| This post ranks among the most hypocritical that Brad has EVER made (and he's made a lot) | Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:30:02 -0500 (CDT) Let's stop both the personal crap and the old history and get on-topic. This used to be what was _insisted_ on in this newsgroup: ON TOPIC. OR ISPs were immediately contacted each time this was not the case (and then some). PH#2 used to be the iron maiden of this strictly enforced policy . Kinda seems ironic now, doesn't it? (Esp. with a PH#1 coward associate hiding and posting off-topic from an abuse domain right now!!!) Why don't the sick hypocrites learn? Just be decent. AND, know you cannot have your cake and eat it too (as well). Let's see if you can respond to on topic stuff without getting personal. You hear this, John Price? Do you hear this, Peter Hood (and libelous FAQ) associates? All bad has stemmed from YOU. Yep. We could have just had discussions here. But, nooooooooo ... To get what you give would not be what you want. But to not to "get it" anyway should be consider a gift and act of kindness. (Read this over and over a few times and it will make sense, even to sick psychologists) -- and I can say this if it is my opinion!!! |
| Even after 4 times asking Brad to leave me out of things this time, he continues to lie about me, forcing me to post defending myself | From:
thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com (ThePsyko) n Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:32:02 -0500 (CDT), Incognito Innominatus wrote: >Malcolm, thePsyko confessed to doing the emailing. In fact, in a post to this newsgroup (which I will not >Find for you but would be easy to find in google), thePsyko "wonders aloud" about whether he should >continue to email this innocent woman BECAUSE THE NOTE HE GOT FROM HER TELLING HIM >TO STOP DID NOT SEEM TO BE IN HER OWN WORDS. Look, Malcolm -- your bias is so ridiculous >and you are willing so much to jump to the conclusions you want, that I can only think you must be a >psychologist. Only psychologists are that sick and useless. without proof that I emailed her Brad, what you are doing is slandering me.... and according to a recent court decision, slander on the internet is just as worthy of civil action as slander in a newspaper... keep it up Brad - I've already your anonimizing services to hold the logs pending a subpeona.... I've asked you to leave me out of it but you can't.... ThePsyko Public Enemy #7 "God told me to skin you alive" |
| Here Brad posts to my 'home' groups mentioning my name.. probably in an attempt to get people to ask me to leave him alone hahahahahahahha | Date:
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:39:49 -0500 thePsyko, get your Netscummy pals out of my newsgroup. Please |
| Once again we find Brad posting in alt.hackers.malicious actively seeking people to come to SPP | From:
Frog2 <FrogRemailer@NoReply.Invalid.com> Oh, no. It looks like someone called ICEMAN has come back again to harass people in sci.psychology.psychotherapy. Can anyone come over and tell us who this asshole is?? |
| That obviously didn't work, so he tries a little harder... | Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:01:07 -0500 Cipher (posting as lartvocate), various databasix pervs, ICEKNIFE and thePsyko are abusing and spamming and flooding a sci newsgroup with off-topic posts. This appears to be in an effort to do 'Net Copping -- to get somebody they don't like off of Usenet. This is punk behavior not hacker behavior and they should be scorned and shunned by reasonable hackers. I thought these guys were supposed to be the good guys, against off-topic spam and harassment BUT this is all they are doing in sci.psychology.psychotherapy. Since they all claim alt.2600 or alt.malicious.hackers as their home base, I thought it would be fair enough to share the behavior they have been doing in a sci newsgroup for over a week with you. And, the keep telling people not to say anything bad about GB. Who is that? |
| This post is just fucking unbelievable. The amazing thing about it is that he actually seems to believe it!!! Of COURSE he brought up the past and went off topie AND mentioned people who arent' still posting in the newsgroup. We've already seen those posts since October 6th. | Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:27:23 -0500 (CDT) The only time friend's of Brad ever went off-topic, brought up the past, OR mentioned anyone that is not still posting inthe newsgroup IS WHEN others brought up allegations that REQUIRED bringing old stuff and old people up. This has been true for a long time now. Thus Brad's friends have NEVER violated the posting principles that many people here want everyone to subscribe to. I think it is safe to believe that if people didn't seem to have a need to TRY to smear Brad all would be current and on-topic here. This is my analysis of the situation. Funny thing is, Brad (who used to post here up until w years ago) did so very little wrong that the only way to try to smear him was to bring up old unfounded allegations from the past. Why do you think the Diane