REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES - Part 2
II. The 11th Amendment Issue
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional
questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place
us under the despotism of an oligarchy." Thomas Jefferson, 1819
In order to prevent and/or abridge the right of the people to adequately petition the government for a redress of grievances, and to empower Federalism with an overwhelming and superior advantage, the early Federalists in power and control of the Congress, and the government of the United States, created the necessary legislation to empower Federalism, and much of this legislation was aimed at preventing legitimate arguments against Federalism.
One of those key pieces of legislation, which created an immediate and overwhelming legal advantage for Federalism, and started abridging the declaratory basic rights of the masses of American people, is the 11th Amendment to the Constitution, which states; The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state. This amendment is totally contrary and in utter disregard of the original intent and meaning of the Constitution, which under Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution, clearly affirms that, The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution.
Be it further known, that the 11th Amendment denies to the masses of American people a full redress of grievances, by preventing and/or putting stipulations and/or certain requirements onto the redress of grievances process, that denies the people a direct redress of grievances by the Judicial branch of Federal government, by denying the people direct and immediate access to a speedy and fair judicial remedy within the Supreme court, i.e., in regards to the basic human rights enumerated to in the First Article of the Bill of rights, the people must first exhaust all administrative and lower court processes before the Supreme court will even hear the cases. Said unconstitutional actions of the 11th Amendment, are meant to abridge and/or discourage the right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances, by unconstitutionally putting requirements and/or laws on the process of a fair, equal, and speedy Judicial remedy.
Further, that the 11th Amendment was used, and continues to be used, as a constitutional tool to aid and further the cause of Federalism, by unconstitutionally assisting Federalism in their continuing takeover and/or manipulation of the government of the United States of America, and the masses of people residing therein. The 11th Amendment was used to bolster and support the Federalists cause, against the masses of people, in conjunction with the Sedition Act of 1798. The 11th Amendment continues to be used by the Federalists, to maintain control over the peoples right to equal and fair Representation in Congress; the peoples right to a monetary and financial system that is public, not private; the right of the people to have a system of taxation based on the required constitutional guidelines of enumeration, and many other constitutional rights, which have been, and still are, being misconstructed and abused, and/or abridged by those in Congress and elsewhere in Federal government.
Further, that the 11th Amendment is currently in total conflict with Article V of the Constitution which declares; Provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year 1808 shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article. Article V is a "declaratory" and "restrictive" clause that establishes the legal constitutional fact, that if the 11th Amendment was passed and ratified prior to the year 1808, which it was, then the 11th Amendment cannot be valid if it affects in "any Manner," Article I, Section 9, first and fourth Clauses of the Constitution. This redress of grievances hereby acknowledges that the first Clause of Article I, Section 9 has become invalidated because of time, and no longer applies. The same does not hold true for the fourth Clause of Article I, Section 9, which declares that, No Capitation, or other direct Tax, shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken, and further, that the hereinbefore directed part of the clause is in direct reference to Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 which declares, Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States... according to their respective Numbers. When the Constitution clearly spells out and declares specific instructions to those in Congress and elsewhere in Federal government, on more than one occasion, then the intent of those declaratory clauses are clear and concise; those rights enumerated to in the Constitution, are not to be tampered with and/or abridged, because they are part of the basic American human rights, as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Bill of Rights.
Further that the 11th Amendment currently continues to remain in total conflict with the declaratory and restrictive clause of Article V of the Constitution. The 11th Amendment does in fact, affect in any manner, the right of the people to question the authority and validity of the 16th Amendment, by effectively keeping serious and threatening constitutional questions about the 16th Amendment out of the direct legal purview and scope of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Without the constitutional judicial restraints, and remedies that Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution can potentially allow for, Congress and others within United States Federal government, can continue to do whatever they want to do, with the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the government, and the basic American human rights of the masses of people in the United States. The 11th Amendment severely restricts the peoples rights to a speedy, equal, and fair judicial redress of government, at one of the highest levels, i.e., the Supreme Court of the United States, by severely abridging and/or limiting the right of the people to adequately, equally, and fairly petition the government for a direct legal redress of grievances.
The 11th Amendment is therefore not constitutional, because it is not consistent with the intentions and the motives of the original framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and those who passed and ratified those documents. And further, that the 11th Amendment is not constitutional or valid, because it directly interferes with, and or abridges the constitutional "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses of Article V, main body of the Constitution, and the First and Ninth Articles of the Bill of Rights.
We the People, therefore, submit Grievance II to the Congress and other branches of United States Federal government, for an immediate and complete reparation and restoration of all basic constitutional rights lost and/or being denied by the 11th Amendment. The United States government shall further abolish and/or constitutionally invalidate the 11th Amendment and any subsequent laws and/or legislation attached to it. This full reparation and restoration of all constitutional rights and/or privileges shall be carried out immediately; this being a necessary constitutional obligation and requirement, as strictly declared by the second paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, which fully affirms; This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Appendix A, page 62-92, is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this redress of grievances.
III. The Equal and Fair Representation Issue
"A government is republican in proportion as every member
composing it has his equal voice in the direction of its concerns: not indeed
in person, which would be impracticable beyond the limits of a city or small
township, but by representatives chosen by himself and responsible to him
at short periods." Thomas Jefferson, 1816
"A representative government [is] a government in which the will of the people will be an effective ingredient." Thomas Jefferson, 1816
"The further the departure from direct and constant control by the citizens, the less has the government the ingredient of republicanism; evidently none where the authorities are hereditary... self-chosen... and little, where for life, in proportion as the life continues in being after the act of election." Thomas Jefferson, 1816
In order to gain more control and power over the government and "peoples" money of the United States, and the masses of people therein, the Federalists in control of the United States government and Congress, intentionally and willfully, abridged and/or misconstructed the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, through a prolonged series of intentionally timed pieces of legislation and constitutional amendments, that over a period spanning at least 140 years, would reduce the number of members in the House of Representatives in Congress, to it's current level of 435 Representatives. That is equal to approximately one Representative in Congress for every 650,000 people in the United States of America.
