BOB DYLAN
"I see my light come shining, from the west unto the east"
General Rating: 5
ALBUM REVIEWS:
HIT PACKAGES
Disclaimer: this page is not written by from the point
of view of a Bob Dylan fanatic and is not generally intended for narrow-perspective
Bob Dylan fanatics. If you are deeply offended by criticism, non-worshipping
approach to your favourite artist, or opinions that do not match your own,
do not read any further. If you are not, please consult the guidelines
for sending your comments before doing so.
This page also hosts comments from the following Certified Commentators: Michael Battaglia, Jeff Blehar, Ben Greenstein, John McFerrin, Nick Karn, Thomas McKeown, Sergey Zhilkin.
Robbie Zimmerman is an extremely complicated kind of guy. You can spend
weeks, months and maybe years trying to catch him by his tail, and when
you finally think you got him he suddenly turns around and says something
like "hold it, pal, you're not gonna make me that easy". Over
the years he's made albums that were praised as the greatest albums of
all time; albums that were trampled over as the most horrible trash in
the world; and albums that were both. He's had so many 'peak periods' and
'down periods' throughout his career that it is not even possible to discuss
him in terms of peaks and downs.
The truth is that Bob Dylan is a genius. And an absolute genius at that.
He never thought too much, nor too carefully, about the making of his songs.
He just wrote down things that flew through his head. And all of the time
he has been deceiving people. First, they thought he was a folk
singer - he deceived them. They thought he was a drug-addled psycho - he
deceived them. They began to think he was a country-western minstrel -
he deceived them. He was none of those. He was (and still is, I dare say)
a genius. The essence of his sound lies in its introspectivity, that's
my humble opinion. All of his songs are about himself, about all the sides
of his life, be they good or bad. And he never cared about which of his
sides the people appreciated most. And - once again - he was a genius.
And he gets a 5. And you should like him, 'cos if you don't - you don't
know what music is all about.
And please don't think of me as of a stupid Dylan deadhead that's ready
to lick the man's toes in any case. The reason I don't prattle too much
about Dylan flaws (like quite a few witty reviewers like to do) is that
these flaws are obvious. He's got an 'unbearable' voice, his melodies are
for the most part rudimentary, many of them jibbered from traditional folk
songs and most of the others falling into the standard blues pattern, and
he often gets much too repetitive and even 'boring' in the objective sense
of the word. But all of these things are so much on the surface that discussing
them seems a task fit for an idiot. That's the exact reason why nobody
usually brings them up. The bad sides are obvious. I might just have to
add that it's easy to cope with these sides once you stop thinking about
Dylan's singing and songwriting in the conventional terms of singing and
songwriting: frankly speaking, his creativity transcends all conventions.
Sure, his voice is gruff and wheezy: but wasn't he the first rock'n'roller
to prove to the world that you could get away with singing without having
to sound like Elvis Presley or Frankie Avalon? His singing style has served
as the primary inspiration for hundreds of performers, including such outstanding
acts as Lou Reed and Jimi Hendrix. It's just not what you're going to expect.
Unfortunately, people seem to be divided in two major groups here: those
that get his singing and those that don't. The first group (which includes
your humble servant) think he's a great singer, highly emotional and in
a class of his own, using his vocal chords as a peculiar musical instrument
all the time. The second group either thinks he's talentless or, at the
very best, that his songs always sounded better when sung by other performers.
And nothing can change the opinions of either, and I do mean nothing
- I've held numerous battles defending poor Mr Zimmerman from those who
say they'd better go listen to their toilet flushing than put on a Dylan
record. Whatever. I guess this has something to do with your genes after
all. Nevertheless, it is always better to 'get' something than 'not to
get' it (this is my primary belief about art: always try to like it), so
I say that if you don't 'get' Dylan there must be something wrong with
your genes. Now feel free to flame me.
It is not entirely true as well that Dylan's primary strength lies in his
lyrics. Sure, he was one of rock's greatest poets, and certainly the main
force behind the 'lyrical revolution' that took place somewhere in the
mid-Sixties, when people finally started listening to songs like 'Mr Tambourine
Man' and getting away from the permanent 'girls-and-cars' thematics. And
he's indeed a great poet. He started off as a funny, rambunctious folk
singer, then descended into full-bodied psychedelia and afterwards just
kept flooding the gates with one layer of imagery after another. Again,
some people complain about the utter nonsense and incomprehensibility of
his lyrics, but somehow people often forget that lyrics are not prose:
you do not go around 'understanding' lyrics like you 'understand' prose.
Much more often than not, Dylan's lyrics just convey a mood, a general
feeling, maybe a vague idea, and an endless stream of entertaining, intriguing,
and sometimes downright hilarious wordgames. I mean, everybody knows that
'Ballad Of A Thin Man' is a protest song, right? Right. And then they go
on complaining about lines like 'give me some milk or else go home' and
say 'THAT's protest? Man, you're whacky!' This is beat poetry, little dude.
You won't be hearing direct calls like 'up against the wall mutherfuckah'
in every second line. On the other hand, just think of the angriness of
the lyrics. Think how Dylan goes around hitting poor Mr Jones on the head
again and again and again. These lyrics might seem to be random crap -
but try to substitute them with your own written random crap and you'll
see nothing will work better. Stream of consciousness, but that's a consciousness
of a genius.
However, like I said, it's not just the lyrics that make a Dylan song sound
great. It's the way that everything is combined - the rudimentary melody,
the gruff whining, the lyrics, the attitude, and Bob's own superb guitar
and harmonica playing. By the way, Bob's really a unique harmonica playing
dude - be sure to check out his early acoustic albums to particularly appreciate
that, but, well, he's always been great at supplementing the emotions of
his voice with the emotions of the little metal bar. His guitar ain't particularly
impressive, but first-rate anyway: he's actually done his folk homework,
and done it fully.
Incidentally, Bob has been often hailed as 'the greatest put-downer' in
rock: this is probably true, but it's only part of the story. What often
escapes the listener and the reviewer is that Dylan is really a small humble
guy. He was never a big commercial star, with just about a handful of chart-topping
LPs (most of which came in the Seventies, way past his peak hour). He never
really cared for success: maybe he didn't really shun it, but he always
made clear that his primary aim in this world was not making money
or screwing chicks, and success never really got to his head. He only went
for a slight commercialization of his sound in the Eighties, making the
fatal mistake of incorporating disco elements in his music; but he's come
back with a bang since then, and if only his poor health won't fail him,
we may yet hear a significant word or two from Robert. He wrote songs that
hardly ever made you stand up and shake your hips or sing along to some
sentimental romantic melody; instead, these songs went straight into the
very depths of your soul and spoke to you on a personal, intimate level
- a thing that neither the Beatles nor the Rolling Stones, as much as I
love them, could never pull off. The proof is that whenever I listen carefully
to a Dylan song or try to sing along to it, I always end up putting myself
in Bob's place and trying to feel the things he felt. It's amazing how
such simplistic songs as 'Mr Tambourine Man' or 'Gates Of Eden' or 'Stuck
Inside The Mobile' can get under your skin and change your life forever.
This, of course, is only possible if you manage to get rid of the shackles
of conventional singing and conventional songwriting - I sure did, and
I'm both glad and proud about that. You really gotta live up to the good
sides of Bob Dylan. You have to take the presumably 'bad' sides as a given
fact even before you start listening to the first Dylan song in your life.
You just have to concentrate on other things, ya know? Now on to the reviews
before I start talking metaphysical.
Due to its largeness, the page has been split in two parts: this one covers
everything Dylan released from 1962 to 1974, the second part which you
can either access from any of the links to particular albums or by following
the link at the bottom of this page, deals with the post-1974 catalog,
starting with Blood On The Tracks.
General Evaluation:
Listenability: 4/5. All
of Dylan's melodies are easily accessible, and while his voice takes some
getting used to, at one point you'll notice that it doesn't come around
as 'weird' anymore.
Resonance: 5+/5. It would be
hard for me to try and come up with an artist who digs into your spirit
deeper than Mr Zimmerman. That's what he's there for, after all.
Originality: 4/5. One point
off for the 'folk-melody-recycling' stuff, but it's hard to seriously dock
points in the 'originality' department for the man who basically transformed
rock'n'roll into serious music on his own.
Adequacy: 5/5. Dylan never gets
overbearing. The 'humble guy' image prevents that.
Overall: 4.5+ = *
* * * * on the rating scale.
What do YOU think about Bob Dylan? Mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
jamman <j.mccoy@home.com> (15.11.99)
One of the most significant artists ever.
Baltimore show, 11/08/99 really rocked, better than 7/16/99 w/simon.
MarkGMoe <MarkGMoe@email.msn.com> (15.11.99)
Wow...what can I say? You are so far off on your reviews that it seems
ludicrous that you even have a web page dedicated to the work of Bob Dylan.
You belittle some of his greatest songs and miss the point so many times
that it's ridiculous. And how in the world can you call yourself a fan
and ridicule his voice. I once attended a Dylan concert in 1996 and read
a review later of the same show. An 18 year old girl said everything better
in just once sentence than you did in all of your reviews. I thought what
she said was truly inspirational. She wrote, "I guess we all stop
empathizing with those people who say they can't understand a thing he
says about the same time that we realize that his voice can't be anything
but beautiful."
[Special author note: apparently,
Bob Dylan is none other than Jesus Christ in person, and Mark is his Saint
Peter. And The Eighteen Year Old Girl Who Puts So Many Periods In Her Sentences
She Ends Up Sounding Cabbalistic? The Virgin Mary, no doubt... Ladies and
gentlemen, please don't treat Bob as a religious object. That's exactly
what he's been trying to get away from all his life. Unfortunately, some
people weren't intelligent enough to take a hint. Not to mention that I
never called myself a fan and I never ridiculed Bob's voice, but that goes
without saying.]
<Jazzforhim@aol.com> (29.11.99)
hi im a 15 year old who loves bob dylan , i have 22 of his albums and he is a shelter to those who are sick of pop hysteria, I like him because he proved that humbelness is cool, in the 60's he proved that rock songs can be intelectual ( something the 90's havent figured out) . in the 70's he showed that everybody can change and boy did he! in the 80's he followed his own convictions, by becoming a christian, now im a christian and his christian albums were the best that i have ever seen , i think saved is underated, but yes i think his secular stuff is better,
Brian Blacklow <blacklow@applepark.com> (05.12.99)
I don't think anyone could express my thought of Bob Dylan better than you did... wow... You were wrong about one thing though... you can make non-Dylan fans into Dylan fans.... it just takes some work... first, find out what kind of music they like.... whether it be Ministry, Rod Stewart, GNR, etc.... there's a Dylan connection there... amaze them by pointing out that the song they like by Ministry, etc. is originally a Bob song... play them the original Bob song... continue doing this until they ask to borrow an album... give them BOTT if they have recently had a breakup, otherwise, give them Greatest Hits volume 1.... they'll become Bob fans sooner or later.... this technique has worked on two of my friends and I plan to test it on a third...
Dave <dave@film-center.com> (20.01.2000)
Although I'm only 30, I've managed to see him at least 20 times and have been a big fan since college. Admittedly, I've lost interest in him a bit over the past 3 years. I've always been more of a fan of his earlier stuff (when you could understand what he's singing). What I've never liked about him is his attitude with interviewers. Even in the 60's, he would put people down without the saving grace of the beatles' wit. The 70's was a lot of psudo-intellectual garbage. I'm not sure what he's like today. Maybe he's matured a bit with a likeable sense of humor...or maybe not. Who knows? What I do know is his earlier efforts are classic and always a joy for me to hear.
Rose Mary <raponte@prtc.net> (12.02.2000)
English is not my first language...but I can say that Dylan is the greatest artist in rock history or probably in the music field in general. If you do not feel moved by his lyrics, his voice and his harmonica, must probably you are dead or you suffer from heart numbness....
John McFerrin <stoo@imsa.edu> (02.03.2000)
Over the past couple of months, I've been searching out as many Dylan
albums as I can (except for Planet Waves, I have studio stuff through
Desire) and in the course of listening I've come to a general conclusion
about him and his music.
Any album by Dylan, from the debut onward, CANNOT be truly appreciated
the first run through. The reason for this is fairly obvious, of course;
the first things one notices when going through an album are simply the
notes, both vocally and not. But as you've basically asserted, Dylan is
NOT about 'conventional' music-listening. There is an old adage that states
that, "the most important part of music is what isn't the notes,"
and this is true with Dylan more than any other artist. The first time
I ran through Highway 61, I sorta liked, but I was more amused by
it than anything, what with the bizarre lyrics and all. And first time
through Blonde on Blonde, I must say I was bored. Same with JWH.
BUT, subsequent listens pulled out the Dylan magic, and I was hooked. I
cannot explain what exactly it is he does, not for the life of me, but
he does it WELL. Even on Time out of Mind (and I must also say that
'Highlands' _definitely_ has this magic, I honestly did not notice that
it was 16 minutes long) and, let's face it, Self-Portrait. In any
case, I agree with giving Blonde the best grade of all, as 'Sad-eyed
Lady' is just gorgeous beyond words.
Per Anderö <per.andero@lund.mail.telia.com> (14.05.2000)
I didn´t like Nashville skylines! What happened to his
wonderful voice? And Selfportrait was a disaster! And still is!
The only song that´s worth listening to is the one he doesn´t
sing: "All the tired horses"!
But I can forgive Bob! He has made such wonderful albums after that, like
Blood on the tracks and Oh mercy! On May 15:th, he´s
going to receive the Polar Price, the musical Nobel Price, here in Sweden!
He´s deserved it!
Richard James <rowleyt@supanet.com> (07.08.2000)
Your favourite song selections are pretty sound ('Tom Thumb's Blues' is, after many years of thought, my personal Dylan favourite), but 'Chimes of Freedom' and 'Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands' ?? Both are musically dull ('Gates of Eden' is slightly better than 'Chimes') and lyrically overcooked. So, best song on Another Side? I'd have to go for 'To Ramona' or possibly 'I Don't Believe You'. 'Lowlands' sounds to me Bob's drunken way of saying 'Sara Lowndes,' just as 'Johanna' is a stoned 'Joan' [Baez]: 'Visions of Johanna', though, is a good song (despite the bit towards the end which spends too much time with the owed/loads/explodes etc. section of the rhyming dictionary), whilst 'Sad-Eyed' is an embarrasment.
Billy Rabara <billy_raybar@email.msn.com> (10.08.2000)
I am a true admirer of much of Bob Dylan's work. There are Dylan songs
that I have kept my interest through hundreds of listenings. But there
are no true masterpieces. Every Dylan song, to a lesser or greater extent,
is flawed. I applaud his passionate three note harmonica and guitar solos.
I applaud his passionate croaks that us Dylan fans graciously term 'singing'.
After every listening of every Dylan song, I think, "Damn good try,
Bob. Damn good try." But Dylan has repeatedly displayed a lack of
effort. It's a shame that Dylan hasn't cared enough about his music to
get vocal lessons. The inability to 'hit notes' perfectly is not disastrous
but coupled with the inability to control voice is ... well ... disastrous.
I have heard the argument: "Dylan isn't TRYING to hit notes".
Give me a break. This IS music we're talking about, isn't it? Mary had
a little lamb IS E D C D EEE DDD EGG, isn't it? Dylan certainly knew at
a young age that he didn't possess much natural singing ability. He just
doesn't care. It's too late, now. His vocal chords are most likely damaged
beyond repair.
Dylan is obviously a great song writer. But even his songwriting is, at
many times, flawed. Writing is not supposed to be riddling people. What's
the point of writing lyrics that nobody understands? It's as if Dylan gets
a good idea in his head -- a clear picture of what a song will be about
-- then he obscures that image and writes it. And sometimes a particular
image, albeit obscured, is indeed interesting. However, more times than
not, the entirety of a song is not and can never be fully understood.
