TELECOM Digest     Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:38:47 EST    Volume 20 : Issue 6

Inside This Issue:                          Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Telephone-Pole Battle: Steel Takes On Wood (Mike Pollock)
    Traffic Exchange (Sergey Mosienko)
    Stop Missing Calls While You're Online! (Mike Pollock)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Ben Schilling)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Michael G. Koerner)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Joe Jensen)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Fred Daniel)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Eli Mantel)
    Re: NXX by NPA (Michael Sullivan)
    U.S. Wants Less Web Anonymity (Monty Solomon)
    New '10-10' Call Ads Coming (Monty Solomon)
    Re: DoubleClick Looks to Regain Surfers' Trust (Ryan Shook)
    Re: DoubleClick Looks to Regain Surfers' Trust (A. E. Siegman)
    Re: F.C.C. Debates Changes to Cell Phone Fees (Maxime Flament)
    Record Telephone Calls (Stephan Lux)
    Re: 7D Dialing Across NPA Boundaries (Michael G. Koerner)
    Should Your Boss Know About Those Visits to The Shrink? (Monty Solomon)

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, and other forums.
It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated 
newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copywrited. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occassional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        611 Poplar Street
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 805-545-5115
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe/unsubscribe:  subscriptions@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the second oldest e-zine/
mailing list on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: hyperarchive.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.


* TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from the * * International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in Geneva, Switzerland * * under the aegis of its Telecom Information Exchange Services (TIES) * * project. Views expressed herein should not be construed as represent-* * ing views of the ITU. *
In addition, a gift from Mike Sandman, Chicago's Telecom Expert has enabled me to replace some obsolete computer equipment and enter the 21st century sort of on schedule. His mail order telephone parts/supplies service based in the Chicago area has been widely recognized by Digest readers as a reliable and very inexpensive source of telecom-related equipment. Please request a free catalog today at http://www.sandman.com
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of twenty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.
From: Mike Pollock <itsamike@yahoo.com> Subject: Telephone-Pole Battle: Steel Takes On Wood Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:24:36 -0500 Organization: It's A Mike! By ROBERT GUY MATTHEWS Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL March 2, 2000 How many wood poles do woodpeckers peck, since woodpeckers do peck poles? In a typical midsize city, roughly 1,000 telephone poles have to be replaced every year because birds -- and then rain -- cause them to rot. That annoys utilities and sets them back about $200 a pole. It's a needless expense in the opinion of the nation's steel industry, which has decided that the telephone pole is an important niche for steel. Not only are steel poles woodpecker-proof, the industry says; they also don't break as easily -- there are fewer down wires -- and they are better for the environment. One junked car can make four utility poles. Better yet, they come in colors. Places in Texas, Arizona, California and Ohio, among other states, have put up decorator steel poles. Pole Camouflage "We can even make them look like trees," says Richard Favreau, the president of U.S. operations for International Utility Structures Inc., in Calgary, Alberta, which makes steel poles. "There is tree-bark applique that we have. It's bloody expensive, but if you want to hide a steel pole, this is the way." Tree-bark applique, which is an inch-thick plastic coating that can be melded onto steel poles, has yet to catch on in the U.S. But it is big in England, where steel poles resembling tree trunks are a far more common sight. In weather-beaten places like Puerto Rico and the Philippines, steel poles work out much better than wood did. But steel poles face the concerted opposition of the North American Wood Pole Coalition. The group, which represents the big wood-pole manufacturers, mainly concentrated in the Northwest, notes that wood poles don't glare and that linemen who climb poles prefer wood. Every year, there is a Lineman's Rodeo (last year, it was in Kansas City, Mo.) where pros race up wood poles. It isn't as easy to climb a steel pole unless you use clip-on stairs or a cherry picker. The wood-pole people also scoff at the claim that steel poles are good for the environment. "You don't get much greener than a tree," say brochures for the wood poles. Adds Dennis Hayward, chairman of the coalition and also executive director of the Western Wood Preservers Institute in Vancouver, Wash.: "Wood poles soak up carbon and help reduce the accumulation of greenhouse gases." As for the fact that creating a wood pole involves killing a tree, the group says a new tree (Southern pine, Douglas fir or Western red cedar) matures during the life of every wood pole. Sign of Progress But the biggest plus, at this point, is history and market dominance. Wood poles have predominated since 1897, when American Telephone & Telegraph Co. put a line from Washington, D.C., to Norfolk, Va. They were cheap, plentiful and durable. Wood poles up to 50 feet