Back Next                                                                                                                                                                                                        Contents

 

III

SIP AND THE STUDENT

Through the Child’s Eyes

 

We wonder if we could choose what we want to do .....

do it the way we want to .....

see life our own way

not as adults want us to .....

Experience, explore and ask questions

about anything that we are curious .....

Create our own environment

find our own space .....

Have fun, get messy

taste, smell, touch, feel .....

      We wonder if .....

            We could just be .....          


Near the steps of the school the two-and-a-half year old was bidding a brave farewell to his mother. On the staircase stood a pre-school teacher with a welcoming smile and a greeting. Encouraged, the child left his mother’s hand and climbed up the steps slowly. At the bend of the steps further up stood another adult. “Hurry up, you don’t have all day to climb up.” The strident tones shook the child to the harsh reality of a new environment. 

The incident was small, yet it leaves one thinking. Just how much adjusting does a two-and-a-half year old have to do at every turn of the step? Does he/she understand the contradictions of the adult world? How can adults be sensitised to the needs of children ?

 

 


Any child coming to school brings with him an innocent wonder about the world he encounters. There is a curiosity about this world and a willingness to touch, feel, ask questions about the things he encounters. The look of concentration on the face of a three-year-old as he tries to balance blocks, the face of a fouryear-old as she tries to thread beads - it’s important for that child to get it right. She’s willing to try the same task again and again until in her own eyes it appears perfect.

Children come to school as active learners, their minds open to learning. This freshness is what they largely lose as the reality of school hits them. They end up learning to adjust, accomm-odate and conform to a pattern of learning rather than create their own patterns. The adults in the environ-ment seem to forget that children think in ways that adults can no longer remember.

The spirit of “I am willing to try”, “I want to know more” dies out as children feel pressurised to learn chunks of knowledge beyond their interest and understanding. Any originality or creativity a child may want to show often gets nipped in the bud. Children end up losing the spirit of questioning, the freedom to initiate their own learning. On the other hand

they  gain a distaste for formal learning, dispensed  as  the  teacher and the system sees fit. They grow up as adults expected to take initiative, make the right choices, lead independent lives when  their schooling precludes those very qualities.

An uphill task

This discrepancy is perhaps because the  focus of education has been on the content, seldom on the recipient. The School Improvement Programme at Diamond Jubilee Schools recognised the existence of this discrepancy through the evaluation undertaken in 1987. While at one level children were given to believe that education and ‘study’ is important for the future, in reality, as many as 50 per cent of the students interviewed during the evaluation found studies dull, often beyond their present capacity... an uphill task with little support in the home. The conflict was real for these children - of knowing that education is important and yet, in its present form, being unable to handle it.

School Improvement implied looking at the whole process of education from the point of view of the child. Was the learning in the classroom meaningful to the child? Did it excite him, challenge him, draw upon his existing frame of experience and lead him on

 

to  further  exploration ?  Did  he have opportunities to share new knowedge ? Did he have a choice about what he wanted to learn? Suddenly the business of education acquired a  different  perspective,  a different meaning. It was recognised that  the   classroom  environment, the methodology as well as the attitude of significant adults needed

to change.

From the teachers’ point of view, it meant stepping back from directing learning to facilitating it, watching it happen at its own momentum and in turn, learning from it. It meant, setting aside traditional modes of teaching, reposing faith in each individual child’s own ability to learn.

 

 

MY INTRODUCTION TO SIP

 

I was in the VIII Std. when I was first introduced to the School Improvement Programme. It did not include the senior classes. In the beginning I had no idea about the project. I remember being invited with a lot of other students to what seemed like a workshop rather than a routine programme.

 

We were also expected to work together as a group and not individually. Each and every individual was given a chance to express their views and exhibit their talent and skill. The discussions were really exciting as everybody gave their independent opinions.

 

After that we were asked to write individually a small story or incident on a given topic that would reflect our opinion as well as ability to communicate through words. Can you imagine my joy when later on I was given a short story I had written during this workshop. I was told it was going to be one of the reading cards for the primary. I still preserve it as my most precious possession.

 

When I look back I feel I learnt a lot from this experience. The group discussion really changed my way of thinking. I learnt to think broadly from all aspects and then comment on a particular subject. It has broadened my way of looking at life, taught me how to communicate with people, get to understand their personal views.

 

It was a wonderful experience getting to know the students as well as teachers as individuals. The programme is a very nice beginning to help students express themselves freely, helping them to become creative and less book-oriented.