Edmilson Paes <EdPaes@aol.com> (13.08.2000)
Estou escrevendo em Português para dizer que mesmo no Brasil Bob
Dylan é considerado um poeta maravilhoso e influêncioou grandes
nomes do Brasil como Caetano Veloso, Raul Seixas. Belchior, Zé ramalho
e etc.
[Special author note: for those
who accidentally happen not to have brushed off their Portuguese in the
past few years, this means something like 'I'm writing in Portuguese to
say that even in Brazil Dylan is considered a marvelous poet and has influenced
such Brazilian greats as...' sorry, my knowledge of Brazilian culture really
sucks.]
<PRytur@aol.com> (31.08.2000)
He is one of two artists who leave me in jaw dropped awe (The other
one is novelist Ernest Hemingway). Like Hemingway, Dylan is a true American
original, a pioneer, a visionary. He single handedly reconfigured the way
the record buying public listens to music. Many musicologists attribute
the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's album as being the first record to insist
the listener must actually sit down and consume the entirety of the album
from start to finish (like a book)...I beg to differ. That distinction
belongs to Dylan's Blond on Blond. A masterpiece of popular music.
A singular achievement of the highest order.
Bob Dylan will endure because he challenged and triumphed over convention.
Plain and simple. Like Hemingway, Dylan fused tradition with innovation
and created something that was newer than new.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (03.10.2000)
First, thanks for devoting so much time to reviews of Dylan's work, and for encouraging intelligent discourse on a subject close to my heart, and obviously many others'. Second, you are right to suggest that you can't truly appreciate the brilliance of so much of his work without acknowledging his flaws, his poorer material, the second-rate product that has been released, particularly in the 80's. Third, I think it's clear that there is never going to be consensus about Dylan's best album, although most people would surely list the Top 3 as Highway 61, Blonde, and Blood, and then argue about the gold medal position. I would further like to confuse the issue by stating that my 'favourite' Dylan album, of the 35 I possess, is Blonde On Blonde, but, the 'best' album Dylan has ever made is Blood On The Tracks, because it is more consistently good than Blonde - it has no weak moments, but Blonde has, love it as I do, love it as I have done for 27 years!! Finally, having just discovered your Dylan back pages, although we've exchanged comments on Mark Prindle's Dylan page, I'm looking forward to contributing to the debate. Cheers, George!
Ola Hansson <046-158725@telia.com> (17.10.2000)
Well, Bob Dylan's lyrics are a popular hobby among intellectuals, I think
Thomas McKeown <t.mckeown@cns.norfolk.sch.uk> (15.12.2000)
Ooh, Bob Dylan. To my mind, if all Dylan had left us was a box of his lyrics, he would justify his place in history; of course, we'd be missing out on a lot of great music, but to me, sitting down with some Bob Dylan lyrics and reading them is just as much fun (if not more so) than listening to the music. The fact he left us lots of catchy melodies is almost incidental. Of course, cultural phenoma such as Dylan always inspire both lots of fanatism and lots of crappy wannabe imitators, but Dylan's legacy has been thankfully relatively unharmed by critical back-lashes inspired by waves of copy-cats, which is what has happened, to a certain extent, to the Beatles (Oasis?). I can't say that untill you pointed it out in your introduction that I even thought of Bobby's voice as being weird, perhaps because it's the voice that people such as myself, who can't properly sing, adopt when they have to. His finest moment? To my mind, either the great roll call of bitersweet introspective masterpieces on Blonde on Blonde that begins with 'Visions of Johanna' and ends with 'Stuck Inside of Mobile With the Memphis Blues Again', or 'All I Really Want To Do', which never fails to get me to "share all the fun", particually where he starts howling (don't pretend you've never done it when you thought no-one was listening!).
Year Of Release: 1962
Record rating = 5
Overall rating = 10
Old folk covers. But it's Dylan that sings, and that's something.
Best song: HOUSE OF THE RISIN' SUN
His first 'have-at-it' try; it's got only two of his own compositions
('Talkin' New York', a funny spoken commentary on his being received in
Big Apple, and 'Song To Woody' which could be regarded as a kinda 'dedication'
of his entire creativity to that ol' man folker), but you even hardly notice
- they sound oh so derivative from the rest of the folk stuff he's covering
on here. In fact, this album is not very significant musically, but it
sure provides a lot of insight into Bob's roots: after listening to it
a few times you begin to understand all those incessant country and folk
cliches of which his early acoustic albums are chock-full. Songs like 'Highway
51 Blues' were certainly the inspiration for 'Highway 61 Revisited', and
I've always thought the melody of 'It's Alright Ma' was pure Dylan until
I've heard its origins on this LP.
But then again, all of this material is quite listenable. Not essential,
but nice. Actually, at that point Bob had already penned quite a few compositions
of his own; however, as a humble beginner, he had to prove that he was
qualified enough for singing his own material by recording all those covers.
I do not think, though, that he took it as a heavy burden: the songs are
all lively and fresh and almost breathing, and Bob has really great taste,
as most of the numbers have something to them. (The most amazing thing,
of course, is that there were tons of similar or even better stuff
left unreleased, as amply demonstrated by The Bootleg Series). Thus,
his rendition of 'House Of The Rising Sun' is not an ounce worse than The
Animals' version, even if it's played with just an acoustic, without those
organs and all - perhaps the generated feeling is just not as ecstatic
and cathartic as in the Beasts' case, but then again, you will never want
to accuse the Dylan version of being 'pretentious'. Note also that Bob
sings the song with the original lyrics - daring not to change lines like
'it's been the ruin of many a poor girl/And me, oh God, I'm one'. So in
this here case it ain't metaphoric and gives the listener a clear picture
of what 'the house' really is, which makes the song all the more poignant.
As far as I understand, the legend that the Animals learned the song from
Dylan's version turns out to be, well, just another legend in the endless
series of rock legends, but it's still nice to have both hanging around
to do the comparisons. The funny thing is that Dylan's debut also includes
his rendition of Ric Von Schmidt's 'Baby Let Me Follow You Down' - a song
that was later reworked by Burdon, Price and Co. as 'Baby Let Me Take You
Home' and was something like the band's first single or the band's first
hit single, whatever. Again, though, I far prefer Dylan's version (though
the Animals' is by no means bad); later on, he made the grotesque
move of rearranging it as a rip-roarin' live electric number in order to
piss off his braindead folkish fans. Check it out on Live 1966,
it's groovy.
There are also faster songs on here - like 'She's No Good' and 'Freight
Train Blues' that make you want to boogie with a minimum effort, even if
essentially they're just 'whizzed-up' generic blues numbers. However, on
'She's No Good' Bob arrives on the scene with all his might - squirming
and squealing out the lyrics all the while furiously beating the shite
out of his acoustic, and, while the uninitiated may vomit on the spot and
go throw on some Engelbert Humperdinck instead ('anything but THAT rusty
engine hum!'), I find it to be an exuberant, enthusiastic statement of
youth, force and good clean fun. Later on, Bob would become much too serious
for these tricks. And 'Freight Train Blues'? In his review, Brian Burks
called his vocal efforts on that one the equivalent of a 'hoarse vocal
feedback', and I couldn't agree more. 'I got the freight train blue-oo-OOOOOOOOOS...'
Personally, I laughed my pants off first time I heard that wheeze, and
apparently, Bob felt inclined to laugh as well - noticed these funny 'whoa-hoo-hoos'
after each verse? Hah!
However, don't get the impression that the record is just a hilarious throwaway.
Nope, the so-much-beloved death theme is reprised many a-time - in 'Gospel
Plow', 'See That My Grave Is Kept Clean', 'In My Time Of Dyin'', etc.,
etc. The funny and gloomy songs are interspersed in a very, very bizarre
way, so that you're really left puzzled as to what old Bob's real emploi
is, but get used to it: this is just the first of the cute little mystifications
that Bob would soon start throwing at us in bunches. As for the songs themselves,
'In My Time Of Dyin' is a great deal more effective than that horrendous
eleven-minute hard-rockin' Led Zep version on Physical Graffitti:
Dylan never tries to transform the song into a lengthy self-indulgent dirge
full of crappy vocal and instrumental noises, just sticking to the essence,
and his passionate vocal delivery is one of the best on record. 'Man Of
Constant Sorrow' is supposed to give us the creeps, and 'See That My Grave
Is Kept Clean' ends the record on a gloomy, dreary note - just like 'She's
No Good' started it on an upbeat note, despite the endless 'wanna lay down
and die' refrain.
Still, even if he intended to make this album really depressing, he failed.
The songs are good, but they're not really Dylan: see, no generic folkish
lyrics are gonna depress me any more than your average death metal song.
Except for 'House Of The Risin' Sun', which is truly scary due to the 'grounded'
character of the lyrics and its being based on a true or, at least, a realistic
story, I personally just don't feel any real darkness here, at least, it's
not more dark than Freewheelin', an' dat 'un shoah ain't dahk wo'th
a penny!
In my time of dyin' I'll still be posting your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Barry <bgkla@conncoll.edu> (11.10.99)
I'm afraid I have to disagree with your assessment of Led Zeppelin's "In My Time of Dying". Dylan treats the song well, and I would definitely listen to Dylan before Led Zeppelin any day; as far as straight-up rock songs go, though, this song is nearly perfect.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
6.5 - I think this is a better album than you give it credit for, George! The songs may not be Dylan’s but it’s an impressive debut nevertheless. Best songs: “Baby, Let Me Follow You Down” and “Fixin’ To Die”.
Year Of Release: 1963
Record rating = 9
Overall rating = 14
The big acoustic breakthrough. Hard to get used to, but that's about
the only complaint...
Best song: A HARD RAIN'S A-GONNA FALL
The real bursting out on the scene occurred here - with 13 tracks, not
a single one of 'em a duffer! This time, young Bob was so assured of himself
that he dared to make almost all of this album consist of his own compositions,
and they're darn good. At least three or four of them rate as some of his
best-known material: thus, everybody loves the great epic 'A Hard Rain's
A-Gonna Fall' which puts to shame all the folk singers and songs all around
the world with its majestic, pompous and truly epic lyrics (and
I do mean 'epic', not in that grotesque 'Stairway To Heaven' sense, but
rather in the great Homerian tradition) and the gorgeous 'call-to-arms'
refrain. Actually, I suppose the song's lyrical matter is close to 'The
Times They Are A-Changin', but in a much more veiled, sophisticated and
poetic way. The grooviest memory related to that song I can recall is that
Dylan once said something like he had actually planned every one of the
endless imagery lines in that song to be the beginning of a separate tune,
before he changed his mind and lumped them all together. Might be a hoax,
of course, but ever imagined the possibility of Bob's catalogue being doubled
through this witty manoeuvre?
The more introspective, slightly misogynistic 'Don't Think Twice It's Alright'
is yet another timeless classic here: if you ever doubted that Dylan could
pen a great melody, here's your chance to disprove it. (Of course, it's
probably a rip-off, but that's a problem to be solved). A bitter, yet tender
'bybe bye love'-style ditty, it hits you with all the might of the Bobster's
weird, by now softer, gruffer and more melancholy tone, and the effect
is unforgettable. And for some hard feelings, don't forget to check the
all-time human rights anthem in 'Blowin' In The Wind', a song much too
famous for me to describe it here, and the violent, almost bleeding protest
notes in 'Masters Of War'. For the record, this is the only song in which
Bob lusts for someone's death, by the way: never after would he repeat
these maniacal, vampirish lines: 'And I hope that you'll die/And your death
will come soon/I'll follow your casket/By the pale afternoon.." Groovy.
Some gentlemen complain about the song sounding ridiculously dated and
ineffective today, but I just don't get it. Now if there were no more 'masters
of war' in the world today, I would understand; but the problem is just
as actual today as it was fourty years ago. Okay, perhaps there was no
need to get that violent; but at least it's kinda interesting, and certainly
a unique expression of straightforward anger in Bob's entire catalogue
(not counting minor protests like 'Hurricane').
But the anthemic classics are not the only thing to be enjoyed here. Bob's
gruff, intentionally raw ballads are equally brilliant. 'Girl From The
North Country' is a gorgeous, sad love song, and Bob's intentionally off-key,
stuttering delivery of the lyrics gives it the kind of authenticity that
Johnny Cash could only hope for. And as for the humourous parts - well,
there's plenty to be found: 'Talkin' World War III Blues' and 'I Shall
Be Free' can kick the belly out of you! Listening to these songs still
makes me wonder how a guy with such a blistering sense of humour could
almost completely have lost it in just a few years... anyway, that verse
about Adam and Eve should rank as one of the world's most flabbergastingly
brilliant jokes. Remember it? "Well I spied a girl and before she
could leave/I said 'let's go play Adam and Eve'/I took her by the hand
and my heart it was thumpin'/When she said 'hey man you crazy or sumpthin'/You
know what happened last time they started". And I never actually thought
about it before, but what about that verse about the 'folk singer' who
'works herself blind' in 'I Shall Be Free'? Could it be a veiled hint at
Joan Baez or not? 'Writes me letters and sends me checks'. Hmm. Probably
not. Then again...?
As you have probably already understood, this is still a straightforward
folkie album - which means most of the time it's just Bob and his trusty
harmonica. The major exception is a primitive-band-take on the traditional
'Corrina, Corrina'; it can strike you as extremely awkward on first listen,
but you'll get through after you get used to the arrangement. Just don't
try to remind yourself of the Taj Mahal version.
Certainly the peak of Dylan's folk period, it was a great inspiration for
tons of people, including 'em damn Beatles; still, I wouldn't give this
record a super rating, primarily because it's that listener-unfriendly:
it takes a lot to get used to everything. After all, it's almost hour-long
(at that point, Bob obviously had no respect for the fourty/fourty-five
minute barrier, not to mention the three-minute radio barrier, of course),
and, while I can easily tolerate folk music in general, an entire hour
of guitar and harmonica is a wee bit too much even for me - what about
all the hard-rockin' people out there? Once you do assimilate it, though,
you'll probably ask me to pump up the rating yourself. After all, guitar
or no guitar, this is a great album for inventive folk players to draw
their inspiration from. Just listen to 'Down The Highway', for instance.
Essentially, it's just a simple blues tune, and lots of artists would just
play it as a simple blues tune. But Dylan re-arranges it drastically, with
that great crescendo guitar phrase after each line, and bringing his vocals
close to a real wolfish howl: notice how brilliantly he does the closing
line of each verse. 'LORD I REALLY MISS MY BABY-EEEEEE-EEEEEE
- she's in some far-off land...' I mean, ain't it brilliant? A great, great
use of dissonance: bring all the passion and fury and howling into the
first half of the line and then quickly chew up the second half as if it
were nothing but an equivalent of some ad-libbed 'oh yeah' or something.
That's the trick that Dylan employs on many, many more songs, although
always in a different way, and it always works for me. A terrific way to
expand the capabilities of conventional singing, if you axe me.
Nevertheless, a couple of the tunes like 'Bob Dylan's Dream' still do nothing
for me, so I'm gonna leave the rating as it is. For any artist of a lesser
stature than Dylan, this would be a solid ten without a doubt; but the
amazing thing is that Bob could do better, and he did - at least twice
or thrice. Unfortunately, that wasn't the case with his next album, though.
Don't think twice, it's alright! Just mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Mike Zupan <viktoria@siol.net> (09.11.99)
In my opinion, best song ever ('Dont Think Twice' - G.
S.).
I can never get bored with it! "I once loved a girl, a child I am
told, gave her my heart, but she wanted my soul, but don't think twice
it's all right..."
Orgazmic lines.
Brian Blacklow <blacklow@applepark.com> (05.12.99)
<<Nevertheless, a couple of the tunes like 'Bob Dylan's Dream'
still do nothing for me>>
Listen to this song the day after a childhood friend dies...
