WHO ARE YOU?
.


.

Schopenhauer: "We forfeit three-quarters of ourselves to be like other people." ... people, we might add, who are doing the same thing, to try to be like who they think we are!

Hamlet, to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern: "What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving, how express and admirable! In action, how like an angel! In apprehension, how like a god! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust?"
. . Dust? Who are you? After a set of stock answers that would fill in the blanks on an imagined form, you might finally say, in a 1960's vein, "I am an expression of the universe." A phrase that's almost trite. Throw it away. Yes, it's true, but someone simply said it and you simply heard it. Even to "know" it scientifically is nothing, tho necessary. To understand it is considerable, tho not everything. Move that stuff from the "know about" column to the "understand" column.
. . To feel it, as you could feel the sunset, or to realize that the Earth turns --to feel that in such a way that you could not possibly find words for the feeling-- that is something!
. . The feeling of insignificance as we regard the cosmos . feels good. Why is that? Isn't insignificance a bad feeling?
. . I think it's because we instinctively feel the truth; that we are part of an unimaginably big and complex thing; yet, a thing not outside ourselves; therefore, we can feel proud. There's no "it against us". We know it won't reject us. We generate our own feelings about it. And all we can do is feel about it --it's beyond thinking about. You are part of the Gaia... not as a member is part of a club, but as a hand is part of a human.
. . People have felt that way about the ocean for a long time. But it's simply big. We see only water, and only the surface of it at that. For me, the thing most beautiful in its complexity is a rain forest. But that doesn't mean I'd want to live there, tho some people can do so quite happily. I want the protection it gives my environment --wherever I am.
. . The grandeur of the cosmos is not always benign toward rain forests and other living things. Things happen. The biggest thing happens every 28 million years or so. The last few events apparently weren't as bad (1908, Tunguska, Siberia) but the big one before that was a hammer!
. . There is little doubt left that the dinosaurs were wiped out when Earth was hit by one or a few planetisimals. That was the big opportunity for scurrying little forest things called mammals. That disaster ("bad-star") opened the door for us. It was, essentially, the time when the universe began to make the expression "human".
. . We call that time --65 million years ago-- the K-T boundary. I think that after it, there would've been a mass evolution of many species toward an immediate increase in body-size. Some species probably changed habits between solitary and pack-hunting.
. . (Can this be one trouble with human communication; that we have switched only so recently from pack-hunting, to towns, to be increasingly solitary? . This would be due to our culture, our increase in body-size, and our new hi-tech weapons.)
. . The extinction event shook the Gaian system of life severely, but it survived. It, but not most species in it. The dinosaurs had been extremely successful, but every animal over 10 kilos in weight went extinct. The little survivors quickly evolved into a new balance, though it must have been a chaotic time.
. . With a vast number of ecological niches opened, evolution must've been fast. Shapes, sizes, and functions changed. Most animals got bigger, of course, including the one that would eventually become human. Note that it didn't have to be that way. A lot of luck went into our path.
. . A disastrous change such as the extinction event is happening again now, and obviously... we are the culprits.
. . In technological societies, we've built cities around people. When we destroy nature for our seeming profit, or put up barriers, or distance ourselves, we remove our contact with it. This has already happened for most of the world's people. It then becomes difficult for the people to realize (experience) their place in nature. They have no experience of it. They can't find their place in it any more.
. . Therefore, in destroying nature, or by removing our contact with it, we've destroyed our own identity; our only chance to know who and where we are; like the lost cures from extinct plants, or an orphan who can no longer find his biological parents because... he's burned his papers!
. . We can also call Gaia a meta-symbiosis! I've coined the word to match "endo-symbiosis". Symbiosis means mutual benefit; and meta-symbiosis takes our understanding beyond that of a mere pair of beneficiaries, or of merely local action. In fact, there seems to me to be a continuous scale. At the microscopic end, there is Dr. Margulis' Endo-symbiosis that makes up the parts of our cells. Even further down in scale, genes too can be said to be proteins which are symbiotic with each other.
. . At the "macro/telescopic" (meta-) end is Gaia, a single planet-wide being that consists of cells such as ourselves, (the "individuals" we imagine ourselves to be) and things from viruses to Blue Whales.
. . When a single cell procreates, it is by fission. It can't be said that one is the "mother" and the other is the "daughter". The two cells are equal and each is the original. Likewise, all creatures of the current earth are equal parts of the original cell. Some of us, like humans, are collections of vast numbers of cells.
. . Tho in less direct contact, and in less obvious communication, all these cells still form one body. Gaia. Incredibly, we are in the womb yet! Earth is not "the planet we live on" --it is us, our "meta-self". Those dramatic pictures from space are self-portraits.
. . So we --our physical bodies-- are merely one point on that spectrum; not in individual size between a virus and a whale, but as our species is between micro-creatures being part of our bodies, and our species being part of a larger body. Where we begin and end is not as simple as we always thought. Are the vital bacteria in our gut  part of us? Do they count as an organ of our bodies? Without them, we die, sure as we would without our liver.
. . How about the mitochondria and dozens of other creatures that populate the inside of our every cell? They reproduce every time a cell splits. Formerly free, tiny independent creatures, they now perform vital functions inside our cells.
. . Perhaps a better example: the termite --as we think of "a" termite-- is not one individual, but a dozen to thousands, all of which are necessary to the survival of the whole being. Most of the creatures that total up to "a termite" are organisms in its gut, and bacteria inside those! (really!) Each of what we see as an individual termite is really a colony in itself.
. . Obviously, it can also be said that that termite "individual" (or a Bee) is as truly seen as one cell of a colony. And that colony is really just another level toward the "real" individual. And so forth. So too are we. Finally, the individual is Gaia!
. . Huge as we are, we can look up (in scale) telescopically to see ourselves as cells in Gaia, and down microscopically to see the once-independent micro-organisms in the cells that make up our bodies.
. . Part of your identity is your physical self. The people in history perhaps least acquainted with that part of themselves were the Victorian ladies --the champions of denial.

