Editorial Blog
October 2 to 15, 2002
By JEFF RUSHING, Webmaster
   
God bless you, Stephen Ambrose, and rest in peace. Alas, my favorite historian passed away due to cancer today. I really need to get to New Orleans, only to visit the D-Day Museum he worked so hard to make one of the top World War II historical sites in the States.
Posted 10/13/02, 7:37 p.m.
   
Can someone please tell me why the heckydoodle should Muslims in India get upset over something Jerry Falwell said? Does anyone notice that Americans don't get in a huff when Imams in Mecca call for our destruction?
Posted 10/13/02, 7:35 p.m.
   
So former president Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize. I don't think he should feel too proud, though. This was the same group that gave Yasser Arafat a Peace Prize in 1994. And while it would be nice if the Nobel committee recognized Carter's work in building homes for the poor or monitoring elections, the committee head admitted that it was done to thumb their noses at Pres. Bush's foreign policy.
      Before we celebrate the worst president of the 20th Century, let us remember Carter's history of coddling the worst leaders of the world (courtesy Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online):
      -- While the first President Bush was trying to orchestrate an international coalition to remove Saddam Hussein from Kuwait, Carter wrote a letter to the U.N. Security Council asking its members to stymie Bush's efforts.
      -- As the "human rights president," Carter noted that Yugoslavia's Marshall Tito was also "a man who believes in human rights." Carter saluted the dictator as "a great and courageous leader" who "has led his people and protected their freedom almost for the last 40 years." He publicly told Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, "Our goals are the same. . . . We believe in enhancing human rights. We believe that we should enhance, as independent nations, the freedom of our own people." He told the Stalinist first secretary of Communist Poland, Edward Gierek, "Our concept of human rights is preserved in Poland."
      -- Since Carter has left office, he's been even more of a voluptuary of despots and dictators. He told Haitian dictator Lt. Gen. Raoul Cedras he was "ashamed of what my country has done to your country." He's praised the mass-murdering leaders of Syria and Ethiopia. He endorsed Yasser Arafat's sham election and grumbled about the legitimate vote that ousted Sandanista Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua.
      -- And, I learned from a devastating critique by my National Review colleague Jay Nordlinger, Carter even volunteered to be Arafat's speechwriter and go-fer, crafting palatable messages for Arafat's Western audiences and convincing the Saudis to continue funding Arafat after the Palestinians sided with Iraq against the United States.
Posted 10/13/02, 7:15 p.m.
   
Continuing with the "peaceful" religion, what is believed to be an Islamo-fascist terror group linked to Al-Qaeda killed over 180 people on the island paradise of Bali in Indonesia last night, in a series of car bombs aimed at tourists.
    Also recently, admitting the obvious, U.S. and French officials say that the tanker attack in Yemen last weekend was a terrorist act.
Posted 10/13/02, 7:09 p.m.
   
Another installment of "Islam Means Peace?":
    Angry over his new bride's admission that other men might have seen a photograph of her in a bathing suit, police say a Pakistani man repeatedly tortured her with a lit cigarette, hot wax and a knife. Police say "he was also upset because she watched men playing basketball on TV." (The Detroit News)
Posted 10/13/02, 7:04 p.m.
   
Once more we see an example that the people who shout for tolerance are most often the most intolerant. Sometimes it just seems that no matter how obnoxious some religious believers can be, anti-religious loudmouths are even worse.
      This time, we head to Seattle (big surprise), where a fund-raising effort - selling engraved bricks - for the Redmond Regional Library turned into a battleground over separation of church and state. Well, okay, it was a battle by one anti-religious nut who decided that too many people were inscribing their private tiles with messages of hope, such as "God Can Change Life." So Matthew J. Barry decided to combat such good will with tiles that said, among others, "God Kills Babies."
      All this, because someone is offended by free speech in a charity effort. Tell me again who spreads the hate?
Posted 10/11/02, 6:41 a.m.
   
