FTAA '05 deadline in jeopardy
    Negotiators fail for third time this year to end an impasse for talks aimed at creating a Free Trade Area of the Americas
    BY JANE BUSSEY
    jbussey@herald.com
    Miami Herald
    April 2, 2004

    Efforts to revive the stalled negotiations for a Free Trade Area of the Americas failed for the third time in two months Thursday, jeopardizing the year-end deadline for completing an agreement for a 34-nation trading bloc.

    In a sign of deepening discord, regional trade officials ended informal talks in Buenos Aires without agreeing on a date for the next round of negotiations.

    Progress on fleshing out the details of blueprint for free trade that was worked out in November in Miami has been slow.

    Deputy trade ministers were at an impasse after the 17th round of the Trade Negotiating Committee in Puebla, Mexico, in early February. A mini-meeting in Buenos Aires in early March also ended without agreement but with a pledge to reconvene all the deputy trade ministers in Puebla April 22-23.

    Now that meeting has been pushed into the future, possibly some time in May.

    ''Further progress is necessary before resuming the 17th meeting of the TNC,'' said a statement from the U.S. and Brazilian co-chairs of the informal Buenos Aires talks.

    ''Obviously we would have liked to have completed our work at this meeting,'' said Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Peter Allgeier in a conference call with reporters. ``It is proving more difficult.''

    The latest stalemate prompted questions about how negotiators could meet the talks deadline.

    ''They can't,'' said Peter Morici, a University of Maryland business professor who was involved with the North American Free Trade Agreement and ratification of the World Trade Organization.

    Morici said the framework thrashed out during the Miami meeting has proved to be ''unworkable,'' especially in the light of the upcoming presidential election in the United States and Brazil's reluctance to open its markets to industrial imports.

    ''Given the deep deadlock between blocs of countries with opposing views of what an FTAA should be, it is amazing that the Bush administration still insists that the FTAA is alive,'' said Lori Wallach, a free-trade opponent and director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch in Washington.

    ''Pull the plug on the comatose FTAA and start over with rules aimed at pulling up wages and environmental and consumer standards in the hemisphere,'' Wallach said in a statement.

    The top U.S. trade negotiator acknowledged the difficulties in setting the ground rules for talks, but Allgeier said it was up to trade ministers to alter the deadline if it proves unworkable.

    ''The timetable of completing these negotiations by [January] 2005 is one that has been set by our leaders and reaffirmed by our ministers,'' said Allgeier. ``We have to work within this framework unless there is some change.''

    Negotiators from the United States, Canada, Mexico, Chile, the four South American Mercosur countries -- Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay -- and Ecuador met Wednesday and Thursday in the Argentine capital in hopes of ending a deadlock over agriculture and market access for other products, among other issues.

    The Mercosur countries are demanding an end to U.S. price supports and other farm subsidies, political hot potatoes even in a nonelection year. Brazil, on the other hand, has dug in its heels over broadening legal rights of foreign corporations in Brazil and access to services and government contracts.


    FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. NoNonsense English offers this material non-commercially for research and educational purposes. I believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, i.e. the media service or newspaper which first published the article online and which is indicated at the top of the article unless otherwise specified.

    Back to Resist the FTAA