Medical Education in India - A SWOT Analysis

 

Prof K.R. Sethuraman. *

 

 

General Issues

 

The number of registered doctors in India has increased from 61,800 in 1951 to about 645,825 in 2005 - that's 0.6 doctor for 1,000 people. Compared to this, Cuba had 5.91 doctors for 1,000 people in 2002. India has 0.6 doctor, 0.8 nurse and 0.5 midwife for 1,000 people, which adds up to 1.9 health workers for 1,000 people.1

 

The country had 67,576 government doctors: meaning one doctor was serving roughly 15,980 people. The urban-rural skew is well illustrated by Chandigarh, a predominantly urban area, where one government doctor is available for just 654 people, which is the best figure in the country.2

On the other hand, one doctor might be responsible for more than 200,000 people in some rural areas. 1

 

India would need at least one million more qualified nurses and 500,000 more doctors by 2012 according to a report from Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, 2005.

 

STRENGTHS

 

Healthcare Infrastructure

 

Over the last five decades India, unlike many other Third World nations, has succeeded in setting up a complex medical and health infrastructure involving teaching, training and research, drugs and medical instrument production, and healthcare, including at the tertiary level. There is no denying of the many achievements over the decades: increased life expectancy, reduced infant mortality, declines in fertility, some success in eradicating basic communicable diseases.

-

Number of Colleges

 

The Health Survey and Planning Committee of 1961, for instance, had recommended that one medical college should be available for five million people. This amounts to 200 colleges for the country's roughly one billion population. By this reckoning we have made the grade. By August this year, the number of medical colleges has crossed 260 (see the table)

 

State

Public

Private

Total

A P

11

21

-32

Assam

03

--

-03

Bihar

06

02

-08

Chandigarh

01

--

01

Chattisgarh

03

--

-03

Delhi

05

--

-05

Goa

01

--

-01

Gujarat

08

05

-13

Haryana

01

02

-03

Himachal Pradesh

02

--

-02

Jammu & Kashmir

02

02

-04

Jharkhand

03

--

-03

Karnataka

06

29

-35

Kerala

05

13

-18

M P

05

03

-08

Maharashtra

19

20

-39

Manipur

--

01

-01

Orissa

03

01

-04

Pondicherry

01

06

-07

Punjab

03

04

-07

Rajasthan

06

02

-08

Sikkim

01

--

-01

Tamil Nadu

16

09

-25

Tripura

01

01

-02

U P

10

06

-16

Uttaranchal

--

03

-03

West Bengal

09

--

-09

All India

131

130

261


Source: MCI website (www.mciindia.org)

 

Student Quality

 

Competition for medical seats is intense, entrants to medical school are usually of a high academic standard, and their application (at least with respect to passing exams) is often exemplary.3

 

The President of Michigan State Medical Society, Dr M Appa Rao has recently said, 'The standard of medical education in Indian colleges is better, compared with that in the United States. Our foundation was better as all students read science and mathematics at the school final level, while it was possible for a student in the US to complete his degree without studying these two subjects.

'25 meritorious US students from various medical colleges who were brought to the NRI Medical College to be taught along with students here could not compete with Indian students.

'While only 70 per cent of US students were able to clear the Board Certification, more than 95 per cent of Indian doctors easily overcame this hurdle.' 4

 

National Curriculum

 

MCI regulation of 1997 has given Indian medical colleges a good traditional curriculum to adhere to. In the name of innovation, a lot of experiments are being done across the world without any strong evidence that any one of them has a superior outcome. Traditional curriculum is resource efficient and till date, as good as the more expensive innovative curricula. If all the colleges adopt the 1997 curriculum in letter and in spirit, then, India could have a truly national curriculum - not a notional one!