Further, that the number of Representatives in the House, as established by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution, calls for a number of members in the House of Representatives in Congress, that is equal to one Representative for every 30,000 people, as enumerated to by the Census. This number for members in the House of Representatives of the United States Congress, was reaffirmed again, by the will of the masses of American people, in 1789, when a Federalist proposed constitutional amendment, that would reduce that number of Representatives in the House, was soundly rejected and defeated by the will of the people. The intent and meaning of those that authored the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and that passed and ratified the same, is perfectly clear; the masses of American people are to share in, and have a legitimate stake and place of power within their Republican Form of Government, by virtue of the masses of American people having one Representative in the House of Representatives of Congress, for every 30,000 people in the United States of America. This was done so the masses of American people would have a peaceful and positive way of putting into check, the extravagant excesses and continued threat of abuses of power, by the Federalists and/or others within "select" power and control of United States government.
ARTICLE I, Section 2, Clause 3
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several
States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective
Numbers… The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after
the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every
subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.
The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand.
These are the necessary "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses of the Constitution and Bill of rights, and these clauses contain the essential essence of the "republican" constitutional principles, whereby the "absolute rights" empowering the real Freedoms and Liberties of all Americans is found. It is in these "declaratory" and "restrictive clauses," that the true republic can really be found, and without these necessary and important clauses, there can be no true and real republic, there can only be a Federalist Run State government operating without ordained and established constitutional empowerment.
It is hereby further stated, that Federalists and/or others in charge of Congress, intent on having the Representation in Congress in a position to continually favor their position of control and power over the Republican Form of Government and masses of American people, did willfully and intentionally abridge and/or misconstruct the Constitution of the United States, in order to favor the Federalists and/or others ideological, philosophical, religious, and/or political beliefs. The Federalists, to establish a clear and fundamental level of control over the power and financial wealth of America, its people, and the playing field of American government and politics did this intentionally and willfully. It is further provided that to carry this Federalist mandate out against the will of the masses of American people, the Congress in 1868, did execute under force of arms, the mandatory ratification of the 14th Amendment. This amendment being necessary to establish firm control over the Representation in the House of Representatives of Congress, through the reapportionment process, thereby significantly reducing the ability of the masses of American people to have any fair and equal Representation in Congress. It is hereby further provided, that in 1929, the Federal Congress of the United States, by virtue of the Reapportionment Act, did again willingly and intentionally further reduce that Representation in Congress by establishing the "permanent" number of house members in Congress at 435.
Further, that the illegally coerced (under force of arms) passage and ratification of the 14th Amendment, was against the will of the masses of American people, and totally against the intent and meaning of those who authored, passed, and ratified the original Constitution of the United States. In addition, that due to the forced manner in which the 14th Amendment was ratified, it is thereby invalid, as if it had never existed.
Further, that the unfair and unequal Representation of House members in Congress at 435 "permanent" members, is a continuing constitutional violation of the First Article of the Bill of Rights, as this unequal and unfair number of Representatives in Congress, does not allow for an adequate, equal, and fair redress of grievances by the American people against the government of the United States. By virtue of this supporting and overwhelming constitutional fact, the 14th Amendment is in full view of all reasonable and understanding American people, to see and to judge, that the 14th Amendment is totally unconstitutional, and therefore legally void in all power, authority, and scope, i.e., Congress shall make no law... abridging the right of the people to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The 14th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929 are both an abridgment to that "absolute" constitutional right, and therefore they are both unconstitutional.
It is further stated that the 14th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929, are also abridgments and/or misconstructions to the First Article, "absolute" right of Freedom of Speech. If the people are unable to redress their grievances with the government of the United States in an adequate, timely, equal, and fair manner, and cannot adequately pursue a competent and positive dialogue with Congress and/or its members thereof, and/or others in United States government, then the voices and speech of the masses of American people are not being heard and listened to, and this is thereby denying the people their basic and fundamental right to Freedom of Speech.
The founding fathers meaning and intent over the issue of Representation in the House, as enumerated to in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution, was well-defined and declaratory as to the number of members that should be in the Congressional House of Representatives, and that constitutional and correct number was one Representative for every 30,000 people, as enumerated to in the Census. The Federalists an/or other select few in power, since 1789, have continued to systematically and methodically, misconstruct and abridge the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States of America, by reducing that number of members in the House of Representatives to one Representative for every 650,000 people, thereby giving the Federalists and/or other select few in power, full control over the United States government, and therefore dissolving the true American republic.
And it is resolved further, that the dissolving of the true American republic, through the intentional and willful misconstruction of the constitutional right of fair and equal Representation in the House of Representatives, is in strict violation of Article IV, Section 4, of the United States Constitution, which affirms, The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government. Without the fair and equal Representation in the House of Representatives, in the Congress of the United States government, at one Representative for every 30,000 people, there cannot exist a true republic, because the number of members in the House of Representatives must be maintained at one Representative for every 30,000 people, in order to constitutionally maintain a true and correct Republican Form of Government. Without this correct and true Representation in place, only a Federalist Run State government exists, and therefore there is no republic and no Republican Form of Government. It is just this plain and simple: no equal and fair Representation in government by the masses of common people in America and no republic exists, and therefore no Republican Form of government exists.
While Federalism might maintain that it is a form of republican government, it is not the true Republican Form of Government as required under Article IV, Section 4, of the United States Constitution. There is a clear and distinct difference between a form of republican government, which is what Federalism, is, and the exact Republican Form of Government as enumerated to in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights. This issue is discussed further in Appendix A, page 62-92.
