- p. 106, THE (‘hypothetically beastly’) RELATIVITY EXPLOSION,
by Martin (Presumably) Gardner

Speaking of ‘hypothetical beasts’:

WHY: THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG

The Big Bang Universe ‘has a (speculatively presumed ‘super split second’) beginning’ and a speculatively presumed (entropic ‘heat death’) ‘ending’. Unlike the Steady State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which (Steady State Theory) was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven expansion of the spatial universe ‘must result; "inevitably" in the dissipation of occurrent numbers (density) of objects occupying given units of space over extensively progressive periods of time.’

A Steady State Theory projects a general uniform density of space, rather than a dissipating space projected in a *Big Bang translation of Universal History. From the more dense - relatively smaller - past; into the increasingly less dense and ever-enlarging future. *Space always becoming more dissipated with increased passage of time in the spatially expanding, Big Bang. Which is what is said to ‘inevitably’ result when the dissipating universe of the present and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) past. Eventually ‘intersecting’ very densely, when and where an explosion (*Big Bang) is said to have occurred. Proclaimed by the big bang gang to be the cause of the recently discovered, spatially expanding universe’ - *therefore ‘thinning out’ with the passage of time.

Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a desperately concocted (1927 emerged Henry Silpher discovered, Edwin Hubble refined, Lemaitre generalized), ad hocly makeshift history.

The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in response to the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is expanding (1927- ‘34).

Back tracking the observed expansion through past time seems to find the observed expanding universe at a point of convergence - an intersecting point where all the matter of the universe was presum-ably joined in one singular ‘cosmic egg’. What seems ‘inevitably’, to be (‘therefore’) a universal ‘beginning’.

Yet, there is, in astrophysically proven and agreed upon fact: no common center from which the spatially expanding universe recedes.

The expansion is proven, dynamically structured as though the center (alleged origin of the ‘big bang’ - said to be the beginning cause of the observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the location of any given observation point: the structural dynamics of the observed expanding universe are such that always the ‘red-shift’ recession of the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects) is: in direct line of sight; moving directly away from points of observation; wherever they are located...

Establishing a structural expansion corroborating a physically and spatially expanding - steady state - universe. Where ‘the center’ is (‘would be’) everywhere; as it is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of mass (‘charge’/’disturbance’; systems of combined particles) and its (their) generation of omnidirec-tionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity as the collective cause - and ‘origin’ of the observed, red-shift measured expanding universe.

The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past’s intersection of three dimensions to a ‘point of origin’ (the anticipated ‘end’ of retroactively expanding space - traced backwards in time to ‘an inevitable intersection’ and consequent point of ‘beginning’), does not apply to a four dimensional space-time continuum. The past of which is progressively smaller, to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially expanding (‘Big Bang originated’; 3-Dimensionally fixated) universe is traced backwards through past time from the present.

Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is popularly said by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an intersection where ‘space ends’: in three dimensions. There is no open argument against the omniscience of the four dimensional space time continuum here. It is simply and altogether excluded as a solution (refer ‘option’/ AKA, ultimatum). The Big Bang Theory denies altogether here, what its perpetrators say they acknowledge...

Meanwhile. The Big Bang Theory instantly goes extinct, when it comes in contact with the (Invisible, ‘What? ‘) four dimensional space-time continuum.

Whereas, in four dimensions (when space-time is not excluded from the universe, as the Big Bang Theory excludes the 4th dimension altogether), past space goes on ever-smaller for-ever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as largeness: with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located every-where in the occurrence of matter-field ‘particles’ (without a spatial limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter, culminating in the alleged explosive ‘begin-ning’); in the increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever larger forever in the increas-ingly distant future; to infinity. (Although black holes have yet to be proven, they are nonetheless extremely controversial and have strangely taken the foreground of discussions in theoretical physics. Their cause - if they exist at all - is not controversial. Presently, with the exception of this offering, there are not even any formally submitted guesses as to their cause. If black holes exist, until further notice, they are - ostensibly - the causative result of a contracting four dimensional space-time continuum; that is to say, a four dimensionally contracting material system, becoming ever smaller and more dense: to microcosmic infinity.) The four dimensionally expanding steady state universe (universal density) remains always the same relative density; consisting always of the same amount of energy, increasingly distributed over - creatively becoming - an ever en-larging space; from microcosmic infinity, to macrocosmic infin-ity.

