Emil
Heinäaho
What
caused grey hair for Bismarck and Cavour?
There
are some similarities in the unifications of Germany and Italy. Not just that
they occurred in the 19th century, but also the fact that they were not
a result of a big nationalistic movement that had driven the people out on
streets screaming “We want to unite with our brothers and sisters!” No. The
both unifications very started and done by a small groups. Above these groups
there were Bismarck and Cavour who were the leading persons in this business in
their own countries. The unifications were definitely not easy deals. Both
Bismarck and Cavour had some big problems – partly same, partly not.
Bismarck and Cavour were two totally different politicians. Their
work for the unifications started after they had both achieved the high
position in their governments. Here the similarities actually end. Bismarck was
the man of the army. Even if he thought that diplomacy, where he was very good,
comes first and using the army is the last choice, he considered army as a much
more valuable “tool”. This is easy to see in the behaviour of Bismarck. Even if
he had no special position in the army he used always the army uniform in
public and from his speeches: “… but by blood and iron.” This was the way he
was going to handle the big questions of the future. What about Cavour then?
Cavour can be seen as a quite miserable creature if we are comparing him to
Bismarck. Cavour relied on diplomacy. He was not working that much in
publicity. He was more a person who discussed and planned his next act away
from the people. Actually, he was not a that popular person in Italy. Maybe
just because the people did not see him shouting with a red face in front of
the government how they should attack Austria and unite Italy. This difference
in styles made at least the work for Cavour much harder, because he could not
rule as he wanted like Bismarck did. One of the major problems of Cavour was
that he did not have the resources he needed. He had not the support of the
people, the power or the personality to just walk over the others. Bismarck had
never even thought about a problem like this. He had even more power in the
united Germany that the Emperor had!
It was
not only that Bismarck and Cavour were different, but also the “playing ground”
they had varied. When Bismarck faced different parties, Cavour was struggling
with person called Garibaldi. Bismarck’s opinion was that the liberals, the
democrats and the socialist could run to the mountains and shoot themselves. He
had a lot of fights specially with the liberals. Even if he was able to weaken
their position, the liberals always lifted their heads from the mud. Cavour’s
opponent was Garibaldi, who was nothing like Cavour. Garibaldi wanted to handle
the questions with the army. Cavour disagreed him in many things. There were
any real fights between these two men, but they irritated each other. As an
example Garibaldi’s plans to take Rome. Garibaldi was going to take over Rome and
unify it with the other states. When Cavour heard this he got in contact with
France and after a while France declared that an attack against Rome would mean
an attack against France. Garibaldi had to forget his plans. The biggest thing
that made Garibaldi a threat to Cavour was that he was much more popular among
the people than Cavour. Anyway, Garibaldi probably never could have managed to
crush the Austrians with the help of the Frenchmen!
If
Bismarck had more power, Cavour had a better location. The independent states,
which were going to be Germany, were located in the middle of the “super
powers” of the world. There has to be said that Italy, even if her situation
was better, was not in that good place either, but at least it had only Austria
and France threatening. The different powers around Germany forced Bismarck to
work in a special way. Bismarck had planned that he would unite the different
states in the following way: He would conquer states and the rest of them he
would force to unite with Germany by making the other nations a threat to the
states independence. The plan was clever. To do it required a lot of diplomacy
and after that the skill of fighting. Every time Bismarck wanted to attack a
nation around Germany, he had to sign alliances with the rest around Germany,
so that the others would not see the attack as a threat against their
independence. This would have led to a too early World War I! Cavour in the
other hand was in a better position. With the help of his diplomatic skills he
was able to make an alliance with Napoleon III. This alliance was playing a
major role in Cavour working. Austria was not an easy neighbour. With the help
of the weak Italy Austrians maintained their position in Europe among the other
powers. So in other words Austria wanted to stop all the acts that were made
for uniting the peninsula. Cavour knew that there were even Italians that had
joined the Austrian army, which could attack Italy almost without a reason and
in this fight the Italians would be crushed. Both Bismarck and Cavour had to be
on their toes, because of the threat of the countries around them.
Both
Germany and Italy were based on independent states that had been spread on a
big area. This meant that the culture and the habits of the people varied a
lot. There cannot be forgotten the economical position of the different areas.
This was not a big problem in Bismarck’s Germany, but Cavour got a lot of grey
hair because of this. In Italy all the money was concentrated in the north just
because in the south farming was hard, because of bad land and ancient
technology. Even if the religion was the same and the ancient Rome connected
the people, they could not even understand each other. Even the farmers and the
people in the cities had difficulties in understanding each other’s speaking.
Even if the people was originally the same, Cavour had a big problem here. The
people was not just divided, but it was not even interested in whole
unification process. Because Cavour was not a strong leader, he could not get
the people on his side, which would have helped to unify this people.
Bismarck’s working methods were differing more than a little from Cavour’s way.
The German states contained not only German-speakers, but also many minorities
like the Polish. There were two leading religions, protestant, Bismarck’s
favourite and then the Catholics. Bismarck tried to crush all the different
groups in Germany to make a “pure” German Empire without any minorities
disturbing. It is hard to say who had the harder job in unifying the country,
Bismarck who was popular among people or Cavour who had not enough power. The
fact is that both Germany and Italy were not fully united. The unification was
just some official words on the paper, but among the people, who never cared
about the whole thing, it had not created a feeling of any nationalism or
brotherhood with the people in the other states.
As
there can be seen, Bismarck’s and Cavour’s problems were both similar and
totally different, but also their starting points differed. Powerful and
popular Bismarck crushed ,at least tried, his enemies by his strong speeches
and actions, when Cavour, who can be seen almost as a small rat, faced the war
mad Garibaldi. Bismarck lost his hair when thinking about the other countries
actions against him when he declared wars. Cavour had just the Austrians as
opponents, because with the help of his diplomacy the Frenchmen were on his
side. Both Bismarck and Cavour could not unify their states. Bismarck had
different minorities, when Cavour’s problem was the economical conditions. The
conditions really varied between these two states, even if the nature of the
problems was the same, they were not the same.