IOSH EDINBURGH BRANCH
Revised Minutes of 179th Edinburgh Branch Meeting
Craighouse Campus, Napier University, Edinburgh – Thursday 8 February 2007 - 130pm
Sederunt: R Lovering S Wilson N Barclay B M Davies R Thomson P Age
L Roberts I Wilson P Gallacher J Cornwall L Young A James J O’Kane J C Peoples J Marshall J Dwyer K Flockhart I Sinclair A Bell J Scott
M Downer S Hughes A Russell A Dick E Preston B Cherrie S Scott
L MacNeill D Millar P Graham K Lloyd V Stewart A McLeod G Lyall
J Fisher G Laing G Marshall J Little H Kerr T Kinnaird B Gippert T Ambler J Brannigan R McLean T Mellon H Pearson R Walker P Brown G MacGregor H Gardner B Jackson W Davidson N Goveia S Martinez C Black
G Anderson A Pittendrigh M Bancroft M Johnstone C McVeigh
• Accuracy:. November 2006 Proposer – G MacGregor; Seconder – .A Dick.
Rural Industries: Liz Crichton reports that next networking meeting Wed 25 April Sherwood Pines Forest Park. Visitor Safety – Controlling Risk. More details on their website.
Consultants: Derek Cawkwell reported the first Branch SG meet will take place 12.00 - 1.00 pm immediately prior to the main Branch Meeting at Craighouse on March 8. This is intended to be an initial meeting of consultants to determine what they wish from the group and to meet their peers. Additionally, a member of Croner Consulting's Sales Staff will attend which may be of interest to those who wish to discuss sales / marketing techniques.
Fire Risk Management: Paul Graham gave details of the Irish Branch Seminar.
Public Services: Marion reported that the Newsletter was now available.
•HSE Investigation – HSE had published general guidance on how they would select incidents for investigation.
Cameron McVean
Road Safety Officer, Lothian & Borders Police, Road Safety Unit gave a presentation entitled:
Road Safety at Work, Why Bother?
Liz Young the Branch Development Adviser briefly introduced the speaker for the afternoon to the assembled members as Cameron McVean, who in turn introduced himself by pointing out that he was not a Police Officer. He had worked for 13 years in Road Safety within the Traffic Branch of Lothian & Borders Police Force. The department did not have a huge budget and they were publicly accountable, so why did they bother? Answer – They felt the very urgent need to raise awareness of road safety amongst all groups of road users.
Young male drivers only make up 10% of licence holders but they are involved in the largest group of traffic incidents (30%), but the second largest group consists occupational drivers, who Cameron described as those who spent either 100% or at least a large percentage of their working hours driving, which would include Sales Representatives, Service Engineers, etc and could well include IOSH Members. To illustrate this point he then showed a newspaper clipping headed “Safety Expert banned for shaving in his car” relating to Edward Hutcheson who was potted leaning across the car to look at himself shaving in the drivers mirror whilst he overtook a line of cars at 70mph as he stated he was running late to give a first aid demonstration.
Size of the issue
Cameron quoted a frequent saying of – “The cost of not knowing is always greater than the cost of finding out” and indicated that this is very pertinent with respect to road safety incidents related to working activities, particularly when you consider under current health & safety legislation every car/ van/ vehicle is considered to be a “place of work”.
Fleetsure – his Road Safety Unit within Lothian & Borders Police were doing all they could to encourage pro-active look at company car driving.
For years there had been no real and accurate picture of the number of road accidents which should be considered “at work” and RoSPA were leading a charge on use of outdated information when the Government finally prompted a pilot study through “C” division and found 35% of accidents were in fact work related and this was followed by the Department of Transport poster which most members are probably familiar with =
- This being based on
the findings and the final estimate of work related deaths being in the order
of 1000 per year together with 80,000 injuries during the same period.
No industry would condone this level of injury and fatality statistics.
Why are the figures so high?
The speaker suggested the major issue was one of TIME and the way that modern living seems to have us all finding ourselves short on time – needing to be somewhere else quickly and under pressure to drive other than taking full accord of the conditions prevailing.
From a recent study it has been shown that –
57% of work driver regularly traveled in excess of 80mph on motorways
8% of work driver regularly travel in excess of 90mph on motorways
20% of work drivers admit to regular use of the mobile phone while driving
The speaker also suggested that a further factor may be the condition of the vehicle itself and it is a sad fact that individuals do not take as much care looking after company vehicles as they may take over their own.
One of the disturbing factors for the speaker was, that despite such a high level of incidents (NB He insisted on calling them incidents and not accidents, as he believed there was always someone who was to blame for the incident happening) was that very few (if any) individuals ever seemed to get punished for the incident. This is totally opposed to the conditions which you will find in other walks of life. If someone at work in a machine shop causes damage costing several thousand pounds to put right they would be almost certainly held accountable for it and receive some form of disciplinary action at the least.
Excess Speed
Think about traveling in a car in the 1970’s – if you were traveling close to 60mph you would be feeling it as very fast – the noise and vibration being very noticeable. However to do that nowadays in a modern car would be a very different condition – little noise or vibration and almost no sensation of speed
BUT – speeding doesn’t cause accidents – human error does, which probably comes from the lack of sensation of speed and lack of vision of the impending conditions.