 

AREAS OF CONCERN (Weaknesses)

 

In the last two decades the growth of medical colleges has been several folds faster than that in the first three and half decades after the independence, thus earning the epithet 'mushrooming of medical colleges'. The pliable Universities and Councils were used to bend rules, fuel corruption and violate standards of quality for accelerating the business of medical education. It is therefore not surprising that many of those involved in establishing the money-spinning colleges are power-brokers working in tandem with the leading lights of medical profession and the industry.5

 

Awareness of the ailing state of medical education is neither recent nor confined to the inner sanctum of deans' offices. Even two decades earlier, an editorial from the Indian Express (Jan.5, 1985) had thundered thus: 'The continued lack of concern about the unhealthy state of medical education in India is shocking. The various authorities who could do something about it are either unwilling or simply powerless to do so . . . there are states, universities and colleges where medical education has been reduced to an utter farce. Cases have come to light of deliberate dilution, often abandonment, of the requisite standards of teaching, inadequacy of laboratory and hospital facilities, minimum requirements for admission and gross corruption in examinations and results.'

 

Does medical education address the social need for healthcare?

 

There is no correlation between the number of medical colleges and the availability of doctors in a state. Maharashtra, which has the highest number of medical colleges, one government doctor services 20,010 people. In Andhra Pradesh, which has the third highest number of colleges, there is one government doctor for 13,468 people. A major reason is that these states have a large number of private medical colleges, which typically do not send doctors to the state health sector. 6

 

Data from the Medical Council of India (MCI), as of August, 2006, shows that 130 out of 261 colleges are private. Also, the proportion of private seats raised from 6.8 per cent in 1960 to >50 per cent in 2006. A study by Harvard University has noted thus: 'Increasing involvement of politicians in the lucrative business of private health education is a current reality because politicians find it easier to get institutes recognised and swing the necessary procedures for getting non-profit status and benefits like tax exemptions and free land.' (A paper on 'Higher education reforms in India' from Center for International Development at Harvard University, usa, 2004.)

 

The mushrooming of private medical colleges on extraneous considerations other than merit have attracted even the attention of lay people and were amply exposed by the media. On 26th Dec 2003, regional television channels in Andhra Pradesh showed that a Medical College in Ranga Reddy district had arranged fake patients and got medical students to pose as doctors and nursing students as staff nurses to get the necessary clearances. It is by no means restricted to only one college. 'Sub-standard medical graduates from mushrooming medical colleges is a great threat to the Health of the people of the country, particularly to the majority of the population in rural areas & urban slums.' 7

Some argue that private college are better because their courses are well-planned and the faculty pays more attention to students; they update their educational systems, which, the government colleges may not do. This may be true of some of the reputed private colleges. However, as wikipedia reports, Private colleges generally suffer from poor quality and low quantity of faculty, poor infrastructure and facilities (despite being private institutes), lower student quality, lesser clinical opportunity and exposure (because being a charging hospital that chases away a large chunk of patients) thus generally resulting in overall a lower academic level and quality. 8

 

Proponents of public funded education say that infrastructure in private colleges is to no avail as there are very few patients for the students to learn from. This is true, observers say, because most students from private colleges gain experience by taking up residency jobs in public hospitals. Teaching faculty in public colleges is not allowed to practise unlike their counterparts in private colleges. This, they say, makes for teaching of better quality. Except for a few well provided Central government institutions like AIIMS, JIPMER and AFMC, most other government medical colleges are comparable in terms of the faculty, student quality and good clinical exposure for the students (as all are attached to Government Hospitals which offer free treatment and thus attract huge number of patients). Some of the colleges may lack the latest diagnostic equipments such as MRI, CT scanner, etc which are essential from a Post Graduate point of view.9

 

The growth of private medical sector deprives public institutions

 

Even aiims is facing a shortage of manpower. The college had 479 faculty members against a sanctioned strength of 543 (Rajya Sabha news item of May 12, 2006). If aiims cannot hold on to faculty members, it is unlikely other institutions, especially those in smaller centres, will be able to do so. This is in fact the case, with grievous repercussions. Exodus from JIPMER, Pondicherry, NIMHANS, Bangalore and other colleges resulting in severe shortages is a matter of concern. If this trend of 'bleeding public institutions' has to be stopped, creative solutions are urgently and desperately needed.-