We the People, therefore, submit Grievance III to the Congress and other branches of United States Federal government, for an immediate and complete reparation and restoration of all basic constitutional rights lost and/or being denied by the 14th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929. The United States government shall further abolish and/or constitutionally invalidate the 14th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929, and any and/or all subsequent laws, and/or legislation, that adversely affects the peoples rights to a fair and equal "Republican Form" of Representation in the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States. The Congress and the government of the United States shall immediately restore Representation in the Congressional House of Representatives, to one Representative for every 30,000 people in the United States of America. With a population base of approximately 264 million people in the United States of America, and at a ratio of one Representative for every 30,000 people, this equals approximately 8,800 Representatives, or approximately 8,365 more members in the House of Representatives than what the United States government currently has. Without this proper and adequate Representation in Congress, the masses of American people have no firm voice and/or bond in the affairs of their government, as was fully intended by the Constitution of the United States and those who framed it. It is hereby further stated again, that there can be no true republic, and/or even a republic at all, as long as the masses of American people are being denied their constitutional fair and equal Representation in the House of Representatives. This reparation and restoration of the peoples constitutional right, to a fair and equal Representation in Congress, shall be carried out as immediately is practical to do so, but such time shall not exceed one, one year time period. This full reparation and restoration of all constitutional rights and/or privileges shall be carried out and followed with no argument or question, and in the time limit allotted for; this being a necessary constitutional obligation and requirement, as strictly declared by the second paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, which fully affirms; This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Further, that as part of this reparation and restoration of a constitutionally equal, fair, proper, and adequate Representation in Congress, the Congress and government of the United States shall establish a method by which the adverse affects of the political parties are totally and forever dissolved, and it is further added and stipulated by We the People, that the United States government will seek out, develop, and establish a fair and equal method by which the election of the President and Vice-president, Senators, and Representatives can be carried out, without there being any financial, monetary, media, religious, and/or other adverse and unfair advantage(s) involved. Any individual seeking office will, gain, and win that office on his or her own merits, nothing more and nothing less. It is further stipulated by We the People, that the government will seek out and establish term limits for any and all holders of elected offices of public trust under government authority of the United States. The President will appoint a citizens congressional districting committee, and this committee will work directly with Congress, to insure that the "republican" principles of equality and fairness are strictly adhered to, as new congressional districts are created throughout the several States and the District of Columbia. Implementation of this paragraph will coincide fully with the time limit as specified above.
Appendix A, page 62-92 is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this redress of grievances.
IV. The Money and Financial Issue
" Specie is the most perfect medium because it will preserve
its own level; because, having intrinsic and universal value, it can never
die in our hands, and it is the surest resource of reliance in time of war."
Thomas Jefferson, 1813
"I now deny [the Federal Government's] power of making paper money or anything else a legal tender." Thomas Jefferson, 1798
"All the capital employed in paper speculation is barren and useless, producing, like that on a gaming table, no accession to itself, and is withdrawn from commerce and agriculture where it would have produced addition to the common mass… It nourishes in our citizens habits of vice and idleness instead of industry and morality… It has furnished effectual means of corrupting such a portion of the legislature as turns the balance between the honest voters whichever way it is directed." Thomas Jefferson, 1792
Article I, Section 7, Section 8, Section 9, and Section 10 of the United States Constitution, all deal with the issue of the money of the United States, and those sections clearly affirm just whose, and what type of money it is to be. The money (type and regulation thereof) and the financing of our Nation, as it was constitutionally ordained and established, says that the money and the regulation of that money, is to belong to We the People, and not to anything or to anyone else. Under the Constitution the money and the regulation of it, is to be the total responsibility of the masses of the people, through the peoples equal and fair Representation in Congress.
From the book, The Miracle on Main Street, written by F. Tupper Saussy: "The Coinage Act of 1792 specifically declared gold and silver to be 'as money in the United States.' But in 1933, Congress suspended the redemption in gold, and in 1968 suspended the redemption of silver certificates in silver. (In both cases, the excuse was 'temporary emergency,' as it always is when governments work with bankers to harvest the people's property without due process.) The cumulative effect of those acts of 1933 and 1968 was this: Congress eliminated the money of account of the United States from the banking system without declaring a replacement, with the astonishing result that neither our courts nor our public offices are complying with 31 U.S.C. 371!
31 UNITED STATES CODE 371
The money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars
or units, dimes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and mills or thousandths,
a dime being the tenth part of a dollar, a cent the hundredth part of a
dollar, a mill the thousandth part of a dollar; and all accounts in the
public offices and all proceedings in the courts shall be kept and had in
conformity to this regulation.
The money of the United States of America is not in a "public" account belonging to the United States, as required by the Constitution; it is in a private account that belongs to the privately owned Federal Reserve Banks, of which there is little to no public concern or regard. The money of the Federal Reserve therefore simply replaces one debt for another, something that the framers of the Constitution had strictly warned against. Federal Reserve money is not a Republican Form of money as required by the United States Constitution, Federal Reserve notes are simply worthless pieces of currency drawn on the speculation of the future of United States Posterity.
12 UNITED STATES CODE 152
The terms 'lawful money' and 'lawful money of the United States'
shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the United States.
Article I, Section 7, Section 8, Section 9, and Section 10 of the United States Constitution, are the necessary "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses of the Constitution and Bill of rights, and these clauses contain the essential essence of the constitutional instructions, whereby the "absolute rights" empowering the real Freedoms and Liberties of all Americans is found. It is in these "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses, that the true republic can be found and without those necessary and important clauses there can be no true and real republic, there can only be a Federalist Run State government.
Be it further known to all Americans, and/or all interested parties, that the rights to the ownership and regulation of the peoples money in the United States, was illegally and unconstitutionally transferred to the control of the powers and forces of Federalism shortly after the United States officially became a Nation, and that this transfer of the ownership and regulation of United States money was initially transferred to the control of the Federalists, by the Federalist Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, and with the overwhelming approval of the first Federalist President of the United States, George Washington.
Further, that on December 23, 1913, with most of the Senators and Representatives in Congress away from Washington, DC for the Christmas holidays, a select number of Senators and Representatives remained at the United States Capitol, and passed the Federal Reserve Act. The Federal Reserve Act transferred almost all of the ownership and regulation of the "peoples" money to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Banks. In addition, that at this point in times, 1914, approximately 76% of the Federal Reserve Banks money was owned by foreign interests. The owners of the Federal Reserve remain largely unknown to the public, and the Federal Reserve Banks are not accountable to the public, so therefore, no public audits!