Without infringement on the law of conservation of Mass-Energy 4-D smallness

(of past space-time) as infinite as 4-D large-ness of future. With the present

eternally in the middle of micro-cosmic past-smallness and macrocosmic future

largeness. Whereas, the 3-D pie chart intersects ‘end-space’ where all of it’s

ever nar-rowing slices come together (with the Beatles?) at the center. A

weightless apple pie, without gravity.

Whereas, the four, five and six dimensional universe demonstrates and

reinstates a (Bondi-Hoyle represented, 1948 introduced, then abandoned),

Steady State universe; without beginning or end. The same amount of

ever-expanding energy distributing itself over in-creasing amounts of space -

all densities per coordinately system-atized frame of reference remaining

relatively stable and ‘unmoving’, ‘static’, ‘not expanding’: relative to all

other comparably expanding material in a given coordinate system - to

infinity. ‘Disturbed areas’, ‘spreading indefinitely.’ Generating 4-D

space-time: conducting itself: Ostracized From Reality, by

The Discoverers & Practitioners Of

Insulation From The 4th Dimension

(Hip, hiphooray?) ((Hailing from Eureka, California?))

(((Points further south?)))

Finding the so called Big Bang: a lot of hissing, new world radiating

background noise said to represent - falsely said to prove - ‘a universal

beginning of space and time.’ The Big Bang: a 3-D pie charted non-event, in

four dimensions.

A popularly fabled time and place where all of the matter in the universe

(with no common center from which the expansion occurs) was 3 dimensionally

gathered (carefully excluding the 4th dimension every parsec, light-year,

mile, yard, millimeter, Angstrom unit and quantized photon of the

retroactively backtracked way), and then and there the 3 dimensional contents

of all the 3 dimensionally expanding universe (‘had had enough’, ‘ran out of

space’ to back-track into the past, and naturally, due to said convergence and

resulting pressures and temperatures of all the matter in the universe

gathered - retroactively compacted - in one place) explosively ‘went off’.

Held up today as the reason the spatial universe is presently (was recently

and unexpectedly discovered to be) expanding. Silpher discovered the expansion

in 1927. Hubble described the structural dynamics of the expansion in the

early ‘30s.

Whereupon, Lemaitre (and a host of other followers since), ven-tured to

generalize that a moving picture of the observed, measured and agreed upon

expanding universe, if played backwards, would inevitably find the stellar

bodies, planets, galaxies, stars et al, re-treating backwards in time toward,

and eventually coalescing into an ‘inevitable intersection’, where all of the

matter of the universe ‘must have coalesced/intersected/been converged’ .

Then, so it is said, due to enormous gravitational pressures and resulting

extreme temperatures: exploded. Went off. Big Banged. Thereby causing the

observed, proven, acknowledged expanding universe (increased speed of

recession with distance)

Decades after this archaic, three dimensionally flash frozen theory came

forward, Hollywood actor Peter Ustinov, will be hired to narrate Einstein’s

work and proclaim that ‘Einstein predicted the Big Bang Theory.’ Untrue. A

newly spun fable in a passel of lately unrav-eling yarns. (It was a dark and

stormy night. Continued?)

On the other hand, Einstein did predict the (4 dimensionally) expanding

universe; which is not at all the same as the Big Bang interpretation of ‘why

the universe is *expanding’ - a relatively very recent, very solidly proven

*discovery that took the entire scientific community by surprise (1927 -

1934).

The Big Bang theory is the hurried attempt to compensate for the

unexpectedly revealed ignorance of the entire scientific community; regarding

the generally unexpected (Einstein predicted) discovery that the entire

spatial universe is in fact expanding.

The expanding universe has since then been met and conquered smartly, of

and for the Big Bang, by the Big Bang Gang. Who are doing outstandingly well:

without the 4th dimension. For which they have no use. No applications

anywhere to that which is ‘fully acknow-ledged’ to be everywhere. Nothing can

be made or non-mathemat-ically understood of it. (Refer: ‘QUARANTINE:

‘Unstable; disturbed area’. ‘May expand or contract at the slightest

provacation’. KEEP CLEAR! Beware Of Reality. Etceteras).

The Big Bang has displaced the 4 dimensional space-time continu-um (no

universal beginning or end: a Steady State universe) alto-gether. The

inquisition still lives. Only its methods have changed.