It's official. While I'm a natural at walking and chewing gum at the same time, I cannot walk and unwrap gum at the same time.
Posted 10/11/02, 6:35 a.m.
   
Slobodan Milosevic wasn't doing anything to the U.S., either, but that didn't stop Clinton from bombing Serbia to smithereens to implement "regime change."
Posted 10/11/02, 6:35 a.m.
   
Former San Fran mayor and noted liberal (as if that could ever be a separate description) Jerry Brown hit on an idea, however sarcastically, that blogger James Lileks finds quite sensible:
      Later I was passing the TV and saw Jerry Brown debating O’Reilly. Brown’s default facial posture always seems to be android-calm, as if his internal systems are in Sleep mode, waiting for the cursor to move. O’Reilly was quoting a “60 Minutes” story about PLO - Iraq links; Brown responded that since the Saudis fund radical mosques, shouldn’t we invade them?
      Thank you! I thought; there’s my column.
      “The proper response to this is a big wide grin: capital idea, old chap; why not, indeed? Let’s go! Glad you’re on board. We can liberate those American-born women our craven State department refuses to help; we can take the oil fields, set the pumps on “gush” and flood the world with sweet, cheap crude. We can defund the radical mosques, disband the religious police, and build swingsets in the parks they use for public hand-choppings. As an added bonus, the West will occupy the most holy sites of Islam, so we can photograph, fingerprint, and possibly detain anyone who comes for a pilgrimage. Invade Saudi Arabia? Dude! You are so hard core!”
Posted 10/08/02, 11:28 p.m.
   
National Review's Jay Nordlinger relates his displeasure at the name Homeland Security, and a better suggestion:
      I was griping last week about the word "homeland," which I thought was a little un-American, and had a few unsavory associations. A reader says, "It's my understanding that 'Homeland' is actually jargon from the missile-defense program. A Homeland Defense is a system defending a country, to differentiate from Theater Defenses, like Patriot missiles, Phalanx gun systems, etc., which protect a battlefield or a ship. You're right that it's better than 'Fatherland,' but you don't point out that it also beats 'Motherland,' which was the Commie fetish.
      "Personally, I would prefer to call the thing 'The Department for Preventing People From F***ing With Us,' but don't know if it would fit on the letterhead."
Posted 10/08/02, 4:15 a.m.
   
Newsies talked today about a recent phone call supposedly made by Taliban leader Mullah Omar in which he refers to talking in the room with Osama bin Laden. Hmmm, that seems odd, especially since we were inundated with reports that bin Laden shunned using phones when he found out that U.S. intelligence could track him using any sort of technical communication device. So color me unimpressed by this "news."
Posted 10/08/02, 4:07 a.m.
   
Life imitates Monty Python:
      After searching through 40,000 jokes from 70 countries, the British Association for the Advancement of Science revealed the world's funniest joke. Here it is:
      "Two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn't seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed. The other man pulls out his phone and calls emergency services.
      He gasps to the operator: "My friend is dead! What can I do?" The operator in a calm, soothing voice replies: "Take it easy. I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead."
      There is a silence, then a shot is heard.
      Back on the phone, the hunter says, "Ok, now what?"
Posted 10/08/02, 3:40 a.m.
   
Not good times. Braves lost to the Giants last night, ending their season, once again, without another World Series win to validate the "dynasty" label for their 11-year run as division champs. Bah, humbug. It figures that our offense betrays us to the end, and Sheffied and Chipper make the last two outs on bad swings to end the season. Bah!
Posted 10/08/02, 3:32 a.m.
   
