consultant: Glagow/Stirling
area approx 10-15 hours per month & Perth/Dundee area approx 30/40 hours
per month. Iain M. Murray on 01828 670535 or 07944 837368
3.4 Membership
National:
28396 Branch: 813 of which Corporate: 384 TechSP: 125 Assoc: 176
Construction:
192 Public Services: 126 Environment: 111 Consultancy: 47
Offshore:
44 Education: 45 Healthcare: 37 Fire Risk Man: 25
4.
Group Reports
•Branch Education Development Officer – Liz Young
Liz
gave details of a Fire Brigade Seminar for businesses on the new fire
legislation taking place shortly. Another one would be held if there was
sufficient interest. She would circulate details in due course.
•Specialist Groups
–PUBLIC SERVICES –
Marion Johnstone
Zurich Municipal Awards for Achievement in Health and Safety - the
Deadline date for the Zurich Municipal Awards for Achievement in Health and
Safety is 15 July 2005.
PSG National Safety Symposium
–CONSTRUCTION – Allan Dick – see details of presentation below.
–FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT
– Dave Sinclair
NEBOSH
National Certificate in Fire Risk Management: Back on track and we now have
full support from NEBOSH. Revised syllabus will be discussed at next week’s
FRMSG meeting and hopefully have something out for comment by late September.
Joint
Retail / FRMSG Event - "Evacuation of less able-bodied customers in retail
and leisure" received good feedback. Despite having about 118 registered
only around 40 turned up. This was disappointing as the venue was moved to
accommodate the numbers and we also change the programme to suit. Our
administrators also had a wasted effort as they made up packs to meet these
numbers. Copy of the presentations and précis of the event, including the
break-out workshops, will be available soon on the FRMSG website.
IOSH
Conference - The SG stands were far better positioned this year and I was
certainly kept busy. I still think that better use of the main IOSH stand
should be considered and I will push this via the SGMC.
NEXT
FRMSG Networking Meetings:
Tuesday
14th June at Pilkington European Technical Centre, Ormskirk.
Tuesday
27th September in Edinburgh. Topic Forensic Fire Investigations.
–HEALTHCARE –
Martin Scott-Smith. Nothing to report
–ENVIRONMENT – Julian
Davies. Julian reported that the SG website had been updated and was well
worth a visit. It linked into the IEMA website. The SG had started to develop
links with Chartered Institute of Waste Managemet.
–OFFSHORE – Tam Boyd. Nothing
to report
–CONSULTANCY – Derek
Cawkwell: Nothing to report
–SAFETY SCIENCES – Steve Boucher Nothing
to report
–TELECOMMUNICATIONS
– Graeme Lyall Nothing
to report
–EDUCATION -
Chris Lawson Nothing to report
–Forth
& Tay District: the Site visit to
RAF Leuchars had been well attended (about 20 persons) and very interesting.
5.
Members Items
•Membership – message from HQ – important not to let
membership lapse – otherwise you would have to join under the new system with
no possibility of carry-over from the old.
•Site Visit: Fri 17 June – 2pm: Glenkinchie Distillery.
Names to Andy Sharman including details of who needed transport.
•Assistance with writing report of guest speaker.
Marion reminded members that the detailed reports that appeared in the minutes
were the work of Richard Lovering (Past Chair). On occasions that Richard
wasn’t present we would like somebody else to undertake this. Julian Davis was
doing it today. Offers of help to the Secretary.
•Julian Davis reported his attendance at a debate on
Corporate Killing in the Signet Library where Lawrence Waterman, IOSH
President, had been one of the speakers.
•New CDM Regs Consultation – Allan Dick
Allan made
a 10 minute presentation detailing how IOSH – through the Construction Group SG
of which we was a member – were going to respond to the current HSC
Consultation Document on combining the CDM Regs with the Construction Welfare
Regs. Allan showed the main parties on whom duties were placed under the current
CDM regs and detailed where failings had still occurred despite the intent of
the Regs.
The proposed
new Regs had six broad areas: Pre-construction, Construction phase plan,
client, designer, co-ordinator.
During a
special meeting of the Construction SG later in June each of these areas would
be looked at in detail by one of the regional groupings of the SG. The
Scottish group would consider the Construction phase plan. Later in the day
each group would report back to a plenary session and from this an IOSH
response would be made to the consultation.
Alan hoped
that members would find useful this insight into how the SG operated and how
IOSH participated in such national consultations. He would report back at the
October meeting on the outcome.
6.
Guest Speaker
PROFESSOR
KENNY MILLER, VICE-PRINCIPAL STRATHCLYDE UNIVERSITY
CORPORATE
KILLING
Current
Law
Crimes
involve two elements – forbidden act plus guilty mind.
Common law
crime involved in corporate killing is involuntary (non-intentional) manslaughter/culpable
homicide.
In
England established
through breach of duty to deceased and gross negligence – an objective
approach.
In
Scotland death must
arise through utter disregard of consequences of act for the public – requires
a state of mind.
THUS in
Scotland there must be a mental element for the crime – this was the outcome
when judges were asked to review the law during the Transco case.
In England
no direct mental requirement (test objective) but in Attorney General’s Ref
(No 2) (Southall case) court stated proof of state of mind relevant to
grossness and criminality of accused’s conduct.
