General Evaluator’s Report
General Evaluator: ______________________________________________ Date: ___________________
| Category | Description | Rating | Comments/ Recommendations |
| Start | On Time? Were
the call to order, invocation, pledge to the flag, and opening remarks handled smoothly
and orderly? |
||
| Business | Done smoothly or
did it drag? Too much time spent on triviality or did business get "railroaded
through"? Was proper parliamentary procedure followed? |
||
| Table Topics | Did members not
on the program participate? Were the topics appropriate? Did topic monopolize time? |
||
| Guests | How many
present? Did each member introduce himself or herself? Was each guest made to feel like
the most important person in the room? How many became members? |
||
| Introduction | Consider all
introductions; Toastmaster, Guests, Table Topic Master, Speakers & Evaluators. All
deserve more than just name and title (duty). |
||
| Speakers | Did the speakers
accomplish their purpose? Did they use and follow their manuals? Were they well prepared? |
||
| Evaluations | Consider
thoroughness, length and tact. How helpful did they seem to be? Were there suggestions for
improvement? |
||
| Timing | Were the time
limits observed? Was the meeting smooth flowing? Did it drag anywhere? |
||
| Fun | Did the members
seem to enjoy the meeting? Did YOU enjoy it? What was the tone of the meeting? |
||
| Program | Did the program meet the TM standard of excellence for variety, imagination, and participation? Did the program provide the members with a rewarding, educational experience in communication and leadership development? |
Ratings : 1 – Excellent, 2 – Good (Above Average), 3 – Satisfactory (Average), 4 – Should Improve, 5 – Must Improve (Requires immediate attention)