The Big Bang is said - by the dominant scientific paradigm and its

perpetrators and maintainers - to be the cause of the (observed, proven,

measured) expanding universe. Pictorial glossies - featuring blue and red,

cold and hot spots - of the alleged ‘aftermath of the Big Bang’ are sold to

earthly tourists, as alleged 13 billion year old souvenir replicas of the

ongoing aftermath of the so called Big Bang. Giving what is unproved,

precedence as a standard over what is pro-ven. Ergo: everything geological;

having to do with flora, fauna or human life, proves the Big Bang Theory.

(‘That Einstein was right in predicting it’).

Whereas, Einstein predicted an expanding universe: before the universe

was serendipitously proven to be expanding. On the other hand, the Big Bang

was formulated: because, the universe was unexpectedly proven to in fact, be

expanding.

‘The beginning of creation.’ A subjectively invented, finite crutch for

objectively manifest infinity. An empty box of 3-D promising CRACKERJACK. A

surprise 3-dimensionally pushy toy inside; featur-ing a 3-dimensionally

exploding universe that ignores - finds and maintains an insulation against -

the 4th dimension. Excluding it from reality altogether. (The jestering

insistence that there is no gravity and that ‘the 4th dimension sucks’).

If a bullet in Dealy Plaza, Dallas, Texas, 22 November, ‘63, can be

theoretically taken seriously and passed on to the public the way that famous,

president-murdering (gun jumping) bullet has been passed on; along with all of

the other impossibly awry, krazymaking contingencies of that event. If the

president can be murdered as he was and the nation deceived (force fed) into

thinking one man acted alone to carry out that murder. Simultaneously deprived

of locked up evidence for fifty ongoing years after the fact (with the

president’s brain missing and the hardest evidence - the Zapruder film -

withheld from the public by TIME magazine for 13 years -until 1975, from ‘63.

Nine years later their feature article proclaims: "George Orwell’s 1984

predictions are ridiculous". - TIME (‘GOD IS DEAD’) magazine, 1/1/’84): why

can’t Hollywood and Carl Sagen have their (dynamically ridiculous) Big Bang

universe? Why can’t Peter Ustinov’s professional, Hollywood inspired

theoretical physicists continue to persuade everyone that an elephant can hang

off a cliff with it’s tail tied to a daisy?

Ever Enlarging Tolerance Thresholds, continued:

Why can’t they have a three dimensional universe to fight gravity, promote

and pimp off 12 year old girls in movies (Pretty Baby. Blue Lagoon) you have

to be 18 years old to see, and ‘revise’ the history of science and social

reality? What - and who - is to stop them? Reality is irrelevant here. The 4th

dimension is pesty. Surgically extermin-ated by the presiding, friendly

fascist authorities. Carl Sagen and his confederates not only authorize, but

also play God over exactly such 4 dimensionally bereft COSMOS. Repeatedly tell

the world where Einstein was at. What Einstein meant by this. What Einstein

meant by that. What Einstein couldn’t possibly have meant. Without correction.

No absolute authorities on the subject (is a comforting thought - a hastily

hallucinated port of false refuge in an inescapably ship-wrecking maelstrom

)

Golden Gate - and Brooklyn - Bridge sales are up.

The Rules Have Changed. Inquire deeply within.