tall were planted in cities, towns and neighborhoods all over the country and fed wires into individual houses. Sure, they were ugly, but they were a welcome part of a new era of comfort. Not much has changed, except that more wires than ever are strung up. Electrical, telephone and even cable-television lines move from pole to pole throughout the U.S. Burying wires might seem like a good way to avoid the eyesore, but it can cost three or four times as much. Because utilities are reluctant to cough up the money, buried lines are reserved mainly for dense commercial areas and expensive new residential neighborhoods. The U.S. currently has about 90 million wood telephone poles. Steel poles have tripled since 1997, but they still represent less than 2% of the market. The key, the steel industry believes, is in the telephone-pole replacement market: Four million wood poles each year need to be replaced because of routine maintenance, accidents, construction, and steel's friend, the woodpecker. George Manning has had a lot of experience with woodpeckers. "Those little fellows can make one heck of a lot of damage. There isn't much that you can do that is environmentally friendly," says the executive vice president of Licking Rural Electrification Inc., Utica, Ohio. Despite the best efforts of utility companies to distract woodpeckers in the past, the birds almost always came back. Companies plugged holes. They sounded loud alarms to scare off birds -- to no avail. Various chemical coverings were tried, but sometimes they seeped into the ground and risked contamination or endangered animals. The average wood pole lasts about 35 years, though a few pampered ones survive from their earliest days at the end of the 19th century. Mr. Manning's company eventually switched to steel. "Woodpeckers are no match for steel," he says. A true believer in steel poles, Mr. Manning, of the Licking utility, has stumped for the steel industry in seminars held in Illinois, Georgia and Texas. He tells developers, utility executives and mayors that steel poles can be resistant to renegade snow plows and to ice storms. They are a little more expensive -- about $266 a pole, compared to $205 for wood -- but will last longer, he says. The debate over wood vs. steel isn't confined to the industry. At Mohican State Park, in north-central Ohio, and other state park lands, steel poles have been tinted greenish and "sky gray" to better blend with grass and trees. In Arizona, industrial plants have painted their poles white to match their water towers. A Texas housing developer says that his company won't take free wood poles that electric companies offer because they are unattractive. Instead, he pays to install steel poles. "Aesthetically, the wood poles wouldn't work. Steel looks cleaner," says Robert Long, director of a Texas company called MK Development. In Austin, at Steiner Ranch, a huge new development west of the city, three neighborhood meetings were held to discuss telephone poles. The utility company presented a slide show of other neighborhoods around the city, some with new steel poles, others with newly replaced wood poles. Consensus couldn't be reached among the people along Koenig Lane, a major thoroughfare in Austin. Residents wanted a nice, soothing brown steel pole that doesn't look like a tree but blends in with the trees. To many an untrained eye, the coating, which over time turns brown as it oxidizes, resembles the color of an old rusty car. Smooth and shiny gives too much of a sterile feeling, residents argued. Businesses, on the other hand, liked smooth and shiny, because it looks clean and sterile. So half the street is shiny and the other half is brown. Claire Barry, an Austin activist, is perplexed by all the fuss over the color or kind of poles. She wants the telephone lines and electricity lines buried, and she has pushed her government representatives to force the electric company to pay for it. "My ultimate goal is to get shade trees," she says. Write to Robert Guy Matthews at robertguy.matthews@wsj.com Copyright Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
From: Sergey A. Mosienko <mosienko@inncom-svyaz.ru> Subject: Traffic Exchange Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 20:25:22 +0300 Organization: TOR-Info Ltd. Hi, Pls, Where I can find the references for an IPT traffic exchange ( WWW) ? Soon we shall have Moscow - Nakhodka ( Russia ) min E1 ( max 36 E1 ), Router - Tigris AXC-711 ( Ericsson ) and Gateway AXI-511 ( Ericsson ). Best Regards, INCOM Telecom and Datacom Networks Sergey A. Mosienko Deputy Director on Business Development Tel / Fax. +7 - 095 - 795-3323 E-mail: mosienko@incom-svyaz.ru Web: http://www.incom-js.ru [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Would a couple of our readers please correspond with Sergey in Russia and see if his questions can be answered. Thanks very much. PAT]
From: Mike Pollock <itsamike@yahoo.com> Subject: Stop Missing Calls While You're Online! Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 09:40:31 -0500 Organization: It's A Mike! This is sort of interesting. ----- Original Message ----- From: "CallWave News" <news@callwave.com> To: <itsamike@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 12:58 AM Subject: Stop Missing Calls While You're Online! > Dear Mike Pollock,
> We have exciting news! In just 4 months, more than 1,000,000
> people have installed CallWave's FREE Internet Answering
> Machine (IAM). It's our newest FREE service. We're handling
> over 10 million calls a month now - saving our customers money
> and time by answering their phone calls while they're on the
> Internet! CNET calls IAM "a brilliant alternative to a second
> phone line." Have you tried it yet? It's a perfect complement
> to your FaxWave service.
