|
THE OSCE MG CO-CHAIRS DID NOT BRING ANY NEW PROPOSALS BUT INTENDS TO DO SO
BAKU, 14 DECEMBER, AZER-PRESS. 'Armenia's government means to continue the dialogue with Azerbaijan about just resolution of the conflict over Nagorno Karabakh, and we have good reasons to expect that the two parties will soon be able to reach agreement on some aspects,' said the Russian co-chairman of the OSCE MG Nikolay Gribkov upon arrival in Baku late on 13 December. He, and his French and American colleagues Jean-Jacques Gayard and Keri Kavano came from Nagorno Karabakh. In the opinion of Mr Gribkov, Azerbaijan and Armenia alike shall have to accept serious compromises for otherwise the conflict cannot be resolved. 'There must be no winner and no loser, and neither side should feel injured because otherwise resolution is out of the question,' said Mr Gribkov. He added that the co-chairmen had not brought any new proposals to Baku. 'Our trip is on the introductory side, and we shall think of new proposals when we are able to sum up our meetings in Armenia, Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan,' went on Mr Gribkov. Commenting on the presence in the Russian delegation of his predecessor Vladimir Kazimirov, Mr Gribkov said that 'conflict resolution in Nagorno Karabakh' was the 'first love' of Mr Kazimirov, who terminated his holiday to return to the subject. Mr Kazimirov told the press that he had come to Baku as a private person, and that 'Mutual accommodations are necessary. I am glad that there is the reason for regular meetings of the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Previously, our negotiations were useless sometimes as there was no interaction at such a high level.' It should be remembered that Mr Kazimirov was suspended from his former position on insistence of Azerbaijan. Mr Kazimirov, the protege of the ex-defence minister of Russia Pavel Grachev, was not interested in elimination of the antagonism and all the proposals that he used to make only served the ends of the Armenian side. The president of Azerbaijan did not mind openly Mr Kazimirov's being in the delegation, although it is felt in Azerbaijan that this person may spoil everything. Musavat's secretary Arif Hajiyev believes 'Mr Kazimirov did not offer anything useful at the time, and Russia demonstrated that it is not interested to have the problem solved by involving Mr Kazimirov in the negotiations again. Clearly, Russia does not want to lose the chance of pressurising Azerbaijan and Armenia.' It is believed in the PNFA that Mr Kazimirov's return is designed to restore Russia's leadership of the process. Curiously, it was not long after the departure of the MG co-chairmen from Yerevan and Karabakh that Armenia's foreign minister Vardan Oskanyan told the press that Armenia still adhered to the three resolution principles. These are the necessity of self-determination in Nagorno Karabakh, security of its population and provision of geographical links with Armenia.
Habarlar-L
WHAT BROUGHT MR KAZIMIROV TO BAKU?
BAKU, 15 DECEMBER, AZER-PRESS. Azeri political circles are worried by Vladimir Kazimirov's involvement in the current negotiations about the conflict over Nagorno Karabakh. A source said it was feared that Mr Kazimirov might be made co-chairman of the Minsk Conference, the last instance to resolve the conflict that will be gathered after the peace treaty has been signed. Now, this position is occupied by Valentin Lozinsky. It is felt in Azerbaijan that should Mr Kazimirov take over from Mr Lozinsky, this would mean that Russia demonstrates its negative attitude towards possible resolution of the conflict. Mr Kazimirov was the Russian co-chairman of the MG in 1992-1996 and put forth the ideas that could not promote resolution; moreover, Mr Kazimirov's proposals would aggravate the differences between negotiators. Russia is not likely to have changed its attitude to the subject since. Russia is still providing military assistance for Armenia thus violating the balance in the region. However, the events in Chechnya make Russia more cautious about how it deals with its neighbours in the Caucasus. Mr Kazimirov told the press that 'he has nothing to do with replacement of the Russian co-chairman in the OSCE MC so far (!).' Asked whether he would be helping the co-chairman of the OSCE MG Nikolay Gribkov, Mr Kazimirov answered: 'I shall help him if he needs my help, which it not clear yet. As it is, I am legally on leave having recently completed my diplomatic mission in Costa Rica.'
THE PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN MET THE OSCE MG CO-CHAIRMEN
BAKU, 15 DECEMBER, AZER-PRESS. 'The international arena and the local situation are favourable towards prompt resolution of Karabakh problem,' said the OSCE MG chairman from France Jean-Jacques Gayard while meeting with President Aliyev together with his colleagues from USA and Russia. The co-chairmen of the Minsk Group last visited the region all together 13 months ago. Azerbaijan then rejected the 'common state' proposal. In the opinion of President Aliyev, the negotiation process have been delayed since and there have not been any new ideas. The presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia have been contacting directly since April 1999, saying that they were ready to make necessary compromises to resolve the confrontation. According to President Aliyev, he and President Kocharyan were meeting to help the OSCE MG find a solution; their dialogue does not mean that the OSCE MG should be distanced from the parleys. 'My conversations with Mr Kocharyan will be continued, however, the OSCE MG should become more actively involved in the new phase of its intermediary endeavours,' said President Aliyev. He thinks that 'the OSCE MG wants to build its new proposals on the direct negotiations between the two presidents as a productive way of reaching the desired results.' The co-chairmen agreed to meet at some later point to discuss new proposals for resolution of the conflict with consideration of the recommendations received from the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan. The co-chairmen said they were 'prepared to mobilise all the resources to rehabilitate the territories damaged during the war' as allows the cease-fire lasting for more than five years. Representatives of IBRD, IMF, EBRD and UN attended the meeting of the co-chairmen and the president.