 

Uneven distribution of colleges

 

Pondicherry, with a population of 1.2 million has 7 medical colleges at present and will soon have 10! It is evident that the availability of professionals and health care facilities is highly uneven in the country with the south and western regions enjoying much better standards. The whole of North East for example is heavily deficient as regards specialty and super specialty health care facilities and as regard opportunities for medical education. Shri JVR Prasad Rao, a former Health Secretary to the Government of India had assessed the demand for health professionals for the entire North East Region and underlined the growing gap between availability and projected requirements for the entire North East Region.

 

Payment for Education

 

With growing privatisation, the government had to ensure that medical education did not get limited just to those who could pay. The Centre set down some ground rules: 50 per cent of seats of a private institute would have to be filled through a state-level exam and the fee structure for these seats would be the same as that of a government college. Rules were set down by mci in 1997 to reduce these wide variations. But this kind of control has not been effective in most cases. 6

 

While litigation has been extensive, three cases have been significant; a lot of do-undo in judgments has created its own share of confusion. On August 12, 2005, the Supreme Court delivered a unanimous judgement in the case of Inamdar and others versus the State of Maharashtra and others, saying that the state could not impose its reservation policy on unaided private colleges, including professional colleges. Private players echoed this view saying the government could fulfil its social responsibilities by enforcing quotas on the seats it regulated in private colleges. This argument, of course, begs the question of how wide the government's powers of enforcing a merit list and fixing fees should be.

 

In the judgement delivered on October 31, 2002, (the Pai Foundation case) the court suggested that a certain percentage of the seats could be reserved for the management from among students who had passed a common entrance test held by itself or by the relevant state/university, while the rest of the seats could be filled on the basis of counselling by the state. 6

 

In the other judgement delivered on August 14, 2003 (Islamic Academy of Education and another versus the State of Karnataka and others) the Supreme Court interpreted the 2002 judgment and said that the unaided professional institutions were entitled to autonomy but at the same time they would have to take into account the criterion of merit as specified by the government. Secondly, it upheld the earlier ruling on reservation of seats for management filling seats on the basis of counselling by the state agency. The court also suggested that unaided professional colleges should also make provisions for students from poorer and backward sections of society.

 

The fate of the controversial Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Bill, 2005, which proposes a division of seats that is largely in favour of private colleges, is uncertain, given the reservation debate that is dividing the society.

The real tragedy however, is that the privatisation and reservation debates risk getting lost in a morass of detail about percentages, jurisdictions, and debated with rhetoric, passion and prejudice.

The fundamental issue totally lost in all this is: the delivery of quality health care to the people.6

 

On the one hand, the state sector has been on the point of collapse for some time now both in the areas of health education and health care. This has facilitated the growth of the private sector, which the state is trying to regulate, or, indeed, control, with mixed results. The casualty is public health. 10

 

Inadequate Funds for Rural & public Health

 

The national health policy also suggests that a two-year rural posting should be enforced before awarding the graduate degree, but the idea remains strictly on paper. There are rules about compulsory service in rural areas, though they differ from state to state. Medical students are supposed to sign a bond saying they will work in villages for a stipulated period. But in most cases, the states are unable to provide jobs. Vacancies are often not filled because governments do not have the money to pay salaries. 11

 

India currently produces some 375 students each year from its 95 schools of public health and institutions compared to the 10,000 needed annually.

 

Medical Council of India (MCI)

In 1992, MCI was transferred under the control of the Centre and the imc Act was amended to give extensive powers to mci. This has created many controversies. It has been alleged that mci used its powers to issue orders directly to the state government by-passing the Centre, which argued that it was blocking public-private partnerships and private initiatives.

