![]() Guest Critic Selection: FINAL DESTINATION 2 |
Frank Ochieng is a guest critic who also writes reviews for his own personal website, located here. To become a Guest Critic for CINEMA
2000, please notify David Keyes.
|
Written
by FRANK OCHIENG
1 hr. 27 mins. Rating: ** stars (out of 4 stars) Suffice to say, it appears that Death will never take a holiday. As long as there are ridiculously over-the-top hideous teen scream flicks out there to be had, the Grim Reaper will always be working overtime to ensure the delightful decapitation of some unlucky stiff in a needlessly harried horror adventure. In director David R. Elliss feeble and rancid offering Final Destination 2, were treated to more of the same nonsensical gory goings-on that generate the continuance regarding the sick-minded excitement that thrill-seeking audiences love to wallow in. Theres a clever way of slicing and dicing clueless one-dimensional youthful protagonists who perish in campy, sadistic fashion. But the overdone vile murders in Final Destination 2 really do take the cake. This disjointed display of recklessness is bluntly overwrought, blatantly numbing and downright laughable to say the least. The original Final Destination
flick presented the prospect of gamy youths facing their mortality. So this presents the interesting prospect of Death becoming its own conceptual villain. Since Kimberly and the rest of the clan cant comply by the grim rules of the game, the Dark Side has to take matters into His own hands as the crafty emcee and help out the haunting situation. And thus these poor elusive souls must face the sheer task of ducking and dodging Deaths infamous target. Still, its not long after some fortunate near misses that one by one these very same stubborn survivors start to succumb to their deadly fate via wacky gruesome exits courtesy of fatal and freakish brushes with devilish pigeons, unpredictable appliances, a nitrous oxide tank and sheet of glass, etc. And there you have it-Death getting its last laugh at the expense of arrogant adolescents and other motley crew prototypes that are the usual fair prey in overzealous, brain-dead scare-maneuvering thrillers. Final Destination 2 has its wicked and perverse twisted jollies in perpetuating this constant paranoia concerning when were going to meet the Maker. And what better way to ominously and hysterically look at this lingering concern than to mull it over a flippant frightfest such as Elliss pesky pet project. In a sense, FD2 is disturbingly riotous in some doses and one cant help but chuckling at some of the spontaneous executions that take place at a moments notice. But the dire deeds being demonstrated are cute in their intermittent cunning calculations but quickly develop a quick resistance after the novelty wears off a bit. Ellis and his screenwriters J. Mackye Gruber and Eric Bress have the makings of a unique premise that dares to add some caustic dimension to an otherwise raw and worn-out genre that captures the same old territory of senseless slashing and such. However, with the evidence of trite dialogue, ghastly wooden performances and a perfunctory script that doesnt bother to challenge its imaginative situational makeup, FD2 never quite capitalizes on its promising presentation as a giddy gamut of fear and fatalism. This movie has some spunk and nerve, more so than its predecessor, but nevertheless doesnt take advantage of its delightfully deranged proceedings as much as it should have done. This may leave one wondering what inventive ways can the moviemakers come up with next to ensure more creative dastardly results that may exist in its inevitable follow-up in Final Destination 3? Still, why prematurely jump the gun a bit, right? If a goosepimply film is aiming to be intentionally morbid in its sensational creepy skin, at least have the decency to make sure the off-kilter material has some semblance of heart and soul in its mundane fiber. All that Final Destination 2 accomplishes is delivering a series of empty-headed terrorizing tactics that doesnt accurately or effectively back up its cynical pulse. The film has some erratic fun bringing the carnage to fruition but theres no meaning or profound forethought after the mayhem has subsided. Hence, we are left wondering if the presence of Death is supposed to be looked upon as a comical source of comeuppance or if its a sign of spiritual significance? Arbitrary in its mean-spiritedness and souring disposition, the birth of Death didnt start with the irksome chicanery of the films damaged players and their plight as much as it did with their clueless filmmaking inventors who conceived them in the first place. Lets just hope that this
current films final destination is just that-its final one.
Somehow in this day and age of chronic cinema sequelitis, I doubt this
very much. On the horizon is probably another golden opportunity where
the FD backers can squeeze another premonition out of a wayward curvy
hottie who telepathically fears for the safety of passengers on an errant
train about to derail off its tracks. I know
why risk encouraging
the intuitive handlers of this developing movie franchise
by giving them any more sparkling ammunition to contemplate? Who knows,
maybe I am simply a glutton for punishment? © David Keyes, CINEMA 2000. To keep the content of these pages at near-perfect quality, please e-mail the author here if the above review contains any spelling or grammar mistakes. |