Mountains may crumble, seas dry up and gravity fail, but Joe the excrement

salesman will always prevail. Finding and marketing his buyers. ‘Going

‘global!’ with the - ‘MAKE 7! UP YOURS! ‘ - latest anal

rape-as-everyday-entertainment in Large Corporate State sponsored - and

meticulously designed, Neurolinguistic Program seasoned - hard core Amerikan

soft drink advertising. ‘Parental discretion advised’. Segue to a report from

the White House Oval Office, parental discretion advised. If you can’t govern,

admin-istrate or journalise: entertain. P.S. Go for the crotch. TOYOTA is

bound to drive you like you’ve never been driven before. The perennial,

verbally intrusive, invasionary and poly-abusive word, and everything that

rhymes with it, in and around the obediently corralled - television and

entertainment industry mesmerized - herd.). ‘Life’ got cheaper & tougher while

EXCEDRIN got richer, stronger and more expensive. With Mr. Telephone (Is not

Ma Belle): now charging for information that use to be free. Information 411

services, more-over, automatically include not only a new (previously

non-existent) service charge, but also a boldly imposed commercial. Featuring

a woman’s voice (to blame), praising the corporate state invasion of your

telephone service; that the involuntarily paying customer must wait through

(Time is money?), in order to get what they are paying for. (Miss

Information?) A time of the signs. A trivial, laughing matter for unominously

surex. ‘The wide open! - uncensored! - media’. Its Academically Awarding

owners - and your lucky stars - are to be endlessly thanked for uniformly

excluding the wild-eyed, incredibly freaked out, drug crazed, remissive

alco-holic, paranoid schizo-phrenic messages herein. Don’t believe a word the

propagandist author says. Join Students (‘Put up a fight that

U nose and eye C’s is rite’) Against Gravity at U.C. Santa Cruz. As well as in

the bookstore by the same Holy Crossing name. Excedrin did not get stronger

in Einstein’s uni-verse. It got busted. SOUTH PARK: yore conversatonal

dialogue practicing, nazi excrement festering az. Talking to - head to head

with - Art Danner the turd. Speaking to his subordinates < save the children!

> from the toilet bowl. Dying is not much of a living. Ciao

for now Ms. Misogyny and Mr. Unrefusable Offers. Friendly fascist cocaine and

Pretty Baby purveyors. Eat hot American constitutional lead, Adolph. Josef

Mengele LUVS U. Remember, if it’s no good or inferior it sucks and rhymes with

sexual intercourse. And now this continuing seriatim message from yore new,

bad guy slaying sponsors)

Death From Above, continued:

As though cosmology could (afford to) do without the 4th dimension. The

Big Bang Theory is based on the notion that the 4th dimension as a universal

ingredient is optional. On again off again. Here today. Gone tomorrow and on

alternate Wednesdays. The Big Bang menu is the biggest, singularly

3-dimensional burger being sold: sans 4th dimension (A 3-dimensional wish

sandwich) in aca-demia’s corporate state sponsored kitchen.

What the universe looks, touches, tastes and feels like without the 4th

dimension. No time. No motion. No Ronald Reagan re-runs. No ex-pansion or

contraction anywhere. No bone for Carl (Gimme Shelter Howling) Sagen’s

misspelled Weimeriner. No place to Dr. Jekyl or Hyde (No air)...

What happens: when the order is for a ham sandwich and the waiter struts

boldly out of the galley and delivers only an oink. Charges you extravagantly.

Copping an attitude, telling bad, diversionary jokes and spilling things on

his customers throughout his remarkably animated three dimensionally flash

frozen, pigeon excrement subjecting, ominously hissing, background radia-tion,

dark matter, black hole, MACHO vs. WIMP supported - boldly squealing -

presentation. Blaming it all on - turning it all over to - Stephen Hawking,

who likewise does very famously without the 4th dimension.

Not to forget: what the 4th dimension of space-time does, upon its

inter-nationally accessible, non-mathematical introduction to the 7th grade

class (for example): to the Big Bang creationist school, its teachers and

indefinitely spreading, anti 4th dimension, gravity fighting cult advocates

(refer: S.A.G. - ‘Students Against Gravity’ <= 22 letters to catch>), at UCSC,

Santa Cruz, CA., since the mid-’80s, for example. The yarn spinning tales,

wagging the lying dogs).

A hysterical creationist fetish. Clutching and shivering together a

fictional three dimensional blanket of fitful security. Swiftly running from

safety, reason and the overwhelmingly incumbent four dimen-sionally

continuous, counter dogmatically accelerating facts.

The growing obsession of a 3 dimensionally expanding under-ground pool of

historical revisionists; all agreed to find no concep-tually measurable or

comprehensive use for, or manifestation of the four dimensional space-time

continuum. In and out of their own ac-knowledged as well as unrecognized

experiences.

(Not counting Richard Robertson’s Hollywood sponsored poly dynamic,

Or-wellean Newspeaking pedophile cult and its undeniably vast and far reaching

- highly influential, swing-shifting, local, state and federal rogue

government employee memberships. Refer, Tim - spice channel - McCormick)

The bespectacled search party in madly shoveling pursuit of its pain

digging spectacles. The Dig, continued:

All of which buoy up and otherwise airily bubble to the surface in the

ocean of above cited, indomitable revelations. One of which is re-peated here,

below (‘EYE won’t be fooled again‘, continued:):

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be

mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron

(‘disturbed area’) in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes

it obvious that these waves are merely a math-ematical phantom; consequently

it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their

existence. The apparent con-gruity between calculation and experiment must be

in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that

the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper

interpretation". - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE.