Consider walking into your kitchen at home where someone has left a cupboard door open at head height and you walk into it - outcome may be a small bruise and some choice words. However, consider running into the same cabinet door rather than walking into it and the outcome could be very much more serious. It is the same on the road. Speed does not cause the accident, but the outcome becomes more serious – also consider the speed as inappropriate for the conditions
Too much Drink or Drugs
For years there was a huge problem but no real gauge of the problem, but now we have the law in place providing some details of limits. However the law makes no distinction between illicit and illegal drugs or those taken for legitimate reasons, it only considers the effect it has on the driver and any ensuing prosecution would be shown as a “drugs” conviction.
Consider “Tixylix” – the cough & cold treatment for children
It states on the package = “Not recommended for adults or children over 10yrs”
And the warning quotes = “May cause drowsiness. If affected do not drive or operate machinery”
How many fathers may well have taken some “Tixylix” before driving to work – if they get stopped and tested they could face prosecution on a “drugs” charge
Not enough sleep
The National Press recently showed the picture of the Army Convey lorry which went wrong in East Linton – when the driver fell asleep at the wheel and drove the lorry straight into a house because he had done a full week’s work prior to going on maneuvers that weekend.
The speaker was hopeful that the days had gone where employees were expected to drive from Aberdeen to Leeds – do a full day’s work and then have to drive home again.
This will be reinforced by legislation due to come onto the Statute Books on 11th April 2007 whereby the amount of domestic driving will have to be limited to 10 hours in any one day. (For more information refer to Department of Transport VOSA “Drivers’ Hours and Tachograph Rules for Goods Vehicles in the UK and Europe” Second Edition: Effective from December 2006 – Ref - GV 262 (Second edition 12/2006))
Seatbelts
Legislation made it mandatory to wear seatbelts in the front of a vehicle from 1982 and surveys show that this is complied with in the main, however the use of rear seat belts is patchy and currently a number of campaigns are planned to increase the use of seat belt when in the rear.
Consider the issue – The vehicle hits a lamppost or other immoveable object at 30 mph – the vehicle stops in fractions of a second, but the bodies of the occupants are still moving forward at 30 mph – the bodies of the front seat passengers then hit the seatbelt which stops their outsides, but the inner organs are still moving until they hit the inside of their rib cages – then the air-bag explodes and tries to push them back at about 300 mph – THEN they are hit at the rear by any unrestrained rear seat passengers, or bags, or loads, or their dog etc coming forward at the original vehicle speed of 30 mph
Bad Driving
It has to be considered that some drivers are “rubbish” – the sort of driver who makes you glad to get out of the car – driving too fast, swerving round corners, braking late etc.
A number of Companies offer their employees a half-day driving assessment, particularly when they feel the drivers may be less than adequate, but unfortunately this is of little use as most of the “rubbish” driver are aware of what to do to pass the test and immediately afterwards revert to their original way of “rubbish” driving. Frequently this factor is exacerbated by the shortage of time and other pressures on the individual.
Are you prepared?
Have you done everything that is reasonable to do to ensure your employees are safe on the road. Remember that a civil court action could come forward several years in the future where your driver has either injured or even killed a 3rd party, how could you prove that the driver was safe. Did he have regular medicals, was he taking any medicine at the time, do you check their licenses at regular intervals (how else will you know he/she has got points or even has been banned), etc.
Have you policies in place for
· Drivers under 25 - statistically they are a real menace
· Spouse and family drivers – what is vehicle used for at weekends
· Checking service intervals – be proactive, Company vehicle often miss services
· Snap inspection of vehicles – e.g. tyres are often ignored
· Trips overseas
· Towing
· Section 172 RTA Compliance – Same vehicle with a number of drivers – WHO was guilty of the speeding ticket you receive - £500 fine for first offence if you cannot state who it was
Mobile Phones
Mobile phone used to be shaped and weighing similar to a house brick, but now they are so small and fancy they are not just in the hands of business men but are almost part of the school uniform right from primary school and are in such frequent use by all and sundry. A survey by the Transport Research Laboratory undertaken on a simulator driven at 70 mph showed drivers reaction times before breaking to be :-
Normal Under influence of alcohol Using a hands free Using hand-held mobile
31m (102ft) 35m (115ft) 39m (128ft) 45m (148ft)
almost a 50% increase in thinking time before breaking when using a hand-held mobile
“Driving at Work” published by HSE with input from by Dept of Transport and Road Safety is to be considered in the same way as the “Highway Code” as guidance of good practice in managing work related road safety. Being issued by the HSE there is a likely increase in their increased involvement although as yet there is no indication of this.
Harsher penalties for rogue operators – there have already been cases of Company Directors being jailed where their approach is more “get the business done”. Responsibility always lies at board level, but is this specifically defined for road safety issues.
The “Road Death Investigation Manual” used by police forces into fatal accidents includes direction on actions where there is indication of a lack of a safe system of work and possible involvement of the HSE.
A number of voluntary schemes are available (it is FleetSure in Lothian & Borders) which are aimed at improving road safety which are more than just offering in-car training. Seminars are felt to be much more effective and the speaker showed one testimonial from a delegate on one of FleetSure presentations which indicated the delegate’s change in approach to driving.
|
Max Bancroft, MRSC, CMIOSH Branch Secretary |
|