Unterspan bullshit from such a distant past was brought up. They found the allegations, but forgot that all those allegations were BULLSHIT from a sicko with no evidence behind them. Second, why is the CANCELED and explained "child killer" post brought up so often. The answer is simple: For years this was the "worst thing" (or seemingly worst thing) Brad had done!!! It still has to be misrepresented and the fact that that post was cancelled and explained by Brad must be left out. Bottom line. There has been for years the maximum effort to smear Brad in every little way. All possible "evidence" was collected and it was misrepresented or exaggerated or lied about STILL to make it sound bad. THE PRIMARY FACT IS: Psychologists had motivation to try to smear Brad just because of facts and views he brought up (facts and views that will not go away). It is much easier to find improprieties done by the psychologists here than any by Brad. Much much easier. |
| Once again, here's another
post by Brad denying something that he already admitted
to doing, with a lot of just plain 'kooking out'
interlaced (I don't know about you,but I find these posts extremely amusing) |
Message-ID:
<20011027150355.88870.qmail@propane.zoomph.net> You talk about keeping things on Usenet. But you don't and you act in the most inappropriate manners. You go off Usenet again and again, apparently. You have NO evidence of any wrong-doing by Brad, yet there is all the talk about going off-usenet against his innocent wife. You are hoodlums pure and simple. You don't get exactly your way and you engage in what is technically called aggression (and even against people who for sure are innocent, it seems). ThePsyko just for one example, if he does what he says, is without a doubt a psychopathic individual with no self-control. A real sicko. I really don't know what the hell you people want. There is no evidence of wrong-doing by Brad or anyone who could be Brad. The only evidence of wrong-doing is by you out-of-control sick hoodlums (and their psychologist pals here in this newsgroup). Just one person's view. Why don't you say what you want. Do you want no one who could possibly be Brad or an anonymous Brad to post here?(That would asking too much and asking the impossible.)WHAT? What is it you want?? I personally think you have all just lost it. There has been NO evidence of wrong doing BY anyone who could be Brad (at least there is no new evidence of any new wrong-doings). Cite the evidence if you have it. Otherwise you all out to find a nice group home for out-of-control psychopaths, because that is what you are. Get help. I suggest you all confess to the police and then confess to a good priest. |
| Brad tries his hand at a logical argument but obviously is not mentally equipped for the challenge | Date:
Sat, 27 Oct 2001 17:00:01 -0500 (CDT) If thePsyko did not email Brad's wife, how is it that he IMMEDIATELY knew the account of the email abuser had been cancelled. He is either the abuser himself or a very good friend of a person who abuses innocent women. If you are not the abuser of the innocent woman,then tell us who the bad guy is, okay ? Quoting thePsyko (a REAL psycho, prozac or not): From: thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com
(ThePsyko) On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:35:35 -0400, An
Metet >Ask the psychologists how they have harassed every NON-ABUSE domain>where people had web sites against them so the sites would be taken>down. (In fact, the sites would NOT have been taken down by any>responsible ISPs but were on free hosts that could easily be pressured.) You mean like that throw away free email provider whom you hassled and lied to not once but twice to have a certain email account closeddown? Do you realize that if your wife DID reply, that reply was nevergotten because you kept closing the account so quickly?? so as far asanybody is concerned, she never asked anybody to stop emailing her...perhaps she WANTS to know what's going on?
>Now, they support a slanderous/libelous web site that continues >to exist only because it is on an abuse domain (lart.com) -- that site >itself speaks for the nature of most all the psychologists here (they >are abusers) >>>Some supporter of Brad is presently holding out an olive branch in >>another newsgroup. It is a most reasonable position. It is completely >>reasonable and fair to all. Will the enemies of Brad slap it down???
ThePsyko Public Enemy #7 "God told me to skin you alive" |
| Here, archived for all to see forever, is Brad requesting people archive his posts (no more bitching about how your posts being reposted to be archived is harassment) ;p | Date:
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 02:50:20 +0100 From: Anonymous <nobody@paranoici.org> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: Re: thePsyko, abuser of innocent woman (more evidence) Message-ID: 0a9f7cd1f6c7cdb231256ae63273f895@paranoici.org will someone be sure to quote all my posts, so the fact that thePsykois a 24 karet asshole is documented for posterity in the archives? |
Brad gets nasy next