OTTAWA -- Prime Minister Jean Chretien's not only fighting to stay Liberal leader, he's battling to keep his anti-poverty struggle in Africa alive.
When he sits down with the world's most powerful leaders for the two-day, G-8 summit in Kananaskis he'll be trying to keep U.S. President George Bush's eyes focused south on Africa -- and away from the Middle East.
Then there's the ever-present debate on international terrorism, the threat of nuclear war between Pakistan and India, and the anti-globalization protesters to further dilute his call to rich countries to help relieve the spiral of poverty on the stricken continent.
Government officials insist they will keep the spotlight on Africa, even though Bush will be focused on the unrest in the Middle East.
The PM has scoffed at those who say his African crusade is a thinly-veiled attempt to build a legacy before he retires.
"It is a moral obligation for us who have a lot to share with those who have not much," Chretien said last week, recalling he spent two weeks in April travelling in Africa to see the horrid conditions first-hand.
"We have an unparalleled opportunity to create a new partnership for Africa's development."
He points to the hunger, AIDS, the lack of education and health care that plagues many African countries as obvious reasons for rich countries to reach out.
And, of course, there are the statistics that paint a bleak picture.
More than half of Africa's 820 million people live on less than a $1 a day; 200 million Africans have no access to health services; 250 million have no safe drinking water; southern Africa is home to two-thirds of all the world's AIDS cases; and one in five Africans is a victim of war.
The thrust of the plan for Africa strikes a new partnership with industrialized countries is the so-called New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD).
NEPAD was put together by African heads of state and establishes standards for good governance -- such as democracy and the rule of law -- in exchange for enhanced trade, investment and foreign aid from the developed world.
When the G-8 meetings wrap up Thursday, Chretien will announce Canada's long-term commitment to Africa.
"This is only the beginning of a long-term partnership and therefore the African action plan is only the first response in what everyone hopes will be ... a new partnership," a senior government official said.
Canada has invited the leaders of five African countries, plus UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to participate in the Africa plan discussions. There's even a possibility that U2 singer Bono -- a pro-African crusader -- will lend his voice to Chretien's case.
Chretien believes Canada has already put its money where its mouth is -- with a $500-million Africa Fund, and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) announcing last week it was giving $34.2 million in humanitarian aid for South Africa.
The U.S. has also taken out its wallet. Bush announced $100 million over five years for education in Africa, and $500 million to fight AIDS on the continent.
But money is not the only answer to Africa's problems, says Liberal MP Denis Paradis, the junior minister for Latin America and Africa.
"It's always the country we forget," Paradis told Sun Media. "The continent will remain in misery unless they have private investment coming in ... but they know if they want investment they will have to improve in, for example, democracy."
Under NEPAD, it will be up to African countries to police their progress under the plan -- something Paradis said will work because the world will be watching.
Paradis concedes the biggest battle for African countries will be to eradicate rampant corruption.
He admits the Africa plan isn't going to bear fruit overnight, but it may take "at least 15 years."
Critics say G-8 summits produce little, and cost a lot. Early estimates of putting on the two-day Kananaskis meeting have been pegged at $300 million -- more than half of the $500 million earmarked for Canada's Africa Fund.
But Mark Fried of Oxfam Canada said if it weren't for meetings like the G-8, Africa would not be on the radar screen.
He argues that wealthy nations must commit monies for Africa -- especially for education.
"Aid is effective and it is going to continue to be more effective," Fried said.
Not so, said Canadian Alliance MP Keith Martin, who has lived and worked in Africa. "What the G-8 and Africa should not be about is more aid. I'm concerned it's been too easy for countries, historically, to equate money spent with effect. It will be private investment, not aid that drives the continent."
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper which first published the article online and which is indicated at the top of the article unless otherwise specified.