Jeff Blehar <jdb3@jhu.edu> (27.02.2000)
Of his early folk/protest albums, Freewheelin' is the best of them by a very wide margin. It lies at the perfect median of Dylan's early growth: neither as inexperienced and ear-shattering vocally as his debut nor as unhappy, humourless, and jaded as The Times They Are A-Changin'. Just about the only song I really don't care for is "Masters Of War," because he goes TOO far. Dylan is great when he's insulting someone, but when he's wishing for someone's death it's just a trifle too nasty for comfort. That being said, the song redeems itself with its incisiveness and clarity. And the rest of the album is just top-flight material, pretty much as good as a guy with his guitar and a harmonica will ever be able to get. "Down The Highway" is average, I suppose, but I frankly enjoy its mood. "Blowin' In The Wind" is the only other one which I dislike (trite! dated!), but I can't really tally that one up as a strike against the album since it's generally so well-loved. Everything else, from the devastating "A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall" (the absolute peak of his protest - surreal, disturbing, moving, unforgettably beautiful) to the hilarious "I Shall Be Free" (my favorite line? "Make love to Elizabeth Taylor/Catch hell from Richard Burton") is just amazing. The love songs are alternately suffused with yearning ("Girl From The North Country") or cynical and jaded world-weariness ("Don't Think Twice"), and the comedy numbers are (surprising, this) genuinely funny. Not only that, but comedy/protest numbers like "Talking World War III Blues" have a strange poignancy to them: "I'll let you be in my dream if you let me be in yours." I really don't think this album drags at all - it's a mesmerizing mood piece, and Dylan performs the impressive feat of getting me really excited about an hour of "wooden" music. Three cheers and a 9/10.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7 - It’s a pity that songs like “Down The Highway” were left on this record, when so many better tracks were excluded by the record company. Nevertheless, it’s a very good album. However, I think the ‘protest ’ songs get a little too much attention. “Blowin’ In the Wind” is charming, but it’s also rather trite. “Masters Of War” is too extreme, too preachy - I got slammed on Mark Prindle’s page for commenting that it was overblown - I still think it’s a good song and a great performance but I think some of you give Dylan too much credit for his social comment. Dylan has admitted many times that he didn’t really care about these issues that much - he used them to become better known and get the artistic freedom to make the records he really wanted to make - in a 1965 interview, for example, he said “I didn’t want to write topical songs”. (I’ll provide the source of this quote if anybody’s interested.) The point is that the songs have to be judged on their merits, not for the ‘sincerity’ that some people imagine that Dylan sang them with. Anyway, I think the best songs are “Don’t Think Twice”, despite it being a little harsh on the girl, and the lovely “Dream”.
Michael Battaglia <Dhalgren99@aol.com> (07.12.2000)
I don't listen to the "folky" ones as much as I should, which
is weird since being mostly a guy interested in the lyrics of songs, this
album is basically all about the lyrics, as entertaining as Bob can be
on guitar, I doubt anyone will be listening to the "karoke" mix
of this anytime soon. Still, it's stuffed to the gills with classics,
"Blowing in the Wind" "Masters of War" "A Hard
Rain's A-Gonna Fall" (my personal favorite), "Don't Think Twice,
It's All Right" among others. Tied for personal favorite is
the absolutely hilarious "I Shall Be Free", which with a different
backing probably would have fit in well on one of the later albums.
Not really the first album you want to play for people if you want to introduce
them to how great Bob Dylan is, his voice is about as annoying as it gets
on some songs and I'm pretty patient when it comes to stuff like that.
Y'know, someone once commented to me that it's easy to cover a Bob
Dylan song because all you have to do is get someone who can sing and I
almost wanted to smack them. Not the point! It's about HOW
he sings it, the phrasing and all that crud . . . I don't know anything
about music and I can tell that. Sigh.
Pant pant pant. Off the ol' soapbox now. But still, his lyrics
here do it for me anytime, when every other "protest" sixties
album has turned to dust in the record sleeve, Bob touched subjects that
won't go away and did it in a way that you don't feel like someone is sitting
next to you reading the Times when the album is on.
Year Of Release: 1964
Record rating = 4
Overall rating = 9
A forced-out album of protest songs. Fortunately, Bob was tougher
than the fat guys thought him to be...
Best song: THE TIMES THEY ARE A-CHANGIN'
Apparently Mr. Zimmerman was having lots of pressure from his folk companions
(and the record company, too) who wanted to have him put forth a real
protest song album - you know, with no shit like 'A Hard Rain's A-Gonna
Fall' and other stuff which was obviously too artsy and snobby to be appreciated
by the braindead folk audiences. So this is exactly what you get here -
ten protest songs with straightahead dumb lyrics. 'So what', people say,
'Bob is so smart he can't really pen truly dumb lyrics, and what do you
have against protest songs? At least they're honest!' Well, the problem
is that anybody can do protest songs - and Bob was spinning in circles
where virtually every second dude like Peter Seeger or d... er, what's
the feminine of 'dude'?.. or Joan Baez, anyway, were protest song writers.
They probably didn't do their stuff much better than Bob does it on this
album - but they sure didn't do it worse, either. Trying to market Bob
Dylan as a second-rate Phil Ochs was more or less similar to trying to
market the Beach Boys as a third-rate Surfies: both attempts were made,
and both failed, fortunately for us listeners and popular music in general.
What's even worse, ninety percent of the melodies here are nothing but
recycled waste from the previous album. Some of Bob's guitar playing is
still fascinating, as ever, but it almost never hooks you like those ragged,
broken lines of 'Down The Highway', for instance. And these songs are LOOONG
- I mean, I never got tired of the long stuff on Freewheelin', but
here, much too often it's like walking down a long long alley with two
high walls on both your sides and pretty much nothing else in sight. Needless
to say that none of the songs feature even a slight saving touch of humor
- protest songs make you weep and repent, don't they? Deadly serious, like
in 'Masters Of War', but far more generic and less convincing.
Of course, my complaints do not refer to the title track - one of his most
well-known anthems of all time. The lyrics for 'The Times They Are A-Changin'
are excellent and certainly capture the essence of the Sixties' cultural
revolution like nothing else. Whether it's actual or not nowadays is another
question - it probably depends on whether you have or don't have a generation
conflict in your neighbourhood. The vocal melody is fabulous, too: that
majestic Biblical intonation was only captured by Bob a couple of times
since, most notably on 'Gates Of Eden'. It's a pity that the rest of the
album seems so rushed out - perhaps, if only Bob had given himself (or
was given) more time, he could have turned it into a protest masterpiece
after all.
Apart from the title track, there is a little bunch of classics
or semi-classics here - this I must confess. 'One Too Many Mornings' has
its moments, being a sad, mournful little ditty with a melody suspiciously
reminiscent of... the title track. I actually prefer the live versions
of that one - particularly the electric workout on Live 1966, but
even the newer one on Hard Rain will do - simply because the tune
works better if drastically rearranged. 'When The Ship Comes In' is also
renowned, and first time around I almost missed it, but now it's coming
in again as the groovy little gospelish chant as it is. Oh, I mean, it
ain't jolly or funny or anything, but it's probably the only song on the
whole record that doesn't openly batter your brains out with its heaviness
or darkness or sadness or anything. 'Oh the time will come up when the
winds will stop...' Almost sounds like a nursery rhyme, or something country-western,
doncha think? And be sure to check the Bootleg Series for a superb
piano version of that one. Also, 'Boots Of Spanish Leather' would be a
great song... were it not 'Girl From The North Country' with new (and worse)
lyrics: pretty, but far more generic and less inspired.
Some of the songs also point forward to better things to come - I'll be
darned if you can't spot the grandeur and majesty of 'My Back Pages' in
the beginning of each verse of the endless, dragging 'Lonesome Death Of
Hattie Carroll', for instance. And the brainwashing lines of 'Only A Pawn
In Their Game'? Why, later on you'll be glad that they actually were
here, as the same principle is applied to 'Mr Tambourine Man'. Right? But
that would be later. For now, you just have a short taster, and tons of
filler in addition. And since the melodies are overall so darn unimpressive
(I simply can't stand mediocre yawnfests like 'North Country Blues'
or 'Restless Farewell'), you can't but concentrate on the lyrics, and since
they're the usual kind of lyrics you can get from reading Joe Hill stuff
and suchlike, you'd better be off somewhere else.
Songs like 'Ballad Of Hollis Brown' and 'With God On Our Side' are particularly
rotten in that respect. I really can't believe Bob wrote the lyrics. Maybe
it was really Joan Baez? Can you tell me? 'Hollis Brown' tells us the grim
fate of a working class hero who ended up shooting all his family: sad,
but, once again, I'd rather hear about it from Peter Seeger. Then again,
I must admit that the lines 'There's seven people dead/On a South Dakota
farm/Somewhere in the distance/There's seven new people born' are absolutely
brilliant, and could hardly have been penned by anybody than Bob himself.
On the other hand, the lyrics to 'With God On Our Side' are dumb to the
extreme and destroy every bit of that frightening impression that was induced
by 'Hollis Brown' only one song earlier. Gee, I hate protest songs. For
some reason, they often dress everything in black and white, and the results
are often stupid and sometimes cretinic. What does that verse about the
second world war really mean, for instance? 'We forgave the Germans/And
we were friends/Though they murdered six million/In the ovens they fried/The
Germans now too/Have God on their side'. Perhaps Bob would like us to fry
all the Germans in the ovens as well? What was he thinkin'?
This is certainly NOT the essence of Bob, and I'm almost sure he really
did not care much for this album. Even his poems (the so-called '11 Outlined
Epitaphs') that can be found among the liner notes show how far he'd already
advanced by that point. Mind you, I'm not saying this album truly sucks:
take any of these songs on its own and it'll turn out to be great - that
is, if you haven't heard Freewheelin' before. Together, and in the
general context of Bob's work, they're utterly derivative and dumbly straightforward;
just the thing you'd expect from a fully conventional and, let's face it,
artificial record. Avoid this album if you're not a completist.
With God on our side, we'll make it if you mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Mike Zupan <viktoria@siol.net> (09.11.99)
are you an idiot?
the times they are a changin' is a classic bob dylan album.
[Special author note: okay it
is a classic bob dylan album and i am an idiot does that make you happy]
'Boots of shanish leather' is a magnificent work, far superior to
'girl of the North c'. The final verse is just simply brilliant. you are
not a true bob dylan fan!!!!
[Special author note: is there
any kind of test to determine whether one is a Dylan fan or not?]
<Ram.Elisha@fin.gc.ca> (11.01.2000)
Aren't we being just a little harsh on ol' Bobby here? Well, maybe not. As you adroitly pointed out, each song here (with the exception of 'Spanish Boots', a true horror) could stand well on its own, but together they combine to form a dreary listen of de Millean proportions. Apparently, Bobby in his guise of 'Serious Young Folk Artist' jut didn't feel the need to provide any variety in terms of melody, speed or even vocal inflexion. A shame really, because some of these ditties coulda been douzies... I've posted sort of a similar comment on the Prindle site, but hey, I can't trust everyone to check that place out, can I?
The Kelly's <jakelly@bright.net> (30.01.2000)
You have to give credit to 'BALLAD OF HOLLIS BROWN'. The song is excellent. 'NORTH COUNTRY BLUES' is an all time great too. This album is worth much more than you give it credit for.
Jeff Blehar <jdb3@jhu.edu> (24.02.2000)
Shockingly weak; the only reason this is considered a "classic Dylan album" is because it a) fit in with the tenor of times so well, and b) came in the midst of a period where he was more or less untouchable. But other than two or three songs, possibly four, this is a real groaner of an album to sit through. I for one never liked "The Times They Are A-Changin'" a whit (even if I can recognize its objective quality), since I get really turned off by Dylan's early finger-pointing "exclusionary" protest songs. I much prefer the fresher "When The Ship Comes In," which to tell the truth is every bit if not more "us vs. them" in tenor ("We'll SHOUT from the bow 'your days are numbered!'), but it's just much less exposed and it has such verve and vigor to it. "The Times They Are A-Changin'," for all its heralding of massive change, is slow and draggy, quite unlike what you'd expect from lyrics like these, but "When The Ship Comes In" has an anthemic speed and self-assurance that REALLY sounds like it could push a revolution along. The former is a warning, the latter a battle-cry. Other than those two, I quite like "Boots Of Spanish Leather;" more than just a rewrite of "Girl From The North Country," it has a very powerful erotic yearning all its own, and I think it's actually the best piece on the album. "Hattie Carroll" is about as good as his straight topical songs would get - even though it's outdated and hopelessly preachy, it does have SUCH a power to it: "NOW is the time for your tears." But whew! Everything else is as grey and unpalatable as the picture of Bob on the cover where he looks like he's 67 years old. "With God On Our Side" might've been some sort of classic protest song, but all I hear are some the most embarrassing SENTIMENTS, to say nothing of lyrics, of Dylan's early career. When it got to the "the Germans now too have God on their side" bit my friend John actually yelled out, "Oh please, get off your high horse, Bob Dylan!" Hear, hear. I'll give this a 3/10 - I tolerate it only 'cause it's Dylan. If it were Phil Ochs I'd laugh snottily and put on some Clash.
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
You're really trying score points with the Dylan Fans aren't you. Forced out? That's a joke. This is an artist who has made his career out of being sincere lyrically, spiritually, or musically. You're trying too hard to be right, and you forcing out opions that just happen to be pretty ignorant. Listen to this album, and try to relate to it. that what it's about, not about forcing your opinions on his critical views on society, you're a critic to.
sidney keith <sid_d81@yahoo.com> (12.05.2000)
do you know what music is. that album is a classic. i've been listening
to it before the reviews were out. did you even read the album and are
definately ignorant of dylans symbolism. "Avoid this album if you're
not a completist?" fuck that. i'm not a completist and its the best
album out there
get a life dude
<Mallow6@aol.com> (08.07.2000)
This is in response to your review of the album The Times, they are a changin You seem to be looking at this album with a purely 1990s perspective. Now free speech in music is taken for granted, with bands freely spewing obscenity-laden slurs at the government and the judicial system. If you think back to 1964, when the album was released, you'll realise what Bob was thinking when he recorded it. Before this time period, music was mostly meaningless bubblegum-pop that had no real meaning. With Bob's The Times, they are a changing album, he used his masterful songwriting ability to aid in the protest against conformity, the vietnam war, and the oppression of the poor. This album could be considered one of his finest piece of work. The only reason the songs seem out of place is because the situation in the United States today is so much different from the situation in 1964. The title track in the album sets the stage for the movement at the time, that the old way of thinking wasn't working, and that the times were changing. 'The Lonesome Death of Hattie Caroll' is a beautiful, haunting, gut-wrenching tale of Legal corruption that is still relavant today, just watch Dateline or 20/20 and you'll see the relevance of that song. 'The Ballad Of Hollis Brown' is another haunting tale of the hardship of a poor man desperate for work faces. These songs were espescially amazing coming right after an era (the 1950s) where a depressing song with meaning would be unheard of. 'The Ballad Of Hollis Brown' is also relevant today, the quality of life for the poor of this country hasnt improved much in 36 years. True, today any half-wit singer can write a song declaring that the rich are getting richer while the poor were getting poorer to make people feel
John Caulfield <JCaulfield@justice.gov.za> (11.09.2000)
First of all I'd like to thank you for an inspirational site and, particularly
for inspiring me to go out and buy a load of Dylan albums. Prior to reading
your site I had only the first greatest hits album, Blonde and Highway.
However, I must disagree with your low ratings for his first album as well
as Times. To me they are both classics with an immediacy and directness
that was never recaptured after he went electric. (And I am not a diehard
"folkie" I am a fan of Floyd as well as modern noisy stuff like
Nick Cave and the bad seeds.) I do love Blond and Highway,
but I don't believe they are better, rather just "different".
What Dylan gains with the addition of electricity and a band, he loses
in simplicity and directness.
But, of course, this is always going to be a matter of taste and personal
preferance.
As an aside, you are right about the derivatineness of some of the melodies
on Times. The title track's melody is reprised a number of times
on the album, for example. But, more importantly, the melody for 'God on
our side' is virtually a straight crib of the melody of 'Patriot Games',
a traditional Irish IRA "folk"song. Furthermore, the last farewell
song on the album is a straight lift of another traditional Irish folk
song called "The Parting Glass". And believe me, this is no accidental
crib. It was deliberate. Being a songwriter myself I know only too well
that one can easily unconsciously steal parts of a melody from less well
known songs one may have only hearad once or twice many years before. However,
one cannot unconsciusly lift a melody and a lyrical idea simultaneously.