>
> Get it now by clicking here: http://www.callwave.com/?r=FaxWave2
>
> What is it?
>
> The Internet Answering Machine makes it possible for you to
> hear who's calling while you are surfing the Internet. You no
> longer need to order, install and pay for a separate telephone
> line to make sure you don't miss important calls while online.
> IAM also eliminates annoying busy signals for callers trying to
> reach you when you are on-line. Instead of getting a busy signal,
> the caller can leave a voice message WHICH YOU HEAR
> INSTANTLY OVER THE SPEAKERS ON YOUR PC! It
> also displays incoming calls, plays messages, and saves messages
> for later retrieval.
> Installing IAM is easy. All you have to do is click here:
> http://www.callwave.com/?r=FaxWave2
>
> It takes less than a minute to download the FREE software (it's
> only 180k!) The small installation program will register the
> service and set up the Internet Answering Machine. The software
> includes a demonstration and easy-to-follow instructions.
> Why not join the 1 million other IAM users who are surfing the
> Internet without worrying about missing important phone calls?
> The CallWave Team
> FREE ALTERNATIVES TO EXPENSIVE PHONE LINES!

From: Ben Schilling <Ben.Schilling@oci.state.wi.us> Subject: RE: NXX by NPA Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 07:49:29 -0600 You can get the lists from http://www.nanpa.com/ . They are under Central Office Codes (Prefixes). There are sixteen zip files in the entire set.
From: Michael G. Koerner <mgk920@dataex.com> Subject: Re: NXX by NPA Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 02:22:37 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Reply-To: mgk920@dataex.com Robert M. Bryant wrote: > Do you know where I can get a list of NXX's by NPA or by City or State??
> Robert M. Bryant
> DNAE IBM Team
> 440 Hamilton, 12th. fl.
> White Plains, NY 10601
> (914) 397-8451
> Pager: 888-858-7243, pin 116852
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: It would be a humongous list to say
> the least, on several CD Roms, and printing out to hundreds of pages.
> And the list never ends, and is never entirely up to date. PAT]
The best thing I can think of is a copy of the 'NPA-NXX Active Code List' ('NNACL'), available from the TelCordia (formerly 'BellCore') website http://www.trainfo.com. Click on the 'catalog' and look for the product. It is issued quarterly and costs $150/issue. Monthly updates to that list are called the 'NPA-NXX Activity Guide' ('NNAG'), and are also available via the website. Regards, Michael G. Koerner Appleton, WI
From: Joe Jensen <jjensen@cablesystem.com> Subject: Re:NXX by NPA Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 07:42:49 -0500 > Do you know where I can get a list of NXX's by NPA or by City or State??
Try www.nanpa.com Joe Jensen Buckeye TeleSystem Toledo, Ohio
From: Fred Daniel <fdaniel@home.com> Organization: @Home Network Subject: Re: NXX by NPA Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 03:21:57 GMT Robert M. Bryant wrote: > Do you know where I can get a list of NXX's by NPA or by City or State??