(‘Obviously matter is not expandING’. - Ibid.)

The Steady State Theory was abandoned because it was unable to explain how

the universe would remain at a generally uniform den-sity while at the same

time becoming ever larger, spatially.

Hoyle-Bondi at first (desperately; because everything else about the

Steady State theory is an eloquently strong account of the ob-served,

universal status quo) proposed ‘the *spontaneous creation of hydrogen’ to

maintain the required uniform density of their Steady State universe. This

reparative course was later abandoned, mainly because it contradicts the law

of Conservation of MassEnergy.

Whereas, the four dimensional space time continuum requires no such

*‘adjustment’ - an adjustment that does indeed (prohibitively) contradict the

Law of Conservation of Mass Energy.

Whereas: "These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand

3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot

state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a

tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of

disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely'. - Ibid.

Exactly what the present day - ‘indefinitely spreading’ - universe looks

like: without the Big Bang. (‘By now it would have spread

indefinitely’: squared...)

- The six dimensionally advantaged author, K.B. Robertson (Si)

When all else fails: read the instructions.

Good morning class. Today we’re going to wake up to sleep inducing

lectures on theoretical physics; from now on. From dawning spin-in to dusking

spin-out. Opposition here may optionally augur-in and/or crash and burn

spectacularly at the front of the class. Once you’re in, you’re in for the

revolving binary duration. Condemned to keep adding up to the 3 Body Problem.

Where 2 wrongs don’t make a right. But, 3 doodoo. Please restrain any residual

applause? (All background noise, including hissing, booing and flatulence,

will only be improperly inter-preted as further proof of the Big Bang

theory.)

__________________

"Some of you may be familiar with the book title: ZEN AND THE ART OF

MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE, by Robert Pirsig. There are two statements in that

book which are appropriately applicable to the self inflicted demise of

‘Con-temporary Physics’ (representatives) and its (their) prevailing

gravitational and 4-Dimensional dilemma. On page 100, Pirsig writes:

'‘The real purpose of scientific method is to make sure Nature hasn't

misled you into thinking that you know something you don't actually know'.

And again, on page 5, Pirsig writes, 'The truth knocks on the door and you

say, 'go away, I'm looking for the truth', and so it goes away'.

"Pirsig’s precautionary allows that you must also make sure Nature hasn’t

mislead you in to thinking that you don’t know something that you do actually

know.

The attempt to isolate and discover gravity waves is very similar in its

failure, to the failure to recognize the 4th Dimension; as is; as universal

gravity on or near four dimensional matter; extended across space from four

dimensional matter (acting at a distance), via the 5th and 6th dimensions of

electricity and magnetism respectively.

In attempting to isolate - and find an insulation from - gravity we have

succeeded in isolating - and finding an insulation from - the 4th Dimension.

Isolating it from reality - and ourselves from an unprecedented understanding

of the Gravitational ('How can I relate to it in my own?') Experience.

We keep asking the wrong questions. I have been repeatedly asked by

sincere people, 'What can we do with the statement 'GRAVITY IS THE 4th

DIMENSION'?' These people would ask Lief Erikson (or an elevator operator) for

a run-down on North American Civilization, or the Wright Bros. for a quick

briefing on Air Force One or a Boeing 747 crossed with a hummingbird. One must

know that the unrecognized continent - or aerodynamic principle - is there,

before one can do anything with it.

The improved question is: 'What can we do without it?' The prevailing

answers to this question being: 80% or more of the (alleged) 'problems' of

Contemporary (whining and complaining, pompously pretending; decorously

impotent representations of) Theoretical Physics. (Spin Doctoring The Caboose

Of Casey Jones Pt. II. By The Grateful Deadly)

THE DOMINANT ACADEMIC PARADIGM

"Reminiscently comparable to the drunk who was crawling round and round the

base of a street lamp one moonless night. A policeman happened by and watched

him for a coupla’ few minutes; finally asked him what he was doing. The drunk

replied, 'I'm looking for my wine bottle, I lost a full bottle of wine'. The

policeman queried, 'Are you quite sure you lost it around here - I don't see a

sign of any wine bottle'. The drunk replied, 'Oh no officer, I didn't lose it

here - I know that for sure. I heard it fall out of my pocket about forty or

fifty feet from here'. The policeman exclaimed, 'Well then man, you'll never

find it here!' The drunk looked up and said 'Yes, I know officer, but there's

no street lamp over there'." (At least, there didn’t use to be?)

