Minutes of 167th Edinburgh Branch Meeting

 Craighouse Campus, Napier University, Edinburgh – Thursday 8 December 2005 - 130pm

 

Sederunt:     S Morton G Oxtoby S McMorland D Cawkwell  L Johnson L Crichton C Wilmott      B Anderson S Brown         K Breem J Hepburn    R McLean     G Foggo R N Mambo J Anderson I Brown C Lawson     A Pittendrigh C Black R Allan J R Brownlee      D Richardson I Munro A Polhill        K Heatley      S Boucher    C Pender L MacNeil    L Jacomb S Milligan          P Gallacher  C Shiels          R Innes H Gardner J Little A Dick A James      V Stewart      N Doherty         J Hamilton    C Amati M Bancroft LYoung M Johnstone          D Collins       M McPherson          J Battles       J Fenton A McLeod         K Murray       D Sinclair      A Reid S Daly          J Robertson     T Elliott J Craig R Kotas

 

Apologies:   Karen McDonnell, Graeme Lyall, Julian Davis, Kevin Lloyd, Richard Lovering, Andrew Reid, Simon Heesom, Bob Hammond, Paul Graham, Tom Neilson, Bob Bertram, Barry Davies, Ali Milne, Alastair Baily, Alan Thomson, Dick Morrison

 

1. Chair: Marion Johnstone took the Chair and outlined the Safety arrangements (Fire)

 

2. Minutes of previous meeting: November 2005

    Receipt: anyone not receiving them should contact the Secretary.

    Agreed a true record: Proposer – H Gardner; Seconder – S Daly

    Matters arising not on the Agenda: None

 

3. Correspondence:

 

3.1 Events

        6-10th March 2006: HU-TECH: Ergonomics Essentials (BOHS Syllabus) Edinburgh, (£925) Further details are at: http://www.hu-tech.co.uk/training-ergonomics_essentials.html

        30/31 March 2006: Wales & Chester Circuit: major medico-legal conference: industrial disease litigation: Cardiff.

        10-12 April: Universities Safety and Health Association: Annual Conference: Join us for the main day, Tuesday 11th April. Learn how to convert compliance into added value for your organisation.  A full day of 6 expert presentations and 2 participative workshops with teas, coffees and lunch, all at the City Quay Apex Hotel, Dundee. £145. http://www.dundee.ac.uk/safety/conference2006

 

3.2 From HQ

 

No breakdown of membership but current Branch membership is 806.

 

3.3 Others

     The Institute of Occupational Medicine - undertaking research for the HSE: “Assessing the Effectiveness of the Manual Handling Assessment Chart and Associated Website.” Trying to locate companies currently using the MAC tool (ideally for a number of tasks rather than just the one) and that would be willing to participate in this research. May involve a visit by one of our staff to view the tasks performed and look at the results obtained from the MAC tool then discuss any problems encountered in using it (and the website).

    Looking for different sized companies (small especially welcome) from different sectors.

    e-mail: Alison.melrose@iomhq.org.uk

 

3.4 Job Spot

     Emtelle UK Limited: manufacturer of tubing, ducting and fibre bundle, employing 150 personnel in the Borders area. Health and Safety Manager based in Hawick factory.  Liz Sneddon, Emtelle UK Limited, Haughhead, Hawick,TD9 8LF: Tel:   01450 364013; E-mail: lizs@emtelle.com

     Jacobs Babtie: construction health and safety adviser to support our supervisory team of dams and tunnels experts for Scottish and Southern Energy [SSE] £100m+ Glendoe project: Scottish Highlands.          peter.gotch@jacobs.com

 

4. Group Reports

     Branch Education Development Officer    – Liz Young: Have you registered for CPD yet?

     Specialist Groups

  PUBLIC SERVICES        – Marion Johnstone;  The visit to the Irish Branches had been most successful and the Groups were looking at the 2006 programme which might include a networking visit to Scotland.

 

  CONSTRUCTION                     – Allan Dick. Nothing to report.

 

  FIRE RISK MANAGEMENT – Dave Sinclair

 

NEXT FRMSG Committee Networking Meeting: The Grange (IOSH HQ) in Wigston: 15 December: "Emergency Preparedness". All aspects of Business Continuity. Principal speaker: Ron Edmond of SIESO (Sharing Information and Experience for Safer Operations). 80 delegates booked. The following meeting: joint meeting with the Irish Fire Section on the 23rd of February 2006 in Dublin.