For those who haven't seen it, the Democrat Party has a new ad on their web site denouncing Republican ideas for saving Social Security. That's fine. What's not is that the call for donations is accompanied by a graphic of President Bush pushing an elderly wheelchair-bound woman off a cliff as she screams. Twice.
    As ABCnews.com's "The Note" says: "In the 'movie,' a cartoon figure with a pasted-on Bush head shot pushes a future retiree - who has dark skin, incidentally - down a set of 'stairs' . . . . Images of the NAACP's 2000 James Byrd ad . . . flashed through our minds as we watched this."
    The Byrd ad in question refers to a Texas campaign in which daughters of James Byrd, a black man who died horribly when dragged behind a pickup by three white nimwits, saying that by Bush not signing the Hate Crimes Law that it was like their father was being dragged all over again. No mention that even without such a Law, two of the three men are on death row with the third given life without parole.
    Usually Democrat party officials only 'suggest' that the GOP wants to starve kids and kill old folks. Now I guess they figured it was humorous to show it, too. And heck, while they're at it, how about lying about the Republican plans, too? ABC News the Note: "The narration makes it clear that Democrats think the Bush Social Security plan would crush the nest eggs harbored by seniors. Citing an, um, 'nonpartisan' source. . . ." (American Prospect Magazine)
    Nevermind that Republicans should embrace voluntary individual privatization of Social Security accounts (heck, if I had the choice I'd opt out of receiving it so that I could invest it all on my own), but Pres. Bush chickened out and has vever called for the government to invest Social Security funds in the stock market once he took office. In fact, under President Bush's executive order, his Social Security Commission could not even consider such an option. Even still, 'privatization' isn't accurate, as former Sen. Patrick Moynihan noted, "This is not privatization. . . . I want to say [that is] not a proper characterization. That's a scare word."
    What would really be scary is not the GOP plan to allow personal accounts, but relying on the government to do so. In 1999, "President Clinton proposed . . . transferring 62 percent of projected budget surpluses to Social Security, to put more than $2.7 billion into the system over the next 15 years. He said about $700 billion of it should be invested in the stock market for increased returns. Gore support[ed] the administration plan." (Associated Press, November 27, 1999)
Posted 10/08/02, 3:25 a.m.
   
I've heard so many anti-war types grumble over the cost of removing Saddam Hussein from power. For your information, while getting rid of Saddam would cost only $9 billion a month, the lockout on west coast ports is costing $2 billion PER DAY. If we can afford for union workers and management to bicker, we can afford to oust a dictator with terrorist ties. Also, considering it only took a month to defeat a supposedly strong Iraqi military in 1991, you'll have to convince me otherwise that we can't topple his weak government in more than a week's time.
Posted 10/08/02, 3:20 a.m.
   
Thinking along the same lines as below, this is not a new phenomena of neglecting to mention when Muslims go bad. For instance, Instapundit reminds us that officials downplayed to the point of absurdity that it was an Egyptian muslim who killed the Jews at L.A. airport a few months ago.
    Also, last night and this morning it was reported over and over about the Paris mayor being stabbed Saturday night. What no news report will say, though, is that the attacker is "a 39-year-old practising Muslim born near Paris, who told interrogators he acted 'out of animosity towards politicians and homosexuals.'"
Posted 10/06/02, 10:59 p.m.
   
Regarding the tanker explosion in Yemen reminiscent of the U.S.S. Cole bombing, I understand why Yemeni officials were automatically saying this wasn't terrorism, but for U.S. officials to follow their lead and say they don't think it's terrorism is disturbing. The only first hand account - the tanker's owner- described a boat approaching the tanker and ramming it, causing the explosion. Almost immediately, Yemeni and U.S. guys said they didn't believe it, which leads me to believe that someone in the State Department is afraid to acknowledge suspicions of terror acts, such as the sniper shootings in the D.C. area that have also been downplayed as the work of a loon rather than potential terrorism.
Posted 10/06/02, 10:43 p.m.
   
One more example that Iraq hasn't come to grips that Clinton is no longer in office and they have to deal with another President Bush: One of Iraq’s “vice presidents” has challenged Dubya to a duel with Saddam.
    Good luck, losers. You're dealing with an NRA-friendly Texan now, not the wishy-washy crybaby pantywaste that was his predecessor.
Posted 10/04/02, 6:33 a.m.
   