The Federal Reserve Bank's are privately owned and have no constitutional authority to exist, except the unconstitutional Federal authority given to them by the powers and forces of Federalism and Congress. Thomas Jefferson knew that such an unconstitutionally empowered banking system was unconstitutional, and reflected that in an Opinion on Bank, in 1791: "The incorporation of a bank and the powers assumed [by legislation doing so] have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States by the Constitution. They are nor [not] among the powers specially enumerated." In 1803, Jefferson goes on to further state that "[The] Bank of the United States… is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles and form of our Constitution… An institution like this, penetrating by its branches every part of the Union, acting by command and in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constitutes authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or its regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the United States, with all its branch banks, be in time of war! It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw its aids. Ought [are] we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile?"
Be it also known to all interested parties, that at this current time, it is estimated that foreign interests own approximately 58% of the Federal Reserve. Further, that the direct inflation and deflation (regulation) of the money of the United States is done for the explicit benefit and gain of the money powers and forces of the individuals and/or groups who own and operate the Federal Reserve Banks. Further, that the Congress of the United States has no control over any part of the money of the United States, and that this is in flagrant disregard of the constitutional declarations and restrictions placed on the money of the United States, by the intent and meaning of the Constitution and those who framed it.
Further, that there is no constitutional amendment, approved by the masses of the American people, on record, that gives the American peoples right to place the ownership of their money, financing, and regulation thereof, into the hands of anyone or anything in the private sector. This is a right expressly reserved to We the People, through the peoples equal and fair Representation in Congress.
Further, that the murder of President John F. Kennedy, was facilitated and carried out, so that Lyndon Baines Johnson and the other Federalists in control and power of the United States government, could gain 100% control over the money and financing of the United States. As a result of Kennedy's issuance of Executive Order #11110, and the parallel presidential "ordered" issuance of United States Notes, as ordered by President Kennedy, approximately 25% of the ownership of United States money was given back to the people. Two weeks after the murder of Kennedy, President Johnson rescinded Executive Order #11110, and immediately recalled all United States Notes from circulation. Further, that to remove the 25% public ownership of United States money by the masses of American people, President Johnson passed the Coinage Act, created by the Federalists in Congress in 1965. The passage of the Coinage Act transferred the last percentage of the public's ownership in the money of the United States, firmly back into the hands of the big money Federalists, via the Federal Reserve Banks. The money of the United States was and remains 100% under the control of private interests, and this is in strict violation of the United States Constitution. Note: On November 26, 1963, the day of Kennedy's funeral, and with Kennedy not even cold in his grave yet, the Federal Reserve issued the first no-promise Federal Reserve notes, quickly replacing Kennedy's Executive Ordered, silver-backed United States Notes. A coincidence of timing? Hardly, and it is not had to figure out why Kennedy was murdered. John F. Kennedy was murdered to protect the "massively large" financial interests and profits, that were and still are being made off of the American people, through the "plunder" of the United States Treasury via the Federal Reserve Banks!
It is hereby further disclosed by this redress of grievances, and from information obtained though the public records of the United States government, that since the conspired birth of the Federal Reserve in 1913, over FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS in interest has been paid to the Federal Reserve Banks and its private owners. This is largely money that was supplied by the American taxpayer, via the United States Treasury.
It is hereby further affirmed, that there was, and remains, no legal constitutional power and/or authority in affect, willingly approved by the masses of the American people, that took away the peoples constitutional right to own and regulate the money of the United States of America. The money of the United States, by virtue and empowerment of the United States Constitution, is supposed to belong to all the masses of American people, and not just to the select few in power who get the greatest benefit and gain from it. The Federalists and others in power and control of the Congress of the United States, just stole the constitutional right of monetary ownership away from the masses of American people, and the Federalists and others in power have done it in the same manner that they keep on stealing the ownership of the United States government away from the masses of American people, and that is by continually and methodically misconstructing the Constitution, thereby depriving and/or abridging to the masses of American people, their "declaratory" constitutional basic rights as enumerated to in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.
We the People, hereby submit Grievance IV to the Congress and other branches of United States Federal government, for an immediate and complete reparation and restoration of all basic constitutional rights lost, and/or being denied, and/or abridged by illegal and/or unconstitutional legislation, which may in any manner affect the masses of the American people's ability to own their own money, regulate it, and to have it impounded in anything but a public owned institution. We the People do hereby further require an immediate and full disclosure of all the names of the investors in the Federal Reserve, and that an immediate public disclosure be made of the exact percentage of ownership that each investor has, both foreign and American, in the Federal Reserve Banks of the United States of America. There will also be a full and complete public audit of the Federal Reserve System with a complete and publicly published description of all results obtained in the audit. The Congress and government of the United States shall further abolish and/or constitutionally invalidate any and all laws, and/or legislation that hinders, interferes with, and/or abridges the right of the masses of American people to own, coin, and to regulate the value of their money thereof, in any manner. It is hereby further stated that as part of this full reparation and restoration of the peoples declaratory constitutional right to own, coin, and regulate their own money, that the Federal Reserve System will be dissolved and all foreign owners who own a part of the Federal Reserve will be immediately paid back no more than 30% of their investment, with no interest paid, and less a Nationalization (accounting) seizure fee on the total of their investment, which will not be greater than 25% of their investment in the Federal Reserve. American investors will retain their investments, less the required devaluation of the money when the monetary and financial system changes from one of credit to debit, and the American investors will have their accounts transferred over to the new system. These investors, both foreign and American, will be initially restricted to a limit of drawing out no more than 5% of their investment. The United States of America will immediately dissolve financial and monetary ties, and inner dependence on, and with, the already established World Federalist monetary system. The United States Congress will establish a "publicly owned" financial institution for the peoples money, and that institution will be based strictly on the publics ownership of the bank, and Congress will further assume their "declaratory" and "restrictive" constitutional financial responsibility for the regulation and handling of the money, and financial system that belongs to all the people in the United States of America. The Congress of the United States will change the monetary system to one of debit instead of credit, as was originally promised to the masses of common people in 1789. It is hereby further stated, that in order to better facilitate the changeover of monetary systems from the present system of out of control credit and inflation, to an eventually more stable and fair financial system of debit, that all debts will be extinguished, all debtors forgiven, and all monetary, financial, and account balances will be set to -0-, including the National debt, as was originally intended and promised to the masses of common people in 1789. Worthless paper currency will be replaced by Specie as the form of money. This full reparation and restoration of all "declaratory" constitutional rights and/or privileges, as enumerated to in the United States Constitution, and guaranteed and reaffirmed by the Ninth Article of the Bill of Rights, shall be carried out immediately; this being a necessary constitutional obligation and requirement, as strictly declared by the second paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, which fully affirms; This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. As part of the reparation and restoration process of all "declaratory" constitutional rights under Grievance IV, the Congress and government of the United States shall take no more than 90 days to start implementing all of the necessary monetary and financial changes.