 

Membership: Now standing at 1374.

 

FRMSG Committee: As we continue to reach out to other Professional Bodies we have a representative from the Institute of Fire Prevention Officers attending our next meeting.

 

Newsletter: Latest Newsletter published and distributed to all members, copies available via FRMSG Section on IOSH web site. Next due to be issued in May 2006.

 

In reply to a question Dave commented that the implementation of the new fire safety laws might be slightly behind that in England & Wales.

 

  HEALTHCARE               – Martin Scott-Smith.  Nothing to report.

 

   ENVIRONMENT            – Julian Davies

 

Year on year SG membership has increased as a percentage of total IOSH membership from 11.66% to 11.86% over the last 12 months. We are still the third largest SG but are closing in on Public Services.

 

Communication remains one of our main priorities for this year and much work is being done on the web-site to raise the profile of environmental issues as it is one of only a couple of SGs that span all the other SG interests and we continue to seek partner ventures e.g. a joint meeting with the Retail SG at Hull yesterday (7th Dec) following on an IOSH conference link up with the Rural SG, and last year's joint meeting with the Construction SG in Birmingham.

 

Looking forward to next year, it has been agreed that Environment SG will participate in both the shared SG stand at IOSH 2006 and the parallel sessions for SGs. The stand content will include a quiz!

 

Under objective 19, the SG is committed to helping NEBOSH resolve its problems with their environmental diploma.

 

A new objective was agreed to undertake a survey of Environmental SG members which should be issued early (Q1) 2006

 

It was also agreed that next year's plan to be submitted to the SGMC must have fewer objectives than the current one!!

 

Julian continues to circulate Environmental issues via the Branch environmental SG e-mail group - both those issued from IOSH HQ and locally collected news. Anyone wishing to be included in the circulation, please e-mail Julian or give the Branch Secretary your name

 

  OFFSHORE                   – Tam Boyd.           Nothing to report.

 

  CONSULTANCY – Derek Cawkwell: Nothing to report.

 

  SAFETY SCIENCES      – Steve Boucher: Nothing to report.

 

  COMMUNICATIONS/MEDIA      – Graeme Lyall: the networking meeting yesterday had been well attended.   

 

  EDUCATION                  - Chris Lawson: Nothing to report.

 

    Forth & Tay District: no meeting since last Branch meeting.

 

5. Members Items

 

5.1 Karen McDonnell (IOSH Forth & Tay District Chair) has replaced Karen Niven as the representative of OSH professionals in Scotland on the HSE’s PHASS. S Brownlee offered his congratulations to Karen on her organising the RoSPA initiative “Scottish High Performers Challenge”.

 

5.2 Branch Officials Conference – Max Bancroft.  Max reported he and Karen had attend this event organised by IOSH HQ at Alton Towers in November.  This had included the AGM at which the rules changes creating individual Chartered had come into effect.  Presentation had included one on Branch achievements – our sponsorship of the Dundee Uni Fire Safety DVD had been explained and well received.  The Chief Executive had presented the IOSH Corporate Plan for the next 5 years.  This was available on IOSH HQ website.  It included a growth in membership to 40,000 (currently 28,000), growth in overseas Branches and IOSH becoming the OSH thought leader

 

5.3 From the floor: Dave Sincalir hoped to make a presentation on the new Scottish smoking legislation next month.

 

5.4 IOSH Response to CDM Consultaton: Allan Dick gave a short overview of how he saw the new regulations and how they might develop following from our input last June and the special meeting of IOSH’s Construction Group.

 

Objectives

 

      To provide a review of the C.D.M. Regulations 1994 as outgoing (old CDM)

      To preview the C.D.M. Regulations 2006 as pending (new CDM)

      To inform of the I.O.S.H. response to the Con.Doc. 200 on C.D.M. 2006

      To provide comment on the possible impact of C.D.M. 2006.