It may be highlighted that the Engineering in IT Education, which is controlled by the All India Council of Technical education (AICTE) has been able to expand at a much more satisfactory level, primarily because AICTE is far more constructive and displays a highly positive approach. 12

 

In 2005, a bill to amend the imc Act was approved by a group of ministers and sent to the Union cabinet. It asked for an increased role for the ministry of health, with government nominees placed in mci. It was argued that such nominees would have no vested interests and be better placed in improving transparency and accountability in running health education. It was also suggested that since the people controlling mci did not have much administrative experience, the induction of the director-general health services would lend teeth to the body. This move was widely opposed by the medical fraternity, with its representative organisation, the Indian Medical Association (ima), saying this would lead to arbitrary government action. 7

 

But the controversy over jurisdiction continues: mci is supposed to carry out physical verification of medical colleges and not quality assessments. It is also supposed to regulate and update the curriculum.

 

In December 2003, journalists found that a Deemed University in Pune had hired doctors to play faculty during an MCI inspection. A high-level probe was ordered by the state governor to look in to the functioning of private medical colleges in Maharashtra. The probe found serious lapses: Of the 17 private MBBS colleges inspected, only one fully complied with the MCI norms. Three colleges had a 50 per cent shortage in the professor cadre, while four colleges had a shortage of more than a 50 per cent deficit in the professor cadre. Four colleges had a shortage of more than 50 per cent in the associate professor cadre. They somehow managed to get recognition. 6

 

Curricular deficiencies

 

The curriculum set out by MCI in 1997 does not allow for contact between medical students and patients in the early years and perhaps desensitises prospective doctors from the needs of patients.

Most countries, especially developing ones, are focussing their energies on issues of manpower and health care delivery during who-decade (2006-15) dedicated to increasing human resource for health (HRH). It's unfortunate that in India public debate has been embroiled in the reservation issue to the detriment of basic questions of healthcare delivery. The authorities are stuck in the same morass. 13

 

Internship Training

 

The four-and-a-half years of undergraduate medical education is followed by 12 months' internship when students are meant to enhance their clinical skills and understand health care delivery in a community/rural setting. Internship is currently implemented only on paper; various universities have started the PG entrance examination, making learning practical skills during internship redundant, rather harmful to their PG aspirations. Throughout his/her internship, a medical graduate prepares for the MD/MS postgraduate entrance examination and loses out on a once in a lifetime chance of skill learning at patients' bedside. 14

 

Quality and Stakeholders

 

A medical student's experience is shaped by four different stakeholders:

 

The education provider, which is interested in a student's fitness for award of license to practice.

The professional and statutory body, which is interested in fitness for practice in order to determine whether an individual can be licensed/registered as a professional practitioner.

The potential employer, who is interested in a graduate's fitness for purpose in terms of the competencies and capabilities which s/he is able to demonstrate in the workplace

There is a fourth one in Indian context - the financier of private -education industry, whose primary motive, in many instances, is profit. India Today has exposed how some private, unaided medical colleges fake the facilities and flout the Medical Council of India norms, affecting the credibility and quality of education. 15

The health seeking public, who should have been the main stakeholder, is totally left out of stake holder debates and claims. This is an avoidable tragic lapse.

A mechanism for quality assurance in medicine must therefore involve all the stakeholders and must have the capacity to demonstrate the extent to which professional education meets the ultimate aim of developing medical practitioners who are fit for purpose, practice and award.16

 

Suitability of Out-dated Western Model

 

Two of the main criticisms of medical education are: i) the neglect of rural and remote areas and ii) overproduction of highly trained persons with no corresponding increase in gainful employment.