 

--- Safia Kapadia. ex-student D.J. Girls


 

All of the above did not happen simultaneously. Each step taken in this direction brought with it new insights into children, their ways of learning. For the pre-schoolers, the first year of the programme meant coming into an environment that had more space, looked brighter and hence more inviting. What they did within the classroom also appeared more varied. There were more materials in the classroom, studies seemed to gradually move away from chalk,  talk and text to worksheets, field trips and play.

Easier Transition

Over time it was observed that children coming to school did not spend their initial weeks crying in an attempt to adjust to their new surroundings. It now seemed easier for a two-and-a-half year old to make this  transition.  All  it  had  required

was an understanding on the part of the adults that what the child needed was warmth and affection not only education and discipline.

This was however a hard transition to make for the adult. The schools had been grappling for years with the issue of discipline. The notion was that unless the rules were enforced, children would go astray. It took a few years to understand that the term discipline was not an enforcement of rules, rather it encompassed an awareness of the rights of others. The idea was not to get children to regard the wrongness of wrong conduct as a breaking of a rule. Rather, the wrongness lay in being inconsiderate or infringing upon the rights of others. The idea was not to have a heavily rule bound institution in which children cannot see beyond the rules to the reason for them.

 

My Day .....

Sayyad Shahid     6th A : I’ve been in D.J. Boys since Std I --- 6 years now. This is my first School. I wake up at 6.45 a.m. iron my clothes, pour water to the plants, dress and come to school by public bus. After I go home, I change my clothes, have food. I play video games for one hour by myself. My sister helps me with my studies till 8 p.m. I have four sisters and two brothers. I am the youngest. I don’t have cable T.V. I watch cricket and read Tinkle. My father runs a business  he sells grass and nylon mats. I want to be an engineer.

Mustakim Telwala 6th A : I joined D.J. Boys in Std I. I went to another school before that. I wake up at 7 a.m. I bathe, have breakfast and come to school. When I return I change my clothes, eat. I love playing cricket and football within my room. I study upto 8.30 p.m. Sometimes I watch comedies and horror movies. My father has a business perfumes, body sprays but I want to be a doctor. I have to study more Science and get more than 96%.

Bhavesh Jain  Std. 9th B :  I go for Maths tuition in the morning. After that I come to school. I go home during the long break for lunch. After school I play for a while. I study until 6.30 and then learn Karate. I like watching comedy programmes and movies. I’d like to do Commerce. Maybe I’ll join daddy’s cloth business.

Arun Vishran Std 9th B :  I’ve been in D.J. Boys for 5 years. I take Maths and Science tuition’s. I like Science. I’d like to do research in physics because I enjoy experiments.

 


This issue needed  focused handling. And so in Phase I,  ‘Token Economy’ --- a system of positive discipline as a means of reinforcing positive behaviour was launched. Special tokens were printed to be given to students exhibiting positive behaviour, immediately rather than retrospectively. Over time these tokens gave way to stickers which, the teachers felt, children found more attractive. The idea did not meet with the same degree of success at all levels of the school. While it seemed to work better with younger children, the novelty soon wore off with the older  ones.  Some  children,  it  was

reported, recognised the value attached to the tokens, and set up a barter system with the rest, in order to encash their tokens for a larger reward! Gradually it was recognised that other means of motivation would have to be devised.

However the system succeeded in instilling one idea: the importance of self worth. The adults were beginning to recognise the dangers of eroding a child’s self esteem. Schooling at D.J. had seldom until then consciously talked of self esteem. Teachers became aware of how vulnerable children feel because the teacher could exercise power to control and evaluate.

 

WHAT AM I LIKE ?

WHAT DO I WANT TO BE ?

SAIMA...

I think I am intelligent, I am proud. Silly things make me laugh. But that is when its about others. If anyone else does that I start crying. What makes me happy is when I get the highest marks. I feel angry when teacher scolds me or someone talks behind my back. I don’t like it when someone else is praised. I don’t even talk to that person !. I hate being compared, I am not close to anyone in my house. I only tell things to my best friend. I think school is better than my house.

MEHJABEEN 

I am sometimes naughty, sometimes angry and sometimes sad. I feel happy when someone praises me, when I get good marks and when I help someone. I do show off but others showing off makes me angry. You know I don’t have a father. He was in the Navy, his ship sank. I miss him. I am close to my mummy.