Okay, the Braves pulled even in the NL Division Series heading to San Francisco. Come on, Atlanta!
    You don't understand; I NEED the Braves to win a World Series while I live here. 1995 doesn't count, because I was in college surrounded by the bubble that is Union University, not caring about anything else but the next date or "why can't I get a next date"? So now that I live here, I want the experience of being a city with a champion, because while 1998 with the Falcons was nice, the Dirty Birds fell flat in the Super Bowl.
Posted 10/04/02, 6:32 a.m.
   
Many times the Left is a parody of itself:
    "Delegates at an anti-racism conference voted Wednesday to expel non-blacks from the meeting, saying it was too traumatic to discuss slavery in front of them," the Associated Press reports from Bridgetown, Barbados.
Posted 10/04/02, 6:31 a.m.
   
You decide if Democrats don't care about appearances but only care about power. Over the last few years:
-- Democrats in Missouri ran for office with a dead man on the ballot, getting the Dim. governor to replace him after the election.
    -- A Republican senator from Georgia died, replaced by a Democrat by the Democrat governor.
    -- Democrats in Hawaii this fall are running with a dead woman on the ballot for representative, meaning if she wins the state will have to spend millions of taxpayer dollars to hold a special election for a rea-life candidate.
    -- A Democrat senator in NJ bows out of a race because he's losing but doesn't resign, yet the state supreme court says to forget the law and let the Democrats use another candidate, who might resign after winning so he can be replaced by another Democrat by the Dem. governor.
Posted 10/04/02, 6:30 a.m.
   
The GOP should always watch out for underhanded tactics in November's mid-term elections. Democrats are like the Cobra Kai karate group in the "Karate Kid" flicks. When you're head-to-head with them, master tells the players to "Sweep the leg," while those on the sidelines laughingly yell out to "put him in a body bag, yeah!" The left fights without honor and using shortcuts to the rules to get their way.
    What we've seen coming from New Jersey, with the Democrats acting with all the ethics of "The Sopranos," is the perfect example.
    First, Sen. Robert Torricelli's speech was one of the most megalomaniacal, speeches ever given by a candidate bowing out of an election. Blogger Andrew Sullivan counted almost 100 uses of "I" in his speech, as Torricelli was flabbergasted that America stopped being "a forgiving country." We forgive, yes, Bob, but only when people are contrite. And the fact that you dropped out of the race only because you were going to lose and the Dim-ocrats are scared of losing the majority in the Senate, not that you were sorry for being caught taking illegal gifts. No remorse, no class.
    Now, the New Jersey Supreme Court "liberally" interpreted a law stating that parties must declare candidates 51 days before an election to be fudged by 15 days. So the state has to scramble to create new ballots and the GOP candidate has to re-configure his strategy. And many absentee ballots have already been returned, which means they'll have to get a new ballot and re-vote. You tell me who's disenfranchising who here.
        So yes, another Democrat-controlled state supreme court rewrites laws during an election to favor a Democrat candidate. Hm, sounds familiar.
    Using this logic, now that Arizona is down two games to none in the NL Division Series to St. Louis, I'd like to replace them with the Dodgers to see if they can pull out a victory.
Posted 10/04/02, 6:28 a.m.
   
Looks like the United Nations may have a function after all, even if it is ruining a perfectly honorable job:
    "A French ban on the controversial practice of 'dwarf-tossing' has been upheld by the U.N. Human Rights Committee," CNN reports from Geneva. The committee rejected an appeal from Manuel Wackenheim, who "began his fight in 1995 after the French ban meant he could no longer earn a living being thrown around discotheques and nightclubs by burly men."
Posted 10/03/02, 7:03 a.m.
   