The root cause of our problems may arise from the blind imitation of the older version of Western model. This obsession with the Western model and standards has made our products misfits in our own society and perhaps unwittingly promoted brain drain. The truth is that the medical graduate finds himself more at home outside the country than at home. So, the changes in the curriculum have to be brought about in a more rational way by assessing our own needs. 17

 

Who should determine these needs? Whose needs - the needs of learners, their parents, planners, the financiers or those of the society at large? The west has changed its curriculum in the 80's to include behavioural aspects and has adopted integrated, problem based approach, while in India, we are stuck with the same old discipline oriented curriculum and 'one size fits all' approach that leaves little scope for innovation. 13

 

Teaching Faculty & Resources

 

MCI says in it website, It was felt and observed that a large number of doctors are claiming employment as medical teachers in more than one medical college at the same time, and has displayed a list of teachers claiming employment as medical teachers in more than one medical college and whose names have been removed temporarily from Indian medical register. 18  

 

Teaching faculty on their part, seem to have resigned to the sorry state of affairs: Talking to pillars of medicine when I visited India, I was struck by their air of hopeless resignation. It was depression of a different order of magnitude, and their open admission that standards of medical education in India have declined appreciably over the last couple of decades was worrying. The rise in student numbers without a concomitant increase of facilities or staff has been a problem for some state run medical schools. A system which allows full time staff (in most state hospitals) to leave the hospital at 1 or 1.30 pm to do private practice does not suggest that teaching students is seen as a priority. That something happens or rather does not happen between the time the student enters and the time he leaves is implicit in the comment that was made to me by a professor at one of the most prestigious medical colleges, "We accept racehorses" he said,"and turn out asses." 19

 

Corruption

 

Let me only quote the chairman of the Karnataka Health Task Force, Dr H. Sudarshan: Corruption is at various levels: In medical education, starting from joining the medical college - you can buy a seat, you can buy the examiner, the examination system, you can buy the question papers. This is much less now with the University trying to bring in some reforms, but still, in the viva-voce and practical, many people continue to pay and pass; we are not sure if we have plugged that. 20

 

 

CHALLENGES

 

Globalization

 

Despite high marks that India gets in the world media for an educated labour force, its fossilised and sclerotic institutions of higher education are facing many challenges from globalization.

Countries struggle with the fact that the market for talent has become global. India's premier institutions are hampered by the fact that incentive structures to retain good faculty simply do not exist. Premier institutions like AIMS and IIT confront faculty shortages up to 40 percent, and their research profile is nowhere commensurate with their possibilities. India has become a net consumer of foreign education - spending to the tune of $3 billion a year to train students abroad.

Second, globalization has made benchmarking in education global. While India's premier institutions are good feeder schools for institutions abroad because of their recruitment process, their ability to compete globally is still an open question. Only three Indian institutions rank among the top 500 in the world, and significantly none of them are full-fledged universities. Beyond a small group of elite institutions, few Indian institutions are globally accredited or recognized.

Third, globalization has made education an extraordinary business opportunity with a great impact on employment. While there is some R&D outsourcing to India, there is also the sense that India is missing out on the opportunity to position itself as a global education hub. Its share in the global higher-education market is miniscule, and there are significantly more foreign students in China than in India. According to a study by the Association of Indian Universities, the number of foreign students in India shrunk from 12,765 during the 1992-93 to only 7,745 in 2003-04.

Fourth, the ability of an economy to compete depends on the character of its education system. India has historically neglected primary and secondary education. But even in higher education, the nation faces severe shortages of talent. The mismatch of education to the economy is also evidenced in this paradox: While there is a severe shortage of skilled manpower, a third of unemployed youth are science graduates.

 

The four challenges of globalization - the flight of talent, benchmarking to global standards, the possibility of education as a business opportunity, and the mismatch between supply and demand - have a common thread running through them. Inflexible and overtly regulated education systems are unlikely to respond to these challenges.