In two of the songs on Times even the lyrical content of parts of
the songs are similar, in fact almost identical, to the other original
songs. The Parting Glass, for example starts : "For all the money
that e're I spent, I spent it in good company..." with precisely the
same melody. And the second verse begins "All the sweethearts that
e're I had, are sorry for my going away..."
I would be interested to know from anyone who had the original vinyl packaging
whether Dylan acknowledged the origins of these songs, because I can't
find any on the cd packaging that I have. Possibly at the time of release,
when he was playing on the folk circuits, the audience would have known
these folk songs and the need for formal acknowledgement would not have
been necessary.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
6.5 - At the risk of being ‘flamed’, I would say this is a good collection of songs but the mood is rather ‘bleak’, or ‘down’, and the album could do with a humorous song or a happier love song to lift the mood. I’m sure that Columbia Records made the selections and chose to put out that dark black and white cover, and Dylan was forced to go along with it. “Hattie Carroll” and “Mornings” are probably the strongest songs here.
Brian Adkins <badkins@mail.calltech.com> (10.11.2000)
I think Bob was talking about Hitler killing all Jews in the Holocost about the line with the Germans murdering six million. If I'm not mistaken isnt Bob Jewish so when he refers to we he probably means his people.
Michael Battaglia <Dhalgren99@aol.com> (07.12.2000)
Well while I can't think of anything remotely witty to say about this
album to compare with the bloke that told you to get a life, I mostly got
this because the completist part of me was like "Get it get it!"
and because it was cheap and I felt like giving it a shot. Oh well.
Generally hunches like that normally play out but not here, for the
most part all the humor and vitality that made the last album so great
is just sucked out. Other than the title song, which unfortunately
most of the other songs resemble in one way or another, there aren't many
"classics" here. There's a lyrical bright spot here and
there (and there and here) but it's just so monotonous after a while that
they either blend together or you fall asleep.
I'd rate it a bit higher than you on my scale mostly because the dirge
like stuff doesn't bother me a whole lot (probably might make a six), but
of all my Bob Dylan albums this probably goes on the least and if someone
came to my house and stole just that album, I doubt I'd miss it. Still
it is good for completists and well . . . folky people I guess. More
of a Fairport Convention guy myself, but hey, it takes all kinds.
Year Of Release: 1964
Record rating = 8
Overall rating = 13
Not really innovatory, but very solid. Even more serious and more
humorous, too.
Best song: CHIMES OF FREEDOM
Continuing the line of Freewheelin' and not Times - thanks
so very very much, Bob! Funny, around that time he started receiving letters
from protesting folkies accusing him of 'selling out'... letters that would
increase next year, of course, when he went electric; and one of the main
complaints about him was that he was indeed 'selling out' - getting chewed
up by the pop industry and marketed as an inoffensive pop star. In retrospect,
though, it's obvious that it was vice versa: the industry would have loved
to market him as a protest folkie, since protest folkie records sold well.
Instead, he went the other way, cheated, deceived everybody and came out
totally transformed. Another Side finally presents Bob as the kind
of Bob we know and love - not Pete Seeger and the like. Perhaps
'Chimes Of Freedom' can still be viewed as a more or less straightforward
protest song (although it certainly goes far beyond protest), but the rest
here has nothing to do with rioting on the streets or Russian bombs or
hungry farmers with seven kids. Well, there are references to farmers
here, in 'Motorpsycho Nitemare', but these certainly have little to do
with protest either...
Anyway, this one's much more introspective - and therefore Dylanish - than
the previous album. Bob's still riding the fully-acoustic vibe at that
point; the electric piano used on 'Black Crow Blues' may give us a slight
hint at things to come, but it did take Bob the Byrds' arrangement of 'Mr
Tambourine Man' to be convinced of the full power of the electric guitar.
So right now, folkie fans of his still had nothing serious to be scared
of. Whatever be, the songs are mostly super: perhaps the songwriting is
a wee bit less tight and hard-hitting than on Freewheelin', but
at least the melodies are for the most part original, except for 'I Shall
Be Free No. 10', which is quite logical, as it's a natural successor to
'I Shall Be Free'. (Did he really do eight more sequels in between?
Ha ha!)
As the arrangements are all so incredibly similar, the main difference
is in the mood, of course - this is where Bob gets his royalties, see?
Almost every song sets a different mood, not the easiest thing to expect
from a folkie. Some are very, very sad: 'Ballad In Plain D', though definitely
not my favourite on here because it drags on at a snail pace for
far too long (I have my own Dylan limits, too, see?), is nevertheless a
gentle, moving ode to a lost love. Others are also a bit sad and thoughtful,
but with a touch of understated majesty that only Dylan could pull off
- yup, it's the brilliant 'My Back Pages' I'm blurbin' about, mister. You
probably heard that one in the Byrds' arrangement, and it's definitely
more accessible and all, but for Chrissake they transform it into a pop
tune! How can a pop tune equal the subtle mystery and tenderness of a fresh
young enthusiastic Zimmerman delivery? Not that the Byrds did it bad, mind
you, but... just try to get into it a bit deeper, 's all I got to say.
And just wait until I get around to bashing Hendrix's cover of 'All Along
The Watchtower'...
The sad, of course, is interspersed with the groovy. I've always considered
'I Don't Belive You' as filler until I heard the live version on the Live
1966 CD, whereupon I went back and it finally struck me as yet another
in an endless series of moments of subtle glory (wow, my English is rapidly
improving). The melody is twisted but catchy, the lyrics are thoughtful
but fun, and it presents the matter of lost love in an entirely different
light from the one in 'Ballad In Plain D'. Funny that both are placed in
sequence - after the fun, the sadness. What a clever arrangement.
And then the hilarious grooves. Ooh these hilarious grooves. For my money,
Bob was never funnier than on this album. 'All I Really Want To
Do' makes a perfect job of opening the album - it's as if he's inviting
you to share all the fun, and the amusing wordgames of the song are unforgettable.
'I Shall Be Free No. 10' narrates some more comical situations, and 'Motorpsycho
Nitemare' will get you going in no time as Bob narrates the story of his
miraculous escape from a farmer and his daughter. I suppose we frame these
lyrics as some of the greatest examples of 'intelligent comedy' of the
twentieth century.
And now comes the majestic - 'Chimes Of Freedom'. It's a real pity he didn't
have time to include it on Times: the song could have more or less
fit in thematically, and at the same time it's so much more mature and
free-flowing and lyrically competent that it makes me wonder... but nah,
I've already condemned Times, no need to go rehashing all the stuff.
If you can tolerate the song's length (I sure can), there are no other
possible flaws to be thought of. Actually, this is Bob's second impressive
display of his visionary power (the first was 'Hard Rain'), and just as
indisposable a classic as 'Desolation Row' or 'Sad-Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands',
whatever you have to say about it.
And kudos to Bob for ending the album on a 'low' note - hymns are hymns,
and epics are epics, but deep inside Bob is just a plain simple fella:
a weak, humble, unpretentious little Jewish dude who says so in 'It Ain't
Me Babe' (well, he doesn't exactly say he's a Jew, but we know that,
right? Why make a fuss of it anyway?) The song's yet another fabulous classic
(gee, I'm tired of epithets, and I've only just begun). Just don't listen
to it in that dreadful Turtles version.
The major problem with the album is that, while most of the melodies are
more competent and independent than last time around, they're still extremely
raw, so you still listen to the lyrics most of all. Listening to this album,
it's hard to believe that less than in a year's time Bobbie would earn
the fame of one of the world's greatest composers. Here, perhaps only 'I
Don't Believe You' and the weird chant of 'Spanish Harlem Incident' have
more or less 'outstanding' melodues.
But enjoy it, still: enjoy the word-games of 'All I Really Want To Do',
the plain fun of 'Nitemare', the great singing on 'Chimes', the general
atmosphere which is one hundred percent Dylan. I originally gave the album
a seven, but I've changed my mind. There ain't a single bad song on here,
after all. Not a single! Still, old Bob would do even much better in the
future, so I guess an eight will have to do.
All I really want to do is to post your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Jeff Blehar <jdb3@jhu.edu> (24.02.2000)
Not much for me to add here, except that I always considered this a
lost Dylan classic and that every song on here is great except for the
embarrassingly bad karma of "Ballad In Plain D." I always contend
that, despite his knack for inspired put-downs and sarcasm, Dylan is at
his weakest when you KNOW exactly who his target is (in this case it's
Suze Rotolo's sister), because all you do is feel sorry for the other person.
This song is him at frankly his nastiest ever; even he openly says he regrets
it. There's a fine line between this and attacks like "Rolling Stone"
or "Positively 4th Street" (to say nothing of the awesome "Idiot
Wind") but a line indeed.
Everything else is tippy top, even if for some reason I can't help feeling
that "Motorpsycho Nitemare" is derivative of "Bob Dylan's
115th Dream" despite the fact that that's impossible. Highlights are
everywhere: the snappy "I Don't Believe You," the playful "All
I Really Want To Do" (I LOVE those rhymes! He's intentionally mocking
his own verbal finesse! Great!), the visionary "Chimes Of Freedom"
and the deeply personal "My Back Pages" and "It Ain't Me
Babe." I for one can never tire of the latter, although I really think
The Byrds' cover of the former was a masterstroke and managed to top the
Jester himself for once. A 9/10: no album this entertaining and substantial
deserves less.
Fredrik Tydal <f_tydal@hotmail.com> (17.03.2000)
This album is actually quite similar to Beatles For Sale in a way. Both albums were released between well-publicized efforts (The Times They Are A-Changing/Bringing It All Back Home and A Hard Day's Night/Help) and tend to get kind of overlooked. This is probably Dylan's second best of his early acoustic albums and it sure beats The Times... A high percentage of the material on this album has been covered by acts such as The Byrds, The Turtles and Sonny And Cher. I really can't compare the Byrds covers with the originals, but I have to say that McGuinn would have to be a genius to pull out the pure beauty in a song like "Chimes Of Freedom". My favourite song on the album is probably the epic "My Back Pages", which The Byrds later would turn into a completely different, though not necessarily better, song.
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
This is my favorite Dylan 60's folk ablum. Why? because he is as negative. this is an album he proved he was a person. (and not just an online internet critic who thinks he knows everything about music.)
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7 - A better album, more ‘artistic freedom’ - could have been called The Real Bob Dylan. Here you get social commentary, but also love/hate songs, and humor. Best song: “My Back Pages.” Dreary song: “Ballad In Plain D.”
Michael Battaglia <Dhalgren99@aol.com> (09.12.2000)
Definitely one of the more overlooked Dylan albums that I have, the
early acoustic stuff I'm not a huge fan of, but this album has the lyrics
that I've come to know and love from Mr Zimmerman. I can't believe
how good they are here, even songs that should be fairly simple, like "All
I Wanna Do" turn into something else after a minute or so. And
he definitely sounds like he's having fun here. Some of the stuff
is a little too much on the weird side, I liked the original "I Shall
Be Free" and for the most part I like the tenth (?) sequel to it,
the appropriately titled "I Shall Be Free #10" but some of it
just sounds forced. If you ask me I think he drives the counting
and Cassius Clay thing a bit too far into the ground but the rest of it
is just about perfect. And other than "Motorpsycho Nitemare"
for some reason re! minding me of "Bob Dylan's 115th Dream",
everything's just dandy. I don't even need to go into the other classics
that lots of folks have mined for cover material ("My Back Pages"
"It Ain't Me Babe" "Ballad in Plain D" among others),
since you already did a fine job with that.
Was actually playing this today, my brother once again pointed out that
Bob Dylan can't sing. I disagreed but what does he know? His
voice still does bother me in spots here, but it's not like he's delibrately
singing off key or anything. It gives me hope that one day folks
like me who can't carry a tune might become big superstars. All I
need to learn is what a chord is.
Can't be that hard. Great album . . . probably a high eight from
me as well.
Year Of Release: 1965
Record rating = 8
Overall rating = 13
Dylan goes electric, but some of the best songs on here are acoustic.
The most dazzling paradox in history.
Best song: SUBTERRANEAN HOMESICK BLUES
(NB: the original version of this LP was entitled Bringing
It All Back Home. Remember this when you start searching the racks).
Seeing that, like you know, everybody was playing plugged at the time,
and probably also seeing no future in pure folkish delight, Zimmerman suddenly
made a quick shift, grabbed himself a Fender (or was it a Gibson? I'm not
too sure of such things) and recorded a complete electric side. It was
still a treading of water, though, as Side B is complete acoustic. Nevertheless,
it nearly cost Bob his fame at that particular moment, and up to this time
remains as one of the bravest radical decisions in rock music - hey, perhaps
Dylan's funny self-comparison with Columbus on 'Bob Dylan's 115th Dream'
is not as unmotivated as you would have thought the other day. His falling
out with the folkie scene in general is legendary, as of now; back then,
it was kinda dangerous, and included death threats and all kinds of shit
from rabid 'protest song' thugs who only expected another Times
and claimed that Dylan had sold out to the all-devouring pop industry.
Well, time has corrected all the accents, including putting the protest
thugs in their correct historical place (which is 'wastebin') and putting
Bob on his deserved pedestal. Time is on our side, indeed.
Anyway, the electric side here is slightly weaker than the acoustic one.
Paradox? Might be. Of course, it totally revolutionized rock at the time,
but not in a Beatles- or Hendrix-like style. I mean, most of the melodies
here are primitive, some of them following the obvious fast blues pattern
('Outlaw Blues', 'Maggie's Farm'), while some of them are just the same
as on his previous album, only electrified and sped up ('Bob Dylan's 115th
Dream'), and Bob's backing band is essentially just a garage outfit with
next to none instrumental virtuosity (still sounds exciting, tho'). What
really made the difference were the lyrics that were set to these
melodies: psycho, trippy, absurd and some of them purely paranoid. The
title track boasts four enormous verses, all sung in slightly more than
two minutes - 'Johnny's in the basement mixing up the medicine I'm on the
pavement thinking of the government...', etc., something absolutely amazing
in a yet relatively primitive rock world. 'She Belongs To Me' is, musically,
just a simple piece of generic blues-rock; lyrically, it masterfully ridiculizes
traditional love songs with lines like 'bow down to her on Sunday, salute
her when her birthday comes/For Halloween buy her a trumpet and for Christmas
give her a drum'. And the beautiful 'Love Minus Zero/No Limit' (which features
the only great melody on Side A, with marvelous descending guitar lines
after each phrase that almost bring tears to my eyes) establishes a completely
new type of a rock love song: that of a gorgeous, heartfelt epic, yet definitely
unmarred by the by now traditional 'wanna hold your hand' cliches. Instead,
the lyrics branch out in all directions, with that wonderful stream of
conscience that links the 'Her' of the song to all kinds of imaginable
and unimaginable situations... well, you just gotta hear that one yourself.
'Maggie's Farm' and '115th Dream', on the other side, continue the line
of Bob's earlier humorous tunes. The former is more or less a protest song,
in the same sense that 'Ballad Of A Thin Man' from the next album is a
protest song: of course, it's clear that the 'farm' in question is a metaphor
for the whole world, and you can easily guess the true nature of all of
Maggie's relations, but then again, you can twist it all back and pretend
that it's just a funny pastiche, nothin' else. Bob's vocals sound really
cool on that one, though - fresh, exuberant, angry and a little bit lazy,
as if he were too tired to discuss the whole business. And as for the hilarious
'discovery of America' that Bob narrates about in 'Bob Dylan's 115th Dream',
well, he's taking his 'pseudo-biographical' excourses a bit too far on
here, as the lyrics jump from one psycho image to another without a halt
for six minutes. Wouldn't that be a bit too long, you'd ask me? Nope. The
story's so funny I can't get enough of it. Not to mention that silly burst
of laughter that opens the song...
