FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. -- Some North Carolina police officers say they're concerned about a new state law that allows private dog handlers to conduct drug searches for businesses.
The law, which the Legislature approved last year and takes effect in October, lets private dog handlers register with the state and establish a commercial detection service.
Supporters of the new law say the private services can help employers maintain a drug-free workplace, but critics say only sworn officers should be allowed to search for drugs because of legal issues.
"This is a bad idea," said Eldon Presnell, president of the United States Canine Association for North and South Carolina. Presnell, a dog handler with the Greensboro Police Department, said his association wants the law repealed.
Lawmen are concerned, Presnell said, because the law was designed for people other than law enforcement officers and could jeopardize the chain of custody by eliminating law officers from drug searches.
State officials have been developing requirements for private dog handlers.
Proposed rules require those who apply to be dog handlers to show they are competent in drug-detection training and handling, including basic obedience, dog safety and the legality of searches and identifying illegal drugs.
The handlers must be certified by a state-approved association, have registered with the Drug Enforcement Administration and submit five reference letters. Criminal background and fingerprint checks will be done. The applicant must also register to handle drugs for training.
Richard Rogers, a retired police officer and a police dog trainer who lives in Harnett County, said the law could infringe on people's rights.
Lawmen must have probable cause to conduct searches but the law would allow private companies and individuals to do what officers could not.
"We have got to adhere to the Fourth Amendment," said Sgt. Tim Loughman of the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office police dog unit. "There are certain things that we as police officers must obey."
Loughman said some dog training associations will certify handlers only if they are police officers. He said dog handlers must know how to command their dog as well as understand the details of search and seizure to eliminate problems if a case goes to court.
Others officers have taken a neutral stance.
"I don't know whether it will be good or not," said Herman Dunn, an investigator and dog handler for the Bladen County Sheriff's Office. "I guess we would have to see after a trial how it would go."
Fayetteville Police Chief Tom McCarthy said other states have had similar laws for years.
"I have not read the law, but from a philosophical standpoint, if it's done correctly, I don't have a problem as long as all the background checks are done and there is a good auditing process," McCarthy said.
Eddie Caldwell, the legislative counsel for the N.C. Sheriff's Association, said his group worked with lawmakers to rewrite it. Caldwell said the original version of the bill caused some concerns for the association but the group had no opposition to the law after it was rewritten.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper which first published the article online and which is indicated at the top of the article unless otherwise specified.