 

The Indian education system is one of the most tightly controlled in the world. The government regulates who you can teach, what you can teach them and what you can charge them. It also has huge regulatory bottlenecks. There are considerable entry barriers: Universities can be set up only through acts of legislation, approval procedures for starting new courses are cumbersome, syllabi revision is slow, and accreditation systems are extremely weak and arbitrary. The regulators permit relatively little autonomy for institutions and variation amongst them. 21

 

Low Development Index

The countries that India resembles the most today are the ones in Africa we tend to dismiss as unimportant globally. The annual human development index rankings are a reminder that we are no better. (See the table below : source:indiatogether.org/)11

 

* Infant/Maternal Mortality Rate per thousand live births. $ Life Expectancy at birth.
# As a percentage of the total population. For poverty, measured as percentage of population below the $1 a day line. -@ Per Capita in US Dollars at purchasing power parity (PPP) rates.

Is it not our duty as teachers and educationists to do something about it? What is the use of having the largest scientific and technical human resource if we can not improve human development in our mother land? All the other claims sound hollow when faced with such hard facts.

 

Scientific Research

 

During 1980-2000, the number of scientific papers from India included in the Science Citation Index fell from 14,987 to 12,227, whereas China's grew from 924 to 22,061, according to the Human Development Report of 2004.

 

"Unfortunately India's scientific research capability - whether measured in the number of research papers published in journals or the number of patents registered - is slipping. This bodes ill for Indian society because without the constant development of science and technology capability through original research, there can't be meaningful development," said Mehta, director of Indian Institute of Science, in an interview. 22 Indeed, most universities in India are just teaching shops with the faculty rarely engaged in any research work, unlike academics in the US, UK and Australia.

 

OPPORTUNITIES & SOLUTIONS

 

In 2001, Dr H Sudarshan called for a moratorium on starting new medical colleges in the Karnataka? He explained why:

'If you look at the health needs, there are two issues. One is commercialisation of medical education - open a college and run it like business. The second is that these medical colleges also have accountability to the people of the state. This is the model, which Israel has. In Israel each district has a medical college and that college takes the responsibility for the health affairs of that district. We could have private colleges, but we should also make them accountable for the health of the people. Firstly, three primary health centres should be run by each private medical college.

'Secondly, mushrooming of the medical colleges is not good... If we can provide good quality medical education, with good infrastructure, and good faculty, we have no problem; we can produce good quality doctors. What is happening is that some of the colleges are really good, but some are really bad and they need to be closed down. Let us promote good quality medical education that is need based and that has accountability to the people of the state.' 20

 

Correction of Imbalances

 

Under the Pradhan Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojna, a scheme has been launched to offer all Specialties and Super-specialties medical care in the states where there are gross imbalances in the availability of tertiary care Hospitals/Medical Colleges providing Super-Speciality services and improve the quality of Medical Education in India. 23

 

There are two components of this scheme: One component is to set-up six institutions of national importance (like All India Institute of Medical Science) in the States of Bihar, Chattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan and Uttaranchal within three years. These institutions will be established and maintained by the Central Government. The other one is to up-grade one Medical College each to the level of the proposed All India Institute of Medical Science-type institutes, in the State of Andhra Pradesh, Jharkand, Jammu & Kashmir, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. The capital cost of upgrading these institutions would be provided by the Government of India. The project is scheduled to be complied within three years. 24

 

To meet the demands of globalization, the government must spend more on education, increase student access, and also extend greater autonomy to its universities. More funding combined with greater flexibility will strengthen research capability and secure talent within the country's borders. India's rigid regulation of education retards the intellectual growth of its institutions, diminishing their ability to compete for global talent.

Globalization demands a paradigm shift in the regulation of higher education. In India the debate has only just begun. 21

 

Information Communication Technology (ICT)

 

ICT is a great opportunity to improve access to medical education, to improve the quality of education and to facilitate collaboration amongst individual learners and institutions. challenges do exist, especially for rural areas. These include

  • technological (e.g., overcoming barriers like cost, maintenance, access to telecommunications infrastructure)
  • educational (using ICTs to best meet learners' educational priorities) and
  • social (sensitivity to remote needs, resources, cultures).

