Temple Update:
New Discovery
Each year, the Jerusalem Temple Conference proves to be one of
the best ways to keep up-to-date on the progress being made in preparing to
rebuild the coming Temple.
Precise Location?
One of the controversies involves the actual location of the original First
and Second Temples. The traditional site, of course, is the Dome of Rock, the
prominent Muslim shrine which dominates the Temple Mount. Most of the rabbis in
Israel take this site for granted.
Many have become aware of Dr. Asher Kaufman's research, which deals with the
possibility that the Temples may have stood about 100 meters to the north of the
Dome of the Rock.
Perhaps the most provocative conjecture has emerged from Tuvia Sagiv's
studies which suggest a location to the south of the Dome of the Rock. (Each of
these views have been previously presented in our newsletters, briefing
packages, and the publications from the previous Conferences.)1
Infrared Fly-by
The most interesting session at the Fourth Annual Jerusalem Temple Conference
was, again, Tuvia Sagiv's presentation. Tuvia first reviewed a number of the
traditional view's questionable aspects which emerge from 3-D computer studies,
including elevation problems conflicting with ancient records citing both
Agrippa's and Titus' apparent ability to view the Azarah, the water aqueduct
implications, etc. He then showed us infrared photography, taken only two weeks
earlier on a fly-by over the Dome of the Rock.
Since the differential rates of cooling can often reveal subterranean
structures, these techniques can be quite revealing under the right conditions.
The heat-sensitive photography reveals a pentagonal structure underlying the
present Dome. This pentagonal structure may have been Strato's Tower, part of
the Antonia Fortress. A similar pentagonal structure, also called Strato's
Tower, was part of the Roman buildings at Caesarea, on Israel's Mediterranean
coast.2
Aristobulus I, King of Judea 104-103 b.c., had his brother Antigonus murdered
in a subterranean passage to Strato's Tower, which was between the Temple and
the Antonia Fortress proper.3 This
would seem to indicate that the rock outcropping presently covered by the famed
Dome of the Rock was actually part of the Antonia Fortress, not the Temple. This
makes much more sense since this also would place the fosse (moat) north of the
Antonia rather than between the Antonia and the Temple.
Jerusalem was always vulnerable from the north, as it is protected by valleys
on the east, south, and west. The ancient records also indicate that the Antonia
was directly adjacent to the Temple precincts. It all seems to make sense.
Conclusion
Only real access to the mount and careful archaeological
exploration will resolve these controversies. And the volatile political
situation renders speculation pointless. Since Moshe Dayan--in his own "land for
peace" deal--granted control of the Temple Mount to the Muslim WAQF, it will
take some major changes to even permit serious investigations to take place, let
alone any rebuilding dreams.
But we do know that the Temple will be rebuilt. Paul, John, and
our Lord all make reference to the Temple in events immediately preceding
Christ's Second Coming.4 And the
preparations have begun. The major components are moving into place for the
final countdown. Have you done your homework?
This article was originally published in the April 1995
Personal Update NewsJournal.
Notes:
[RETURN TO TEXT]
- Personal UPDATE, January 1993, p. 19-20; May 1993, p. 9-15; The Coming Temple:UPDATE Audio Book, Jerusalem Temple Conference notes, 1993 & 1994; The Coming Temple (book).
- Flavius, Josephus, Wars of the Jews, III. 5.
- ibid. III. 4.
- 2 Thessalonians 2:4; Revelation 11:1-2; Matthew 24:15
Additional Related Resources:
The Coming Temple Update
by Chuck Missler -
Briefing Pack, $12.70
|