YASMIN....

I know I would not be sent to college. My parents are very strict. I don’t talk much to my daddy. He did not know that I am the head girl of my school for a long time. I get a higher percentage than my brother. My father says “I spend so much time teaching my son and my daughter does better.” He feels that girls should not study. If they do study they will work. He says to me “I don’t want your money.”

REHMAT .....  

 
I thought I would be a Chartered Accountant or take Finance Management. But I am poor in Maths. I have the power of arguing. I can fight. I think I would be a lawyer. When I see poverty I feel I should do something maybe meet big authorities and work for the people in the slums. Maybe I’ll charge the rich and help the poor. I want to be famous like Mother Teresa.

            Exams ? ....... easy !

In a system that relies heavily on testing the decision not to have exams at the Primary is a brave one. When these children move into the Secondary and are faced with tests for the first time, they approach it without any ideas of what is expected of them. Some anecdotes on this new intrusion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


During the recent unit tests, confusion and chaos prevailed every afternoon since the Std V students had absolutely no idea of examinations at all (how they were to behave, where they had to, sit etc.) Most of the teachers were driven up the wall by their blissful ignorance!

 

 

One little fellow, when the answer books were being collected, put up a terrific fight. The teacher asked for his paper, which he promptly refused to give up. Clutching it tightly he asked indignantly, “How can you take my paper? I haven’t finished writing! I will finish my paper and then I’ll give it to you!”

 

 

A Std V student asked the supervisor in his classroom during the exam whether he could pick up his bag. The teacher who asked for the reason was told very matter of factly, and in no uncertain terms that he had forgotten an answer (he said that he had known all the others) and he wanted to revise it and then write it !

 

 


As control loosened and children experienced freedom, their behaviour became, in the eyes of some adults, more boisterous. Parents began comparing their “bold” behaviour with the much more conformist behaviour of their older children. A child who was allowed to choose at school, wanted the same freedom at home. Could parents see their children as decision makers ? In what ways  would  the  acceptance  of  such behaviour change the relationship between parents and children ? It was the  teachers  to  whom  the  parents came  with  these  issues.   While  the teachers had to be

clear about allowing children to make choices about their own learning in school, they had to deal with parental anxieties about outspoken, “undisciplined” children.

As pre-school teachers grew to understand  children  and  their  ways of  learning,  they  became  more  confident  of  facing the parents. “Do  the   parents realise  that the school is making no demands on them? Why are they not appreciating this fact? Parents have set  ideas  about percentages,”  reflects Laila an  ex  DJG  student  and  subsequently  a  teacher  in  the  pre-school section.

            Exams ? ....... easy !

 

In a system that relies heavily on testing the decision not to have exams at the Primary is a brave one. When these children move into the Secondary and are faced with tests for the first time, they approach it without any ideas of what is expected of them. Some anecdotes on this new intrusion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


During the recent unit tests, confusion and chaos prevailed every afternoon since the Std V students had absolutely no idea of examinations at all (how they were to behave, where they had to, sit etc.) Most of the teachers were driven up the wall by their blissful ignorance!

 

 

One little fellow, when the answer books were being collected, put up a terrific fight. The teacher asked for his paper, which he promptly refused to give up. Clutching it tightly he asked indignantly, “How can you take my paper? I haven’t finished writing! I will finish my paper and then I’ll give it to you!”

 

 

A Std V student asked the supervisor in his classroom during the exam whether he could pick up his bag. The teacher who asked for the reason was told very matter of factly, and in no uncertain terms that he had forgotten an answer (he said that he had known all the others) and he wanted to revise it and then write it !

 

 


As control loosened and children experienced freedom, their behaviour became, in the eyes of some adults, more boisterous. Parents began comparing their “bold” behaviour with the much more conformist behaviour of their older children. A child who was allowed to choose at school, wanted the same freedom at home. Could parents see their children as decision makers ? In what ways  would  the  acceptance  of  such behaviour change the relationship between parents and children ? It was the  teachers  to  whom  the  parents came  with  these  issues.   While  the teachers had to be

clear about allowing children to make choices about their own learning in school, they had to deal with parental anxieties about outspoken, “undisciplined” children.

As pre-school teachers grew to understand  children  and  their  ways of  learning,  they  became  more  confident  of  facing the parents. “Do  the   parents realise  that the school is making no demands on them? Why are they not appreciating this fact? Parents have set  ideas  about percentages,”  reflects Laila an  ex  DJG  student  and  subsequently  a  teacher  in  the  pre-school section.