- Kent Benjamin Robertson, @ San Francisco City College

GREENPEACE Gravity Premiere Benefit, October, '76

Afterward:

THE (amazing) LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE (continued):

"There exists a profound similarity between Newton's Law 0f Uni-versal

Gravity, Coulomb's Law Of the Interaction Of Electric Charges, and Sir

Humphery Gilbert's Law for the interaction of magnetic poles. And, if one can

shield electric and magnetic forces, why can it not also be done with

gravitational forces?"

- George Gamow GRAVITY/pp. 143-4

"Einstein again broadened his theory to include the phenomena of

electricity and magnetism. This does not mean that he has given an

electromagnetic explanation of gravitation. Many attempts of this kind have

been made, and all have failed in the same respect - to recognize that there

is no screen for (insulation from) gravitation. What Einstein has done is

something deeper and broader than that. He has succeeded in finding a formula

which may assume two special forms according as a constant which it contains

is or is not zero.

"In the latter case the formula gives us Maxwell's equations for an

electromagnetic (repelling) field; in the former, Einstein's equations for a

(an impelling) gravitational field." - SPACE, TIME & EINSTEIN

(‘Einstein: Man Of The Century’. - TIME Magazine, December 1999)

Today’s representative physicists are on Einstein's Relativistic elevator,

attempting to "screen", "insulate from’ or "isolate" gravity waves. It sounds

like a joke of some kind; except it's not a joke at all (In answer to the cult

codifed, Hollywood movie launched question. ‘R-U Sirius dogstar?’): They're

as serious as foaming rabies.

How Serious The Academy Thanking Dog Stars Are:

The Book-Burning Journalistic Questions:

"If gravity is caused by the acceleration of the earth's surface, why does

a ball roll downhill?" - * THE LA. FREE PRESS, 2/'71 (*‘A HALF VAST LOOK AT

GRAVITY < IS THE 4TH DIMENSION’> - *A Book Review).

‘Maxwell’s (expanding) field equations "break down, at the (al-leged

‘non-expanding’) surface of the particle". / ‘If the universe was made up of

(‘unstable’) disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely’. -

Ibid.

‘Humanity is not 4 dimensional’.

- LIFE Science Library’s Universe, p.

179

When The Corpulent Lady Croons, continued:

"If the Unification of physical theories was finally possible, said Andre

Mercier years later, when such a prospect still looked remote, "its possession

would put the human spirit in possession of an ideal instrument for making it

master of the intellectual world. The scholar would find his and herself both

powerful and bored, like an absolute monarch whose ideas could not be undone

by human stupidity".

- Ronald W. Clark EINSTEIN: The Life & Times/p.493

Willy The Shake, continued:

SMOKE ABOVE THE (invisibly) CONTESTED ‘What?’) BATTLEGROUND: "In the

laboratory of Michael Faraday (1791 - 1867), who made many important

contributions to the knowledge of electricity and magnetism, there is an

interesting entry in 1849. It reads:

'Gravity. Surely this force must be capable of an experimental relation to

electricity, magnetism, and other forces, so as to build it up with them in

reciprocal action and equivalent effect. Consider for a moment how to go about

touching this matter by facts and trial.'

"But the numerous experiments this famous British physicist undertook to

discover such a relation were fruitless, and he con-cluded this section of his

diary with these words:

'Here end my trials for the present. The results are negative. They do not

shake my strong feeling of the existence of a relation between gravity and

electricity, though they give no proof that such a relation exists.‘ - George

Gamow, GRAVITY.

How Odd Is It?

"It is very odd that the theory of gravity, originated by Newton and

completed by Einstein, should stand now in majestic isolation, a Taj Mahal of

Science, having little of anything to do with the rapid developments in other

branches of physics. Einstein's concept of the gravitational field grew from

his Special Theory of Relativity, and the Special Theory was based on the

Theory of the Electromagnetic Field formulated in the last century by the

British physicist James Clerk Maxwell (1831-79). But in spite of many

attempts, Einstein and those who have followed him have failed any

(gravitational) contact with Maxwell's electrodynamics.

