New tactics?

Brad actually posts something funny (well I find most of his attempts at being serious funny).	Date: 29 Oct 2001 18:42:57 -0000 Message-ID: <20011029184257.26974.qmail@propane.zoomph.net> From: dev-null@no-id.com Subject: Who are the stalkers and crybabies?? Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Who are the stalkers??? Who are the crybabies??? They are the hoodlums in this newsgroup who are friends of and supported by the unethical psychologists here!! IT IS OBVIOUS!!!
Here's another good PKB for the archives in conjunction with his post about calling the Iowa Psychology Licensing Board	Date: 29 Oct 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20011029211249.29898.qmail@propane.zoomph.net> From: dev-null@no-id.com Subject: Off Usenet, fair is fair Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy There used to be a lot of talk about how everything should stay on Usenet (that is, in the newsgroups). Brad's supporters, the fools that they were, very much cooperated. But now that the "psychologists" are trying so many of their off-Usenet tricks, like having an known 'Net hoodlum host THEIR libelous page for them, I think the time has come when more professionals get to find out what has been going on in this newsgroup. With all the gross improprieties and all the embarrassment the sppm moderators and other psychologists here have caused the field, I think many would say this was way overdue. I cannot for the life of me understand why unethical people like John Price, Dan Rogers, Mark Morin and their pals have not been well-exposed yet!!! Godspeed. I would hope this newsgroup would get cleaned up, but I think the entire psychotherapy profession is filled with nasty, sicko frauds.
The fact that Brad posted to my two home groups (alt.2600 and alt.hackers.malicious) about a week prior in attempts to drag my name through the mud there seems to be conveniently forgotten when Brad makes this post. More evidence showing how in his mind it's ok for him, but if you do what he does, then YOU are a 'sicko' stalker and you deserve it... This right here is what true kooks are made of	Date: 30 Oct 2001 02:44:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20011030024424.35930.qmail@propane.zoomph.net> From: dev-null@no-id.com Subject: thePsyko smeared there first Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy You know that other newsgroup you go to, thePsyko? Well, no one would have mentioned your behavior over here if you had not smeared 'Brad' first over there. And you did it BIG TIME and out-of-the-blue and really for no reasonable reason. You just wanted to spread some smear around. Well, you guys know that people tend to defend their pals against wrongful smears. So you just got what you had coming (and it was about as mild and objective as it could be). Start growing up, Steve (thePsyko). Maybe you could start calling yourself just steve... ALL CAN SEE CLEARLY THAT YOU ARE A SICKO PSYCHO -- don't reinforce that on yourself. (And, quit the prozac goof -- if you are on it. That could be your problem.)
Here we have Brad trying to say he doesn't even read the group... yet this posting style looks eerily like all the others doesn't it? welll... there's a reason for that.... (and besides, he really expects us to believe this? LOL)	Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:37:05 -0800 From: "A. Melon" <juicy@melontraffickers.com> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: All I do; I don't read this ng Message-ID: 640eb0e6d2455e4c03b8cbe1f0b67043@melontraffickers.com All I do each day is get up and see if the web page first writtenby Paul Bernhardt (sppm ombudsman) and Peter Hood (masters degree from Leicester Univ., England, in Forensic Psychology) is still being hosted by the hoodlums clearly working with and for the psychologists in this newsgroup. The cowardly unethical psychologists KNOW the web page is wrong (defamatory and inlarge part false and unsupported by decent facts or evidence AND they know it is libelous/slanderous). This is why, now, they have hoodlums doing their dirty work for them and do not host the webpage themselves. All who are familiar with this newsgroup know that the psychologists here very much support the slander/libel/defamation and the thuggery conducted by Peter Hood et al. Peter Hood used to host the libelous web page himself, until he had to look respectable for time while seeking degrees in psychology. The psychologist here support all the hoodlum activities and virtually all psychologists here are fans of Peter Hood so much that they each gave themselves a "Peter Hood number" (PH#). After checking on the "therapists" off-Usenet garbage, Then I too go about my off Usenet business. This is what I do.
Of course, just posting lies about me isn't enough for ol' Brad.. no sireee... next he reveals his pathetic research skills by posting what he thinks (don't ask me how the hell he came up with it) is my real name in 2600 and AHM	Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:48:44 -0800 From: AARG!Anonymous <remailer@aarg.net> Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.hackers.malicious Subject: Steve W., not a Brit I hope Message-ID: 3042f15222385a13c0c72daa6cceb94d@aarg.net You are not steve wright and if so not the brit, are you?
And of course, never content with a single failure in one day, he then tries his hand with Icemans identity	Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:35:43 -0800 From: AARG!Anonymous <remailer@aarg.net> Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.hackers.malicious Subject: Iceman? Message-ID: f35c4c665d319c072764f94e11594d09@aarg.net Is this someone we know?: Hello my name is Shawn. I work at Bell Sympatico, in hull. Shawn. > > shawnebbs@sympatico.ca > > ebbsjr@hotmail.com 720-0xxx (last 3 digits X'd out by me to protect shawns privacy, which Brad obviously doesn't give a shit about.. but that's not surprising either)
Here we have Brads last confirmable post of the month (although it's not midnight yet). What is interesting about this link that Brad so generously provides, is that if you look at ALL of the posts in ALL of the threads on that page, you will note that Dr. Packer (whom according to Brad is one of the worst stalkers of all) posted a grand total of TWO times. BOTH were in reply to Brad, and one of which clearly shows that BRAD posted a message in a support group that SHE associates with (not him, he has no reason to be there other than to stalk her) with the obvious intent to defame and undermine her professionally To put it bluntly, he was doing the stalking.	Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:50:02 -0800 From: AARG!Anonymous <remailer@aarg.net> Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy Subject: Long history of stalking (NO EXCUSES) Message-ID: 1eeda3cf6766075649c9c2bc0fc6004f@aarg.net Thanks to "Sheldon" <usenet@sodablue.org> from the minnesota newsgroup, we see an interesting, extensive history of stalking into mn newsgroups BY psychologists, as well as their hacker pals. Over 2 years of stalking and abuse INTO BRAD'S LOCAL NEWSGROUPS. Please do check it out. It makes good reading. It is clearly malicious stalking and harassment. It is interesting to note that Brad NEVER even posts to those newsgroups (except possibly in defense of the off-topic malicious spam and libelous harassment): http://groups.google.com/groups?as_oq=Jesness&as_ugroup=mn.general Much of this record preceeds the time when Dr. Leslie Packer and Dr. John Price befriended the hackers. Hackers (act. punks) have been their pals only a year. Don't want you to think that hackers have just been a bad influence on the psychologists. Just as likely the other way around. Actually, I think they are "birds of a feather" -- people used to abusing other people (like psychopaths).