            Exams ? ....... easy !

 

In a system that relies heavily on testing the decision not to have exams at the Primary is a brave one. When these children move into the Secondary and are faced with tests for the first time, they approach it without any ideas of what is expected of them. Some anecdotes on this new intrusion.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


During the recent unit tests, confusion and chaos prevailed every afternoon since the Std V students had absolutely no idea of examinations at all (how they were to behave, where they had to, sit etc.) Most of the teachers were driven up the wall by their blissful ignorance!

 

 

One little fellow, when the answer books were being collected, put up a terrific fight. The teacher asked for his paper, which he promptly refused to give up. Clutching it tightly he asked indignantly, “How can you take my paper? I haven’t finished writing! I will finish my paper and then I’ll give it to you!”

 

 

A Std V student asked the supervisor in his classroom during the exam whether he could pick up his bag. The teacher who asked for the reason was told very matter of factly, and in no uncertain terms that he had forgotten an answer (he said that he had known all the others) and he wanted to revise it and then write it !

 

 


As control loosened and children experienced freedom, their behaviour became, in the eyes of some adults, more boisterous. Parents began comparing their “bold” behaviour with the much more conformist behaviour of their older children. A child who was allowed to choose at school, wanted the same freedom at home. Could parents see their children as decision makers ? In what ways  would  the  acceptance  of  such behaviour change the relationship between parents and children ? It was the  teachers  to  whom  the  parents came  with  these  issues.   While  the teachers had to be

clear about allowing children to make choices about their own learning in school, they had to deal with parental anxieties about outspoken, “undisciplined” children.

As pre-school teachers grew to understand  children  and  their  ways of  learning,  they  became  more  confident  of  facing the parents. “Do  the   parents realise  that the school is making no demands on them? Why are they not appreciating this fact? Parents have set  ideas  about percentages,”  reflects Laila an  ex  DJG  student  and  subsequently  a  teacher  in  the  pre-school section.

 

 

 

 

“It’s not fair. We didn’t have fun when we were small.”

 

(Views expressed by older non SIP children at D.J. Schools about the children coming up with the Programme)

 

THEY   (SIP)

WE  (NON - SIP)

v     Play games with lessons.

v     We didn’t. We wanted to but we were not allowed. We had only one period for play.

v     They sit on mats & misbehave.

v     We have benches.

v     They celebrate parties, they are given snacks between periods.

v     We didn’t have any parties or snacks.

v     They have educational games.

v     We had lengthy portions.

v     They enjoy studies.

v     We didn’t.

v     They are good at talking telling jokes, not at studying.

v     We have learnt more.

v     They don’t study or take tuitions.

v     We only study.

v     The children and teachers are both active.

v     We as children were not active.

v     They don’t carry bags. They come and go empty handed.

v     We carry heavy bags.

v     Their teachers look after them well.

v     Nobody took care of us.

v     They know nothing when they come to Std V.

v     We had to study so much in the Primary.

v     They get surprise tests and no exams.

v     We were at least told about the dates for the exams. Its better.

v     They don’t know to write, they just come home and play.

v     We spend three hours on homework.

v     Look at their furniture it’s so bright.

v     In our days the desks and chairs were always brown.

v     Even weak children are being promoted as there are no exams.

v     We had to pass.

v     Even the 4th Std girls seem to know better English than us IX Std girls.

v     We still can’t speak English well.

v     They have such interesting worksheets.

v     We were “dumped” with books.

 

 


 

The issues got compounded as children came up to the higher classes. The teachers here found them totally undisciplined, unable to sit still, constantly demanding attention. They were unused to having children surround them. “They all talked at the same time as the teacher. They just couldn’t adjust,” said Lee Krishnan, a secondary teacher. For the teacher the physical distancing from the children was a necessary condition for the learning process.

New pathways

It was not easy changing the teaching strategy. The teachers had to get a basic understanding of what it  means to accompany children in  their learning process. The children coming up with the new methodology seemed to lack the skills required  in  the  higher classes. It was  felt  their  reading  and  writing skills were  poor. They did not appear to come up to their teachers’ expectations.