Habarlar-L
ARMENIA RELEASES AZERBAIJANI POW. As "a goodwill gesture," the Armenian authorities on 15 December freed a 19-year-old Azerbaijani army conscript taken prisoner in September 1998 on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, AP and ITAR-TASS reported. Armenia released three and Azerbaijan four prisoners in September (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 17 and 20 September 1999). LF RFE/RL
KARABAKH ARMY COMMANDER FIRED. Arkadii Ghukasian, president of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, fired Samvel Babayan, commander of the Karabakh Defense Army, on 17 December, RFE/RL's Stepanakert correspondent reported. Two days earlier, a group of senior generals of the Defense Army of the unrecognized Nagorno-Karabakh Republic issued a statement accusing Ghukasian of exacerbating political tensions, and calling on both the president and Babayan to resign, Noyan Tapan and RFE/RL's Stepanakert correspondent reported. Armenian Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian, who traveled to Karabakh on 15 December, pledged support for Ghukasian the following day (see "RFE/RL Caucasus Report," Vol. 2, No. 50, 17 December 1999). An unknown number of Karabakh parliamentary deputies and the heads of the enclave's administrative districts issued similar statements on 17 December, according to Noyan Tapan. LF RFE/RL Karabakh Leadership In Turmoil
The political leadership of Nagorno-Karabakh met for an emergency session on Thursday as a bitter stand-off between the unrecognized republic's President Arkady Ghukasian and the commander of its armed forces, General Samvel Babayan, threatened to disrupt stability. Tension in Stepanakert has run high since last Tuesday when Babayan was said to have assaulted Karabakh's Prime Minister Anushavan Danielian, a close ally of Ghukasian's.
Armenia's Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutiunian arrived in Karabakh the next day in a bid to prevent what is becoming a serious political crisis there. Sources in Stepanakert told RFE/RL that Harutiunian has urged Babayan to resign but was rebuffed by the latter.
Babayan has been at odds with Ghukasian since last June when the latter sacked the previous head of the Karabakh government close to the powerful general. With the help of the Armenian government, Ghukasian has since managed to seriously limit the general's hitherto dominant role in political affairs.
An uneasy status quo in Karabakh politics has been disrupted recently by a series of recriminations exchanged by the two men. Tension came to a head following Tuesday's brawl between Babayan and the Karabakh premier in which the latter suffered minor injuries.
Senior commanders of the Nagorno-Karabakh Defense Army brought a new twist in the standoff on Wednesday when they issued a statement saying that both Ghukasian and Babayan are to blame for the "dangerous political tension" and must step down. The statement urged fresh presidential elections as the only way to end the stalemate.
A spokesman for Ghukasian told RFE/RL that the Karabakh leader does not intend to resign. In a statement released on Thursday, the Karabakh government accused Babayan and his supporters of "resorting to provocative and violent acts."
Official sources quoted Defense Minister Harutiunian as throwing his weight behind the embattled Karabakh president. "I agree with you and am happy that our views coincide," Harutiunian said at a meeting with government members and pro-Ghukasian parliamentarians, according to the presidential press service.
In another development, 13 deputies of the Karabakh parliament supporting the Karabakh army chief have demanded that the legislature meet for an emergency session to discuss the situation. Local observers say they would try to impeach Ghukasian. The parliament majority has so far been loyal to the Karabakh president.
An emergency meeting of Karabakh's Security Council chaired by Ghukasian was still going on as of late Thursday and no decisions were announced by that time.
(Vahram Atanesian in Stepanakert) RFE/RL
POWER STRUGGLE TURNS INCREASINGLY UGLY. Armenia's most muscular political force, the Yerkrapah [Country Defender] Union, has openly raised the issue of removing the country's president, Robert Kocharian, from office. Yerkrapah, an 8,000-strong paramilitary organization beholden to Vazgen Sarkisian and his successors, is over-represented in the governing Republican Party and dominates the territorial administrations, functioning as the Defense Ministry's mechanism of control over the political system. At the Yerkrapah congress on December 4, most delegates supported calls for removing Kocharian and/or calling a pre-term presidential election in 2000--that is, only two years into Kocharian's term of office--with the obvious intention of replacing him. Those demands did not figure in the congress' official resolution, but were contained in the keynote speeches and were received enthusiastically. The congress was equally receptive to speakers' insinuations that Kocharian's entourage was the real beneficiary of the October 27 massacre which took the life of, among others, Prime Minister Vazgen Sarkisian.
