Improvisation and the Music of Michael Daughtery

By Glen A. Tuomaala

 

He sits at a set of dual flat-screen monitors working on a new commission for the Philadelphia Orchestra.  Sticky notes show a number of different titles with “Philadelphia Stories” circled as the title du jour for now.  The work is set to premier on November 17th, 2001 with David Zinman conducting.

 

Surrounding him are racks of electronics, computers, keyboards, audio and video equipment and a huge percussion rack that would make Nexus jealous.  Just as important is a large Batman figure watching the room from atop a bookshelf, an autographed photo of William Shatner and Leonard Nemoy and an eccentric and confident composer of both orchestral and wind music: Michael Daugherty.

 

Born and raised in Cedar Rapids, Iowa; Daugherty was active in his high school band and in particular, jazz band.  His first works were written for his high school jazz band and inspired from his love of improvisation; a style and influence that is still heard in his music.  After teaching at Oberlin Conservatory of Music he now resides in Ann Arbor where he teaches composition at the University of Michigan and begins his first of four years as Composer in Residence with the Detroit Symphony Orchestra.

 

A versatile composer, Daugherty has received numerous awards, including recognition from the American Academy of Arts and Letters, the Stoeger Prize from Lincoln Center, and fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts.  His music has been performed by the Los Angeles and New York Philharmonics, the symphony orchestras of Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, San Francisco and St. Louis. Performances abroad include those by the Melbourne Symphony, the BBC

Symphony, the London Philharmonia, the Tonhalle Orchester Zürich, the Ensemble Intercontemporaine, the London Sinfonietta, and the Netherlands Wind Ensemble.  His music is published by Peermusic, New York, and represented in Europe by Faber Music, London.

 

B&O: WHAT EXPERIENCES INFLUENCES YOU MOST AS A COMPOSER?

DAUGHERTY:  It was the jazz background that informed my classical writing.  It’s more ear-based writing than anything else with material generated by musical instinct just like you would have to when improvising.  That material is manipulated in the abstract, on paper, but it is the composer making the decisions that creates the final work for other people to perform.

 

There used to be a real divide between learning how to be a jazz musician versus a classical musician.  There were only three real places you could really go to study jazz that being Indiana University, Berklee and North Texas State University.  It was at North Texas that I started as a jazz major, but eventually wrote my first piece for orchestra.

 

B&O: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR COMPOSITIONAL PROCESS?

DAUGHERTY:  For me, the title is the first and most important beginning to any work because it sets the idea and tone of everything that follows.  The title represents the idea, the concept, the understanding of what it is all about.  From there I lay out what instruments may be featured and the instrumentation of the ensemble.  For example, in ‘Rosa Parks Boulevard’, which features three trombones, I wrote the trombone parts first and then layered the rest of the orchestra parts within that framework; kind of like multi-tracking on a sequencer.

 

I don’t have any particular system when writing music, but I do focus on building layers within each piece.  I work from the very first measure to the last and think more in terms of pitch center than key signatures.  The form of the piece develops as I write.  If it turns out to be sonata-allegro form, then that’s great, but I never know that when I begin to compose a new piece of music.

 

Within that last step is where the real musical ideas are generated.  One way for that to happen is improvisation and experimentation from the keyboard.  It’s different for everyone, but improvisation often helps music students define and refine how they experience music.  Improvisation is really ear-based composition at it’s best; it’s generated with pure musical instincts, manipulated in the abstract on a computer, and then revised to create a final work.  For me the process of composing is like therapy.

 

B&O: HOW DO YOU REVIEW AND REVISE YOUR NEW WORKS?

DAUGHERTY:  A piece is never really done; I’ve gone back and made revisions to works that have been performed many times.  I prefer not to rush projects and therefore take months to let them take their course.  The best way is to be able to work on a project, put it away for a few weeks and then come back with a new perspective.  You’ll find a new opinion and view on the previous ideas and new directions from that point on.

 

I also invite musicians into my studio on a regular basis to play what I’ve written.  This evening a wonderful flute player is coming over to play through some sections of new music I’m writing for the Philadelphia Orchestra.  Hearing each individual part and often working it out in the studio with a player one on one is terrific in terms of tempo alterations, acoustic space, and generating new ideas.

 

B&O: HOW DOES TECHNOLOGY PLAY A PART IN YOUR COMPOSITIONAL PROCESS?

DAUGHERTY:  Technology plays a big part in the composition process.  I prefer to write directly to the computer and make changes from there based on what I hear from the playback.  I started working this way since 1984 and ever since then I’ve reinvested into the system I currently use.

 

I use a Macintosh G3 with two Sony flat screen 500PS monitors as my major computer for writing music; there’s also another PC in the studio that is just for e-mail.  Tannoy Playback speakers, Yamaha Disklavier acoustic piano, Proteus and Alesis playback modules, a few Sony televisions and video cassette recorders, and a zip drive that backs up everything at the end of the night.  I compose straight to the computer.

 

B&O: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR WORK WITH BOTH BANDS AND ORCHESTRAS?

DAUGHERTY:  I really love the world of the wind ensemble.  I compose for both orchestra and wind band, but the wind repertoire is much like where the orchestra was in the 19th century; it’s still expanding every day.  Because of this more and more wind musicians and conductors are open to new ideas and there is a sincere desire to try new things.  For example, there are some terrific tuba players out there, but surely not too many great tuba concertos.  You can’t say the same for the violin; in fact, there are hundreds of great violin concertos.  Writing for wind bands also has the added plus that they more often ask you to conduct the work you’ve composed for them!

 

B&O: WHAT DO YOU RECOMMEND BAND AND ORCHESTRA DIRECTORS?

DAUGHERTY:  Never put a roadblock up to a students interest.  We should be facilitators to their interests and directions.  This would include the opportunity to improvise as much as possible in different styles from jazz and rock to classical; get away from the printed page and the impulse to be a passive performer.  Any method that will help develop their ears is also important such as developing a digital tape recording project for the students.  They need to learn how to listen and experience sound to better understand it.  You need to be able to see the color samples before you know what to paint the house.

 

WEB SITES OF ADDITIONAL INTEREST

http://michaeldaugherty.net

http://www.peermusic.com/classical

http://www.fabermusic.com

http://www.music.umich.edu/faculty/daugherty.michael.html