I'm going on record as not liking Spanish sensation Sergio Garcia. That nonsense Saturday at the Ryder Cup when he moaned about Americans' high-fiving at the 17th, versus his actions of running down the fairway of the 18th on Sunday while American Davis Love was still in his match, was ridiculous. He runs his mouth without thinking, and then he tries to get away with everything by flashing that stupid grin. And don't get me started on the waggles! I may stand alone, but I just don't like him. There. I said it, and I feel better for it.
Posted 10/03/02, 6:59 a.m.
   
Here's something I've never had to worry about, as this note in OpinionJournal.com says:
    Self-esteem isn't all it's cracked up to be, according to a report in the New York Times that looks at recent social-science research:
In an extensive review of studies, . . . Dr. Nicholas Emler, a social psychologist at the London School of Economics, found no clear link between low self-esteem and delinquency, violence against others, teenage smoking, drug use or racism, though a poor self-image was one of several factors contributing to self-destructive behaviors like suicide, eating disorders and teenage pregnancy.
High self-esteem, on the other hand, was positively correlated with racist attitudes, drunken driving and other risky behaviors, Dr. Emler found in his 2001 review. Though academic success or failure had some effect on self-esteem, students with high self-esteem were likely to explain away their failures with excuses, while those with low self-esteem discounted their successes as flukes.
Posted 10/03/02, 6:55 a.m.
   
Despite the anti-war criticism that seems eerily similar to 1991, like then this will not be a difficult war. It will be a meager conflict where Saddam is handed over by his handlers and we begin dismantling his weapons of mass destruction with a new, democratic-favoring leader. Citizens of dictatorships are never eager to fight for a doomed leader, so why expect the very poor and very repressed Iraqis to pick up a weapon in favor of Saddam?
Posted 10/02/02, 3:30 p.m.
   
It's a good thing the Iraqi people have the Democrats to thank for protecting them from a warmongering American imperialist like Dubya. Here are some random selections from conservative columnists who are rightly flabbergasted by the actions of the left lately:
    George Will - "Not since Jane Fonda posed for photographers at a Hanoi antiaircraft gun has there been anything like Rep. Jim McDermott, speaking to ABC's ``This Week'' from Baghdad, saying Americans should take Saddam Hussein at his word, but should not take President Bush at his. McDermott, in his seventh term representing Seattle, said Iraqi officials promised him and his traveling companion, Rep. David Bonior, a 13-term Michigan Democrat, that weapons inspectors would be ``allowed to look anywhere.''
Bonior, until recently second-ranking in the House Democratic leadership, said sources no less reliable than Saddam's minions told them that inspectors will have an ``unrestricted ability to go where they want.'' McDermott said: ``I think you have to take the Iraqis on their value--at their face value.'' And: ``I think the president would mislead the American people.'' McDermott and Bonior are two specimens of what Lenin, referring to Westerners who denied the existence of Lenin's police-state terror, called ``useful idiots.''
    Jonah Goldberg - "But I take some solace that I don't understand the Democratic party's position on the war, because it is not understandable to the rational mind. ... for those of us on the right and the left who take these issues seriously, it's hard to say that the Democratic party, taken as a whole, is a serious party. It wants to "raise questions" without even attempting to answer them itself. It consistently wants to be "troubled" by what Bush is doing without suggesting a course of action that might be less troubling. In short, it is a party of backseat drivers who don't have anything to say except that the current driver isn't good enough."
    Thomas Sowell - "Congressional Democrats ... felt themselves caught between Iraq and a hard place. They don't want to seem to be opposed to President Bush's campaign against Saddam Hussein but they also don't want to be for it. ... When an enemy is trying to build nuclear weapons, do you act before he succeeds or do you just put him on the waiting list of things to do after you finish whatever else you are engaged in? Are we a country that can't walk and chew gum at the same time, so that we have to wait until we finish chewing our gum before we start walking?"
    Ann Coulter - "Yes, it would be outrageous for politicians to have to inform the voters how they stand on important national security issues before an election. . . . We must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction because otherwise they might get mad and seek our destruction."
    Charles Krauthammer - "The New York Times reports that Gore wrote the speech (castigating the Bush administration) "after consulting a fairly far-flung group of advisers that included Rob Reiner." Current U.S. foreign policy is the combined product of Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz and the president. Meanwhile, the pretender is huddling with Meathead. ... Had it not been for a few little old ladies baffled by the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach, Fla., American foreign policy today would be made by Gore-Reiner instead of the Bush brain trust. Who says G-d doesn't smile upon the United States of America?"
    Back to me: According to the left, if the war's approved by the U.N. it's is justified, but if we go it alone the world is at risk because we make things worse, not better. Between the anti-American left and the anti-conservative left of Daschle and Gephardt, and the anti-ethics of N.J. Sen. Torricelli, the GOP is winning.
Posted 10/02/02, 3:25 p.m.
   