 

GREAT IDEAS

The Chair Pocket

Tiny tots in the Primary carry a 2 kg. load on their small shoulders daily to school and back. In most Indian schools the bag, bursting at the seams with note books and texts, is symbolic of the load which the child carries right through his 13 years of schooling.  In school these bags occupy precious classroom space, hinder mobility, distract children who spend a good proportion of their instructional time opening and closing flaps, hunting for exercise books in the recesses of the bags, apart from the odd pencil or eraser that rolls out of reach and hides within the depths of the bag.

 

The quality of the bag each individual child brings to the classroom varies with varying economic backgrounds, to the despair of those children who can’t afford to own quality bags. The school bag also means children could bring expensive materials to school to show off to their less fortunate classmates.

 

With reduced homework, keeping the textbooks in school, and stationery  provided at school, the bag becomes redundant. The question then arose, was a bag required? Of course what about their lunch boxes? How would they carry the calendar and their library book? The answer lay in the creation of a small bag—more like a chair pocket that could be hung on the back of the chair. The school got small black bags made for all children. However, comments like “the bag is a waste”, “Our children don’t need to carry nondescript bags” are heard from parents.

 

The philosophy of sharing, of becoming aware of the quality of equality, does not seem to have got communicated. Coincidentally around the same time that the Chair Pocket replaced the regular bag at D.J. Schools, the government’s own slogan of “Basta hatao, Bachpan Bachao” (Remove bags, save childhood) caught up and implementers at D.J. Schools felt that their stand was vindicated.

 

The move is on to create a stronger, better looking bag --- of course it is going to be more expensive !

 

 

“I do planning”

 

Interviewer :      What do you do in school Tahoor ?

Tahoor :              [Both index fingers pressed to his temples].“Mein sochta   hoon”.            I think ........ I do planning.

Interviewer :      What is Planning ?

Tahoor :              Planning ..... um I think .... which area to go to ? Block area,           Quiet area ...... book area.

---- Tahoor is a Pre-schooler, all of 2 ˝ years old

 


Why I put Dushyant in D.J. ......... a parent speaks

            My son Dushyant has just turned three. He proudly goes to the ‘D. J. Nursery High School’ (to quote him) Unlike other little babies of his age, who are already bent double with books, and burdened with home work, Dushyant has no such troubles. He enjoys school (though it took him a while to realise that everyone there wasn’t about to fulfil his every whim and fancy). When other kids his age are asked what they do at school they answer, ‘I study’ Dushyant’s answer to the same question is, ‘I play’.

            It is precisely for this reason that I chose to put Dushyant in D.J.H.S. despite its reputation, and despite the fact that I commute from Vashi to school everyday with him. Believe me, it isn’t easy. However, as troublesome as it may be, it is well worth the effort to know that my son finds learning a pleasurable activity,  one in which he willingly indulges. The fact that he is close by during the day while I teach also helps a lot.

            What I appreciate most about SIP is that Dushyant grows increasingly independent and self confident. I enjoy his re-enactment of a typical school day, where he tells me what to say, so that he can play school --- at home !

A typical conversation between me and Dushyant :

Dushyant :      Mummy say, `Planning time, planning time !’

                        (I repeat)

                         At this point this tiny little boy sits cross-legged on the floor,                       shuts his eyes tightly and ‘plans’.

Dushyant:       Art area, book area.

Dushyant :      Now say ‘Dushyant which area do you want to go to ?’

                        (Again I follow his instructions) and he answers !

Dushyant :       I want to go to the art area (this is his favourite). Now say                              `Dushyant hop & go’ (sometimes its jump or crawl)

                        After playing with his clay, he announces that it is cleanup                            time. Generally, I’m expected to help with this ! He then                          announces to an imaginary class:

Dushyant:        Friends -- see what Dushyant has made --- now clap for                                 Dushyant !”

                       

When I see the happiness and joy reflected on Dushyant’s face when  he thinks of school, I say hats off to SIP ! It’s worth every effort and all the time & trouble it takes bringing him here !

P.S. “The first time I heard about ‘planning time’ I asked Dushyant what he did during that time. He looked at me disdainfully and said, “I Plan !”


 

In an attempt to resolve these issues the programme sought to get both sections to dialogue on the objectives and expectations at each level. The pre-school teachers, seeing the difference in their children, defended their stand with a conviction that the primary teachers lacked. The same held true when the project moved to the middle school: “They can’t write properly. Are  we  at  this late  stage

Meanwhile the children continued to demand the attention of the teacher, pressurising her to look afresh at her own strategies and create new ways of learning. By continuously demanding the teachers’ attention, asking questions, they were practically forcing teachers to think along different lines. The teachers were being compelled to examine their teaching strategies, plan

WHEN I AM ANGRY

 

 

 

When I am angry I bite myself to control my temper ..... See these marks on my wrist ?