So what's the deal, actually? Well, the melodies. We all know Bob is not
a great melodist, but this here side, apart from 'Love Minus Zero', has
some of the least imaginative tunes whatsoever. 'On The Road Again' and
'Outlaw Blues', while they are short and I never get tired on them, are
just unadorned garage-blues-rock kind of stuff; '115th Dream' shares the
same melody with 'Motorpsycho Nitemare'; and it's not that easy to tell
the intro to the title track from the intro to 'Maggie's Farm'. It would
get a little better next time around, but it's obvious that musical creativity
is not an element that really bothered Bob during this period. Not to mention
the problem with arrangements: everything is so raw and unpolished that
you can't help but yearn for a little spin of Blonde On Blonde...
Therefore, if it's melodies you're interested in, it's Side B that is the
real highlight of the record. Four acoustic tunes on there, each one a
gem and a classic. Funny, isn't it? The man quit the well-trodden 'acoustic
path' just as he was at his absolute, undeniable peak as an acoustic, folksy
songwriter. I guess it's hardly even necessary to introduce these four
songs - they're among Bob's most well-known and cherished numbers. Okay,
maybe only 'Gates Of Eden' can't hope to be an acknowledged classic, but
in my opinion, it should be one, as it surpasses even 'Chimes Of Freedom'
in its majesty. The graceful, stately Biblical imagery of the lyrics, delivered
in his most convincing 'prophetic' tone, might be seen as pretentious,
but he knows what he's singing about, and the song is so powerful I easily
lift off my hat to it.
And 'Mr Tambourine Man'? It has Dylan's most memorable refrain, and also
features some of his most astonishing poetical imagery ever; for some reason,
I have always thought of the song as depicting the feelings of a slightly
dizzy, slightly happy young man coming home in a misty fog after a particularly
good and booze-heavy party. (Not that I can easily identify with such a
person, mind you). The dreadful crime is that some people actually prefer
the Byrds' version of it, whining about how the song's underarranged and
boring and repetitive and how the Byrds used all those lovely harmonies
and made it really soar blah blah blah... The Fools! I dearly love the
Byrds' version myself (just as I love Hendrix's version of 'All Along The
Watchtower' and all those masterful Rod Stewart covers), but for Chrissake,
the Byrds just made a good pop song out of it, whereas Dylan's original
transcends the limits of pop, folk, everything. Its underarrangement and
subtlety only adds to the general impression. Yes, brothers and sisters,
I'm sorry, but my final verdict is: unless you learn how to love 'Mr Tambourine
Man' as sung by Dylan better than as sung by the Byrds, Dylan is definitely
NOT your personal cup of tea, as it is, for instance, mine. Arrangement
and vocal harmonies aren't everything in the world.
Okay, sorry for that little self-indulgent digression. Anyway, I was just
finishing; I'll just add that the gloomy, enthralling 'It's Alright Ma
(I'm Only Bleeding)' is Dylan's best take on psycho social commentary on
here, with lots of classic quotations-turned-cliches like 'even the president
of the United States sometimes has to stand naked' and so on; and 'It's
All Over Now Baby Blue' should probably represent his proudly saying goodbye
to his folk past. It was his last purely acoustic song (guitar/harmonica)
in oh so many many years... well, not so many, really, certainly
not if compared to eternity, but for the next two years, at least, he contented
himself to only playing fully acoustic on stage. Goodbye, Bob the funny
folkie, hello, Bob the angry rocker. In case you're not aware of it, the
following two records of his were his absolute peak and two of the most
important rock records ever.
It's all right ma, I'm only waiting for your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Fredrik Tydal <f_tydal@hotmail.com> (16.01.2000)
This is a great album. I have always thought that this was *almost* a full-pointer, but then I said to myself; "what's stopping this album to get the highest grade?" Nothing, actually. There is not a single weak spot on this album. I can't mention all songs, of course; but I'd like to point out a few favourites. The opening track, "Subterranean Homesick Blues" is of course a classic and is given a kind of a 'rap' treatment by Bob. "Love Minus Zero/No Limit" is fascinating, with great witty lyrics like "...she knows there's no success like failure, and that failure is no success at all". "Bob Dylan's 115th Dream" is hilarious and I just love the false start. I agree with George that "Mr. Tambourine Man", by no means can be compared to The Byrds' version; since it's almost two complete different songs. I also have a soft spot for "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue", though I really don't know why... It's something about it; maybe because it's the closing track. This is an essential Dylan album, along with Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde On Blonde which means; if you don't have it, get it before it's too late.
The Kelly's <jakelly@bright.net> (30.01.2000)
'IT'S ALLRIGHT MA (I'M ONLY BLEEDING)' has to be considered one of the best songs of the album. This is the best album of all time.
Jeff Blehar <jdb3@jhu.edu> (24.02.2000)
Possibly the greatest album title in all of rock history: Bringing
It All Back Home. It's gotta be close, at least - think about all the
wonderful connotations it carries along with it, the sense of return, recapturing
of roots, integration of musical forms, etc. And the album deserves a title
that grandiose, even if there are at least three songs on here that ain't
that great (the nondescript rockers "Outlaw Blues" and "On
The Road Again" and the groaner "Gates Of Eden"). Christ,
though, other than those? EVERYTHING IS MARVELOUS. I fully mean it when
I say that you could (and should) make a greatest hits collection out of
this album alone. "Subterranean Homesick Blues" is THE original
white rock/rap fusion, and it was as revolutionary as any song could be:
free association in lyrics was completely alien to rock until the first
few seconds of "Johnny's in the basement mixing up the medicine."
And while the "electricity" is subdued in the sense that there
aren't that many rave-ups (but I sure count the protest broadside of "Maggie's
Farm" and the gut-busting "Bob Dylan's 115th Dream," which
is literally the funniest he EVER got on record), it's alive in the sense
that the other songs are *vibrant.* "She Belongs To Me" features
one of the few memorable MELODIES Dylan wrote coupled with really sublime
lyrics, and "Love Minus Zero/No Limit" is almost as good.
You're right about the acoustic songs being timeless - all except for "Gates
Of Eden." I'm going to stand on this one: that song is a lyrical embarrassment.
Now I'll allow quite a lot of lyrical idiosyncrasy from Mr. Zimmerman,
as I feel he's earned the latitude, (Did I hear a "cowboy mouth"
in "Sad Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands?") but the verses of this one
are really ugly: "Motorcycle black madonna two-wheeled gypsy rides?"
Come on, if Jon Anderson threw that one out at us on The Yes Album
we'd crucify him for it (heck, I'll crucify the malignant dwarf anyway).
It's like he picked up a bunch of random images at a poetic yard sale and
threw 'em together, hoping the "Gates Of Eden" motif would mask
the fact that they didn't have any coherence. The tune is certainly pleasant,
but the lyrics are a no-go, especially when they're surrounded with alternately
either some of the most incisive or most poetic lyrics Dylan ever wrote.
Going for the incisive is the utterly flooring "It's Alright Ma (I'm
Only Bleeding)." Words cannot describe this track's quietly throbbing
motive force, chiefly because to do so would require me to quote all the
words. Suffice to say it's a fount of brilliant catch-phrases and criticisms
of American culture ("He not busy being born is busy dying,"
"Money doesn't talk it swears," both of which have made it into
the popular lexicon) lashed onto one of the most driving acoustic guitar
riffs I've heard. And for the poetic side, there's "Mr. Tambourine
Man," of course, and my personal favorite (one of my all-time Dylan
favs), "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue." Wow. I've seen people
describe this as a nasty kissoff to his critics but I don't get that at
all. Instead, what I hear is an amazing stately dignity, from the first
taut strum of his guitar to the lyrical harmonica solo, and those unforgettable
lyrics...there's such a sad azure tone to the whole song, a certain majesty
I suppose. The perfect ending to an album of revolutions. I can't give
this any less than a 10/10.
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
Well 'Homesick Blues' is almost the exact same (or at least the intro
is) as 'Maggie's Farm.' But jeez this album blew me out of my mind. As
I started off with the blues the electric half is all inspiring. It makes
me want to grab my electric and play along.
The accoustic half, is his best effert so far in his career.
Evan P Streb <savage1561@juno.com> (16.07.2000)
The only good thing Bob Dylan ever did to the world was he invented rap music with "Subterranean Homesick Blues". I'm probably the only person in the world that thinks that that is the prototype of a rap song, but listen and you will see that. Replace the drums with a drum machine and put in some synthesizers there and it's damn near "Rapper's Delight". Other than that one song the Bob Dylan ouevore [sic??] is pretty eehhhh. I personally feel that his lyrics didn't mean ANYTHING and he could have just flipped through the dictionary and found lines that fit and it's like BOOM! he's the speaker of the sixties generation! And there really isn't anything "psychedelic" about any of it is there?
Neema Parvini <Parvini1@aol.com> (30.09.2000)
"Gates of Eden" is a severely underrated work of unbridled
poetic genius. Believe it or not i recently recorded my own album (and
not being a singer I generally speak or rap my lyrics) and covered "Subterranean
Homesick Blues" as a rap. It works remarkably well though it sounds
absolutely nothing like the original.
By the way am I one of the few people who prefer this album to both its
successors. If you could swap "Outlaw Blues" for "Tombstone
Blues" it would be nigh on perfect. Highway 61 is also an incredible
album but I find myself reaching for the skip button more than once...
generally... maybe its just because "Ballad of a Thin man" is
so good. Blonde on Blonde is my least favourite of this trilogy,
I've yet to listen to it all in one sitting not that you could really criticise
it in any way (this is 60's Dylan we're talking about). The perfect album
would be a combination of all three (omitting 'filler' tracks adn those
that would not be so great if listened to out of context - eg. "on
the road again")
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7.5 - A very strong collection of songs. By the way, “Subterranean Homesick Blues” takes its ‘rap’ idea, as some people have referred to it, from Chuck Berry’s “Too Much Monkey Business”, which was recorded about 10 years earlier. Dylan was a big Chuck Berry fan, and it was Berry’s clever use of language that appealed to Dylan. Anyway, Berry does a very similar thing with the delivery of the lyrics on “Monkey Business.” True, there are some throwaway songs on the ‘electric side’, but Dylan’s having so much fun with them that you can’t help getting carried along by his enthusiasm. Best song: “Love Minus Zero/No Limit.”
Michael Battaglia <Dhalgren99@aol.com> (09.12.2000)
I'm split between the electric and folk side, I'm not sure which one
I prefer. On the one hand you have the awesome "Subterranean
Homesick Blues" and probably was like a large bucket of cold water
in the face to just about everyone in the sixties. You've also got
"Love Minus Zero/No Limit" (tied for my favorite song on the
first side, who says love songs have to use the same eight words). I
like "Maggie's Farm" and "She Belongs to Me" but I
can't say I'd put the album on just to hear them. And while I can't
say that "Outlaw Blues" and "On the Road Again" are
bad (I think they're actually quite good), they don't exactly reach out
and grab me by the throat and shake me to get my attention. My loss
I guess.
But "Bob Dylan's 115th Dreams" has to rank among one of the funniest
songs I've ever heard and the six minutes fly by like no time at all. My
Mom alas like the Byrds version of "Mr Tambourine Man" better,
as does most of my family but . . . but they just don't understand! Sigh.
Each his own I suppose, there's a sparse mystical quality to Bob's
version that the Byrds, as talented as they were couldn't bring in the
transition from "Bob Dylan song" to "trippy pop song".
The other acoustic songs are just as fun, though "Gates of Eden"
never did all that much for me. However, "It's Alright Ma (I'm
Only Bleeding)" is an absolute marvel with wordplay and "It's
All Over Now, Baby Blue" is about one of the most touching songs I've
ever heard. Perfect way to end the album. So not a bad cut
on here, just classics sitting next to really good songs that seem okay
here but most other artists would ! probably kill for. I'll give
a nine and call it even.
Year Of Release: 1965
Record rating = 10
Overall rating = 15
Professional, deep and rich. A psycho's paradise.
Best song: LIKE A ROLLING STONE, of course (even though I adore
JUST LIKE TOM THUMB'S BLUES)
Even better. No more acoustic side, but never you mind - he's finally
learned to set his melodies to great electric backing as well. Maybe the
record doesn't really deserve ALL of the hype that it gets, just like Blood
On The Tracks, but it certainly deserves most of it. Out of the nine
tunes that he's recorded this time, there ain't a single bad one... hell,
not a single less-than-brilliant one. Okay, if you really want me to denounce
some of the 'filler' on here, you should probably seek it out among the
few songs whose melodies are indeed underdeveloped, left off in favour
of the unforgettable lyrics. Thus, 'Tombstone Blues' is a simple ferocious
blues-rock tune played at a terrific speed - garage rock indeed. Perhaps
it might have been a couple verses shorter, but then again, if we start
speaking in these kinds of terms, nearly everything on here should be a
couple of verses shorter, and that's the main point of the record. These
songs were intended to be long and long they will stay; take it or leave
it. On the other hand, the furious, paranoid guitar breaks in between the
verses, coming from axeman Mike Bloomfield, are enough to redeem any possible
lengthiness. And, whatever you say, nobody played that fast at the time
- not even the Stones. Another song that's more or less 'fillerish' is
'From A Buick 6': same old blues, same old blues, ladies and gentlemen.
Even so, extremely memorable, if only for that naggin' refrain 'she's bound
to put a blanket on my bed'. Plus, I really love how the instrumentation
is handled on that particular track: the organ, the guitars, the bass,
the drums, everything is tightly locked together in a fast, exciting 'rush-towards-the-end'
groove, tighter than anywhere else on the album.
But that's it for the 'fillers'. All of the other tracks are, at best,
classics, at worst, semi-classics. You probably all know the famous drum
bang! that introduces the swirling Al Kooper organ riff of 'Like A Rolling
Stone', Bob's personal signature and his most tattered musical visit card.
Much as I've already got tired of the endless live versions, not to mention
covers, of this song, the original still sounds awesome whenever I put
it on. Probably because that energized, concentrated anger and 'musical
termination' of the social female character he ridiculizes can never sound
dated or out of place. But, huge as it is, the song never really overshadows
all the rest of the classics on here. The title track is great fun, with
all the whistles and the lyrics that use the notion of 'highway 61' as
a metaphor for something positively mystical (death? life? God? Who knows?
Go ask Mr Zimmerman himself!)
'Ballad Of A Thin Man', then, is one of his best counter-cultural products.
The song borrows its unforgettable bombastic piano chords from Ray Charles'
'I Believe To My Soul' (I remember spending long endless sleepless nights
trying to remember where the hell did I hear these chords before, until
I suddenly fell upon a valuable Net resource that informed me of the source),
and the gloomy, heavy-handed interplay of Bob's electric piano with Paul
Griffin's organ sets the perfect scene for his lyrics, an ideal composition
that subtly alternates patches of utter silliness ('you're a cow! Gimme
some milk or else go home') with masked, but very poisonous attacks on
the braindead yuppies ('you've been with the professors, and they've all
liked your looks/With great lawyers you have discussed lepers and crooks...',
etc.), every single one of which ends with a devastating 'you know something's
happening, but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr Jones?' If anything,
'Ballad Of A Thin Man' is Dylan's psycho equivalent of the completely straightforward
'The Times They Are A-Changin', and far more artsy, subtle, delicate and
thought-provoking at that. And what a great polygon for philologists!
As you already understood, a lot of keyboards are heard all through the
album, and they're good, solidifying and expanding the sound so that it
never gets boring; particularly on 'Thin Man' and the great 'generic'
blues 'It Takes A Lot To Laugh, It Takes A Train To Cry'. Yeah, I put the
word 'generic' in quotes intentionally. The song is essentially just a
slow, dreary blues tune, but the lyrics, Dylan's tinkling, crystal clear
electric piano (what a great instrument that one is - why the hell don't
people use it much more than they do?), and the skillful, powerful harmonica
blasts throughout make it an instant classic with me. This is the
kind of blues I've really been wanting to hear all my life, along with
Cream's 'Strange Brew' and Led Zep's 'You Shook Me'.
