Tribute to Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra»
(Manuel Rubio Herguido)

On the 22nd of April, 1978 the Centro de Estudios Alcazareños published the review whose first page we show in the memory of another 22nd of April, 1616, day of the death of the great writer.

Manuel Rubio Herguido, tireless researcher of the Alcázar history, wrote in the presentation the following lines:

    Portada

    "There are two believings in Alcázar de San Juan that no one will be able to withdraw from the memory of this town. The first one is the idea that the origin of this place goes back to ancient times. The second is the certainty of being the real birth place of Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, the author of The Quixote. Both believings have suffered a hard censorship several times in the past.

    A member of the Academy of History and a nose and throat specialist by the name Dr. Laina, used to visit oftenly Alcázar and wrote in 1947, in a review of Tomelloso called Albores de Espíritu, an article entitled La Leyenda Embustera (the lying legend). In that article he wrote about the Régulo Turro, Alces, the eight towers and Sempronio Graco saying that if the origin of Alcázar went back to 1291. date when it was founded by the Orden Militar of San Juan, then all previous references to Alcázar are part of a lying Legend.

    It was worthless to argue that the emblem of Alcázar, made in 1292, refers to an existing town reconquered by the christians, that the Carta Puebla given by the Orden of San Juan in 1231 said: "To you, the Council of Alcázar", that the 362 inhabitants of the place mentioned in the Carta Puebla lived in Alcázar and did not come from the neighboring town of Consuegra since according to the Carta Puebla it was impossible that the more than one thousand people that populated the villages of the Priorato by that time could come from Consuegra, and above all things that the church of Santa María was already founded in 1226.

    The discovering of some roman mosaics in 1953 suggested the following comment to Sr. San Valero Aparisi, professor of Ancient History in charge of the archeological works: Although all the historicians, roman or contemporary thought just in the opposite direction...

    Although the general current among the historicians went against the existence of a roman period in Alcázar's history, those mosaics proved the existence of Alcázar in roman times. Therefore there cannot be a Lying Legend any more.

    In 1748, Don Blas Antonio Nasarre y Férriz1 wrote the following in the birth certificate of Cervantes issued by the church of Santa María de Alcázar: This person was the author of Don Quixote. Yet in 1681, the articled clerk of a lawyer who lived in times of Cervantes used to say pointing to the house of the square of La Rubia del Rosquero: Whenever we passed by this place the Lawyer Quintanar told me that one was the house where Miguel de Cervantes was born.

    The problem of Cervantes' origin became after that into a tough matter. Some experts believed that the Cervantes from Alcázar, in the times of the Lepanto Battle, was in the age of a child, more concerned about gathering nests and that type of things than about fighting as a soldier. Those very experts also thought that the baptism certificate of Cervantes was forged, that Nasarre was not well documented and many other things in the same direction. However we believe that the Cervantes from Alcázar was old enough as to be called the best disciple of Lope de Hoyos, that Menéndez Pelayo found the name of Carvantes in the baptism certificate of Alcalá and that the very Astrana Marín could hardly justify the surname Saavedra in the full name of the Cervantes from Alcalá. All these questions were discussed for more than one century and in most cases the conclusion agreed with those who believe that Cervantes was born in Alcázar de San Juan.

    Therefore it was necessary to use different arguments. In my opinion History was the right one since History can tell us why Cervantes does not want to remember the most important place of La Mancha at that time: Alcázar de San Juan, the capital city of El Priorato de la Orden Santísima, as Cervantes used to call it. Alcázar was in the middled of the road that linked Argamasilla and Quintanar, in the middle of the road that linked El Puerto with El Toboso, in the place where the rivers Amarguillo, Cigüela and Záncara gather together, in the place where the river Guadiana disappears, appearing again in Los Ojos de Arenas, just in the border of El Priorato. Alcázar was also crisscrossed by an important road of La Mesta used by the cattle owners that went from the kingdoms of Andalucía to those of Castilla.

    Another researcher from Alcázar by the name Ángel Ligero Móstoles, based his research in the characters of El Quijote. In my opinion no one can identify the fictitious characters of a novel with those of the real life since even in the case they are akin, they always could argue that all is pure coincidence. However it turns out that not all characters in El Quijote are fictitious. In fact many of El Quijote's characters existed in the real life.

    If the characters of El Quijote existed in the history of Alcázar de San Juan, someone should give an explanation to so many coincidences. The most logical explanation is that Cervantes knew those people and took their lifes with fictitious names to El Quijote.

    The expert in the history of Alcázar Don Francisco Saludador Marino already notices (Noria no. 4) that "it can be seen many times an alcazareño (someone born in Alcázar) side by side with Cervantes.

    Ángel Ligero Móstoles devoted many years of his life to find out how many people from Alcázar appear with fictitious names in El Quijote. His work and dedication deserve to be taken into consideration since it is the fruit of a serious research that opens new horizons and gives and end to old discussions."

    Manuel Rubio Herguido

The above comments were written more than 24 years ago and in our opinion they are still right. In 1991 the city council of Alcázar de San Juan and la Casa Municipal de Cultura Universidad Popular published the first volume of La Mancha de Don Quijote, by Ángel Ligero Móstoles. The second volume was published in 1994 by the Patronato Municipal de Cultura. We believe that these two volumes are an excellent and an extremely valuable research work. All the people from Alcázar as well as the lovers of Cervantes' works and his undoubtful links with La Mancha should feel committed with the cause of unrevealing the truthful origin of Cervantes and the diffusion of this work.


1 D. Blas Antonio Nasarre y Férriz, Librarian in Chief of the King and member of the Royal Academy of the Language in times of Philip the Fifth.