Colony of the World

"If you are disturbed by the current uncontrolled flood of immigrants and fast growing resident immigrant population in the England, this page will give you a valuable toolkit of arguments you can use to make your case. If you are an immigration enthusiast, and accept the media orthodoxy that there is nothing unusual about the current level of immigration, and that nothing bad could possibly come of it, then this page will test your faith severely. And if, like so many Englanders, you haven't even thought about the issue that much, then this page may scare you badly. "

There is a sense in which current immigration policy is Adolph Hitler's posthumous revenge on England. The U.K. political elite emerged from the war passionately concerned to cleanse itself from all taints of racism or xenophobia. . And this, quite accidentally, triggered a started mass immigration, so huge and so systematically different from anything that had gone before as to transform -- and ultimately, perhaps, even to destroy - the one of the unquestioned victor’s of World War II: the English nation, as it had evolved by the middle of the twentieth century.

The media tends to treat the recent changes in England’s ethnic composition, the so-called "browning of England," as though it were some sort of natural and inevitable process, but in fact these changes are being directly and actively promoted by current government policy. It is almost as though it had been decided that it would be best if, as it has been said, "...the Government dissolved the people and elected another." To believe this however would be to give the government credit for knowing what it was doing at the time it was doing it, and there is (to put it mildly) little evidence of this.

After post Powell they said that the new immigration bill would not result a million Third World immigrants flooding into our country and cities every year, and that the "ethnic mix" of this country would not be upset. 

Needless to say, every one of the assurances has proven false. But these assurances were, nevertheless, necessary, because it is clear that the Parliament we had at the time would never have passed such a bill if they had understood what it's consequences would be. Nor have the English people ever wanted such consequences. Unfortunately, the English people were never been asked, although they are willing to ask about joining European single currency.  Many people believe they should be asked, before the process goes any farther.

First of all there are the myths. There is the myth that current immigration is not really all that high in historical terms. In fact, it is higher than it has ever been, both in absolute numbers and in impact on the population. In the past there were not only immigration peaks but also long lulls, when immigrants could be assimilated.  Now, due perhaps to the "welfare safety net" and the policy of "family reunification," and most certainly to our moral cowardice in declining to control our borders, the numbers remain unrelievedly high, in good times and in bad, and the percentage of immigrants who eventually return home is effectively nil. Immigrants account for two thirds of our population growth throughout the nineties, and all of it thereafter. According to U.K. Census projections, by the year 2050 over half of England’s population will be ethnic immigrants At this point the English will be a minority, and we are almost already a minority among the young. And of course, in another 50 years (2100) or so the English may well be a small minority, merely a beleaguered group struggling to maintain their position in what is essentially just another crowded, miserable Third World country.

The next myth is that immigrants are somehow necessary economically. (In other words, that the English are somehow inadequate, and unable to get by on their own without constant infusions of new blood). But immigration is really a luxury, not a necessity, and like any luxury it can be good or bad depending on the circumstances. When you stuff more people into an economy that economy pretty much has to grow in absolute terms, but most of that growth is soaked up by the immigrants themselves, and even under the best of circumstances the per capita economic benefits of immigration for natives can be shown to be quite meagre. However to the extent that such benefits do exist they tend to work in such a way as to transfer wealth from native English workers (whose wages are marginally depressed) to the owners of capital (who benefit from a lower cost of labour), which could conceivably explain some of the pro-immigration sentiment you find among our economic and political elite’s.

A third myth is that of the industrious, energetic, entrepreneurial immigrant. This picture seems to have been true of the pre-1970 immigrant, and remains true of some immigrant groups today, who do indeed "revitalise" whole neighbourhoods (which actually says something pretty awful about the previous inhabitants of those neighbourhoods!). But the rosy picture so often painted was based on statistics decades old -- and newer figures are much more discouraging. Taken, as a whole, post-1970 immigrants are much less successful than their predecessors. In short, many of our recent immigrants do seem to be assimilating, but to the English welfare system rather than to the greater English culture!

To be blunt, there is simply no economic justification for our current immigration policy, and the cultural consequences are enormous, and often enormously bad.

Consider crime. The Russian "Organizatsiya" is unbelievably violent, and so well organised that it may be on its way to displacing the Italian Mafia as the world's largest crime syndicate. West Indian Yardie gangs and Japanese Triads, The list goes on and on, with different ethnic groups tending to specialise in different crimes.

Consider disease. Tuberculosis is on the rise again, mostly due to immigration. Despite the hopes of "bleeding heart Labour," immigration seems to be inexorably reinforcing the "Rainbow Coalition". This is perhaps the main reason that so many on the Multiculturalism Left react to calls for immigration reform with outraged accusations of racism, naive and xenophobia. They see immigrants as reinforcements in their great culture war against traditional English society, and in this, for once, they are probably right.

Please ask yourself this one important question. Why? Why are we doing this? No one can see the future, suppose it is possible that everything will somehow work out. England will become a multiracial, multicultural, multi-lingual country, held together by nothing more than the force of law and the raw authority of it's political elite’s, and everything will be just dandy.

It could happen, but if you look at the rest of the world the picture does not seem encouraging at all. It is clear that we are taking a terrible risk, and for what? The advantages to the immigrants are obvious, and do not fault them for wanting to come here, but the people who are here already have little to gain and much to lose. You may think the worst case scenarios are unlikely. Well, if you play one game of Russian roulette it is "unlikely" that you will lose. The odds are five to one in your favour. If you think that makes it a good idea then we definitely do not want you in charge of our public policy!!! Think about it. Then think about it again.

In the end, there is simply no rational justification for this. For no good reason at all, we are passively allowing ourselves to become, a "Colony of the World," and perhaps it is time for the English people to finally ask ourselves whether this is what we want."

What is need is immigration reform, And all will be resisted bitterly, even hysterically, by pro-immigration forces. Some sort of immigration restriction is inevitable in England, no matter how our political elite’s resist, and that the real struggle will be over what form these restrictions will take.