It was thirty years before the commencement
of our present era that Egypt
exchanged the yoke of the Ptolemies for that of the Romans.
It was in the year
642 A.D. that the treason of a renegade native delivered
her into the hands of
the Arabs. Though Egypt had been more
or less Christian since the preaching
of St. Mark, her faith had been at variance
with that of her masters during
the greater part of these six centuries.
Until 323 the State religion of Egypt was pagan; from
about 340 to 380 it was
generally Arian; and after 451 it became, to give it
the name used by Egyptian
historians, Chalcedonian. The National
Church of Egypt, whether right or
wrong in her rejection of Chalcedon, fairly claims that
she has remained ever
the same--rejecting all later creeds
than that of Nicea, and refusing to
acknowledge any Pope but her own. Since the
conquest of the country by the
Arabs the State religion has always been Moslem,
and has gradually absorbed
into itself the greater part of the
Egyptian nation. Still there are--not
seven thousand, but more than seven hundred thousand,
who have not bowed the
knee to Baal; and with a pathetic pride those who
have remained faithful call
themselves, not the Church, but the nation.
It has been a popular notion for some centuries
that Europe owes to the Arabs
her science and much of her learning. In one sense
this is partly true, ``for
what they were able to assimilate
in course of time from the ancient
civilisations which they destroyed they passed on
in a more or less imperfect
form to Europe; but a careful study of history
shows us that they originated
nothing of value. The Arabs
through the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth
centuries invented the Arab art and
architecture which spread through the
Saracen world were Greek, Armenian,
and Circassian rulers who employed
Egyptian architects and developed existing styles.
The very names which used
to be quoted as proof of an Arabic origin are found
by modern research to be
Greek or Egyptian, pronounced or
written as if they were Arabic. (For
instance, 'Alchemy' is of 'El Khemi' or Egypt.)
In Egypt their physicians,
their architects, their engineers, and their artisans
were all natives of the
country, and for some centuries Christians
as well. Even now any place of
trust, or any post where superior intelligence is needed,
is filled by a Copt,
and generally by a Christian Copt. This
may appear a startling assertion to
make, but it will be borne out by anyone
who will take the trouble to study
the history of Egypt under the
Moslems, and who will put aside popular
prejudice in examining her condition at this day.
The Arabs, and after them
the Turks, were splendid soldiers, and had
some virtues which the Egyptians
would have done well to emulate; but
at heart [t]heir idea of government
is personal aggrandisement, and their idea
of civilization personal luxury
[19].
At the outset of their career
the Arabs, however, were far superior to
personal luxury. Their food was of the simplest,
their couch of the roughest,
and they despised the refinements which they afterwards
so coarsely imitated.
Amr was almost aghast at the wealth and splendour
of Alexandria, and wrote to
Omar in extravagant terms of his conquest.
But though he writes much of the
baths and the shops, he says nothing of the
books or the works of art which
still adorned that city and everyone knows the
story of the library. Gibbon
throws doubt upon its destruction, but his only
good argument against it is
the silence of the contemporary writers, and this
is by no means conclusive.
It was not till they had lived among the Egyptians
for a century or two that
the Arabs realised what they had done. At
the time it must have seemed to
them a most trifling incident. One
of the most learned of the Alexandrian
scholars of that day--one hesitates to call him
John Philopompus, because it
seems almost impossible that he can have
lived so long--sought an interview
with the conqueror, and entreated that the books
of the Alexandrian library
should not be dispersed or destroyed,
but might be delivered to his
guardianship. Amr, we learn, was inclined
to grant his request, but inquired
with curiosity what he could possibly want with the musty
old parchments. The
scholar replied indignantly, but incautiously,
that some of them were worth
all the riches of Alexandria put together.
Amr replied that, if so, he was
not empowered to give them to the first man
who asked for them, and referred
the question to Omar.
The Kaliph's decision was simple. ``If these books
contain nothing more than
that which is written in the book of God (el Koran),
they are useless; if they
contain anything contrary to the sacred book, they
are pernicious; in either
case, burn them.'' It is written that the books sufficed
for six months' fuel
for the public baths of Alexandria [20].
