Reset this site with frames
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PURGE AND MINIMUM FLOWELEVATED FLARE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For most flares, "Burn-back" flow and normal minimum baseline purge are NOT the same. "Burn back" occurs at extremely low rates (a representative formula here) when the normal flare
flame can regress into the tip under the effects of buoyant forces and localized wind turbulence. Operational burn back can occur in all flares which are
The basic phenomenon of "burn-back" is created by atmospheric air which enters the top of the flare tip and flows downward, counter to the gas flow, at the same time that the gas flow is flowing out of the flare. For this to happen, the gas flow must be so small that it cannot generate turbulence Burn-back can be a problem as it may overheat the tip material and can build solid carbon deposits internally. The hot flue gases produced, however, tend to be disruptive to air inflow patterns and it is not easy to predict burn-back using the normal theoretical models.
PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR ASSESSING BURN-BACK A good practical guide for empirical determination of purging requirements against burn-back, is to use the visual flame regression condition for assessing stacks which are burning at purge only rates.
The probable presence of smoke in each of the above conditions can be confusing to operators who will probably react by increasing the smoke-suppression steam for smokeless flaring. In the "burn-back" case, this may actually exacerbate the burn-back problem rather than solve it.
Some flare tip designs permit augmentation of the minimum flow using steam in a center nozzle. Smaller tips do not frequently display pronounced burn-back problems. |