 

Finally, there is a need for more rigorous research to more clearly identify advantages and disadvantages of specific use of ICTs in medical education, to determine the specific conditions under which they are effective, and to understand the use of complex educational systems using multiple ICTs. 25

 

Way ahead

 

Global patterns of funding clearly show that medical education remains very much a state-dominated sector. In countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development - such as Denmark and Holland - public funding provides 98 per cent of health resources in this sector. The figure is almost 90 per cent for Canada. Even in the US, the figure is as high as 78 per cent. 6

One of the major causes of science education losing its sheen is the artificial division between science research and teaching, which obstructs automatic contemporisation of syllabuses. In this India can take a cue from Russia, which is ending the divide between its prestigious academies of science, research institutes and classical universities where teaching is often considered more important than research, by merging the two into "centres of innovation".26

 

Growing Academia - Industry Partnership

 

The pharmaceutical industry notches up about US$6 billion in domestic sales and US$4 billion in exports annually. There are at least over 10,000 registered companies in the country. Major players control 35 percent of the market and the sector is growing at 8 percent a year. With the implementation of the Patents Amendment Act in 2005, the companies are investing in a big way in their research and development wings. -

Importance is given to clinical research by pharmaceutical companies, particularly to clinical trials, which is getting a major boost in the country. Trans-national companies are conducting international trials in India. The segment has grown manifold from mere Rs 1.5 billion a decade ago to Rs.15 billion in the last fiscal year. The sector is certainly going to create a revolution in research job market. Medical colleges must get a big share of these research funds for their development and upgrading without compromising on ethical norms. 27

Summing Up

 

Fundamental issues:

  • Is privatisation of medical education hurting the capacity of the system to deliver appropriate health care to the majority of people?-
  • The answer is yes.
  • Is the distribution of colleges badly skewed?
  • The answer is yes.
  • Is the quality of education good enough?
  • The answer is yes and no.
  • Why is the state health education sector on the brink of collapse?
  • It is multi factorial and involves all the major stake holders including the public.

 

Let Each of Us Do Our Bit

 

'It is ultimately left to each one of us in the educational field to move one small step forward towards this transformation of vision towards reorientation of values and objectives of education. Not only in India, but in the entire world, education places an overriding value on products over people, on achievement over harmony.' 28, 29

 

Let each of us - the participants of APPICON 2006 - take a New Year pledge to do our bit to improve the system of medical education in India.

Jai Hind!

 

References

 

1. World Health Report for 2006 (downloadable from www.who.int)

2. mohfws Health Information of India, 2004 (www.mohfw.nic.in)

3. T Richards, Medical education in India-in poor health. BMJ 1985; 290:1132-5

4. The Hindu dated 13-06-06; URL: www.thehindu.com/2006/06/13/stories/2006061309020500.htm

5. Amar Jesani. Ailing Education: The Medical Education in India. http://www.ritinjali.org/articles/amar.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

6. Medical education in India does not address larger social needs for health care. Down to Earth, Sept 27, 2006. (An 8-part critique on current medical education scene in India) http://www.downtoearth.org.in/cover.asp?foldername=20060715&filename=news&sid=71&page=1&sec_id=9&p=1 (accessed on 04-10-2006)

7. Jain PS, key questions: the Indian medical council (amendment) bill 2005. http://prsindia.org/pdfs/mci_bill/ps%20jain.pdf. (accessed on 04-10-2006)

8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_education (accessed on 04-10-2006)

9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_college (accessed on 04-10-2006)

10. Higher education reforms in India 'A report from Center for International Development at Harvard University, usa, 2004

11. Pavan Nair. A poor and unhealthy nation. India Together, 25 Sep 2005 http://indiatogether.org/2005/sep/hlt-undphdi.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

12. Shreedhar Rao, K. Note on the Medical Council of India (amendment) bill 2005. http://prsindia.org/pdfs/mci_bill/k%20shreedhar%20rao.pdf (accessed on 04-10-2006)