 

Old CDM

      Construction (Design & Management) Regulations 1994

      Intended to:- ‘protect the H&S of those engaged in in or affected by construction activities’

      Implemented March 95 – by EU directive & amended 2000 & 2002

      ACOP & Guidance ( Man.H&S in Construction) intended to clarify

      Introduced 5 main duty holders i.e. CLIENT / DESIGNER / PLANNING SUPERVISOR / PRINCIPAL CONTRACTOR / CONTRACTORS

      Set out the duties responsibilities and competence requirements of the 5

      Introduced key documentation; - H&S Plan (Pre-tender & Construction Phase) and the H&S File.

      BUT DID IT DO WHAT IT SET OUT TO ? ‘protect…………………………’

 

New CDM

      Construction(Design & Management) Regulations 2006

      The principle remains the same but intends to consolidate the provisions of CDM 94 & the CON.(HS&W)Regs. 96

      AIMS:- “less Bureaucracy - more Communications”

    -simplify& improve clarity

    -maximise flexibility

    -focus on planning & management (rather than paperwork)

    -encourage co-op/co-ordination (part. between designers & contract)

    -simplify assessment of the competence of  organisations

      Implemented ; probably Oct 2006

      Consultation – completed July 05

       “Evolution not Revolution” S.W.

      Changes: To duty-holders:- 

      Planning Supervisor- out.   Coordinator – in (but not necessarily as a direct replacement) 

      Duties:-

      C: (as before) + ensure suitable project H&S (can’t abdicate this)  

      D: (as before i.e.design in H&S)+ ensure C is aware of duties & that Co is appointed. Consider H&S of the end users.

Co: Clients friend?-early appointment client support & education- ensure C allocates adequate resources- coordinate design& advise on competence of D & Cons. gather & convey info.

P.C: as before- manage construction H&S- ensure C aware of duties/Co has been appointed & HSE notified prior to starting work

Cons: as before ; ensure C is aware of duties if it suspected they do not have an awareness.

 

Changes

 

Miscellaneous Changes  -

- Major increase in C duties

 -C to inform P.C. of min mob time.

 -Information pack:- to provide back-ground info for tender & H&S Plan

 -Breach of CDM:- employee may sue employer.

 -Competence: more emphasis ie all duty-holders must ensure that their appointees are competent.

 -Possibly ACOP only No guidance

 

CDM 2005:- IOSH Response

      General

      Reg.4 Competence

      Reg.5&6 Co-operation & Election

      Reg.7 Clients Project management

      Reg.8 Client appointments

      Reg.9 Project notifications

      Reg.10, 11&12 Client duties

 

Allan commented that there was little doubt that these regulations would come in in due course. HSE had invested a lot in them. The Co-ordinator had a major task (we might need phone boxes for Superman to change clothes in!).  He hoped the accident statistics in due course would show this had been the right approach.

 

6. Guest Speaker

Chiara Anne Amati

Chartered Occupational Psychologist

The Keil Centre, Edinburgh

 

Stress at Work: Effectiveness in practice

 

Overview

     Stress: definitions & developments

     A comprehensive strategy for taking action

     Key to successful projects

     HSE Support & Standards

     FAQs:

   How to distinguish pressure/ stress?

   How to ensure stress is tackled effectively?

   How to educate/ inform workforce?

   How to accurately record incidence?

 

Reasons for Tackling Stress

     From HSG 218

     Legal case

   Health & Safety Law

   Other: Disability Discrimination Act etc.

     Economic case

   Reduction in absence / accidents

   Increase productivity

     Ethical case

   Protecting health & safety

 

Demands & Resources

 

Pressure & Stress

     Pressure -  Resources match demands

   Feeling : motivated, enthusiastic, challenged, rewarded, relaxed, energetic

 

     Stress – Mismatch

     ‘Adverse reaction people have to excessive pressure or other types of demand placed on them’ (UK HSE)

     ‘State which is accompanied by physical, psychological or social complaints or dysfunction and results from individuals feeling unable to bridge a gap with the requirements or expectations placed on them’ (European Agreement)

 

Stress & Safety

     TKC project to analyse impact of psych. ill-health on safety

   Looking at:  depression; anxiety; stress

   By: Lit review & accident database analysis & SME interviews

     Initial results

   Anxiety – Quicker reactions & poss. over-reaction; decreased efficiency and greater fatigue;

   Depression – Slower reactions; impact on motivation & social functioning;

   Stress – combination of both; links to accidents in home, driving & at-risk behaviour

 

