Brazil, US still sharply at odds over planned regional free trade
    AFP
    Oct. 22, 2003

    RIO DE JANEIRO (AFP) - Brazil and the United States remain at odds over terms of a planned Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) just a month ahead of ministerial-level meetings on the zone due to launch in 2005.

    At a meeting of lawmakers from across the Americas in Brasilia Monday and Tuesday, negotiators for the United States, Peter Allgeier, and Brazil, Adhemar Bahadian, acknowledged they remained far apart.

    Though Brazil backed the FTAA when plans for it were put in motion in 1994, Brasilia since has tried to slow the pace of integration arguing it would be better first to consolidate a Latin American trade bloc to negotiate with NAFTA.

    The North American Free Trade Agreement groups Canada, Mexico and the United States.

    Allgeier reiterated the US position that Washington and the rest of the region will move ahead with or without Brazil.

    Bahadian underscored that the FTAA ran a serious risk of not getting off the ground if the United States continued on its current tack. Brazil says the United States wants to unfairly keep agricultural subsidies off the negotiating table. The United States says the issue should be handled by the WTO.

    The FTAA would group the countries of the Americas except Cuba in a free trade zone stretching from Canada down to Chile.


    FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper which first published the article online and which is indicated at the top of the article unless otherwise specified.

    Back to Resist the FTAA