Problem
How can a
company which is a non-natural phenomenon and an abstraction possess the
necessary mental state?
Solution
Achieved
through the mechanism of identification.
Law
identifies the individual(s) who is the embodiment of the company and is its
“controlling and directing mind” – Tesco – this involved selling
defective goods.
This is
based on the notion that if the embodiment of the company has a ”guilty mind”
so also has the company.
For
conviction, therefore, individual must be prosecuted and convicted before
company guilty of corporate killing – P & O Ferries; Bowbelle
etc. – there was insufficient evidence that the controlling minds were
negligent.
Note: Prosecution is based upon those who
control the company not any notion of vicarious liability. Cf Health & Safety
at Work Act, ss.2 & 3 - Gateway Foodmarkets; British Steel; Great
West Trains.
Consequences
- Difficulties
identifying senior individual who has sufficient knowledge to have guilty
mind – not possible to aggregate knowledge – Transco; GW Trains.
- Delegation
of duties may prevent identification of senior officer – “avoid
responsibility avoid prosecution”.
- Identification
of individual does not deal with systems failures where fault lies with a
number of different employees at different levels – P&O Ferries.
- Identification
does not deal with case where a number of different postholders and
committees are involved over a period of time – Transco.
- Overall
complex nature of large companies makes prosecution difficult – Kite
& OLL Ltd (“one man concern” running adventure activities
including canoe trips).
Note: Does fact that in English law,
test is objective make a difference – NO (GW Trains).
Need for
a new statutory offence
English
Law Commission (Report and Draft Bill (1996)) supporting offence of Corporate Killing.
Two central
ingredients
- Management
failure by company
- Failure
constitutes conduct falling far below what can reasonably be expected in
the circumstances.
Note: There is no need to establish
guilt of senior officer. Analogy is with common law duties owed to employees
which are personal to employer.
Management
Failure arises when way its activities are managed or organised fails to ensure
health and safety of employees or others (notion of a safe system of work).
Conduct
falling far below
involves balancing likelihood of harm against social utility of activities and
cost and practicality of taking steps to eliminate or reduce risk.
Note: Company can still be prosecuted
even where immediate cause is an act or omission of another.
Key
Recommendation that
Company Officers not to be prosecuted as “secondary parties”. (Not an offence
to aid or abet (cf HSWA, s.37) but individuals can be prosecuted separately).
Penalties
- Prosecution
on indictment with unlimited fines
- On
application of prosecutor court has power to make remedial orders
requiring company to take specified steps to remedy failure.
Relationship with HSWA
- Corporate
killing based on personal liability of company
- Prosecutions
under HSWA, ss.2 & 3 based on a form of vicarious liability.
Draft Bill
made clear that company acquitted of corporate killing could be convicted of a
breach of HSWA, ss.2 or 3.
Remaining Issues
- Law
Commission recommended offence should not extend to unincorporated bodies
(eg trade unions, trusts)
- What
about Governmental bodies with Crown Immunity?
Home
Office Consultation Paper (2000) provided an alternative definition based on “undertakings”.
What
about company officers?
- Law
Commission draft Bill specifically excluded them from corporate killing.
Home Office
proposals
- Disqualification
of directors from management role in any undertaking (based on
contribution to management failure)
- Prosecution
of director for separate offence of substantially contributing to
corporate killing.
Legislative
Activity
Scotland – None (though consultation
document and legislation promised since the Transco case)
England – Home Office confirmed in May 2003
that “a draft Bill would be published soon”.
Nothing in
Queen’s Speech in Nov 2003 but commitment made in 2004 Queen’s Speech.
Why the
delay?
Scotland No idea
England
- Concerns
over whether the notion of “management failure” is the right approach.
- Government
appeared to be going back on its proposal to also prosecute directors.
In March
2005 Home Office published Consultation Paper and Draft Bill on Corporate
Manslaughter also a commitment in Queen’s Speech (May 2005) to introduce
legislation.
Key
Features of Bill
- Legislation
will apply to corporations and Crown Bodies but not unincorporated bodies.
- Legislation
is based on management failure without any need to identify offence by
controlling mind
- So
offence is based on way organisation’s activities are managed or organised
by senior managers which causes death (senior management failure).
- “Senior
manager” is a person who plays a significant role in decision-making or
the actual management or organisation of the business.
- There must
be a gross breach of a duty care owed to deceased.
- Gross
breach constitutes conduct falling far below what can reasonably be
expected of the organisation in the circumstances (reference to health and
safety guidance – putting profit before H&S)
- Duty of
care will be owed by corporation as
1.
employer or
occupier of land
2.
when supplying
goods or services
3.
when engaged in
other commercial activities
- Court
will have power to impose unlimited fines and remedial orders
- No
further common law prosecutions for corporate manslaughter
- Consultation
expires on 17 June 2005.
7.
Closing details
Dates
of next meetings
Edinburgh
Branch: 8 September:
Identifying & Reducing the risk of MSDs & suggestions for
rehabilitation: Margaret Hanson: HU-Tech. Sighthill Campus (also for October Meeting)
Forth
& Tay District: 1 September: New
Venue: Dewar Ice Rink, Perth