We are animals. The concept of there being "higher" and "lower" animals is a distinctly Victorian egotism --or back to the Greeks, etc..  And while we may be thought egocentric for putting ourselves on top, there do seem to be reasons. Yet, we may also resist; the top is a lonely place.
. . >The Gaia Society is here to tell you: you are not alone, not isolated, as our traditional culture tends to make us. You are literally part of the biggest picture on all Earth: the "Gaia creature".
. . Three-quarters of animal species can fly. Wow. Probably half the rest can jump more than ten times their length --from a flea to a kangaroo. Poor humans.
. . Humans are unique in many ways. I suppose we could collect a list for other animals too, but this one is interesting.
. . Did you wonder about that "huge size" thing? Yes; we are nearly the largest animals on Earth, just a hair's breadth from the top of the list. There are millions of species that are smaller, but only a dozen or two that are bigger, and we're extincting those fast. We can't breathe or step without destroying vast numbers of simple, microscopic lives.
. . It's interesting; humans must rank as number one --or in the top few percentage points-- in: intelligence, speed, weight, height, and most other categories in this "Olympics of the species". Only our five senses compare poorly.
. . Two curious things among very many that make us unique: over-size brains and genitals, and constant female estrus with sexual receptivity/interest. (The extreme right wing apparently criticizes God for doing that. Curious!)
. . And one more thing: number of lifetime heartbeats --all out of proportion with other animals. For the others, lifetimes are fairly accurately counted in heartbeats. The number --one billion-- is surprisingly similar, from shrews to elephants. Except us. Ours is way higher. The human heart beats 3 Billion times. Were we the same, we'd live only 25 years!
. . Amazing, too, the way we get vitamin D. Our skin sweats stuff that includes precursors to vitamin D, and lets the energy of solar radiation create it; then we reabsorb that part. Clever, eh wot? It's doubtful (to me) that any other animals do that, because no others show skin! The radiation would not penetrate. (I won't count the Mexican Hairless dog or the Naked Mole Rat!)
. . Clothing must've amplified the speed with which northerners got white. (white so the sun could get deeper thru the skin.) The farther north they went, the less sun and the more clothing they would use, so the less vitamin D was made. Finally, it would be a health risk to get far north without some other source.


