Wong Yut Lin
Faculty of Medicine
University of Malaya
Date: 25 October 2001
Time: 4.30-5.30
Women suffer inequalities in health status and treatment despite the
availability of modern medical technology and overall increase in life
expectancy. This is because the healthcare system remains insensitive
to women's needs despite the significant gains in women's right, gender
equality and reproductive health issues as a result of the 1994 Cairo Programme
of Action and the 1995 Beijing Platform for Action. Data, collected
from quantitative studies, illuminating on the extent of the health inequalities
and differentials between men and women are available. However,
such data seemed inadequate to explain the reasons why, the underlying
causes, women's own perceptions, attitudes and the interpersonal dynamics
between men and women relevant to women's health. Hence, the need
for a detailed study on women's access to gender-sensitive health services
using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods. ARROW, Asian
Pacific Research & Resource Centre for Women thus commissioned a multi-country
study towards this purpose. Five countries participated, viz.
Bangladesh, China, Pakistan, Philippines, and Malaysia, exploring a range
of healthcare services from birthing, reproductive health, and women workers'
health services. The Malaysian study assessed women's access to reproductive
health services. The main objective of the study is to assess the
extent to which a local non-government run family planning organisation
is operationalising the aspects of accessibility, gender-sensitivity, and
quality of care services for its users, majority of whom are women.
The site selected was the Kelantan Family Planning Association (KEPA) in
Kota Bahru and the study was conducted from 1999-2000. In addition,
the specific circumstances and background of Kelantan with reference
to gender, politics, Islamic fundamentalism and reproductive health made
the KFPA suitable to such a study. The research principles of participatory
approach, action-oriented research, women-centered, and the culture of
change underlie the entire study design. Specifically, qualitative
methods were used to collect information, and these include in-depth interviews
and focus group discussions with both health providers and users and non-users
of the KFPA. A situational analysis was used to provide both
the health providers' and women's perspectives on accessibility,
gender-sensitivity, and quality of care in the context of reproductive
health. A total of 13 health providers, i.e. all the personnel at
the KFPA, and 47 women (users and non-users) participated in the study.
The study also covered all four, or a 100 percent, of the clinics in the
KFPA, with one clinic in the urban setting and the rest located in the
rural districts of Kelantan. In the workshop, some salient methodological
issues, such as, reliability and validity will be highlighted particularly
with regards to the local context and cultural dynamics underlying the
research setting. As the overall multi-country study aims to operationalize
highly abstract concepts, such as, gender sensitivity, accessibility,
an quality of care, the workshop will discuss the complexities involved
in the process of translating these theoretical constructs into practical
tools and indicators, and the extent of their effectiveness