The Federal Reserve must be dissolved and the control of the money and financing of the United States must be returned back to the American people, where it constitutionally belongs. The current money and financial system is failing worldwide, and it is only a matter of a time before the system will fail in the United States. This is not a given, it will happen, and at this point in time we are pretty close to the zero hour when the financial system will fail. The financial and money system used by the Federalists was seriously flawed 200 years ago when it was adopted by the United States from its European Federalist counterparts, and it continues to be seriously flawed today.
The only recourse that we have as Americans, is to take the uneasy course of changes, that are now necessary to stabilize the Constitution of the United States and the money that belongs to all the people, and not just to the select few in power and control of the government of the United States.
Let these encouraging words of Thomas Jefferson, in 1787, serve as a guide: "I know of no remedy against indolence and extravagance, but a free course of justice. Everything else is merely palliative… Desperate of finding relief from a free course of justice, I look forward to the abolition of all credit, as the only other remedy which can take place."
Thomas Jefferson wrote again in 1813 on the issue of banks and money: "Bank paper must be suppressed, and the circulating medium must be restored to the nation to whom it belongs. It is the only fund on which they can rely for loans; it is the only resource which can never fail them, and it is an abundant one for every necessary purpose. Treasury bills, bottomed on taxes, bearing or not bearing interest, as may be found necessary, thrown into circulation will take the place of so much gold and silver, which last, when crowded, will find an efflux into other countries, and thus keep the quantum of medium at it salutary level. Let banks continue if they please, but let them discount for cash alone or for treasury notes."
Appendix A, page 62-92 is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this redress of grievances.
V. A Fair and Equitable Taxation System Based Strictly
on the United States Constitution
Without an equal and fair Representation in Congress by the people, then
how can there be a fair and equitable tax system in place? There cannot!
The two are constitutionally interwoven, and for there to be a fair and
equitable tax system in place, and for it to work effectively for the masses
of people, instead of against them, then the masses of people must have
a direct say in how that tax system is to be administered. It is a constitutional
requirement, and one that is key to the people of the United States having
a legitimate and just government under the Constitution. A fair and equitable
system of taxation is also mandatory under the Republican Form of Government.
Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the main body of the Constitution affirms the following constitutional "declaratory" clause regarding taxation in the United States; Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers. Article I, Section 8 goes on to further affirm; The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 goes on to further declare that No Capitation, or other direct Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken. These different clauses from Article I of the Constitution, all cover and answer the questions and/or issues regarding the taxation of the masses of American people.
Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 are all "declaratory" clauses affirming and establishing the constitutional fact, that no direct taxation will be applied to the masses of American people, unless such taxation is based strictly on the census or enumeration of the masses of people in the several States. Because those constitutional "declaratory" issues regarding taxation are so clearly affirmed, by twice repeating them, then the clauses are also "restrictive" in intent and meaning, by telling those in Congress and elsewhere in United States government, that no taxation is to be imposed or carried out, unless said taxation is in strict accordance with the original intent and meaning of the declaratory clauses of Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4.
On February 25, 1913, the Internal Revenue Service, which was previously established in 1862, received the financial lift and support that it needed from Congress, via the passage and ratification of the highly questionable and unconstitutional 16th Amendment. The 16th Amendment simply states, The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. It made no difference to those in Congress and elsewhere in United States government, that they were severely restricted from creating such an amendment by virtue of the mandatory constitutional "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses found in Article I. It also made no difference to Congress and the others in power and control of the United States government, that they willfully and intentionally, and unconstitutionally, misconstructing and/or abridging the true intent and meaning of the Constitution.
These types of totally unnecessary constitutional abuses and unconstitutional abridgments of basic American human rights, by those in Congress and elsewhere in United States government, was in the past, and continues to be to this very day and moment, constitutional abuses, abridgments, and violations that are in total disregard of most, and/or all of the most important "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses found in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. These necessary "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses of the Constitution and Bill of rights, are the clauses that contain the essential essence of the constitutional instructions, whereby the "absolute rights" empowering the real Freedoms and Liberties of all Americans is found. It is in these "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses, that the true republic is found, and without those clauses there can be no true and real republic, there can only be a Federalist Run State government.
The basic American human right, to a system of taxation based strictly on the sections and clauses found in Article I of the Constitution have been totally ignored, misconstructed, and abridged by the Congress and others in government. This has all been done so that the select few can profit and gain the most from the system. The common people have benefited very little, while the select few continue to benefit enormously from the blood and sweat of the masses.
Further, that the system of "republican" taxation as constitutionally established and intended by those who framed the Constitution, was done to protect the masses of American people from the excesses and abuses of Federalism, and that the continued abridgment of the "declaratory" and "restrictive" taxation clauses of Article I, are nothing less than a total breach of the constitutional contract between the masses of American people and their government. Excessive and abusive taxation by the select few in power was one of the major issues that the founding fathers and those who framed the Constitution were concerned about, and they never wanted those excesses and abuses to happen again to the American people. That is why Representation and Taxation are two of the most important and essential constitutional issues that are addressed so clearly at the start of the Constitution.
The people are to have both the guarantee of a fair and equitable Representation in government, as well as a fair and equitable system of taxation, and that this Representation and Taxation is to be strictly based on the direct enumeration of the number of people in the United States.
