MESSAGE FROM JV
NOVEMBER 17th
(to respect people’s privacy, all names were substituted by
initials)
Dear Giorgio,
I myself, though
a US citizen since
birth fifty-four years ago, am definitely still learning about the legal
system, the judicial system, and the penal system in the U.S. Just as with any
other system, I think it is only as good as the people
who run it. I went to see him yesterday.
He said that he knew one day into the trial what the outcome would be.
The prosecution called so many witnesses, and they spoke for so long, and the
defense attorneys, Eugene's lawyers, asked
these witnesses questions but not very many, Eugene said. Then when
the prosecution was finished calling witnesses, it was after three and a half
days of testimony and evidence pertaining to the previous trial. Although the
jury was specifically charged only with the sentencing, not with finding of
guilt or innocence, the trial was (I think) pretty much rehashed, and
then on Thursday afternoon, the defense called their witnesses: Q., Eugene's sister; Eugene's brother from Louisiana; myself. I do
not know if any others were called to testify on Eugene's behalf. As I
was going to be on the stand myself, I was not allowed to sit in the courtroom
prior to my testimony. I did not hear the testimony from his brother and
sister. I did however hear the testimony from Q., from a medical doctor about
diabetes, and the closing arguments by three of the four attorneys involved.
There is a man
named W.L., who is an anti-death penalty advocate who lives in Houston. He observed the
trial from Tuesday afternoon until Friday noon, when the jury
was sent out to deliberate. He has some thoughts on the matter, too. I do not
know if I have his contact information anymore. I will look for it.
Giorgio, I think Eugene's lawyers did a
good job. Of course, they were like David versus Goliath, Goliath in this case
being the entire system. They
pointed out that although E. was in fact tried and found guilty
of the D. murder, it was based on a combination of circumstantial evidence (he
gave his live-in girlfriend a ring with her name on it, and a purse that
evidently had been S. D.’ purse) and the testimony of a man named C. S. who was
at the time a drug addict and customer of Eugene's. S. was also a liar, it
seems. But his testimony was taken as truth. He swore he was Eugene's roommate. Eugene says no, he
never was his roommate, but he did know where Eugene lived.
I don't know,
Giorgio. It has been an unanswered and unanswerable question for me, whether Eugene did in fact kill
any of the people whose murders he was charged with. Mr. D.,
and another man who survived a robbery/murder, both are sure it was Eugene who
attacked them. However as E's lawyer pointed out, D. was knocked unconscious
and did not actually SEE who killed his wife, or who shot him in the head. I
don't know about the other man, as that was only referred to, later, when the
D.A. was giving his closing arguments to the jury.
Of course, even
if Eugene did murder
someone, or more than one, he is still my friend, and I am still his friend.
However, he says he never killed anyone, and I tend to believe him. How he got
the ring and the handbag though becomes a somewhat unsettling question. It
seems to me that it is entirely possible that S. did all the murders but
convinced the authorities it was Eugene........and
perhaps, S. paid Eugene for drugs with
the ring, the purse, etc.
Eugene's lawyer, S. C.,
said to the jury, "You have a unique
opportunity, to see how a man who had been condemned to death behaved in prison
for eleven and a half years after that. He did not have much motivation for
good behavior, did he? He was already condemned. But he had almost perfect
behavior, for all those years. The worst thing the D.A. could find out about his
behavior in prison was that he was reported to have thrown hot coffee at
another inmate, and was written up for having too much SOAP in his cell. " Skip
explained to the jury that very soon, the D.A. would play on their emotions,
and that was his job, but that he hoped the jury would then calm themselves
down and make a rational decision to give Eugene a life sentence.
But the District
Attorneys, the prosecutors, have such a different point of view, and different
way of expressing themselves. They said that Q. had testified that Eugene would be a
"threat to society", and they interpreted that for the jury by saying
"society includes the nurses, the
librarians, and the other inmates in general population at a prison",
implying that all those people would be at risk if Eugene received a life
sentence. They are very good at making listeners think the worst. They seem to
believe the worst, themselves. Mr. H., I was told by W. L., has sent quite a
few defendants to Death Row. His job is to keep the citizens safe from
criminals. Unfortunately we do not have here in Texas the kind of life
sentence that does not have the option of parole. So a life sentence really
means the possibility of parole in the future. Of course, I myself would love
to have Eugene sit in my
kitchen and cook him a great breakfast. I had hoped that would eventually
happen, when he and I were OLD! Now, it would take some kind of miracle I
guess. I do wonder, though, what our options are at this point. I know the
governor of Texas hardly ever grants
a stay or a pardon. W. says the appeals are unlikely to be effective, but that
there is a possibility of a new TRIAL if anyone can find an ERROR in this one
that just occurred. I think only W. is likely to do that, and I don't know what
happens, if anything, if he does. The transcript of the trial is very long and
very expensive.........and takes some time before it is available, I was told.
There was a
doctor who specialized in diabetes who was called to the stand, and I don't
understand what that was all about. It seemed they were trying to blame Eugene for gaining
weight, and use that as an indicator of character somehow. In fact, it is
impossible to exercise when you have handcuffs and shackles on, and the food in
prison is terrible. Would I have the self discipline to do sit-ups in my cell,
and not order food from the commissary? Very unlikely!
I asked Eugene yesterday how he
felt, and he said that after the trial ended and he was taken back to the
holding cell in the court building, he considered suicide, but he just has such
a strong will to live. He was angry, he felt the trial was unfair, and he did
not understand why his lawyers did not want him to testify on his own behalf.
He did take the stand, and answered many questions from the D.A., and the judge
had to speak sharply to reprimand the D.A. about tone of voice and volume. He
said, "sit!"
like you would speak to a dog, when the D.A. was standing up and using a loud,
sarcastic voice while questioning Eugene. When I asked Eugene if there is
anything he is looking forward to about going back to Livingston, he said "not really. It's just going from one
worst to another worst". He has a TV in his cell at Harris Co. jail,
which I don't think will be the case at Livingston. From my point
of view, at least our visits will be longer, two hours long, instead of the
fifteen minute visits at Harris Co. in Houston. (driving 3 1/2 hours one way for a fifteen minute visit, and
then driving home, is exhausting. I did it three times in four days, and spent most
of the day Saturday
sleeping to recover. However I am glad I did go again yesterday. W. had been to
visit on Saturday, but Eugene's sister has not
been to see him yet.)
I guess this is
enough! I do want to say again that if anyone from Italy or other
European countries wants to visit Eugene, I will be only
too glad to provide hospitality here in Austin. We are a four
hour drive from Livingston. And one would have to
prepare long in advance as only people whose names are on his visiting list are
allowed to visit, and it takes some time (of course!) to get new names onto the
visitors' list. My husband, Larry, wants to be added to the list, now that he
has visited E. a few times in Houston and has spoken
with him on the phone.
I will visit
again near Christmas, during our school vacation, and will let you know about
that visit afterwards.
all best to you—J.