Wait; is this still on who we are? It's what we are; but it was necessary, to get to who, because we behave in part from our genetic influences. Mind and body interact, intermesh, conflict.
. . Our minds seem built to try to make order out of chaos. (teen-agers excepted, of course.) Is it more psychological than biological? Are our brains "wired" that way? Look at what we do as we play cards. We "randomize" as we shuffle. That's chaos. Then we play them in various ways, and try to wind up with them in four stacks of suits, in ascending order.
. . Here is a psychologically oriented analysis of who people are. (The feeling side will follow. Note the difference.)
. . People differ according to the sum of their experiences and their responses to them. These reactions are based on attitudes formed by previous experiences, ad infinitum. Our responses tend toward self-protection and health --the two are not synonymous-- and are sometimes at odds.
. . We all do what's best for us. Even the worst maladaption was formed from what the person felt (even subconsciously) was best for him/her at the time. The tendency toward self-protection works more often in the short run, and can impair or override the tendency toward health.
. . "Temperament" may even be formed by experience in utero, i.e., the mother's stress, addiction to alcohol or nicotine, diet, medication, pollution, etcetera.
. . Temperament and experience slowly grow our character and personality.
. . We total a huge number of experiences; and each one influences the actions which make up our next experience. Multiplied this by our number of interactions with other people (and things). Each of those people has their own "total life experience" to influence us with.
. . All these possibilities ensure that everyone is unique, with only generalities in common.
. . Another of the things nearing extinction may be our basic human nature. We've almost lost the knowledge of what it is --what it feels like.
. . The experience humans have had lately isn't very natural. It's cultural. Man is coming closer to being isolated inside padded boxes: car, office, mall, house, (computer). Often, people can go thru it all without breathing a touch of fresh air, or seeing anything of nature directly.
. . The car is entered in the garage, and left in a parking building connected to the office building. Isolated from and ignorant of the facts of nature, he will likely come to believe that he's also isolated from the laws of nature. Wrong. Ignorance confers no immunity.
. . What is our natural identity? It's been a big search during the past century, especially.
. . We've invented many ways to search for identity and community: religion, psychiatry, meditation, various groups and gangs; all valid in some way. It's hard to deny that we feel a need to know. Who are we?
. . In Columbia, the Kogi natives, near the shore, below the arctic heights of the Sierra, have the last outpost of undisturbed pre-columbian culture. Some seem as wise as our Chief Seattle. They call their wise men Mama, the same word they have for the sun --the enlightened one. (!) The Kogi say our culture is the "younger brother", and we do not know how to take care of the Earth. They see the Earth as mother, and allow only women to plant. They say all people are part of "mother".  They know who they are.
. . This tribe didn't have to invent ways to find out; they just "always knew", from their intimate contact with nature. We don't have that luxury. I'm afraid that we need to invent ways to unlearn what we are not.
. . Are your reactions based only on a compilation of your merely-accidental life experiences? Or have you consciously designed, modified, and influenced those experiences to create your character and personality, and form the "you" that you would hold as ideal, or something closer to it?
. . Regarding healthy self-love, here's a fascinating experiment. I urge you to consider it on your pillow. If your personality and character were copied into another person of the appropriate gender, would you love or marry that person?! If not... are you really who you want to be?  Who are you?  Who are you?
. . You can't see who you are from inside your ego. You must get outside it, and look dispassionately at your place in space and time... and scale, within the larger individual we call Gaia.
. . Individual" means "not dividable" --it cannot be cut apart. You cannot cut a person apart from his internal organs and still have a person. So; you cannot cut one creature of earth apart from all others and still have that creature. It will not survive.
. . The mitochondria in some of your cells, for example, are part of a larger organ that pumps your blood. They don't, themselves, pump; they perform a function (for good-selfish reasons) that helps enable the larger organ to do it.

You are part microscopic mitochondria,
part macroscopic Gaia --equally!

There is the aboriginal Australian in the movie, "The Last Wave". Richard Chamberlain was the star, but for a time, the focus for me was an old aborigine shaman, who, when the mystified Chamberlain had searched him out, and found him in a stark room, said: "Who are you...  who are you...  who are you."  It was, as I now think of it, not a question. Who are you. Who are you.
. . When I hear someone make a casual statement like "I think X is good", I would love to reply: "What do you mean by the word... `I'?"
. . "I" am a physical body that evolved to best survive and reproduce. To do so, nerves evolved to sense the operating environment, so as to manipulate it well. A central processing unit --brain-- to do it better than the competition --other species or the same. But a more essential "I" resides within that brain --the awareness of it all. That's a side-effect of the processing. "I" am not really the body, even the brain --I am just the awareness.
. . Enlightenment is realization of who you are. This doesn't come about in the usual American fill-in-the-forms way of identification. Who are you.... Your identity is not just a set of answers to questions as to your family, location and job. It is, rather, a quiet and total release of exactly that. Identity, and enlightenment, is the realization that you are part of the it. And belong there.

. . "I" am the part of my awareness that is aware of my awareness.
. . I know the Shaman's secret. I'll tell it to you in an Alan Watts kind of answer to a question: Gaia is the "it" in the sentence "It is raining."
. . You are part of the it that is raining, growing, breeding, dying, recycling, blowing the winds, waving the oceans, exploring, knowing, understanding... and feeling.
. . It is part of you that is raining, in exactly the same way as your heart and liver are part of something that reads these words! Understand and feel that!


.

HOME PAGE

Previous Essay: Can You Find Your Place? Where do you belong?

Next Essay: The Desirability of Insecurity