It is hereby further stated, that because the issues of Representation and Taxation were of such critical importance to the founding fathers and those who framed the Constitution, that the "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses found in Article I, in regards in their intent and meaning over Representation and Taxation is very clear; those "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses protecting those rights, are to be considered "absolute" basic American rights, without any misconstruction and/or abridgment whatsoever, by those in power and control of the government.
We the People, therefore, submit Grievance V to the Congress and other branches of United States Federal government, for an immediate and complete reparation and restoration of all basic constitutional rights lost and/or being denied by the 16th Amendment. The Congress and government of the United States shall further abolish and/or constitutionally invalidate the 16th Amendment and any subsequent laws and/or legislation, and/or any authority attached to those laws. The Internal Revenue Service shall immediately be dissolved, disbanded, and totally done away with. This full reparation and restoration of all constitutional rights and/or privileges shall be carried out immediately; this being a necessary constitutional obligation and requirement, as strictly declared by the second paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, which fully affirms; This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. Further, that the Congress and government of the United States will be given no more than 90 days to develop and implement a system of taxation based strictly on those "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses found in Article I of the Constitution, in regards to Representation and Taxation.
Appendix A, page 62-92, is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this redress of grievances.
VI. The "Absolute" Constitutional Right of
a Total Wall of Separation Between Church and State
"One of the amendments to the Constitution… expressly
declares that `Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under
the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch
that whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the
others." Thomas Jefferson, 1798
"I am really mortified to be told that, in the United States of America, a fact like this [i.e., the purchase of an apparent geological or astronomical work] can become a subject of inquiry, and of criminal inquiry too, as an offense against religion; that a question about the sale of a book can be carried before the civil magistrate. Is this then our freedom of religion? and are we to have a censor whose imprimatur shall say what books may be sold, and what we may buy? And who is thus to dogmatize religious opinions for our citizens? Whose foot is to be the measure to which ours are all to be cut or stretched? Is a priest to be our inquisitor, or shall a layman, simple as ourselves, set up his reason as the rule for what we are to read, and what we must believe? It is an insult to our citizens to question whether they are rational beings or not, and blasphemy against religion to suppose it cannot stand the test of truth and reason. If [this] book be false in its facts, disprove them; if false in its reasoning, refute it. But, for God's sake, let us freely hear both sides, if we choose." Thomas Jefferson, 1814
"Believing… that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." Thomas Jefferson, 1802
The First Article of the Bill of Rights affirms several of the most important "declaratory" and "absolute" basic American rights that are in the Constitution of the United States. One of those basic American human rights, as enumerated to in the First Article of the Bill of Rights, is the "declaratory" clause on Freedom of Religion, and the "restrictive" clause affirming the mandatory Separation of Church and State. The "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses of the First Article of the Bill of Rights simply affirm that the Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
The lengthy legal debates over the constitutional issue of the "absolute" and "declaratory" constitutional right of, the Separation of Church and State are clear. The Supreme Court, and lower judicial courts, have many times over, sided with the meaning and intent of the founding father who was the most instrumental in penning that basic American human right. Thomas Jefferson was that founding father, and all the messages of his intent and meaning on the issue of the Separation of Church and State are clear, and that is, that the Separation of Church and State, is an "absolute" basic American right, that is not to be tampered with in any manner.
"The rights [to religious freedom] are of the natural rights of mankind, and… if any act shall be… passed to repeal [an act of granting those rights] or to narrow its operation, such act will be an infringement of natural right." Thomas Jefferson, 1779
"The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights." Thomas Jefferson, 1819
Those same sentiments about "absolute" rights are mirrored by Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, when he made these remarks about the limits on the power of Congress and the courts to reinterpret the Constitution; "It is my belief that there are "absolutes" in our Bill of Rights, and that they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant, and meant their prohibitions to be "absolute."
It is hereby affirmed in this grievance, that the Congress and the Federal government of the United States of America, have failed to fully comply with the constitutional, "declaratory," and "restrictive" clause of the First Article of the Bill of rights, in regards to the constitutional "absolute" requirement of the Separation of Church and State. Further, that the Congress and the Federal government have failed to uphold and obey the strict and constitutional mandate that they are not to tamper with, misconstruct, and/or abridge the "absolute" rights enumerated to in the First Article.
Let this grievance further bear witness to the overwhelming legal fact, that the wording, In God We Trust, as it appears on both the currency (money) of the United States, and on several Federal government buildings throughout the several States of the Union, supports the question and issue of there being no Separation of Church and State as required by the First Article of the Bill of Rights. The presence and continued use of this monotheistic religious wording on public buildings, the public money of the United States, and on other public items, is in constant violation of the constitutional "absolute" right of the Separation of Church and State, by violating the rights and beliefs of polytheistic religious believers and those of other beliefs and/or non-beliefs, thereby denying Freedom of Religion to the American people who have those beliefs and/or non-beliefs. Rebuttal of this fact by those in Congress and elsewhere within the Federal government, by way of claiming that the money of the United States is not public, and is therefore exempt from the constitutional restriction of the Separation of Church and State, will subsequently and automatically verify Grievance IV as being correct.
This grievance further affirms that there are many monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols on public lands and on public buildings, where in fact there should be none. These monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols are in full view of the public and are there with the full support and legal backing of the Federal government. The presence of these monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols on public buildings and on public lands, is a clear and present danger to the constitutional "absolute" right of the Separation of Church and State, by continually violating the constitutional rights and beliefs of polytheistic religious believers, and those of other beliefs and/or non-beliefs, thereby denying Freedom of Religion to the American people who have those beliefs and/or non-beliefs.