Look at www.stuffsoftware.com for a program called COFinder. Good luck.
From: Eli Mantel <mantel@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: NXX by NPA Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 21:11:49 PST Robert Bryant wrote: > Do you know where I can get a list of NXX's by NPA
> or by City or State??
Check out my "area code links" page at http://cageyconsumer.com/areacode.html which contains several links to web pages that provide the prefixes that exist in each area code. These are generally unofficial lists, so use them at your own risk. Eli Mantel
From: Michael Sullivan <avogadro@bellatlantic.net> Subject: Re: NXX by NPA Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 05:55:34 GMT "Robert M. Bryant" wrote: Go to http://www.nanpa.com and click on the appropriate link, by state or whatever. > Do you know where I can get a list of NXX's by NPA or by City or State??
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: It would be a humongous list to say
> the least, on several CD Roms, and printing out to hundreds of pages.
> And the list never ends, and is never entirely up to date. PAT]
But the NANPA (North American Numbering Plan Administrator) site is relatively up to date and has the files in usable form. Michael D. Sullivan, Bethesda, Md., USA avogadro@bellatlantic.net (also avogadro@well.com)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:04:41 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: U.S. Wants Less Web Anonymity by Declan McCullagh 3:00 a.m. 1.Mar.2000 PST WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government may need sweeping new powers to investigate and prosecute future denial-of-service attacks, top law enforcement officials said Tuesday. Anonymous remailers and free trial accounts allow hackers and online pornographers to cloak their identity, deputy attorney general Eric Holder told a joint congressional panel. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34659,00.html
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 00:11:52 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: New '10-10' Call Ads Coming Reuters 7:25 a.m. 1.Mar.2000 PST WASHINGTON -- The government will announce new advertising guidelines Wednesday for long-distance phone companies, to rein in promotions that bombard consumers with confusing promises about the terms of "10-10" services, also known as "dial-around." The rise in the use of the services, which offer an alternative to a consumer's chosen long-distance carrier, has been accompanied by a rising tide of complaints. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,34663,00.html
From: Ryan Shook <rjshook@uwaterloo.ca> Subject: Re: DoubleClick Looks to Regain Surfers' Trust Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:54:54 -0500 Organization: University of Waterloo On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, it was written: > I've set my Netscape cookies.txt file to read-only as was suggested
> here some time ago and this works ok. But the IE 4.72... that I
> sometimes use has a folder that contains these cookies. (NT's
> windows\profiles\username\cookies folder with files named
> username@domain.txt <mailto:username@domain.txt> ) I've tried to set
> this folder to read-only but that permission gets changed back. Is
> there any way to make it stick?
There are several possibilities to get around doubleclick.net. 1) most computers have some sort of hosts file where the TCP/IP drivers try to lookup domain names there before consulting with a DNS. Insert the major doubleclick servers and set their IP address to 127.0.0.1. This makes your browser think that you are doubleclick.net and try to retrieve the banner from your computer which it obviously won't provide. The gotcha is that with IE5 you get sent to "this page can't be loaded" far too often, there is something fancy going on where doubleclick seems to be executing a script or something. 2) because 1) is flawed I found another solution. in IE5 there are security zones set. Tools | Internet Options | Security. You can add domains to a security zone. By default most everything is considered in the internet domain. Instead ad *.doubleclick.net to the restricted sites list. I have *.doubleclick.net and *.ads.*. Then go through the list of rights given to restricted sites and make sure they can't play with cookies. I believe it is set that way by default. The trouble with solutions that completely turn off cookies (you can do that in the above mentinoed "internet domain" is that they are truly useful and sometimes necessary. By the nature of the web it is not really connection based. You make and break hundreds of connections as you surf instead of making a connection when you start at a website and break the connection when you go elsewhere. For this reason it is difficult for web servers to have a sense of state. Cookies allow a sense of state. They allow a server to recognize you and serve content appropriately based on information they saved in their databases. This is used by banks, airlines, car companies that let you "build" a car online, and yahoo finance so it can remember your customizations and many other groups who use the technology properly. Unfortunately it is hard to control abuses. The "security domain" settings in IE4 & 5 are tricky, I'm still trying to find a combination that lets me get what I want productively from websites while not letting me become too much of a statistic. Ryan Shook Mechanical Engineering | RJShook@uwaterloo.ca Amateur (HAM) Radio Lic.:VE3 TKD | www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rjshook Your mouse has moved, reboot required for the changes to take effect.