Meanwhile, 'Queen Jane Approximately' is often viewed as more filler, but
I disagree emphatically. Every time I hear it, it moves me to tears, and
I'm serious. Are those lyrics really meaningless? Perhaps. But I think
I sense an idea in the text, and the idea is that of the opposition of
loneliness and friendship: the line 'won't you come see me Queen Jane'
evokes visions of compassion and mercy in my head, and it's one of those
songs that make me a better man whenever I listen to them. No kidding.
There's great ethical potential here - you just have to see it.
And I don't even care that the melody is generic...
Finally, the closing eleven-minute 'Desolation Row' is a gorgeous ballad
which never gets boring: the title has long since become a cliche, the
desperation, pain and pessimism of the sad, ironic lyrics has never been
topped by Bob (certainly NOT on Blood On The Tracks), and the little
acoustic guitar flourishes in between each line add an element of taste
and musical beauty that would be lacking otherwise. I don't worship it
nearly as much as 'Sad-Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands', though, because the
melody is too simple and the arrangement too spare to justify eleven repetitive
minutes. I can forgive him, though, as the lyrics are far too interesting
to be cut off simply because of some stupid time limit. Anyway, you just
push the 'stop' button whenever you feel tired, as it's the last track
on the album. I know I never have to push it.
ButI deceived you! I saved the tastiest bit for last! Yup, ladies and gentlemen,
my personal long-time favourite on here is certainly 'Just Like Tom Thumb's
Blues'. Ever heard that one? Slow, lengthy, dripping, yaaaawning and sleepy,
it shuffles off at a moderate pace with Bob sounding as stoned out of his
head as possible. Absurd and extremely humorous at the same time, this
is probably his best effort at 'ridiculous psychedelia'. And the melody...
I just love the melody: it sounds as if it is destined to put you off to
sleep, but it never does. More electric piano. More powerful harmonica.
More excitement. And my favourite lyrics on the whole album: 'now all the
authorities they just stand around and boast/How they blackmail the sergeant
at arms into leaving his post'. I won't explain why; I don't suppose I
ever could if I tried, so you just think about it yourself.
Some people say that this album is a bit too derivative, being just a rip-off
of the previous one. I wouldn't agree with this, because, even if it is
obviously continuing the line of Subterranean Homesick Blues, it
is not repeating it but rather developing it, carrying it further and further.
After all, that one suffered from terribly elemental melodies; here they
are elaborated to a near-perfect state. That one was purely experimental,
since Bob wasn't sure about his skills as a rock musician; this one is
self-assured, steady and boiling with energy. Needless to say, it was hugely
influential, pushing the Beatles and tons of other bands to further heights;
but screw 'influential', even today it sounds not the least bit dated.
Feel free to start here if you're new with Dylan; along with the following
one, it's Bob at his quintessential, and it's certainly much easier to
get into on first or second listen than Blonde On Blonde. And if
you're not able to get into it, you'd better not mess around with rock
music at all - obviously, it's not the kind of field you should be most
interested in.
It takes a lot to laugh, it takes a little to mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Nick Karn <glassmoondt@yahoo.com> (10.12.99)
I have to admit, I was in a kind of 'moderate' version of the second group of listeners you mention in your introductory paragraph, among those that didn't necessary think he was talentless, but that his style was too cold (particularly in the case of his vocals) and his songs sounded better done as covers by other bands - all covers of Dylan songs I've heard so far have indeed been very well done. Listening to Highway 61 Revisited, however, I now understand, after actually sitting through an entire Dylan record, your opinions on him. On every song here he just makes you FEEL who or what he's singing about, even if it appears to be meaningless. It really is the combination of brilliant lyrics, that voice of his which I can't even really explain the intrigue of, the whole vibe of the instrumentation, the simple melodies, it's just unreal. It's impossible, unless you're completely soulless, for this album not to leave some kind of thought-provoking impression on you, especially after hearing "Desolation Row", which is nothing more than a simple acoustic song brought to God-like '11 minute closing epic' status in the hands of Bob and his lyrics - the beautiful acoustic 'flourishes' between each line just push this song even further past mortality. "Ballad Of A Thin Man" also leaves a similar type of impression with those bombastic piano chords and biting lyrics, "Tombstone Blues" is a really fun, fast, but still thought-provoking, well instrumentated (if that's a word) song, "Like A Rolling Stone" is a classic 'nuff said, "From A Buick 6" has tight band playing that just rules, "Queen Jane Approximately" is utterly beautiful, and... crap, it's all great. This is a 10, I was an idiot... Dylan IS a genius.
John McFerrin <stoo@imsa.edu> (15.12.99)
I just finished ftping a few more albums, including this one, and I'm
listening to it right now (for all intents and purposes, this is my first
real exposure to Dylan). I'm on 'Tombstone Blues' right now, and ... amazing.
I mean, 'Like a Rolling Stone' and this are _so_ whack, and it's all I
can do to not fall over laughing as he's speaking (singing my ass) these
AWESOME lyrics. This melody is so stupid that he'd HAVE to be a genius
to come up with it
And now 'Tom Thumb Blues' is on! This is great!
Jeff Blehar <jdb3@jhu.edu> (24.02.2000)
Before I say anything more I just want to point out that both this and
Bringing It All Back Home were released in 1965. IN THE SAME YEAR,
FOR CHRISSAKES! Never, NEVER again will anyone be able to duplicate that
feat. The same year! Most bands will never make ONE album as good as these
in 30 years! The same year! Anyway....
I'm afraid I like this album a lot less than I should. Which is not to
say I don't love it, I do, but it's not perfect. First, I won't say a thing
bad about "Like A Rolling Stone," and I'll ostracize anyone who
does. But I just get nothing out of "It Takes A Lot To Laugh,"
for example. I mean, it's not bad by any stretch of the imagination, in
fact it's quite good, but it just ain't GODLY, y'know? And this album gets
a reputation for godliness. Similarly, two popular ones do little for me:
"Ballad Of A Thin Man" always struck me as a bit mean-spirited;
what did poor Mr. Jones ever do to anyone? I end up feeling sorry for his
alienation. Of course, that's not what the song is about at all, did you
know? It's actually about a member of "straight" society who
accidentally walks into a homosexual club where oral sex is being openly
practiced. Really. Now do all those lyrics like "the sword swallower
walks up to you and then he kneels" and "one-eyed midgets"
asking for "milk" or people saying "here's your throat back,
thanks for the loan" make some more sense? Listen again with that
in mind. It's practically undeniable! And even it that's NOT what it's
about, you gotta admit the imagery is kinda uncanny...
"Just Like Tom Thumb's Blues" don't do a whole lot for me either;
the live rearrangement on Live 1966 is a trillion times better musically
(and that's what I'm griping about here - the lyrics are brilliant). There
I get its appeal, here I don't. So there are my gripes. Fortunately everything
else is just forkin' awesome. "Tombstone Blues" might be even
more hilarious than "115th Dream" from Bringing It All Back
Home, despite what I said earlier, and "Queen Jane Approximately"
is one of those great lost classics. But let me stop to just fall in abject
worship at the feet of the stunningly beautiful, incandescent, never-repetitive,
it-shoulda-been-FORTY-minutes-long "Desolation Row." I prefer
this one to "Sad-Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands" hands-down, though
I'll grant that's just taste (my friends are also split half-and-half),
but this song is positively BURNING with beauty, beauty so ethereal and
transient that you want to hold onto it for fear it'll disappear if you
don't preserve it. I heard it for the first time, glued to my seat, praying
"I hope this is long, I hope this doesn't end," and thank God
he decided to run it for 11 minutes. The aching lyricism of Mike Bloomfield's
running guitar commentary perfectly complements the sad world-weariness
of Dylan's spray-paint allegory for the spiritual end of the world. One
of the few songs I will brook no criticism on. So fine, some tracks here
aren't the best in my book, but this is still as 10 as any 10/10 album
can get. The same year!....
Rose Mary <raponte@prtc.net> (25.03.2000)
Ok, given all the many different opinions here I will decide the strict
hierarchy of the songs, for the sake of good spirits!
#1 'Queen Jane'.... This is the best and no discussions please!
#2 'Just Like TT Blues'
#3 'Like a Rolling Stone' (Baby what a surprise, you expected it to be
#1)
#4 'Desolation Row'
#5 'Ballad of a Thin Man'
#6 'Tombstone Blues'
#7 'It takes a lot to laugh'...
#8 'Highway 61 Revisited'
#9 'From a Buick 6'
And this album is not a 10 or even a 15, it is a 20!!!!!
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
This is the third artist I ever really listened to. the first Samshing
Pumpkins, second Blues Brothers, third the Beatles, and then I heard this.
I've been hooked ever since. 'Ballad of a Thin', 'Desolation Row', 'Tombstone
Blues', 'It takes a lot to laugh But it Takes A Train To Cry', are some
of the best lyrics I've heard in my life.
My only criticism is the fact Like a Rolling Stone is actually topped by
track 2, Tombstone Blues, the fact each song continues this motion makes
the album a blur by it's finish. And to the untrained ear, the album could
be called aweful, oddly it's today's Youth that are too impatient to ear
it, this is where it is really at.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
8 - Starts with the most perfect song in the 46-year history of rock music, and ends with the great “Desolation Row.” “It Takes A Lot To Laugh” is a lovely song, very well sung - the original version (on The Bootleg Series vols. 1-3) is possibly better because it’s a faster tempo. Overrated songs, in my opinion, are “Thin Man” and “Queen Jane.” Yes, really. Whether “Thin Man” is an attack on corporate culture America, or a description of a gay club, I find the song a little dull. “Queen Jane” is pretty, musically, and I love Dylan’s voice on it, but, it’s a bit of a throwaway. That said, this was the first Dylan album I ever bought, 27 years ago, and I still remember the thrill I got from those first bars of “Like A Rolling Stone”.
Year Of Release: 1966
Record rating = 10
Overall rating = 15
Deeper. Richer. Even more wonderful. A timeless classic, this is
the place to start.
Best song: SAD-EYED LADY OF THE LOWLANDS, but they're all great!
And yet even better! This time Bob pulled out so many prime songs out
of his sack that it was decided to produce a double album (the first double
album in rock, actually). And what an album it is! Very often hailed as
one of the greatest albums of that epoch, together with Pet Sounds,
Sgt. Pepper and other epochal albums, and I agree one hundred percent.
Every new time I pull it out of the CD box and cram onto my trusty deck,
there's something new to be discovered - unless I decide to put it on twice
a day, I'll probably never get tired of this one. Fourteen songs on here,
and once again, not a weak track in sight.
What's the news, you'll ask me? Well, the news aren't exactly that important.
Bob's songwriting is at the peak, the lyrics are as trippy and absurd as
ever, but there is a certain depth both in the melodies and the texts that
was lacking on Highway 61 Revisited. The ballads are gentler and
'wiser' than on the previous albums (for that matter, there were no ballads
on Highway 61), the epic anthemic songs acquire a 'universal' sound,
being introspective and overwhelming at the same time. The arrangements
have never been more complex, Bob's voice never sounded more convincing,
and all the other advantages you can figure out for yourself.
Hey now, it's so great that it probably would be necessary to discuss all
the tracks in their exact running order. The album opens with 'Rainy Day
Women # 12 & 35', a title that has little to do with the actual lyrics.
It's an incoherently jolly tune about being stoned (in fact, it's so jolly
that a lot of people seriously believe it's Bob's hymn to drugs which it
isn't - it's just another social commentary). Quite a few reviewers bash
the hell out of it, but I don't really see what the fuss is about - sounds
so dang funny and absurd to me, that I can easily overlook the fact that
Bob's sole aim on here is to make a complete fool out of himself. A job
well done! One of the greatest comic anthems of all time.
'Pledging My Time' comes next. It might be seen as one of the weaker tracks
on here, as it's just one more generic blues, and you have to enjoy generic
blues in order to love it. Two factors, apart from the obvious lyrical
interest, redeem it: the ferocious, mind-blowing blasts from Bob's mouth
organ, and a deep, echoey production that makes it unusually bombastic
and creepy. Obviously, production values have improved since last year.
Favourite lyrical moment: 'Well they sent for the ambulance/And one was
sent/Somebody got lucky/But they say it was an accident'.
'Visions Of Johanna' is the first epic ballad on here, and if you're not
moved to tears by the third listen, well... what can I say? Just listen
to it one more time. I've always thought that it's not really Bob's voice
that produces such a terrific effect, but rather the way he's using it
- his strange intonations and pauses, and 'Johanna' obviously is the proof
to my thoughts. But the song's truly hidden charm lies in the subtle, never
obtrusive swirling layers of organ played softly in the background. Yup.
Just a couple of quietly strummed guitars, a moderate drum track, and that
organ. And the vocals. The song should be played late in the evening, when
you're alone, with dimmed lights and an absolute silence all around. Otherwise,
the charm might not work; it's a 'spiritual seance' ode, after all. Favourite
lyrical moment: 'Inside the museums infinity goes up on trial'.
'One Of Us Must Know'. What can be said about that one? At one time, it
was easily in my Top Five Dylan songs; since then, I've heard enough new
material to shove it a bit further down the line, but I still hold a soft
spot for it. Musically, it's a strange optimistically-pessimistic (indeed)
winterish kind of ballad adorned by snowy organ in the background. Some
of Dylan's most strong and hard-hitting imagery ever on that one. I still
don't understand why the song evokes visions of winter - most probably,
it has something to do with the girl Dylan sings about wearing a scarf
and the organ imitating the howl of the icy wind.
'I Want You' is the next number: a fast, very singalong-style ballad with
probably the most crazy lyrics on the whole album (although 'Sweet Marie'
comes close). Again, it's a love song, this time a song of longing, not
of grieving. Some people can be heard complaining about how Dylan completely
abandons the 'protest' elements on Blonde and begins his 'mellowing'
out. Well, what's wrong with that, I ask? If you really want to have the
'protest' element close at hand, please go and enjoy The Times They
Are A-Changin'. Me, I'll happily stick to this here masterpiece, as
I'm thoroughly impressed with Dylan's total and absolute revolution in
the love song field. Ever tried singing 'I Want You' to your beloved one?
And what, prithee, was her reaction to the lines 'well I return to the
Queen of Spades and talk with my chambermaid'? Heh heh. This is certainly
a love song for the initiated ones.
The darker, bitter 'Stuck Inside Of Mobile With The Memphis Blues Again'
takes us through a set of curious situations, all of them pointing to a
lack of direction and a dead end, thus being the really 'sad' track on
here. Again, the organs, plus the occasional 'twirl-twirl' of the lead
guitar in your right speaker, make the listening experience unforgettable.
Remember what I said about much of Dylan's lyrics being senseless from
a formal point of view but always conveying some kind of general feeling
or idea? Well, that's exactly what happens on here - my guess is that the
song simply deals with the tragic, idiotic, pointless character of life
in general. Depressing and pessimistic, yet at the same time so homely
and cozy, as these guitars, organs, and Bob's soft, silky voice really
make you want to identify your problems with the ones 'dealt with' in the
actual song. Favourite lyrical moment (even if I sure as hell don't know
why): 'Grandpa died last week/And now he's buried in the rocks/But everybody's
still talking about/How badly they were shocked'.
Don't worry that much, though - after the bitterness we have the hilarious,
amusing, and obviously parody-like blues 'Leopard-Skin Pill-Box Hat' with
Bob playing lead electric guitar (probably the only time in his life).
Again, the song attracts lots of protests from stupid blues-haters, but
I absolutely dig it. Everything sounds so sloppy, raw and garage-style,
and at the same time everything is so marvelously produced, including that
fiery stinging lead break from Bob, that it's awful fun, more funny than
the opening number, in fact. And how can one dismiss the genial character
assassination lyrics? Nohow. Favourite lyrical moment: 'you might think
he loves you for your money, but I know what he really loves you for -
it's your leopard-skin pill-box hat'. Personally, I take this line as one
of the most awesome statements of Bob's genius. It is pure genius,
if only from a purely linguistic/philological point of view.