We the People, therefore, submit Grievance VI to the Congress and other branches of United States Federal government, for an immediate and complete reparation and restoration of all basic constitutional rights lost and/or being denied, by the failure of the Congress and the Federal government of the United States to obey the First Article "absolute" constitutional restriction of the Separation of Church and State. The Congress and government of the United States shall further abolish and/or constitutionally invalidate any and all laws and/or legislation, and/or any other authority attached to any laws and/or traditional unwritten practices, written and/or unwritten, that interfere with, misconstruct, and/or abridge the right of the masses of American people, to have an "absolute" constitutional Separation of Church and State. The Congress of the United States and the government shall immediately put into motion a process, whereupon, all monotheistic religious wording stating, In God We Trust, is immediately removed from all public buildings, and from all the currency (money) of the United States, and from other public items. Further, that the Congress and government of the United States, shall immediately put into motion a process, whereby, all monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols are immediately removed from public owned and/or paid for public buildings, and all monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols will be immediately removed from all public owned lands. This full reparation and restoration of all constitutional rights and/or privileges shall be carried out immediately; this being a necessary constitutional obligation and requirement, as strictly declared by the second paragraph of Article VI of the Constitution, which fully affirms; This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. Further, that the Congress and the government of the United States, shall be given no more than 90 days after the receipt of this grievance, to start fully complying with this reparation and restoration of all constitutional, "absolute," "declaratory," and "restrictive" rights, as they pertain to Freedom of Religion and Separation of Church and State, and as enumerated to in the First Article of the bill of Rights, United States Constitution.
Appendix A, page 62-92, is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this redress of grievances.
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes." Thomas Jefferson, 1813
VII. The Religious Freedom Amendment bill Issue
"One of the amendments to the Constitution… expressly declares
that `Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press,' thereby guarding in the same sentence and under the same
words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press; insomuch that
whatever violates either throws down the sanctuary which covers the others."
Thomas Jefferson, 1798
"Believing… that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." Thomas Jefferson, 1802
Grievance VII also concerns the constitutional abridgment of Freedom of Religion and the Separation of Church and State. This is in direct regard to the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, which states: To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience: Neither the United States nor any State shall establish any official religion, but the people's right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, or traditions on public property, including schools, shall not be infringed. Neither the United States nor any State shall require any person to join in prayer or other religious activity, prescribe school prayers, discriminate against religion, or deny equal access to a benefit on account of religion.
Be it known to all parties hereinbefore mentioned, that the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, hereinafter also known as, H. J. RES. 78, is in direct constitutional conflict with the express "declaratory" and "restrictive" clauses, of the "absolute" rights of the First Article of the Bill of Rights, that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It is the natural and inalienable right of all human beings to choose, or not to choose a belief, religion, and/or worship that suits them, and no power or authority, especially in United States government, has the right to interpose on that most basic of the natural human rights.
Congress, the United States government, and any member thereof, have no constitutional right to intermeddle in the affairs of religion, and in the same respect, religion and/or religious views, and/or religious beliefs, have no constitutional right to intermeddle in the affairs of government. This is the meaning for "a wall of separation between Church and State." Thomas Jefferson made that clear when he wrote this to Samuel Miller, in 1808: "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This results not only from the provision that no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the states [and therefore the people] the powers not delegated to the United States. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the states [and the people], as far as it can be in any human authority."
"Whenever… preachers, instead of a lesson in religion, put [their congregation] off with a discourse on the Copernican system, on chemical affinities, on the construction of government, or the characters or conduct of those administering it, it is a breach of contract, depriving their audience of the kind of service for which they are salaried, and giving them, instead of it, what they did not want, or, if wanted, would rather seek from better sources in that particular art of science." Thomas Jefferson, 1815
Be it further known to all parties hereinbefore mentioned, that H. J. RES. 78, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, is a direct misconstruction and/or abridgment of the constitutional "absolute" right of the Separation of Church and State, as was intended by Thomas Jefferson and the other framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. H. J. RES. 78, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, specifically affirms the existence of only a monotheistic God worship as the official government form of religion, belief, and/or worship in the United States. This is in direct disagreement with the First Article in the Bill of Rights, as the First Article does not specify and/or allude to any mention of a God and/or God's, and neither does the main body of the Constitution.
The following statements on Religious Liberty affirms the founding fathers intent and meaning on the subject of Religious Liberty: Religious Liberty, right of a person to form personal religious beliefs according to his or her own conscience.
First and foremost, the first sentence of the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, specifically uses the singularity word of God, thereby firmly establishing the existence of only a monotheistic religion, as the only acknowledged form of belief and worship, and as the only proper belief for religion and worship in the United States of America.
Second, the first sentence of Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, fails to acknowledge the rights of those Americans who do not acknowledge monotheism or who do not acknowledge the existence of God at all. Further, that the first sentence of the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, leaves no constitutional protection left for those Americans who believe in the polytheistic worships and beliefs, therefore abridging and/or denying their "absolute" constitutional right to religious worship as they see fit. Further, that the first sentence of the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, leaves no constitutional protection left for those Americans who do not believe in any God at all.
Thirdly, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, willfully and intentionally abridges the First Article "absolute" right of the Separation of Church and State, by establishing official government respect and protection for monotheistic religions, such as Christianity, by allowing the use of monotheistic religious icons and/or symbols, and/or wording to be used on public property, by giving monotheistic religions the constitutional right to do so. This is an "unconstitutional" misconstruction and abridgment of the "declaratory" and "restrictive" clause in the First Article of the Bill of Rights, to a full and "absolute" Separation of Church and State, and to the "declaratory" and "restrictive" clause of the "absolute" right of the masses of people to worship an/or not worship in the manner that best suits them as an individual. Note: The Constitution and Bill of Rights are all about personal and individual rights; that was the main purpose for the United States coming into existence.
Fourth, that the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, willfully, intentionally, and unconstitutionally abridges the intent and meaning of the First Article of the Bill of Rights, by specifically "respecting" only, and in its total entirety, the worship and belief of "monotheistic religion," as the only constitutionally acceptable manner of deity or non-deity worship in the United States. This open-to-the-public-legal-fact, of the intended intent and meaning of the overall wording and constitutional affect, when implied to the singular use of the word God, as it is specifically implied and used in the opening clause and/or sentence of the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, thereby affirms for all to see and read, that the intended purpose and meaning of the proposed Freedom of Religion amendment bill, is to constitutionally establish "monotheistic" worship, belief, and/or religion, as the only form of constitutionally acceptable worship, belief, and/or religion in the United States of America.