The congress elected the late prime minister as "perpetual chairman" of Yerkrapah and a new leadership filled with foes of Kocharian. These include the new chairman Major-General Manvel Grigorian, three other Defense Ministry officials of major general rank, as well as Industrial Infrastructure Minister Vahan Shirkhanian and Yerevan mayor Albert Bazeian. Shirkhanian and two of the generals had been among the Defense Ministry's envoys who attempted to pressure Kocharian into appointing a military-dominated government on October 27.
The congress also proclaimed the Yerkrapah Union's loyalty to the army, to the memory of Vazgen Sarkisian and to the person of his brother and successor as prime minister Aram Sarkisian, urged the nation to rally around the military and the prime minister (without mentioning the president), and officially called for "uncovering the organizers and executants" of the October 27 "coup d'etat"--an allusion and a warning to the presidential camp. The investigation is in the hands of the Chief Military Prosecutor Khachik Jahangirian and the Internal Affairs Ministry's Criminal Investigations chief Mushegh Saghatelian, two Yerkrapah members and Sarkisian cronies, who are believed to consider implicating Kocharian's entourage in the "plot" and the assassinations. On December 15, the military prosecutor began questioning Kocharian's foreign policy adviser and close personal associate, Aleksan Harutiunian. It remains unclear whether Harutiunian's status is that of witness or suspect. Kocharian, under pressure, had to release Harutiunian from his post and was reduced to expressing the hope that the investigators would treat his departing aide in accordance with due process of law. Only days earlier, Kocharian had given vent to his concern that the military investigators may be pressing the arrested terrorists into giving false testimony for political ends.
Kocharian has only few means to counterattack. He has held unsuccessful or inconclusive meetings with the parliamentary leadership, business circles, intelligentsia representatives and the Catholicos of All Armenians, Karekin II, at the seat in Holy Echmiadzin. None of those forces seem to have rallied behind him. Kocharian is basically limited to issuing infrequent, albeit acerbic, statements through his spokesman Vahe Gabrielian for broadcast on national television, whose management remains loyal to the president. Any move by the Sarkisian camp to replace that management should be taken as a coup alert.
On December 13, presidential chief of staff and Security Council Secretary Serge Sarkisian (no relation to Vazgen and Aram) called a news conference to warn Yerkrapah leaders and unspecified military commanders that he is in a position to reveal their involvement in corruption and crime. Simultaneously, a "spontaneous" demonstration was held outside the main government building--Aram Sarkisian's seat of power--in Yerevan to protest against the detention of an independent parliamentary deputy, whom the investigators accuse of complicity with the October 27 assassins. Serge Sarkisian is one of Kocharian's most reliable and skillful supporters, but his real power has receded dramatically of late. He was a powerful Minister of National Security and Internal Affairs until earlier this year, when Vazgen Sarkisian deprived Serge of half his power by separating National Security from Internal Affairs. Aram Sarkisian then completed his brother's work by pressuring Kocharian to release Serge Sarkisian from the Internal Affairs portfolio. Kocharian rewarded his ally with the two posts on the presidential staff, from which redoubt Serge Sarkisian can selectively open the files he has been keeping on the president's adversaries. But Yerkrapah members and deputies of the governing Republican Party---two interlocked organizations--lost no time retorting that they, too, hold "compromising materials" against Kocharian's supporters, including Serge Sarkisian, whom detractors accuse of controlling an undue share of export-import operations.
The "Karabakh clan" factor renders Kocharian's position even more difficult. Public resentment has been building in Armenia proper against Karabakh natives--such as Kocharian and Serge Sarkisian--who are seen as exercising a disproportionate share of power in Yerevan and are even being blamed for the economic hardships that the struggle for Karabakh has imposed on Armenia. Kocharian has the support of only two small parties in Armenia proper, both of them linked to the "Karabakh clan." One of those parties, "Country of Laws," is led from the shadows by none other than Serge Sarkisian; the other, Right and Accord, is led also covertly by Samvel Babaian from his Stepanakert headquarters. Serge Sarkisian and Babaian, both holding lieutenant-general rank, are a former commander and present commander, respectively, of the Karabakh defense forces. In Armenia's political system, political parties are essentially fronts for groups in the military and security establishment and individual commanders. This applies to both camps involved in the current power struggle and poses the risk of turning political rivalry into armed confrontation (Noyan-Tapan, Snark, Azg, Armenpress, Armenian Television, Respublika Armeniya, Golos Armenii, December 6-16; see the Monitor, October 28, November 1, 3, 8, 18, 24; The Fortnight in Review, November 5, December 3).
Habarlar-L |
|