'Just Like A Woman'. This one you probably know - it's the most famous
hit from the album, and I'm not gonna ramble for a long time about how
it combines a gentle and touching melody with absolutely gross lyrics;
even now my feelings towards this song are rather mixed. I mean, I adore
the melody, but I can hardly bring myself to sing along with it. It's easier
for me to sing along with Zappa on Joe's Garage, because Bob obviously
takes all the matter much more seriously.
'Most Likely You Go Your Way' gives us another misogynistic piece, introduced
by a great-sounding brass rhythm. Listen for the great brass-harmonica
interplay on this one, never reproduced in any way by anyone ever after.
The melody on this one is perhaps the album's most innovative, complex
and solidifying Bob's reputation as a great composer. And the groovy war
march drumming is... groovy. Favourite lyrical moment: 'you say my kisses
are not like his/But this time I'm not gonna tell you why that is'. What
a twist of phrase, my God.
'Temporary Like Achilles' is probably the only filler-looking song here,
since its melody is way too close to 'Just Like Tom Thumb's Blues'; nevertheless,
it's a bit slower and relying much more heavily on keyboards. If you plan
to listen to the entire album in one sitting, better skip it first time
around, as the effect might be a little tiring. I don't care that much
about it, but at least it ain't bad. He just overdid the 'derivative' plank
this time around.
Next we have my favourite short song on here - 'Absolutely Sweet Marie',
with a jolly steady rhythm and a lot of Bob's most famous lines like 'to
live outside the law you must be honest'. Somewhat misogynistic it is,
too, but funny as hell. I wonder how the hell did Bob manage to resist
laughing when he laid down the vocal track - we all know that he did that
on numerous occasions ('All I Really Want To Do' and '115th Dream', for
instance).
'4th Time Around' has often been called Dylan's parody on (or, at least,
Dylan's equivalent of) The Beatles' 'Norwegian Wood', and it may well be
(although it might as well not be, for that matters). Whatever, at least
it is certainly one of the most emotionally resonant tracks on the whole
album, generating feelings of sorrow, lost love and a somewhat melancholy,
but at the same time optimistic future. The interplay between Bob's guitar
and the mandolin in the right speaker (is that a mandolin? you tell me!)
will never get out of your head once you've heard it.
The psycho rock'n'roll 'Obviously 5 Believers' usually tends to be overlooked,
as it immediately precedes the magnum opus of the record, and compared
to the record's highlights, it is indeed a bit 'fillerish'. But kudos to
Bob for taking enough care of even the filler to make it of such quality
that hundreds of bands would have killed for. A seemingly sloppy, but actually
tight and competent rhythm section; the exciting ring and sting of the
guitars; the weird harmonica bridge between the verses; the speed and the
drive; and the usual lyrical strength. It happened to be one of the first
Dylan songs I heard, and for that reason I never tend to skip or disregard
it.
And, of course, the album closes with the 11-minute long 'Sad-Eyed Lady
Of The Lowlands'. By all means, it is the most rich, luxuriant, majestic,
epic, breathtaking, pathetic, etc., etc., etc. piece of art by Mr Zimmerman.
Maybe not his best song, but certainly the most elaborate. I'd bet he spent
more time working on this one than on all the other tracks here taken together.
I won't even try to determine my favourite lyrical moment on here, there's
so many of them. As Bob himself acknowledged in a song written ten years
later, the song is dedicated to his wife Sarah; no doubt about it that
it's one of the most unique praises of a woman by a man in the history
of mankind. I agree that there MAY be times in your life when you'll be
too tired to sit through the song in its entirety. In this case, better
not listen to it at all - wait until you're in the mood. It could be thirty
minutes long for all I care. Fourty. Fifty. Never mind. Deadly slow, horrendously
monotonous, mind-numbingly repetitive, it is all that, but it has to be
that way, and it'll stay that way forever.
Well, that's it - the introduction being made, all you have to do is rush
out and get this album. By the way, Columbia Records made a good deal for
everybody, dumping all four sides onto one CD. I wish they'd do the same
to The Basement Tapes - so you wouldn't have to pay a lot more money
for much less interesting music. Oh, and one more thing. Below, you'll
see a reader comment that insists that this album will date, being superated
by Blood On The Tracks because the latter is much more emotional.
Well, all I have to say is this: if such is indeed the case, I pity the
state of the human mind. Blood is a great album, as well, but a
much more simple and easily accessible one: that's why it usually has more
fans. Blonde is just as emotional as Blood, if not more emotional:
sad, melancholy, optimistic, happy, angry and thoughtful at turns (not
to mention that the blistering arrangements easily overshadow every single
track on Blood). It's just that Dylan's psycho lyrics on this album
are a bit too much to take for most people. They seem to think that if
something is not openly laid out on your palm, shining through from all
sides, it's not really worth your attention. They're wrong. Blood On
The Tracks is a great album; Blonde On Blonde takes us further
than simply an 'album', transcending the limits of music and taking us
to places we've never been before and will certainly never be after.
And let me also say that I'm dreadfully sorry for the length of this here
review (as of yet, it is my lengthiest ever), but Blonde is really
more than a 'musical experience' for me. It is one of the most rousing
LPs of all time, but it also stands apart from every other record ever
released, and it really deserved a special treatment. Count yourself as
one of my best friends if you share my feelings about it. And if you don't,
just for my own sake, put it on one more time and try to immerse yourself
in the richness, depth and mystery of that sound. It might be painful,
but it will be rewarding. I promise.
One of us must know! Mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Simon Hearn <simon@leehearn.freeserve.co.uk> (07.09.99)
Yes. A great album - a double at that - but what about blood on the tracks. Dylan is more mature and his emotions pour forth on blood..... That is why this album will always be over shadowed Blood on the Tracks, blonde will date, but as blood is so emotional and emotions are timeless and we all feel them it will endure for ever.
Mike Zupan <viktoria@siol.net> (11.11.99)
I never could understand the title of this LP, but it's the best fucking LP ever, that's for sure! Ain't nothing better in music! No beatles, no Stones, no Mozart, nothing is better than blonde on blonde!!!
Ryan Mulligan <pxpres@idt.net> (05.12.99)
Although I totally despise the fact that you gave zeppelin a 3(a 3?!?!?), i must agree that Blonde On Blonde is the single greatest album of all time. There's something about 'Sad Eyed Lady Of The Lowlands' that can't be described. It doesn't have the emotion of Blood On The Tracks, but I've never found this album to be boring at all, and i've listened to it maybe 20 times completely. I'd call this Dylan's best work, then Highway 61 Revisited, then Blood On The Tracks. Oh yeah, i love 'Temporary Like Achilles' too, and i can't even consider it a filler. How cool are the first 10 seconds of 'SIOMWTMBA'?
Robert James <rjames@webjoules.com> (16.12.99)
Blonde on Blonde is the conclusion of a long musical-emotional
journey that began with Bringing it all back Home. While Home
and Hwy 61 are bright, exhuberant daytime albums, most of Blonde
seems to take place at night. It's a darker, more mysterious album, Bob's
guitar often lost deep in the aura of electric piano and organ, leaving
his voice to float like a ghost above the densely layered music. I think
this is the reason why so many fans have trouble "getting" this
album, why so many of them prefer the simplistic Blood on the Tracks--Blonde's
overall sound is murky and at times impenetrable. You can hear it evolve
on an outtake from the period "I'll keep it with Mine" (later
covered by the Velvet Underground), a song that begins like a typical Hwy
61 song...until the organ breaks in on its own channel and completely
changes the ambience of the song. Dylan the folkie, Dylan the rocker becomes
Dylan the mystic and not all of his fans (then or now) were capable of
following him.
This album and the two before it defined "Dylan" for the ages.
Had he died in the motorcycle accident without recording another note,
he would still be as famous as he is today. All of his subsequent output
put together wouldn't equal even the first 30mins of Blonde of Blonde.
[Special author note: I agree
to a tee - especially the remark about the day/night opposition. Just compare
'Queen Jane' and 'Visions Of Johanna', you'll see what Robert is talking
about. I'm not too sure about that last sentence, but otherwise, I couldn't
have put it better myself.]
Michel Franzen <crazytimes25@yahoo.com> (12.01.2000)
Things I would change about Blonde on Blonde: get ride of 'Temporary Like Achilles' and 'Absolutely Sweet Marie', trading them in for two other original songs. I would add two more songs to fill out the album as well.
Rose Mary <raponte@prtc.net> (12.02.2000)
Absolutely THIS IS IT!!! Blonde is the only album whick keeps me with chicken skin all the way to the end. Nuff said!
Eugene Kuzmenko <eugenegrus@yahoo.com> (12.03.2000)
Excellent.Grandiozo! Although many pepople tend to be taken aback with
this "thin mercury sound" ,as Dylan himself described it,it is
this very sound that makes this album a uniqie piece of art.In fact Dylan
confessed that never again succeeded he in achieving the same sound.I myself
cannot describe this sound other than "winter mystic breathe"
,although goddamn me if I know what I`m talking about:)
The songs are excellent--my favs are "Memphis Blues Again","Absolutely
Sweet Marie","One of Us Must Know" and " Just Like
A Woman".What a brilliant play of words he displays there!
"Mona tried to tell me
To stay away from the train line
She said all those railroad men
They drink up your blood like wine
And I said:"Oh,I didn`t know that
But then again--there`s only one I`ve met
And he just smoked my eyelids
And punched my sigarette..."
A funniest horror story I ever heard of!
A spectre of moods on this record is the richest in the history of rock-n-roll--plain
groove in "Rainy Women...",irony in "Visions of Johanna",sadness
and thoughtfulness in "Just Like a Woman",bitter anger in "Absolutely
Sweet Marie",mocking humour in "Leopard Pill Box Hat",tenderness
in "Sweet Lady of the Lowlands"...
10! Not less!:)
Evan P Streb <savage1561@juno.com> (16.07.2000)
The title comes from the fact that if you take the first letter of each word of the album title, you get his first name. By the way, BOB wasn't the forst double album ever. I think Freak Out! came a couple months earlier [that's one of the more popular myths in existence - G. S.].
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7.5 - I’ve always loved this album, but it is flawed! The first 2 tracks are not great Dylan, and “Leopard-Skin” is an amusing little blues, but still a bit of a throwaway. “Achilles” is aptly named, the Achilles Heel of the whole show, and “5 Believers” is fun, but a filler too. Then, the great debate - “Johanna”, and “Sad-Eyed Lady”. I think they both go on a verse or two too long, but they’re both great songs anyway. “Absolutely Sweet Marie” should definitely not be removed from the album - I think it’s the 3rd best song here. The best songs: “I Want You” and “One Of Us Must Know.”
Year Of Release: 1997
Record rating = 7
Overall rating = 12
A great performance, but there's more historic interest here than
actual enjoyment.
Best song: TELL ME MOMMA
The infamous 'Royal Albert Hall' bootleg finally officially released.
Yes, it's not Dylan's first live album, as you might understand from the
title, but chronologically speaking, it is, and, moreover, it's an absolutely
priceless document. First, it's the only official live album belonging
to the pre-motorcycle incident era, which featured quite a different live
Dylan from the one we'd get to know later by such albums as Before The
Flood or At Budokan. Second, this is probably the only
live album by any major (or minor) rock (or any other) act on which you'll
hear the performer being mercilessly booed. Of course, this doesn't have
anything to do with the actual performances, only with Dylan putting aside
the acoustic guitar and letting in a back-up electric band; but it's still
fun and quite different from anything you'd expect from a major star live
performance. Buy it for this fact if not for anything else.
Speaking of anything else... Yes, this album's historical significance
clearly overshadows the actual listenability, but even so, there's a lot
of entertainment and nice little tricks to be found. Now don't you please
think that I consider the record to be unlistenable or something. It's
actually quite good, and Disc Two is well worth putting on from time to
time; the problem is, none of the songs superate the originals, and most
of the acoustic renditions can easily be skipped in favour of the originals.
And overall, the historic significance of the record is simply enormous,
so if I say that it 'overshadows' the listenability, it's easily understood.
The first CD is the acoustic part of the show (which, by the way, wasn't
played at the Royal Albert Hall at all, but rather at some Manchester lounge),
with Bob clearly offending the audiences from the very start. Instead of
singing his beloved political anthems like 'Blowin' In The Wind' or 'The
Times...', he immediately goes in for a selection of psycho tracks from
the last three albums. Most of them sound better on the original studio
releases, I'll admit, primarily because they were played by a band and
featured classy arrangements, while Dylan's acoustic and harp can hardly
live up to the standard. Thus, 'Desolation Row' is a plain bore, without
the cute little guitar sequences, and 'Just Like A Woman' can't qualify
as well. Still, Bob brings up the best in his voice, and succeeds to make
'Visions Of Johanna' and 'She Belongs To Me' almost as fascinating as the
originals. So at least nothing is bad here. The audience is also patient,
politely clapping at the end of each song: I wonder what the hell were
these stupid English audiences that came to glance at 'America's greatest
protest song writer' sitting and thinking as he poured his hallucigenous
imagery of '4th Time Around' or 'Mr Tambourine Man' on them.
Yet, CD 1 is just the introduction to the thunderstorm - a brilliant way
to introduce it, actually, as you can't wait for things to get 'heated
up', and the tension builds up immense. On to CD 2, where the backing band
steps in. These are The Hawks who, within the next year, would become known
as, sure enough, The Band. Here, though, they don't try to show off or
even state their presence as an independent act: they limit themselves
to a strict backing sound, and dammit, it sounds good, even if a
tad monotonous. But the sound is loud, the guitar roars, the organ swirls,
and Bob is clearly in top form as he recycles his early acoustic songs
in new arrangements. Yes, I must specially state that this was one of his
really nasty tricks: the old, straightforward acoustic songs are played
plugged, while the new, mind-boggling electric songs are played unplugged.
He couldn't have chosen a more intricate way of saying 'fuck you' to the
audience. He was a brave fella, really! And he really pulled all the stops.
This is not your Simon & Garfunkel 'we-wanna-look-like-rockers' business:
Dylan really rocked live, playing loud, gritty, flashy and with
total devotion, just the things you'd expect from a true rock band. Unfortunately,
this also contributed to the boos: everything was so loud that all the
theatres where Bob and The Hawks tortured their instruments simply couldn't
bear the sound due to bad acoustics. And remember, the audiences didn't
consist of little girls wailing to get screwed; they consisted of 'serious-looking'
chaps that came to see the man curse the capitalist pigs with songs like
'With God On Our Side' and that viewed all 'rockers' as stinkin' pop sellouts.
I do hope, though, that many of these chaps left the show converted.
So he gets booed again and again, with slow handclapping, cries of 'Judas'
and whistles. He don't give a damn, though, telling some strange psycho
stories through the mike and finally saying 'play fucking loud' before
a crunchy 'Like A Rolling Stone'. Unfortunately, the sound on this second
CD does suffer: the vocals on 'Ballad Of A Thin Man' (where Bob moves to
a piano) are almost unheard, and too often the instruments mesh together
in a really horrible mess. Quite as often, though, it does work, like on
the fantastic fast opener 'Tell Me Momma' (as far as I understand, an obscure
outtake which later turned into 'From A Buick 6') or on the re-arranged
'I Don't Believe You'. He even goes as far as to resurrect 'Baby Let Me
Follow You Down' from his debut album, making it rock out just as hard!
In all, if you don't mind the re-arrangements and the boos, you can really
get your cup of tea out of this album. I do - sometimes.
I don't know the exact reasons for the official release of this album (maybe
Columbia has gotten enough of seeing money flow right through its hands),
but whatever they be, this was quite a reasonable thing to do. And yes,
this sounds nothing like his later live albums (even though, to
be honest, all of his live albums sound different), if only because it
belongs to an entirely different epoch. Like I said, an essential historic
document and a great show as well, despite all the problems with sound
quality and the endless boos. And it's got the most beautiful photo of
Dylan in existence on the front cover, too.