Therefore, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, was and/or is, in full constitutional violation, of the "declaratory" and "restrictive" intent and purpose, and/or authority of the opening clause and/or statement of the First Article to the Bill of Rights, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Whereby, this further affirms the constitutional, and therefore mandatory "declaratory" and "restrictive" mandate to Congress, under Article VI of the Constitution, that declares to those in Congress, and others under authority of the Constitution, that they are to "support," and therefore obey the Constitution, and to be ready to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, from its enemies.
The following terms and/or definitions are hereby incorporated into this
redress of grievances:
It is hereby affirmed by the official and indisputable testimony and authority
of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third
Edition 1998, that the definition for the term support is;
To aid the cause, policy, or interests of; To provide for or maintain,
by supplying with money or necessities; To endure; tolerate; To furnish
corroborating evidence for; To keep from weakening or failing; strengthen;
a. The act of supporting. b. The state of being supported; One that supports;
Synonyms: support, uphold, back, advocate, champion. These verbs are compared
as they mean to give aid or encouragement to a person or cause. Support
is the most general; To uphold is to maintain or affirm in the face of a
challenge or strong opposition; Back suggests material or moral support
intended to contribute to or assure success; Advocate implies verbal support,
often in the form of pleading or arguing; To champion is to fight for one
that is under attack or lacks the strength or ability to act in its own
behalf.
It is hereby affirmed by the official and indisputable testimony and authority of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition 1998, that the definition for an enemy is; Something destructive or injurious in its effects; one who is hostile to or opposes the purposes or interests of another; a hostile power or force; a group of foes or hostile forces.
It is hereby affirmed by the official and indisputable testimony and authority of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition 1998, and The Original Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases (Americanized Version) 1994, that the definition for the term law also includes, but is not limited to; constitutional law; written law; legal necessity; unwritten law; prescript; precept; legal restraint; authority; form of law; bill; legislation; order; decree; legality; body of law; code of principles based on morality, conscience; rule; dictum; precedent; regulation; legal process, etc., etc…
We the People of these United States of America, do hereby affirm and attest to the fact, and/or facts, as witnessed to by the written and proposed constitutional amendment, known as the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, as it is officially known; that H. J. RES. 78, is an intentional and willfully written bill, meant to intentionally misconstruct, and/or abridge the "declaratory" and therefore "absolute" right to Freedom of Religion and the full Separation of Church and State, as provided for in the First Article of the Bill of Rights, United States Constitution. Therefore, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, is Something destructive or injurious in its effects to the "declaratory" and "absolute" basic American human rights, as "currently" enumerated to in United States Constitution, First Article of the Bill of Rights. The Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, is therefore an enemy to the Constitution and the government of the United States of America, and to the American people that the Constitution is to protect.
It is hereby further affirmed and attested to, that under the "restrictive" and "declaratory" first clause, of the First Article of the Bill of Rights, that Congress shall make no law… is a constitutional legal demand to "all" the members of Congress, in both Houses, that they are in no way to interfere with, abridge, misconstruct, and or abuse the basic American rights enumerated to in the First Article of the Bill of Rights. The term to make no law means just what it affirms; that those in Congress are not to create, propose, and/or form any legislation and/or bill that will misconstruct and/or abridge First Amendment "absolute" basic American human rights, and this includes all of the making of any Bills and/or Legislation, that would in fact create a law and/or laws through the constitutional amending and ratification process.
Members of both Houses of Congress are under strict constitutional Oath or Affirmation to support and therefore obey, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. H. J. RES. 78, is a failure of that constitutional Oath or Affirmation to support, obey, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, by members of Congress, due to the legal nature of H. J. RES. 78, being an enemy to the Constitution, the people, and to the "republican form" of government of the United States of America.
Thomas Jefferson, in 1799, spoke of those that were the enemies of the Constitution and Bill of Rights; "I do then, with sincere zeal, wish an inviolable preservation of our present federal Constitution, according to the true sense in which it was adopted by the States, that in which it was advocated by its friends, and not that which its enemies apprehended, who therefore became its enemies."
It makes no matter that on June 4, 1998, the measure failed passage in the House roll call vote. All that matters is that the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, H. J. RES. 78, was even created [make] in the first place, and it is therein, and at that first point and moment it was officially created, that the Constitution was attacked and violated by its enemies.
A crime starts at the first offense or moment that the conspiracy to commit the violation is put into motion, and a crime is a crime no matter how you try to present it, and it makes no matter who or what is in violation. If a law has been broken then a crime has taken place, and it is not at the desecration of those in authority to arbitrarily decide for their own benefit and/or gain, what is and is not a crime. Crimes and restrictions as to what we as people can and can not do, are spelled out both in the constitution and in the civil codes. The civil and criminal laws, and/or lawful constitutional restrictions, are to apply to either all of us, or none of us at all, and there is no acceptable in-between as far as the masses of American people and the United States Constitution are concerned. We are either living by the Constitution or we are not, and there is no in-between to that.
Whereas, these abusive and misconstructive actions against the Constitution, the people, and therefore the government of the United States of America, H. J. RES. 78, the Religious Freedom Amendment bill, can only be construed to be hostile with intent, and therefore a treasonable offense(s) that has been, and is still being created for the benefit and gain of Christianity and/or other monotheistic religions.
Further, that any member of Congress or the government while acting in their official capacity and/or otherwise title of office of public trust that they hold, while in their term of office, and who have put their "religious" consciousness, convictions and/or their own "religious" opinions and/or religiously based moral dogmas above that of their constitutional "neutral" obligation and duty to not do so, have failed in their constitutional "declaratory" obligation and "restrictive" duty, to support the Constitution of the United States of America. The dogmatic doctrines and principles of religiously imposed morals and religious beliefs have no place in the hallowed halls of the peoples "republic" of the United States of America.
Continue with First Amendment Constitutional Redress of Grievances, part 3.