From: siegman@stanford.edu (A. E. Siegman) Subject: Re: DoubleClick Looks to Regain Surfers' Trust Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 21:31:58 -0800 Organization: Stanford University In article <telecom20.5.2@telecom-digest.org>, Douglas Dunlop <ddunlop@nortelnetworks.com> wrote: > Rather than bother with manually accepting and rejecting cookies, I
> set Netscape to accept all cookies. I also deleted everything below
> the "do not edit" line in the cookies.txt file and set the file
> properties to read only. All cookies are accepted, none are stored ...
I'm guessing this is a Unix system. Is there a way to do the same thing with the MagicCookie file in Netscape on a Mac? (Email cc of any replies to siegman@stanford.edu appreciated.)
From: Maxime Flament <maxime.flament@s2.chalmers.se> Subject: Re: F.C.C. Debates Changes to Cell Phone Fees Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 14:26:14 +0100 Organization: Chalmers University of Technology Monty Solomon wrote: > By SETH SCHIESEL
> A debate is raging at the Federal Communications Commission about whether
> cellular telephone customers must continue to pay to receive calls as
> well as to make them.
> http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/yr/mo/biztech/articles/22phon.html
During the CTIA Wireless 2000 a few days ago there was interesting debates about this issue, and especially about the advantage of caller-pay systems: > From PC Week Online, February 28, 2000 3:42 PM ET
[snip] Sharp words from Vodafone chief Next Tachikawa, NTT, up was Chris Gent, CEO of Britain's red-hot Vodafone Airtouch, which, with several major alliances in the past few months, including its acquisition of Mannesmann, is arguably the largest wireless network service provider in the world. While Tachikawa concentrated on his own company's success, Gent talked more about U.S. shortcomings. Aside from there being too many competing networks in the States, compared with the pervasive GSM standard in Europe, Gent said the U.S. doesn't offer enough in the way of cell phone services where only the calling party pays. Right now, most cell phone customers pay for incoming calls, so they tend to leave their phones off a lot. "When people leave their phones on all the time, because they don't have to pay for incoming calls, it becomes an integral part of their lives," Gent said. "That hasn't happened in America." In terms of standards, he said, the U.S. may be in trouble there even after everyone begins to adopt 3G. (3G is supposed to be a combination of several network standards.) While that should make things more uniform in the U.S., it may not make things globally uniform because "even now, we're looking at a 3G U.S. and a 3G rest of the world," Gent said. Vodafone, for its part, intends to adopt a WAP (Wireless Access Protocol) platform in July, with plans to move up to GPRS later this year and, eventually, 3G next year. [snip] ---- It is true that since we don't pay for being called we leave the phone always on - even at night - even at meetings (without ring)... A few weeks ago, the Swedish mobile operator started to even pay back people when then answer (http://www.comviq.se/tjanster/abonnemang/kontant.html in Swedish). This holds for only the prepaid card subscription, you get money on your calling account every minutes you spend answering your phone (0.25 re: 3cents/minute). not that much but it is quite amazing!! Regards, Maxime Flament Doktorand Maxime Flament, M.Sc. mailto:Maxime.Flament@s2.chalmers.se Department of Signals and Systems Tel work: +46-31-772 1764 Communication Systems Group Tel home: +46-31-16 38 17 Chalmers University of Technology Tel fax: +46-31-772 1748 SE-412 96 Gteborg - Sweden http://www.s2.chalmers.se/~maxime/
From: Stephan Lux <stephan.lux@pylon.de> Subject: Record Telephone Calls Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 13:42:27 +0100 Hello. I am a student and write even my thesis with the title " development and evaluation of a concept for voice recognition in a call center ". I hang even something firmly, since I cannot to be implemented white as I it that the telephone call can be stored separately according to caller and called person as a sound file. My considerations are so far: 1. I handle me into the cable of the Head set and lead the cables in the sound cards from there - input and take up then the discussions separately from each other. 2. I put a PC with ISDN card, with the call center agent with telephone-software telephoned and try the discussions there to separate. 3. I examine the ISDN Protokol and try on the basis of the header the packages there to partition. Those are my considerations, which are however so far only grey theory. Perhaps someone can help me, and to me say whether at all one of these possibilities to be implemented would be and perhaps how. Of course I am to be had also for new suggestions. I am grateful for each tip or each assistance. Stephan lux [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Will you please see what advice can be given to Stephan. Thank you. PAT]
From: Michael G. Koerner <mgk920@dataex.com> Subject: Re: 7D Dialing Across NPA Boundaries Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 02:34:58 -0600 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Reply-To: mgk920@dataex.com Blake Droke wrote: > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>> Ed Ellers wrote:
>>> Um, I would suggest that Louisville, Kentucky is also a major city!'