"Einstein's theory of gravitation was more or less contemporary

with quantum theory, but in the forty-five years since they ap-peared, the two

theories have had quite different rates of develop-ment. Proposed by Max

Planck and carried forward by the work of Niels Bohr, Louis de Broglie, Erwin

Schrodinger, Werner Heisenberg, and others, quantum theory has made colossal

progress and evolved into a broad discipline that explains in detail the inner structures of atoms and their nuclei. (When in doubt, cite Heisenberg’s principle; let discontinuity displace continuity; 3 dimensions extinctify 4 and more dimen-sions; make and maintain time and motion: immovable ).

Einstein Deprives George Gamow’s Generation, to sullen fade out:

"On the other hand, Einstein's theory of gravity remains to this day essentially as it was when he formulated it half a century ago. While hundreds, even thousands, of scientists study the various branches of quantum theory and apply it in many, many fields of experimental research, only a few persist in devoting their time and passion to further development in the study of gravitation. Can it be that *empty space is simpler than material bodies? Or did the genius of Einstein accomplish everything that could be done about gravity in our time and so deprive a generation of the hope of further pro-gress?" - George *Deprivation Gamow, GRAVITY, p. 136.

(*As though there’s any choice.)

* "There is no space empty of field".

- Einstein, CONTRIBUTIONS TO SCIENCE

"Having reduced gravity to the geometrical properties of a space-time continuum, Einstein was persuaded that the electromagnetic field must also have some purely geometrical interpretation. THE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY, which grew from this conviction, had rough going, however.(Was said to have been rendered obsolete by the 1927, H. Silpher discovery (refined by E. Hubble)that the spatial *universe is expanding. *Said furthermore to have rendered

unnecessary the previous need for what Einstein introduced as ‘the

Cosmo-logical Constant’ - a hitherto unrecognized ‘repelling force’, acting in

the op-posite direction and exactly equal with the pulling force of gravity; prevent-ing the gravitationally dominated universe from collapsing on itself).

.Einstein died(Plop?) without having produced anything in field theory as simple, elegant, and convincing as his previous work." - Gamow.

‘The Gravitational Import Of The Profoundly Disconcerting, In Some Sense Illusory, Experimentally Proven, Mathematical Phan-tom-Haunted Situation Which Has Yet To Receive Its Proper Inter-pretation’ (with and without punctuation).

"It seems that the true relation between gravitational and electro-magnetic forces is to be found only through understanding of the (‘phantom’ haunted) elementary (‘unstable’) particles (‘disturbed areas’), of which we hear so (Very?) much nowadays." (As informative as the Warren Report?)

- George (Whistling In The Dark. So Far Outly Close 2 It) Gamow, GRAVITY p.137

 


 

 

K.B. Robertson is the author of the following small press titles:

GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION (AKA The New Gravity). NOMADS, CIVILIZATION &

WAR: 70 Centuries Of Raiding & Trading. The Biggest Cover-up In The History of

History. A MOVEABLE VIETNAM: A Continental Misunderstanding. BUTTERFLY,

OWL & EAGLE: Athena Marie Prima. THE ART OF MISSING THE POINT: When You

Can’t Afford To Catch On. THE ROBERTSON FAMILY CONSPIRACY: Consumer of

Children, Sanity & Law. THE INVISIBLE 1984 MACHINE. THE JUDICIAL,

JOURNALISTIC & C.I.A. INSPIRED Code Of Silence IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: A

Memorial Of The Murder Of Corine Christensen in 1986.

REPORT FROM V.F.W.. Bill Motto (‘Wage Peace’) POST 5888

And:
* BATTERED & BULLIED WOMEN MAKE BETTER PANCAKES & BURGERS: The Rape, Murder & Resurrection Of Columbia

K.B. Robertson is also one (of two) co-founders of congressionally chartered Veterans Of Foreign Wars - Bill Motto - Post 5888. (U.S.N. BMSN E-3

Coxswain . 1st Loader naval artillery. 3 1/2 years sea duty aboard an ammunition ship. ‘58 -‘62. Bay Of Pigs, Cuba, May, ‘61.)

The author is presently a V.F.W. Chaplain and free lance writer.

Residence, Santa Cruz, CA.

Published by Cold Steel Enterprises. Subsidiary to Death From Above

Issuance’s.

A Great Continental EuroAsian Green Grass RiverDragon Production

____________________________________________________________________