While engaged in arranging the
affairs of Alexandria the Moslem general
received a strange embassy. The monks
of Nitriit in Scetis had mixed but
little with politics for some time, and we do not hear
of their taking part in
any of the petty civil wars and futile rebellions
of the sixth century. But
the tidings that the Byzantines had been
driven out of the land by a new
power, whose very name was unknown to
them, but who--so the rumour ran--was
favourable to the Egyptians and to their National
Church, drew them once more
from their desert retreat. In
solemn procession they came, barefoot and
roughly clad but with all the dignity of an independent
state, to treat with
the new conqueror. They demanded it guarantee
of their safety and liberties,
and the return of their rightful Patriarch, Benjamin,
to Alexandria. Amr must
by this time have been well aware of
the importance of conciliating the
National Church. He at once gave the monks
the charter they desired--which
Makrizi says that he saw still preserved
in one of their monasteries eight
hundred years afterwards--and wrote a letter
to the Patriarch Benjamin to
assure him that he was henceforth
free to show himself as openly as he
pleased. Benjamin lost no time
in returning to Alexandria, where he was
received with great joy. The
Byzantine Pittriarch, Cyrus, did not long
survive the downfall of all his hopes. He
was taken ill on Palm Sunday, and
died in three days. A man named Peter was elected--whether
by the Court or by
the bishops of the Byzantine Church in Egypt--in
his place; but, finding that
Benjamin was recognised as the
only true Patriarch by Amr, he quietly
abandoned his post, and withdrew
to Constantinople with the Byzantine
refugees. For sixty years after his
death no attempt was made to set up a
Greek Patriarch in Egypt.
From Alexandria Amr sent an expedition into Pentapolis,
but did not attempt to
occupy the country which, since the Arab conquest,
has practically ceased to
form part of the Egyptian dominions.
He contented himself with carrying off
an enormous booty, consisting chiefly
of cattle, and a great number of
captives, who were reduced to slavery. After this
he returned to Babylon, and
began to build a new town for himself and his followers,
a little to the north
of the older city. [T]he recorded actions
of Amr show him to have been not
merely a successful soldier,
but a statesman; and he fully realised the
importance of keeping his army separate from the
inhabitants of Babylon and
Memphis. He exacted enormous sums from the conquered
people, but for the rest
he let them alone, and governed them through men
of their own nation. In his
time the promise which he had given of religious
liberty was strictly kept;
justice, even if it strongly resembled tyranny, was dealt
alike to Melkite and
Monophysite, and the native Egyptians were ready to acknowledge
that they were
better off under the infidel than they had
been under ``the Chalcedonians.''
Amr had the Nilometers from Phila to Rhoda put
into sorely needed repair, and
gave orders that Trajan's Canal, since then known as
El Khalig [21], should be
cleared out and prolonged. He regulated and
simplified the administration of
justice, but permitted the Egyptians to be
judged by their own compatriots,
and the decisions of the Moslem
Kadi were only binding on the army of
occupation. He built the first mosque in Egypt
on the site where the present
mosque of Amr, though more than once
rebuilt, still stands; but all the
columns needed for it were brought
at a later date from the churches of
Memphis--a precedent which has been followed ever
since, the Arabs having no
faculty for stone-carving, though in time
they learned how to cut a plain
shaft with a mere block for base and capital.
While Amr was thus usefully
employed in Egypt, the Caliph Omar
was
assassinated, and one of the first acts of his successor,
Osman, was to recall
Amr from the scene of his successes,
and nominate his brother (the same
Abdallah who, according to some authorities, had served
in Egypt, and was the
first to enter Nubia) Viceroy of Egypt.
Abdallah was appointed in 647, but
cared little to enter on his new duties. He increased
the tribute payable by
the Egyptians, but thought more of
extending the Arab conquests than of
governing well the countries which had submitted
to him. One expedition had
already been sent into Nubia, or the country
south of Aswan, and the first
thought of the new governor when
he went to Egypt was to avenge
its
comparative failure.
THE SOUDAN EXPEDITION
Though the Roman or Byzantine rulers of Egypt
had never really established
themselves for any length of time beyond
the limit of Phila, the bloodless
conquest of paganism by Christianity in all these
southern countries had been
going on steadily for centuries. The Christian
religion at the time of the
Arab invasion was professed not only in the valley
of the Nile, but far down
to the southern frontier of Abyssinia,
on the eastern side of the African
continent. All these countries acknowledged
the head of the National Church
of Egypt as their Pope.