Best Practice

     Prevention

   Stress risk assessments

   Policies for mental wellbeing at work; absence

     Management

   Increasing resilience in staff & managers

   Skills for managers to tackle effectively at individual & team level

     Treatment

   Access to professional support

 

Stress Risk Assessment

     Assess risk against key sources of stress

     Implement Action Plan

 

     Effective assessments have:

   Management Commitment to action from start

   Staff Involvement in assessment & action plan

   Solution-focus from start of assessment

   Small-scale to take action / Large-scale as info-gathering

 

HSE Management Standards

     Process to follow

   Simple risk assessment process for stress

   Include assessment: e.g. HSE Indicator Tool

 

     Documents of best practice

   Define effective stress management

   6 key risk areas: 

  Demands; Control; Support

  Relationships Role; Change

 

StressTools

     Toolkit for carrying out risk assessments independently, flexibly and effectively

     3 Stress risk assessments & Set Management Standards

   Simple, risk assessment based process

   Solution-focused

   Proven effectiveness

      Used as ‘one-off’ or licensed

     Training for independent in-house use

 

Team-Based Stress Risk Assessment (on Edinburgh Branch IOSH)

     Online/ paper completion

     Individual confidential & team report

     Effective as:

   Simple to use – easy to understand

   Focus on what needs to be changed to make the biggest impact

   Staff suggestions to ensure understanding & effectiveness

 

Report Results – Overview

 

This had had a 19% response from the members.

32% said they perceived their work as ‘high stress’ compared to 18% in mixed occupations. This was a significant difference.

 

Sources of Stress – the three most frequently cited sources of stress (“always” or “often”) were high workload, information not getting passed between different departments and constant interruptions.

 

Sources of Stress – those deemed to be most severe (ranked as the top 3) were high workload, constant interruptions and the accumulated effect of minor daily hassles.

 

Understanding & Taking Action – the assessment also asked for suggestions of action by the employer and the employee as to what might be done to reduce the stress arising from the employee’s own identified 3 greatest stressors.

 

Policies & Culture Change

     Setting expectations of role, responsibilities and behaviour of Staff & Organisation

     Most effective when:

   Linked to key organisation objectives/ priorities

   Integrated with related efforts (e.g. absence management)

   Contain clear outline of behaviours/ expectations

   Positive focus: e.g. well-being & performance

   Backed-up by organisation resources: support, training etc

 

Stress Management

     Varied: training, ad hoc interventions etc

     Most common training topics:

   “Stress skills” - Stress/ anxiety mgt; work-life balance

   Tailored skills - Assertiveness; time mgt etc

     Most effective when:

   Based on training needs analysis / risk assessment

   Tailored content for diff. audiences

   Focused on easily applied skills

   Integrated into competency-based model for training

   Include strong positive focus

 

Stress Treatment

     Professional input from psychologists & counsellors:

   e.g. EAP (Employee Assistance Programme)

     Integrated with return-to-work management

     Most effective when:

   Organisation receives some feedback & is able to monitor trends

   Stress-related absence handled actively: e.g. case management

 

FAQs … and Answers

     How to distinguish pressure/ stress?

   Vary between individual; need to involve staff

      How to ensure stress is tackled effectively?

   Adopt: prevention, management, treatment

   Ensure management commitment

   Tailor to need; monitor & review effectiveness

     How to educate/ inform workforce?

   Tailor to training need; offer variety & choice

     How to accurately record incidence?

   Increase open-ness and awareness

 

     Focus on positive – wellbeing & performance

 

Useful Resources

     HSE - www.hse.gov.uk/stress/standards

     Research - http://www.hsebooks.com/

     Case-studies

   www.ohstrategy.net

   Real Solutions, Real People (HSE)

     Consultants:

   British Psychological Society (BPS)

   International Stress Management Association (ISMA)

 

www.keilcentre.co.uk  www.stresstools.com

 

7. Closing details

 

Dates of next meetings

    Edinburgh Branch

12 Jan 2006: Biohazards: Managing the Risk of infection at Work: Gillian Fletcher: Occupational Health Safety Advisory Service

Forth and Tay District

February 2nd: Annual General Meeting and Developing Our Safety Influence beyond the Workplace.

 

 

Max Bancroft, MRSC, MIOSH  

Branch Secretary