Subj: | Re: Laguhing@Arabists Drama Words! |
Date: | 3/11/2004 1:03:52 PM Eastern Standard Time |
From: | |
To: | info@ajpme.org |
CC: | counterpunch@counterpunch.org, editor@usatoday.com, foreign@washpost.com, 48hours@cbsnews.com, cookb@ULV.EDU, cnn@cnn.com, cavuto@foxnews.com, feedback@bbc.co.uk, capitalgang@turner.com, ywt@cnn.com, q&a@cnn.com, info@bbc.co.uk, feedback@foxnews.com, cmcmahon@tribune.com, onthestory@cnn.com, cable@msnbc.com, am@cnn.com, gerald.levin@twi.com, mail@carmical.net, csatullo@phillynews.com, evening@cbsnews.com, drudge@drudgereport.com, diplomatic.license@cnn.com, bdold@tribune.com, letters@haaretz.co.il, friends@foxnews.com, cnni@cnn.com, editor@reuters.com, editor@jewishpress.com, foxmagazine@foxnews.com, ecu@un.org, feedback@ap.org, ctc-tribletter@tribune.com, news@sky.com, email@netanyahu.org |
BCC: |
First of all, I fail to see the logic in your statement that it is okay
to refer to "Israelis and Arabs" (nationality and ethnicity), but it is
not okay to refer to "Jewish people and Palestinian people" (ethnicity
and nationality).
Israel is currently a dichotomous nation that draws
lines of exclusion based on ethnicity.
In doing so, they are willingly
accepting a system of outright apartheid for the sake of security. If
Israel chooses to build walls along these lines, then they must do so
definitively by agreeing to a viable and sovereign Palestinian state
free of Israel's Matrix of Control. "The issue before us, the issue
separating a just peace from an imposed one, a sovereign Palestinian
state from a bantustan, has to do not only with territory but with
control."
http://icahd.org/eng/articles.asp?menu=6&submenu=3
The article above is written by Jeff Halper, a former professor from
Ben Gurion University who is now devoting all of his efforts to the
Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions.
Here's another article,
this one by Avraham Burg - Speaker of Israel's Knesset from 1999 to
2003 and a former chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel (he is
currently a Labor Party Knesset member):
http://ajpme.org/articles/af.htm
"Do you want the greater Land of Israel?
No problem. Abandon democracy.
Let's institute an efficient system of racial separation here, with
prison camps and detention villages. Qalqilya Ghetto and Gulag Jenin.
Do you want a Jewish majority?
No problem. Either put the Arabs on
railway cars, buses, camels and donkeys and expel them en masse or
separate ourselves from them absolutely, without tricks and gimmicks.
There is no middle path. We must remove all the settlements all of them
and draw an internationally recognized border between the Jewish
national home and the Palestinian national home. The Jewish Law of
Return will apply only within our national home, and their right of
return
will apply only within the borders of the Palestinian state.
All that path is only self-staining, silly terminology-crime-analogy with attaching bogus 'drama' words to Israel that just wants to breath. (or to any of her fighting-battles for that matter).
A word of advice, next time you have a fight (any fight), be careful not to mention the "final solution", you might get caught up in this massive Goliath Arabist propaganda language.
So sad, they can't seem to utter any sentence without trying to pump it up, dramatizing it senselessly & threading it into WW2 lexicon.
You see?
That's exactly what happens when they push the propaganda envelope too far.
Then again, [Now hold the REAL WW2 thaught for a moment!] these are the same people that diminish or deny WW2 as a whole...
BTW
Grab any Arab-Muslim (radical) propagandists, ask him/her what 'final solution' really is?
He wouldn't have a clue, but that's THEIR way Of propagandizing anyway.
Or Ask any of them, What is the meaning of "ethnic cleansing"? never mind that, this "ethnic" group, such as Arab Israelis (that carry Israeli ID) are full equal rights citizens, How did chasing down terrorists made them associating it with "ethnic cleansing"? Goodness knows.
But Who cares over there? What concerens them in that as-much-silly-so-vicious campaign is to achieve their goal, that is defamation, Be the way as contradictory & illogical it can be.
Motive for this-their crime?
1) Pure Hate.
2) Seeing their own ugly low morality, especially in sheer contrast with high moral Israelis, instead of changing their terrible ways, they rather go on tarnishing their victims.
But facts will always remain facts, there you have (also) another reason why Israel image in Media lacks behind.
Who else besides 'Palestinians' have 'explained' openly that they won't fight their militant mass murderers, for they'd look bad in the eyes of the world, that & only that is their 'problem', not their kids into their death-hate schooling, not the massive civilians used as human shields, not the dead & injured, but their "image", oh!
Whereas Israel cares more about LIVES & real MORALITY