Hillsborough county tax collector
Mary has a 401k with her employer worth $30,000, as well as a $30,000 IRA. hillsborough county tax collector Sales tax rates by state. 4. They own a small joint checking account and various stocks in joint name worth $40,000. 5. hillsborough county tax collector Ir repeater. John also has a $300,000 life insurance policy, with a $50,000 rider on Mary's life, neither of which they believe is included in their estate for estate tax purposes. Their net worth is $465,000, right? Wrong! John and Mary's net worth for estate tax purposes is actually $815,000. Surprised? Probably. hillsborough county tax collector Irs-forms. And, in the event of the death of both John and Mary, estate taxes would be $80,850. These taxes can be avoided with tax-oriented estate planning. The most common mistake I see clients make is undervaluing their estate. Life insurance, pension and profit sharing plans, 401k plans and other forms of retirement plans are all included in a decedent's estate for estate tax purposes. The problem is usually compounded if they also own their own company and have difficulty valuing that business. O. K. Let's assume that John and Mary go to their attorney and have the proper tax-planning documents prepared, and they also include detailed provisions for their children, grandchildren and charities. They leave all their assets, however, titled in joint name to avoid probate. John dies, and Mary discovers that their wonderfully designed estate plan is defeated because they left everything in joint name and named Mary as beneficiary on John's pension plan and life insurance. As a result, everything still passes outright to Mary upon John's death, rather than under the terms of his estate plan. Keeping assets in joint name (or naming specific individuals as beneficiaries) may avoid probate, but can defeat your overall estate planning goals. John and Mary should have divided their joint property between them so as to build up each of their individual estates to $600,000. That way their assets then pass under the terms of their estate plan. This is particularly essential in order to accomplish the desired tax-planning effect. Even more disastrous results can occur if, upon John's death, Mary puts her assets in joint name with one or more of her children. If she does so to avoid probate and thinks the child will "do what is right" in distributing property among his or her siblings, there are several problems with joint ownership. First, Mary may lose control over the property if the child asserts more ownership control than she had anticipated. Second, the property may be exposed to the claims of creditors of the child, such as an ex-spouse in divorce proceedings or creditors in a bankruptcy proceeding. Upon Mary's death, the other children may be unintentionally disinherited if the child doesn't fully understand Mary's intentions, or is unwilling to carry them out. Furthermore, there may be adverse gift tax consequences both when Mary puts the assets in joint name with the child and, if the child makes transfers to his or her siblings, at the time when the transfers are made. If any one transfer is in excess of $10,000, there may be gift tax consequences. These are just some of the drawbacks to joint ownership. Living trusts and durable powers of attorney are alternatives to joint ownership that may provide the same benefits, without the complications, of joint ownership. For instance, Mary could have placed her assets in her own trust during her lifetime to avoid probate, yet she would still maintain full control over the assets during her lifetime.
Hillsborough county tax collector
Forms || Free-income-tax-filing || Free-income-tax-filing || Turbo tax 2002