            ...... a thirteen year old

 

 

 
When I am angry

«    I tell my teacher ........

«    I fight ..............

«    I keep quiet ...............

......  six year olds

 

 

 
When I feel angry

«    I throw things ........

«    I cry ..............

«    I don’t talk ................

            ...... ten year olds

 

expected to teach them the basics of writing as well ? They are a voluble undisciplined lot. To top it all they don’t even have the skills. What are we supposed to do ?” The tussle continued between the primary and secondary teachers. But in the process all the adults were beginning to look at children and their learning patterns as a continuum.

differently to be able to satisfy the child’s hungry curiosity.

It was recognised that a good deal of sophisticated observation of children was required. This would then have to be followed by reflection and re-view to link learning to the pre-occupation of children especially in the pre-school. The project was learn-ing that Child Observation was vital.

PROBLEM SOLVERS ---- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS

IF THERE IS NO GAS ....

[     Cut a tree, make small pieces, burn them and then cook.

[     For cutting the tree go to the jungle on a motor-bike.

[     If there is no breakfast, don’t come to school.

[     Take the gas from the school.

[     Change the cylinders.

[     Use a stove.

--- If  none of these work, contact  Jr. K.G. A for further suggestions.

 

 

 

 

MUZRIM HAAZIR HO...!

Teacher : Yusuf is impossible. He disturbs my class to such a degree.  I don’t know what to do. My children get totally unsettled.”

Strategy.. Let’s try to get the children to decide what punishment to give him. What do you think we should do about him?

The air was electric with tension. Yusuf sat cowering in a corner. It took some encouragement to get the children to articulate what they felt should be Yusuf’s punishment.  Once confident the responses were many:

            “Take him to the Principal”.

            Tell his parents”.

            “Keep  him outside the class for a whole week”.

            “Beat him”?

            “Don’t talk to him”.

            “Write in his calendar”

            “Give him another chance”

            “Make him write sorry a hundred times”

            “Give him a last chance”

            Let him say sorry”    

            “He should promise he wouldn’t do it again”

It was interesting to see their efforts at solving a problem. This approach has subsequently been used time and again at D.J. schools effectively.

 

 

It was a small group meeting over the issue of discipline, rules and regulations. Sections of parents, teachers and a couple of student representatives were there.  The meeting was proving to be volatile with the adults blaming each other and not taking responsibility.

The issue at hand: parents don’t come to meet the teachers when called.

The teachers’ view was:  parents never come. They don’t value our notes. They are not bothered about their children.

The parents’ view was:  how do they expect us to come running every time? The teachers should deal with the children at school. That’s what they are for.

The two bewildered students, the subject of  the debate, sat silent. Finally, interrupting the heated discussion, one of the boys gingerly raised his hand...

 

“Miss....... may I speak?  If my mother is not coming when you call her, why don’t you keep me back in school, she’ll definitely come when she finds I have not got back home.”


THIS CHRISTMAS I WANT ......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


BULLETIN BOARD MATERIAL CONTRIBUTED BY 6 YEAR OLDS (1996)

 


Increased dialogue with children and increased communication between teachers brought forth the realisation that teachers needed to have a common understanding of how children learn and how teachers should teach. The project recognised that teachers needed a theoretical/ developmental understanding of children, their learning. While it was clear that the kinds of activities that the project had initiated were appropriate, it required a framework within which to be applied.

The child’s world

Gradually teachers began seeing the world through the child’s eyes, becoming aware that children are more than just `small’, they are different. The fact that they were small did not mean they cannot plan

and execute. The adults began to see that whenever learning was directed by the teacher perhaps they ended up teaching helplessness.

Meanwhile the inevitable differences that exist between children and their abilities and the manner in which they are valued by individual teachers have been emerging issues. Was the success of some children being made possible at the cost of the relative failure of others? Were some children feeling marginalised while others were praised? Is the stress on achievement rather than on effort? Or is the particular level of achievement of each  child being accepted as a starting point?

The attempt has been to enable children to feel free to make a choice and feel confident about their world.

 

 

 

 

Back Next                                                                                                                                                                                                        Contents