There were a number of politically independent
Christian kingdoms between Aswan and Abyssinia,
which, it must be confessed,
fought a good deal among themselves; but
on the whole, as even Mohammedan
historians acknowledge, this part of Africa
was never so well settled, well
governed, and well cultivated as at this
time. Not even Egypt herself has
suffered so terribly and her civilisation been so effectually
destroyed by the
Arab and Turkish invasions as these kingdoms,
which under the influence of
Christianity had but just begun to emerge from
the chaotic condition which we
have learnt to regard as the normal state of the African
interior.
Opinions differ as to whether Amr marched in
person against Nubia in 643 or
sent an army under the command of
one of his Emirs. In the Book of the
Conquests, by Ahmed el Koufi, the author writes that
Amr ebn Aas was in Egypt
when he received a letter from Omar,
commanding him to march on Nubia and
conquer this country, the country of the Berbers; of
Barkah; of Tripoli in the
west; and all the provinces belonging to them Tandjah,
Afrahenjah, until Sous
el Aksa.
Amr, the writer adds, had intended to send
the sum of ten thousand dinare,
which he had just received as tribute from
the Alexandrians, to Omar; but on
receiving these orders he divided them instead among
the soldiers of his army,
and after making the necessary preparations sent Abdallah
ebn Said into Nubia
with 20,000 men.
Abdallah allowed his soldiers unbridled licence;
they spread themselves over
the country, murdering and pillaging on all sides.
After the first surprise,
however, the Nubians gathered together for the defence
of their country to the
number of 100,000 (?), and attacked the Moslems
with so much courage that,
says their historian, ``they had never experienced so
terrible a shock.'' One
of the principal Moslem warriors told
the writer afterwards that he had
``never seen men aim their arrows with
such skill and precision as these
Nubians.'' He declared that during the war
it was not uncommon for a Nubian
to shout to a Moslem to know in which particular
member he preferred to be
struck; and if the Arab mockingly answered
the challenge and mentioned any
particular part of his person, he instantly
received an arrow in the place
indicated, without fail. But ``they preferred
to aim at the eyes of their
enemies.''
In the end the victory remained with the Arabs,
but they gained little by
their success at first, not even a single
prisoner since the Nubians fought
to the death. The Moslems judged it expedient to
retreat across the frontier,
and it might have been long before they ventured
again into a country where
they had met with so stubborn a resistance, had
it not been for the rashness
of the Nubians themselves, who
in the following years made more than one
expedition into Egypt, and did much damage. The
Arabs after the death of Omar
were greatly hindered by internal dissensions, and Amr
was recalled from Egypt
by the new Kaliph while the new governor, Abdallah
ebn Said, did not go near
the place for some time. Had the Egyptians combined
with the Nubians to expel
the invaders at this juncture, there
is little doubt that they could have
succeeded with ease. But the Heaven-sent
leader of men, so greatly needed,
did not appear, and the
opportunity was lost. The Nubians exhausted
themselves in objectless
raids and in the year 653
Abdallah, who
had now taken over the government of Egypt, marched again
into Nubia with the
resolute purpose of subduing that troublesome country.
He penetrated as far as Dongola (the Dongola of the seventh
century was nearly
a hundred miles south of the present town)
and laid siege to that city. He
constructed a stone-throwing machine, the like
of which had never been seen
among the Nubians and directed it either
by accident or design, against the
principal church of the city, to such good purpose that
in a short time it lay
in ruins.
The fall of their great church
seems to have intimidated the Nubians as
nothing-else could have done, and their king (whose name
is variously given as
Kalidourat, Balidaroub, and Kalidourdat--none of which
versions are likely to
be correct) opened negotiations for peace.
Eventually a formal treaty was concluded between the Arabs
and the Nubians, in
which the former agreed not to invade Nubia, and
to give aid, if called upon,
in the wars of the latter. In return the Nubians
were to allow a mosque to be
built in Dongola for those Arabs who might desire
to settle there, and to see
that no harm was done to it, and no Moslem annoyed or
hindered in the exercise
of his religion. They were even
to hold themselves responsible for the
cleaning and lighting of this mosque. Moslems
were to be allowed free entry
into the country, but no fugitive slave from
the Arabs in Egypt was to be
given shelter.
The worst feature of the treaty was the clause
which laid the foundation of
the Arab slave trade--so difierent an affair from the
domestic servitude which
has existed from time immemorial in Oriental
countries. Three hundred and
sixty slaves from the interior, of both sexes,
among whom should be found no
old man or old woman or child below the age
of puberty, were to be brought
every year to the Governor of Aswan, for the Imam.