Libertarian talk-show host Neal Boortz has a quibble with the Left on another issue:
    "Voting reform is still stalled in the US Congress. The main sticking point? Republicans want voters, especially voters who registered by mail, to have a picture ID with them when the vote. Democrats are against that. You figure out why Democrats don’t want any system of identification for people who show up at the polls."
Posted 10/02/02, 3:16 p.m.
   
I offer one man's analysis as to why there are so many more letters to the editor of late are against an invasion of Iraq than for conflict. Those against are used to beating their drums when their emotions get inflamed by the cause celebe of the day, while the rest of us go about our daily business and trust that our leaders will do the right thing.
    It's not easy to argue against the feelings of those anti-war protestors. Their arguments are old and tired, and it seems that no matter how much information the administration releases to prove that Saddam is an evil thug, the anti-war types don't care, and don't see it as relevant that our actions would be to the benefit of the Iraqi people. What really gets them in a kerfuffle is that despite their fervent drum beating, more Americans polled consistently agree than not that Saddam should be removed, whether alone or with the help of the U.N.
    "It's all about oil," the anti-war types write over and over, which is as absurd now as when they made it in 1991. Seems that the people who call Dubya a moron are the same ones who now credit him for a ruse in which he attacks Saddam Hussein just to increase the money in his oil portfolio. "We helped Saddam in the 80s," the continue. So we should ignore Saddam today for fear of being hypocrites? "Wait until the Middle East is solved," is another call, but all the while Saddam pays the families of suicide bombers to inflame the conflict. Related to that is the argument that "Arabs will be mad at us," but citizens of the countries in the region either don't like us or want Saddam removed as well, so why should we set up focus groups in the Arab street?
    My favorite complaint is that "you aren't going to fight, so if you won't die for the cause, then why should anyone in the military?" Maybe because they volunteered to be in the military, and knew the risks involved. I haven't heard anyone in the military complain about being to all corners of the world to fight the war against terrorism, and there wasn't a backlash against the administration in 1991 for being sent to fight merely for the liberation of Kuwait. They will serve proudly to oust Saddam as well, and count it proudly among their achievements as the protectors of the United States' way of life.
    (Submitted to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, which started keeping count on the editorial page of who was against and who for the war based on the letters sent in. Today the anti-war types were far ahead, 32-8, as if it mattered.)
Posted 10/02/02, 2:23 p.m.
   
"Vote for me, but look at my opponent's ads":
    Hilarious story in the Atlanta Journal-Constipated today, that the Republican candidate for Georgia Governor, Sonny Perdue, is directing voters to incumbent Gov. Roy Barnes' ads, because people seem to dislike King Roy even more when they see his mug on the TV ten hours a day! That's high comedy.
Posted 10/02/02, 2:20 p.m.
   