>>> We still have 7D dialing between parts of the 502 and 812 NPAs, and
>>> since the state (wisely IMHO) changed the 270 addition from an
>> overlay
>>> to a split I expect we'll have it for some time to come. (The state
>> decision came during the permissive 10D dialing period, and -- guess
>>> what? -- permissive 10D hasn't been turned off. Not that it does any
>>> harm, of course.)
> Memphis might also be called a major city and still has 7D cross-NPA
> dialing between local numbers in 901 (TN), 662 (MS) and 870 (AR).
> Unlike Louisville, however, no 10D calling is allowed. Of course there
> are only 13 Mississippi 662 NXXs local from Memphis and 5 Arkansas 870
> NXXs.
> I noticed a potential problem in the Neustar database recently. 901-739
> has been assigned to a CLEC in 901, while 870-739 is assigned to
> Southwestern Bell and is a local call from Memphis 901. Might not be a
> problem since Tennessee is a toll alerting state. It depends on which
> rate center will get 901-739. If its in the Metro Memphis area, there
> will be a dialling conflict.
According to my recent NNAG issues, effective 10-Feb-2000, '901-739' was assigned to a local landline carrier in 'Huntingdon, TN', located about 20 km north of I-40 (about halfway between Memphis and Nashville) and, apparently, WELL outside the local calling area of Memphis. Regards, Michael G. Koerner
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:40:35 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: Should Your Boss Know About Those Visits to The Shrink? salon.com > Technology March 1, 2000 URL: http://www.salon.com/tech/books/2000/03/01/database_nation Employers sniffing through medical records, would-be forgers having UPS deliver your signature -- Simson Garfinkel reveals a world rife with privacy violations in "Database Nation." By Thomas Scoville When the Berlin Wall came down in October 1989, there was, of course, a lot of gloating in the West. We'd won; capitalism and free markets had triumphed over the dark forces of Soviet tyranny and centralized control, conspicuously vindicating the American way. But what about the age-old advice: Ignore at your peril the ominous shadows cast by the creepy glow of hubris; if there's any time the gods love to strike you down, it's during your victory lap. I was haunted by a half-formed notion that, despite all the economic chest-thumping and political high-fiving in the so-called Free World, we were converging on our own reckoning, a day when we would realize our own failures beneath the weight of unacknowledged Western tyrannies. I had no good idea how this might actually come to pass. But reading Simson Garfinkel's new book, it's starting to become clear: The combination of free markets and ubiquitous information technology imposes its own kind of tyranny, the end results being often as scary as a KGB nightmare. "Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century" is a dense treatise on electronic identification and surveillance technology, as well as a guide to the workings of the modern consumer tracking complex. Garfinkel, a technology writer who runs an ISP on Martha's Vineyard, outlines the laws and policies that make these mechanisms possible and explains the commercial appetites that motivate the relentless corporate mining of the mountains of consumer data. The picture is more than a little hair-raising. Take, for instance, the hazards of corporate credit-tracking databases: In the tangled web of electronic repositories that chronicle your personal credit history, a single mistake or false report can be propagated to multiple agencies, ensuring that you'll never be approved for a credit card or a mortgage. Worse, errors can never be expunged, but only mitigated with supplemental reports. Of course, the burden of proof is on the individual. Equifax, Inc. may have made the mistake, but the consumer suffers the consequences, which can last for years. Then there are the hidden perils of those ubiquitous enticements to give up a few shreds of your identity to the commercial data sphere. Think that supermarket discount card was a bargain? Tell it to the man who slipped and injured himself while shopping, then sued the store. His corporate grocers used his consumer profile against him, courtesy of the discount card. A history of large liquor purchases undermined the credibility of the customer's claim. Then there are the databases tracking your medical history: Garfinkel reports that 35 percent of Fortune 500 companies acknowledge that they