As may be imagined, it was
not long before forty slaves were required as a backsheesh
for the Governor of
Egypt in addition to the three hundred and
sixty forwarded to the reigning
Iraart. Presents of wine, wheat, barley, and fine
robes for the king were to
be sent in exchange; but occasionally
the Mohammedan governor for the time
being had scruples about
the wine. Another question of
conscience
subsequently arose--whether, so long as the
tribute of s]aves was duly paid,
it was just to take slaves from Nubia
beyond the stipulated number. The
Mohammedan judges to whom the question was
referred made no difficulties in
deciding that all slaves taken in the wars which constantly
prevailed in these
countries--which, indeed, were bound to prevail
for the purpose of obtaining
slaves for the tribute--and all those who had been
reduced to a condition of
slavery in their own country, were legitimate trade.
It is also recorded by Moslem
authorities that one of the principal
inhabitants of Nubia presented a mumba, or pulpit, to
the new mosque of Amr at
Fostat, and sent Victor, Iris own carpenter, who
was a native of Denderah, to
fix it in its place.
The Egyptians were not slow to feel the difference
between the government of
Amr and that of Abdallah, and in the year 657
they showed unmistakable signs
of preparing for a general rebellion.
Abdallah left the country to consult
the Kaliph; but a conspiracy had already been formed
by the Arabs themselves
against Osman, and Abdallah was hardly out
of Egypt before that country was
taken possession of by one of the principal
conspirators, whom the army of
occupation appear to have readily received.
Osman hastily promised all that
was demanded of him by the Arab rebels, and
in particular the request of the
Egyptian party--that Abdallah should no longer be
their governor. But secret
instructions having been found on one
of Osman's messengers that the new
Governor of Egypt, Mohammed ebn Bekr, was
to be assassinated as soon as he
reached the country, the indignant Arabs appear to have
made common cause with
the Egyptians against the Kaliph. They marched
upon Medina, killed Osman, and
elected Ali in his place the commotions which followed,
Egypt was left without
a governor; two were named, but were dismissed
or died without entering the
country, and the appointment of Mohammed
ebn Bekr was finally confirmed in
A.H. 37.
The Moslems, however, were still disunited.
Ali reigned in Persia, Arabia,
and Egypt; but Syria was in the hands of
Moawiyah, and Amr was on his side.
In the year 660 (A.H. 41) the assassination of
Ali and his son Hussein, with
the abdication of his elder son Hassan,
left Moawiyah sole master of the
Moslem world.
ABD EL AZIZ
Moawiyah is the first Kaliph of the dynasty
of the Ommyades, so called after
Ommyah, the great-grandfather of Moawiyah. Egypt
had reason to rejoice in his
accession, for he at once restored the
governor whom they had respected as
well as feared--Amr ebn Aas. He died,
however, about a year afterwards, and
Moawiyah sent one of his younger brothers,
Atbah, to govern Egypt. Atbah
dying within the year, another man was appointed
and speedily dismissed; so
that Egypt had three successive governors
within as many years. Finally, in
664 (A.H. 45) Mosleima was appointed
Governor of Egypt, and remained there
till his death in 681 (A.H. 62). During these
seventeen years and the three
years of his successor, Said ebn Zezid, Egypt
remained in comparative peace,
though in all other parts of
the Saracen Empire there were constant
dissensions and civil wars, owing to the
struggles of the different Moslem
leaders for supreme power.
About a year before the accession
of Moawiyah, Benjamin, the National
Patriarch of Egypt, died at a ripe
age. He had laboured unremittingly to
encourage and strengthen the members of the National
Church, to refound the
monasteries which had been pillaged and destroyed
in the recent commotions,
and to reform the morals of his people.
He had sent a new Metropolitan to
Abysssinia, and with him a monk named Tekla Heimanot,
of great sanctity, who
is held in reverence to this day, and credited for being
the first founder of
monasticism in that country. Benjamin's last
act was to consecrate a new
church to St. Macarius in the desert settlement
of Nitria.
[1] These towns were so near together that they
are now confounded under the
name of Abousir-Bana, near Samanhoud.