The difference between the U.S./Israeli leaders and the Islamofascists:
    Columnist Mona Charen notes that while Israelis look to save more lives, Palestinian terrorists are looking for ways to kill more civilians. "Doctors in Israeli hospitals had been noticing that when they operated on people wounded in homicide bombing attacks, patients often continued to bleed even after being sutured. Eventually, a young medical resident figured out why: The terrorists filled their bombs with as many nails, screws, glass shards and pieces of shrapnel as they could, and these were first dipped in rat poison. The rat poison worked as an anti-coagulant."
    Meanwhile, on Fri., Sept. 20, Jonathan Jesner, 19, a Jew from Scotland visiting Tel Aviv was killed by a homicide bomber on a bus, one of six who died. His family agreed to donate his organs, with his kidney going to 7-year-old Yasmin Abu Ramila, a Palestinian from East Jerusalem who has been undergoing dialysis in an Israeli hospital -- yes, an Israeli hospital -- for nearly two years.
Posted 10/02/02, 1:28 p.m.
   
This week's best Vents from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
    - If war with Iraq is about oil, the Civil War was about cotton.
    - If war with Iraq is about oil, World War II was about sauerkraut.
    - I was at Shoney's the other day and I overheard Boris and Natasha plotting to make mischief for moose and squirrel.
    - I'm the lucky one. My wife married an idiot.
    - Arguing with your supervisor is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After awhile, you realize the pig likes it.
    - Anna Nicole said she "had a slender model inside of her." I'm guessing that was what she had for lunch.
    - Isn't assuming someone is racist just because they are a white Southerner JUST as bad as any other kind of racism?
    - U.N.'s Iraq Resolution applied to everyday life: "Hey son, I'll be searching your room for illegal substances on Wednesday at 9 a.m. Is that time good for you or do we need to reschedule?"
    - I guess if Al "Great Nations Don't Jump From One Unfinished Task Unto Another" Gore had been around in 1944, he would have blasted FDR for invading Normandy before the War in the Pacific was finished.
    - A Chicago man and his 15-year-old son actually jump onto the ballfield to beat up a first base coach, and they call Southerners ignorant rednecks?
    - Forget the $75 million contract. For a mere $18 million signing bonus, I promise I will not run over traffic cops.
    - If a man speaks in the forest and there is not a woman around to hear him, is he still wrong?
    - Are the people who say evolution is the only answer the same people who accuse Christians of being narrow-minded and intolerant?
    - Let me see if I've got this straight. Liberals are mad that the current administration didn't stop 9/11 AND mad that they are trying to stop Saddam.
    - My mind works like lightning: One brilliant flash and it's gone.
Posted 10/02/02, 4:45 a.m.
   
Remember, this is a DEFENSE of affirmative-action by Maryland gubernatorial candidate Kathleen Kennedy Townsend:
      "Well, let me tell you, slavery was based on race. Lynching was based on race. Discrimination is based on race. Jim Crow was based on race. And affirmative action should be based on race."
Posted 10/02/02, 4:13 a.m.
   
Here’s a hilarious look at the D.C. riots last weekend from a conservative point of view. It’s written by a student at George Washington University who really enjoyed the protestors’ visit.
Posted 10/02/02, 3:27 a.m.
   
Those of us paying attention have known this for months, but it’s nice that the American media is finally getting around to reporting Saddam Hussein’s links to Palestinian terrorists. The Associated Press and CBS’ “60 Minutes” decided to finally believe Israeli officials who know that Palestinian militants have been trained in Iraq by a group supported by Saddam Hussein to carry out terror attacks against Israel with the knowledge of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, most recently with plans to carry out attacks at Israel's Ben Gurion International Airport.
Posted 10/02/02, 2:54 a.m.
   
Atlanta Journal-Constitution headline: "Mexican children risk lives to enter U.S." I didn't realize so many kids were abandoning their parents to live the dream. Oh, you mean it's their parents that are risking their children's lives?
Posted 10/02/02, 2:48 a.m.
Jeff's Editorial Page | Column Archives   | Home