13. Sethuraman, KR. Ushering in Change in Medical education - Evolution or Revolution? Bulletin of NTTC 2001; 8.1:2-3 (downloadable from www.jipmer.edu)

14. Sharma, M. Health Education in India: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis. The International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 2005; 8: 80-85 (http://www.iejhe.org) (accessed on 04-10-2006)

15. -Medical School Fraud in India India Today, Feb 23, 2004. www.valuemd.com/main-foreign-medical-schools-forum/13702-medical-school-fraud-india.html (accessed on 04-10-2006)

16. McKimm, J and Jollie, C. Key Features Of Quality Assurance In Medical Education. http://www.clinicalteaching.nhs.uk/site/Docs/UTL%204%20-%20KEY%20FEATURES%20OF%20QUALITY%20ASSURANCE%20IN%20MEDICAL%20EDUCA%E2%80%A6.pdf (accessed on 04-10-2006)

17. Deshpande, CK. Medical education in India. J Postgrad Med 1982;28:181-3.

18. Medical Council of India; List of Teaching Faculty. http://www.mciindia.org/tools/medical_colleges/faculty_05.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

19. T Richards, Medical education in India-in poor health. BMJ 1985; 290:1132-5.

20. Sudarshan, H. Interview for India Together, June 10 & 11, 2002 www.indiatogether.org?subject=Dr.Sudarshan interview (accessed on 04-10-2006)

21. PB Mehta. Outsourcing of Indian Education. YaleGlobal, 15 June 2006 http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=7570 (accessed on 04-10-2006)

22. Science education on a slippery path. http://www.indiatogether.org/2004/oct/edu-science.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

23. Financing and Delivery of Health Care Services in India. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, September 2005. www.mohfw.nic.in (accessed on 04-10-2006)

24. Parliament of India - Rajya Sabha, 126th Report, Presented on the 15th December, 2005. http://rajyasabha.nic.in/book2/reports/petition/126threport.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

25. Sargeant JM. Medical education for rural areas: Opportunities and challenges for information and communications technologies. J Postgrad Med 2005;51:301-307. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=2005;volume=51;issue=4;spage=301;epage=307;aulast=Sargeant (accessed on 04-10-2006)

26. Moving from Quality Assurance to Quality Improvement

Quality Assurance Workshop, EMSA/IFMSA, Copenhagen (Denmark), July 6-10, 2005

http://www.ifmsa.org/scome/wiki/index.php?title=Quality_Assurance_in_Medical_Schools

27. Boom in Medical Education seen in India. Source: Royal Netherlands Embassy in New Delhi. http://www.nuffic.net/common.asp?id=2136&instantie=0 (accessed on 04-10-2006)

28. Neeru Nanda. The School System in India - A critique. in The Cultural Dimension of Education. http://ignca.nic.in/cd_06021.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

29. Where are we today? Ravi Duggal,

http://www.india-seminar.com/2000/489/489%20duggal.htm

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

1. UNESCO (1972) - Learning to be - The world of education today and tomorrow.

2. UGC (1973) - Report of Educational Reforms Commission.

3. GPEP Report (1984) - American Association of Advancement of Medical Education.

4. Tapan P. Bagchi (1994) - ISO-9000 - Concepts, methods and implementation. WheelerPublishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, India.

5. MCI (1997) - Regulations of Undergraduate Medical Education.

6.Sethuraman KR (2000) - Trick or Treat - A Survival Guide to Health Care. EQUIP, NTTC alumni office, JIPMER, Pondicherry-605006.

7. UNHEALTHY TRENDS - a symposium on the state of our public health system #489 May 2000. http://www.india-seminar.com/2000/489.htm (accessed on 04-10-2006)

 

 

 

* Author Details:

Dr K.R. Sethuraman. MD, PGDHE,

Dean & Senior Professor of Medicine,

AIMST University,

Semeling, Bedong, Malaysia 08100

 

(Formerly Head of Medical Education Department, JIPMER)

e-mail - <sethuraman@aimst.edu.my>