have drawn on personal health records to make employment decisions. Think you're in line for a big promotion? Not with your record of psychiatric treatment, or that one-time abnormal T-cell count after a nasty virus. For HMOs, controlling costs also means the permanent suspension of patient confidentiality; the ramifications of this are nightmarish. Suddenly insurance companies, marketers and mass-mailers have access to the most intimate details of your flesh and blood. The deeper Garfinkel digs, the more ghoulish the picture becomes: Near the bottom of the pit, there's the Medical Information Bureau, a widely used clearinghouse of patient data for medical insurers, which cloaks itself as would any sinister covert agency: unlisted phone numbers, a profile so low as to approach invisibility, concentric layers of codes and obfuscation in reporting procedures. And though its data remains invisible to consumers, its effects do not; with the wrong codes affixed to your name in the MIB data cores, you'll never get health insurance again. And you may never know why. Corporate databases also greatly increase the individual's vulnerability to fraud, identity theft and a host of other criminal abuses. I was surprised to read, for instance, that United Parcel Service stores customers' digitized signatures as proof of delivery. UPS will fax you a receiver's signature if you supply them with a package tracking number. It appears to be relatively easy for someone to arrange for UPS to deliver a facsimile of my signature. Garfinkel makes the infuriating revelation that much of the most promising technology that could decrease consumer jeopardy isn't implemented because of the marginal costs to corporations; profits are more important than individual welfare, apparently. Indeed, this inversion of corporate over individual rights emerges as the dominant theme of "Database Nation." Certainly, Garfinkel finds corporate disdain for consumer privacy rights is right out in the open. Most incensing is the attitude of a mass-mailing maven, the kind of marketer who upholsters your mailbox daily with unwanted catalogs: "There is no such thing as 'junk mail' -- only junk people." In other words, corporation ber alles. Starting to sound a little like tyranny? Of course, resistance doesn't seem to be coming from the technology sector -- the Internet's masters of the universe are too busy pawing through your e-commerce cookies and profiling your Web surfing to take much notice. The onslaught of corporate privacy abuses has been resisted by only a few: whistleblowers like Garfinkel, underground groups like the Cypherpunks and -- in a most un-Orwellian turn -- by the federal government, which has passed legislation to slow the invasion. There are a few problems with "Database Nation." At times Garfinkel seems to wander outside the implicit charter of the book. For instance, his extended taxonomy of surveillance techniques veers away from credibility and dangerously close to "X-Files" territory with accounts of thought-tapping and remote viewing experiments. At other times he seems to want to write a completely different book on spy technology, more appropriate for, say, Jane's Defense Weekly. Garfinkel also has an annoying habit of creating shocking anecdotes of privacy abuse out of whole cloth, not telling the reader until afterward these horror stories only represent possible portraits of the future. He opens one chapter with an account of his e-mail correspondence with a person who turns out to be a program sucking data about his shopping habits and movie preferences -- then reveals that the scenario is make-believe. This sensationalist technique is more suited to National Enquirer than anything else, and serves to subtly undermine his audience's trust. Overall, though, "Database Nation" is well worth the read. In the face of escalating corporate incursions onto our fundamental liberties, popular opposition is in alarmingly short supply; those determined to galvanize public indignation are performing a valuable service, and deserve to be heard. salon.com | March 1, 2000 - - - - - - - - - - - - About the writer Thomas Scoville is either an Information Age Savant or an ex-Silicon Valley programmer with a bad attitude. He is the author of the Silicon Valley Tarot. Copyright 2000 Salon.com All rights reserved.
End of TELECOM Digest V20 #6


Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Visit my atheist friends at Arizona Secular Humanists
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!