[2] In 598 Gregory wrote a letter to Eulogius
of Egypt, which must interest
all Englishmen. After
congratulating the Patriarch on his success in
reviving the Byzantine Church
in Egypt, he tells him of the efforts which
he on his part is
making for the conversion of the Angles. He tells
Eulogius all about the
mission of St. Augustine to England, and relates
with joy that at the last Christmas
no less than ten thousand pagans had
received Holy Baptism.
[3] The town which rose upon
the ruins of Aykelah was called Zawiet.
Professor Amelineau identifies
it with the present Zawiet-Sakr.
[4] In Egypt the Archangel Michael had
taken the place of one of the pagan
gods, to whom they were
greatly devoted. In the fourth century Pope
Alexander solemnly broke the
brazen image of this idol in Alexandria, and
altered the temple into a
church. But he only won the consent of the
people by promising them that
they should find the patronage of Michael,
to whom he dedicated the
church, far better for them than that of the
idol, and that nothing
should be changed in the yearly feast which they
had been wont to celebrate,
save only that it should be held in honour of
Michael instead of the idol.
This ancient heathen feast has been kept in
Michael's honour ever since.
The Egyptians have a legend that on one day
in the year the mouth
of the pit of purifying fire opened, and it is
Michael's privilege to plunge
into it and bring up as many souls into
Paradise as he can carry on
his wings.
[5] Athribis is ruined, and its place taken by the modern town of Beuha.
[6] It is said that Benjamin was cheered in
his flight by the vision of a
celestial messenger, who
foretold to him that within ten years the Lord
would deliver the Egyptians
by the advent of a nation circumcised like
themselves, and that
by them the Byzantine yoke should be broken for
ever.
[7] It is curious that almost the only lasting
result of the attempted Union
of Heraclius in Egypt has
been to impose the observance of this fast on
both Churches alike.
[8] This date used to be given as 638, but modern
researches have established
it two years later.
[9] Omar's reply was to the effect that if Amr
were already on Egyptian soil,
he might go forward; if
not, he must return. Amr having reason to guess
what was in the letter,
refused to open it until he camped within the
frontier of Egypt.
[10] Menas, or Mena, was such a common name in Egypt
that a surname, usually
Greek, was often attached to
those who bore it.
[11] It was not uncommon for Egyptians of the Imperialist
party to take Greek
names, but no instance is known
of a Byzantine taking an Egyptian name.
[12] The ancient religious name for Memphis
was Ha ka ptah. When the Arabs
came, they called it
Agupta (hard g), and the inhabitants Agupti. In
course of time it became
Gupt and Gupti, which the English mispronounce
Copt and Coptic.
[13] The story of Armenosa is taken from El Wakedi, and
not from the papyri or
from the chronicle, which is
here imperfect.
[14] This name is probably corrupt.
[15] Nikius is the Greek name not only of
a city, but a district called the
Isle of Itikius,
lying between two branches of the river.
Both the
district, which was a
diocese, and the city had but one name also in
Egyptian--Pshati. This
older name is still preserved, but given to a
modern hamlet in the same district--
Ibshadi.
[16] Khereu, now El Kerioum, about twenty
miles from Alexandria, whence it
used to be considered the first
halting-place.
[17] Then occurred--so runs the graceful
legend which shines out from a
background of treachery
and bloodshed like & gleam of sunshine on a day
of storm--a curious incident.
When the order was given to strike the
tents of the Moslem camp,
some one told Amr that a pair of doves had
built their nest on
the roof of his tent, and that the young ones were
not yet fledged.
Amr at once gave orders that they should
not be
disturbed, and that his
tent should be left standing as it was until
his return from Alexandria.
[18] Since the above was written, a new census has been
taken (in 1897). The
figures are not
yet published, but it is currently reported that the
total population is now over
eight millions, of which about nine hundred
thousand are acknowledged Christians
of the National Church of Egypt.
[19] The pure-bred Arab in Egypt, represented by
the present Bedouin tribes,
is still superior to
personal luxury; but the reigning Arabs of the
eighth to the eleventh
centuries degenerated almost as quickly as
their Turkish successors.
[20] It is true that the ancient library of Alexandria
was burnt by Julius
Caesar, but
it was shortly after replaced by the rival
library of
Pergamus.
[21] This ancient canal is now
being filled up (1897) by order of the
English sanitary authorities.
It is not known yet whether the Pharaonic
festival of the Nile will be
discontinued in consequence.