Tell me momma... Mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
'Tell me Momma' is great, but 'She actsLike We Never Have Met' is great too, if you haven't heard THE BAND's The Last Waltz album, may be you woouldn't recognize that, but 'Baby let me follow you down' is the best from the electric half.
Eric Einhorn <eeinhorn@home.com> (04.06.2000)
WHAT? A SEVEN for this album? This is not only very interesting and
very important, it's one of Dylan's best albums, and undoubtedly the best
live album ever (by anyone). First of all, it's an incredible historical
document. This shows Dylan completely offending, ignoring, and even chastising
his audience. I mean, it's not that evident on disc 1, but disc 2
(with the band) is just mind-blowing. The audience shows their disregard
by booing, slow-clapping, and just murmuring eerily in between songs. Dylan
not only doesn't let this get to him, he uses it for its effect. For example,
before one of his songs the audience starts slow-clapping disrespectfully.
Dylan gets up on the mike and starts murmuring quietly as if he is telling
a story. He keeps doing it and the audience eventually gets quiet enough
to hear him. As they wind down, he says, "blah blah blah ble blah
if you all wouldn't clap so hard...", stops, and then kicks in to
the next song. Before "Leopard Skin Pillbox Hat", he starts to
introduce the song, but then stops with a rustle in the audience. So then
he says, slowly and deliberately, "This is called, 'Well I see you've
got your brand new leopard skin pillbox hat'," and then breaks into
the song.
The best part, however, is coming out of "Ballad of a Thin Man".
The audience is stirring kind of uneasily, and then this one guy yells
out, "Judas!", implying that he has betrayed folk music. Dylan
waits a moment, and then starts strumming his guitar. "I don't believe
you," he sneers. Robertson starts playing over him, and Dylan goes,
"You're a liar!" He turns to the band and goes "play fucking
loud" and they kick into "Like a Rolling Stone."
But the music is also awesome. The first side is just Bob on guitar and
harmonica, which is nice - a lot of the Blonde on Blonde songs are
spared of electric guitar ("Visions of Johanna", "Just Like
A Woman"). "Tambourine Man" is filled out to almost seven
minutes, and it sounds great. All the other songs are worth listening to,
at least. Side 2 is even better. Apart from some bad takes, like "Thin
Man", most of the songs are at least as good as their originals. "Rolling
Stone," "Pillbox Hat," and "Maggie's Farm" all
sound great. Plus, some formerly acoustic songs become electric. "I
Don't Believe You" and "One Too Many Mornings" sound much
better here than on the original recordings. All in all, this album is
well worth getting, and I think deserves a 10.
[Special author note: 'Maggie's
Farm'? Where the hell did he find 'Maggie's Farm' on here? I have an official
non-pirated release, and it ain't present! Criminy on a shoestring! In
any case, I reiterate that the sound often sucks and this is extremely
valuable as a historic document, but one can hardly prefer any of these
versions, especially on the acoustic half, to the originals.]
Simon <folkmetal@hotmail.com> (05.09.2000)
I was appalled by your review of Live 1966. There, I said it.
I can't comprehend how you can be a Dylan fan (or perhaps fanatic!?) and
dislike this album. No Dylan release previous to this translates anything
close to the intensity of this performance. Dylan's vocals are at their
most raw and powerful, sneering his way through both the acoustic and the
electric sets. And the arrangements! Every song is an improvement on the
original (taking listeners like you out of their stale, studio polished,
musical comfort zone) with the exception of "she belongs to me"
and "Baby Blue", which yearn for extra backing.
And as for this being a listenable record only because of its historical
significance - well that's just WRONG. Although Dylan's plead, "if
you only just wouldn't clap so hard" is humorous, and his order to
the Hawks "play fucking loud!" highly appropriate, the goings
on between the tracks are most definitely asides to the actual performance.
A final note - I know this is pedantic, but if you listen carefully, when
Dylan says "I don't believe you - you're a liar" etc., he's not
responding to the purist who shouts out "Judas!" but a different
purist who yells out something in the order of "blah blah blah Dylan
sold out"
[Special author note: Simon's
preliminary notes are just the problem - over the years, I'm painfully
becoming aware that there are way too many Dylan fanatics in this world,
and the world sure don't need no Dylan fanatics just like it sure don't
need no Lynyrd Skynyrd or AC/DC fanatics. Also, I never said the record
is unlistenable: but, just like Altamont and Woodstock, this concert has
become a symbol of its time, and like every symbol, its original meaning
is shallower than whatever ensued. Even so, I gave it an overall rating
of twelve, and I do not dislike any record with an overall rating
of more than nine, so no slandering please. As for every song being
an improvement on the original... well, even if you disregard the crappy
sound quality, I simply can't see how 'Desolation Row' without its fascinatingly
complex guitar lines can be an improvement. Not that I dislike live albums,
mind you - I'm all for live quality and all for changes. Bah.]
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7 - I tend to agree with you on this one. I bought a tape of the ‘electric’ half of the show in 1983, and having heard all the hype about it, I was disappointed. Only “Tell Me, Momma” made it really worth buying as a bootleg tape, although the electric version of “Follow You Down” is very good. As for the acoustic tracks, they’re good, and some are indeed as good as the studio recordings. However, I was amazed by the general critical consensus when this was finally officially released - all the critics seemed to treat it as a lost masterwork. However, as with The Basement Tapes, the hype wasn’t really justified, and, after all, why did it take the record company, and Dylan, to release them both - obviously because they didn’t believe they were anything special.
Year Of Release: 1975
Record rating = 5
Overall rating = 10
Patchy, but that's understandable. An ex-bootleg with lotsa country
songs. Some crappy, some not.
Best song: TEARS OF RAGE
At the peak of his career Bob eventually got into a motorcycle crash
and subsequently dropped into a coma and out of the cultural and musical
life of the Summer of Love. One can only wonder what album would have followed
Blonde were it not so, and what would be Bob's part in all the movements
of 1967. Instead, after the convalescence he locked himself up in New York,
in the so-called 'basement of Big Pink' (or 'Big Punk', as I call it) together
with The Band and started recording bunches of weird songs. The tapes were
bootlegged for a long time, until in 1975 they were released officially.
However, since all of the recorded material dates back to 1967, this is
where it belongs in my chronology.
Such an affair as this, naturally, can't help but be somewhat patchy. There
are some real gems here, but all are interwoven with lots of barely listenable,
underarranged, throwaway filler. And it's not a necessary thing that Bob's
songs are good and The Band's songs are not. Nope. It's just that this
material wasn't sorted out (as for a regular studio release), and so for
every good song you get one or two shitty ones. Naturally, Bob wasn't too
hot about releasing this stuff originally; perversely, what would probably
be dismissed by the thinkin' public were it to be released in 1967, had
gradually turned into a legendary set of recordings, with multiple performers
'confiscating' all these songs to sing them themselves, starting from Bob's
eternal bodyguards the Byrds and ending with Rod Stewart and even Fairport
Convention ('Million Dollar Bash'). Needless to say, this is that unique
case when the 'alien performers' managed to improve on Dylan, simply because
they took the time to work on the songs and Bob didn't, although, given
the circumstances, we can't really blame him for that.
I don't think many people would tend to disagree with me over the general
assessment of the record. Tastes may, however, differ as to what should
be considered as highlights and what should be considered as low points.
I'll just list some of the songs that did manage to draw my attention,
and try to explain why; but I don't guarantee the absolute truth on here
(as a matter of fact, I never guarantee the absolute truth, but
when you're dealing with somebody as slick and slim as Mr Zimmerman, you
can particularly never tell). And before I proceed, please bear
in mind that I don't really think of Tapes as a 'bad record'; rather
a slightly misguided experiment. I actually enjoy most of the numbers,
but, for the most part, as simply qualified background music. For Bob's
own standards, which are the highest in the world (otherwise his artist
rating would be lower), this is definitely mediocre at best.
On the first disc of the set, I particularly enjoy the album opener, the
jolly countryish 'Odds And Ends' which sounds as if it comes straight from
the Stones' Aftermath - especially if we consider that the sloppy
sound quality perfectly matches the youthful intentional underproduction
of Aftermath. 'Million Dollar Bash' is particularly memorable because
of Garth Hudson's impressive swirling organ and the 'Oooh baby ooh wee'
chorus. 'Lo And Behold!' is exceedingly funny, even if it sounds just like
a slightly modified clone of the former, but I somehow find something intriguing
in the line 'looking for my lo and behold!'. You? Meanwhile, the Band step
in with a few noteworthy compositions of their own - 'Bessie Smith' is
a beautiful, hard-hitting tune with more showcases for Garth Hudson's expert
organ playing and very emotional, deeply moving vocals, while 'Yazoo Street
Scandal' is an unexpectedly grim, spooky tune with echoey vocals, scary,
ice-cold guitar tones and mystical lyrics wherein, to quote Greil Marcus,
'the singer is introduced to the local Dark Lady who promptly seduces him
and then scares him half to death'. The song is really grim, much
more than you'd expect from such a bunch of nice guys as The Band. The
definite highlight of disc one, however, is the closing pleading ballad
'Tears Of Rage', arguably one of the few deserved Dylan classics on the
entire set: while most of his songs here really serve to introduce his
upcoming country-western period, 'Tears' apparently hearkens back to the
Blonde period, with its lush, luxuriant background arrangement;
in yet another sense, though, this song that has Dylan at his most broken-hearted
since God knows when, actually, for the first time, I guess, also presages
Blood On The Tracks.
Now disc two is even weaker. It has a couple more pleasant, but elementary
countryish clones of 'Million Dollar Bash', like 'Yea! Heavy And A Bottle
Of Bread', but even these are getting horrendously generic and annoying
('Tiny Montgomery', a song that strikes me with its complete pointlessness).
So there's just two Dylan originals on here that I favour - the delicious,
gentle 'You Ain't Going Nowhere', which I confess I only started appreciating
after hearing the Byrds' version on Sweetheart Of The Rodeo, and
the menacing blues of 'Long Distance Operator'. Oh, 'This Wheel's On Fire'
is considered to be a classic on here, but for some reason I've never been
able to perceive the deeply-hidden charm of that song, if it ever exists
in the first place. Hell, the chorus has almost the same melody as 'Tears
Of Rage' - a similar, but far superior song, with much more raw emotional
power and far less bombast than here.
So what about the rest? Well, I won't be going on a song-for-song basis:
there's just too many of them, and why should I engage in lengthy ramblings
on tunes that have fewer potential than Rick Danko's left thumb? you tell
me. Most of the rest is either plain derivative ('Orange Juice Blues' and
a million other tunes that don't have the faintest smell of any original
idea lying around), or just boring with no particular place to go (the
lengthy 'Goin' To Acapulco'), or just silly (The Band's 'Katie's Been Gone').
Also remember that the stuff is obviously distributed in a bad way: the
good stuff is mostly grouped on the first disc and vice versa. Oh, well.
Even the traditional 'Ain't No More Cane', which should have been interesting
in The Band's hands, is not so. But what would you expect of a long-time
bootleg, anyway? And to think that you have to pay double price
to get it, as it comes on two CDs! The worst thing is that the running
time DOES NOT exceed eighty minutes, so it was fairly possible to
squeeze this stuff onto one disc even without having to sacrifice some
of the lesser tunes (although I wouldn't really mind). When I think that
I have to pay twice as much for this as for Blonde On Blonde, that
has more or less the same time amount of music, I really begin to get the
feeling that the world is as irrational and illogical a place as can only
be in the world. Then again, life would probably be pretty boring if everything
were to be rational and illogical. Accept this as yet another undecipherable
mystery of life and humbly go and buy The Basement Tapes for thirty
bucks. Better still, rummage around in the used bins. You probably won't
have to waste much time on the process.
Lo and behold! Here come your ideas!
Your worthy comments:
Clark <ckent23@ibm.net> (13.01.99)
I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the Basement Tapes. I do agree
that the selection process for this set was seemingly haphazard. Let me
quote from Clinton Heylin's excellent book Recording Sessions (1960-1994):
"Sadly, when this material was finally released in 1975, Robbie Robertson
seemed determined to present a sleight of hand as the truth. Intermingling
eight songs by the Band supposedly cut in the fall of 1967, Robertson sought
to imply that the alliance between Dylan and the Band was far more equal
than it was...In fact, the so-called Band basement tapes have nothing to
do with the Dylan/Band sessions...two are actually 1975 recordings made
at Shangri-La [studio]...[End quote]
Most, if not all, of the reviewers who rave about the basement tapes
are lucky enough to have heard the several hours worth of tapes that circulate
among collectors (5 CDs worth!). The rumor mill says that the next volume
in Columbia's Bootleg Series will be a collection of songs from
the basement tapes, presumably excluding the crappy Band cuts and with
an eye toward quality unheard pieces -- Heylin and Greil Marcus both rave
about "I'm Not There" and "Sign of the Cross," which
would hopefully both be included. Columbia does have a Bootleg Series
release in store for 2000, but we will have to wait and hope that we will
finally have an accurate representation of those 1967 sessions.
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
this wasn't released when it was recorded for a reason. It doesn't link Blonde with Harding at all. It links Live '66 with Skyline, I'm slightly disappointed with the lack of sincerity this album has. This album is funny, but call me lactosentolerant, cause I'm getting a lot of cheesy cheesy bottles of Bread.
Fredrik Tydal <f_tydal@hotmail.com> (16.07.2000)
I more or less agree with you. This should have been a single CD, if not even a single LP originally. I mean; what interest do I have in songs the Band recorded in 1975, with no connection to the 1967 basement sessions whatsoever? And, personally, I see the charm in "This Wheel's On Fire" and find it to be one of the clear high-lights of the album. I think it captures Bob is one of those rare moods, kind of like in "Idiot Wind". No bombast there at all.
<Justinekrnz@aol.com> (17.08.2000)
your wrong..'.tears of rage' is the most boring number on this LPall of dylans originals are brilliant and some of the overated bands are too
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
6 - I rate this a little more highly than you, because I think that overall most of the songs are good, but, there’s nothing great here.
Caligula King <caligulatheking@yahoo.com> (06.12.2000)
A few words about Dylan's The Basement Tapes. I suppose I went through the classic Dylan "trajectory of taste": enjoyed the well-known hits - "Tambourine Man", "Like a Rolling Stone", etc. Then moved onto the early folk-oriented albums, the so-called protest albums. Then matured and learned to appreciate Dylan's high-water mark - Blonde on Blonde, Blood on the Tracks, etc. And cruised along for many years, ignorant of the deeper pleasures to be found in such masterpieces as John Wesley Harding. And that strange album badly-recorded in a basement with The Band. But I arrived at the Basement Tapes via an alternate route; from Music From Big Pink and The Band to The Basement Tapes. And in many ways I find it the most moving, revelatory album of Dylan's career. For all sorts of reasons. The first thing that struck me on listening to this album the first couple of times was the sheer sense of enjoyment conveyed by all the musicians considered. A sheer sense of fun. The loose drumming, casual horn blowing, a pinched guitar tone that sounds like Robbie Robertson is almost struggling to come up with guitar lines on the spot. And Dylan's singing is playful, mocking, blurred and slurred. Check out "Million Dollar Bash". And this sense of playfulness seemed at odds with the darker songs, in particular "Tears of Rage" and "This Wheel's on Fire". Repeated listenings have altered this view, modified and reconciled this apparent contradiction. And what finally sold me on this album is the atmosphere created by the ludicrous nature of the lyrics. Which is not to say that this is an overly poetic album in the traditional Romantic sense. It is poetic in the sense of classic nonsense verse; nursery rhymes and children's games, songs half-remembered by each generation. The lyrics seem to reflect the instrumentation - off centre, strange, almost as if the artists are reaching into an ancient reservoir of myth and story and tall tales. Greil Marcus' liner notes say it best: "...as knowing as the old man of the mountains." (Both my vinyl and cd copies print Marcus' excellent notes in full. The cd is one of those double-thickness boxes with space in the middle for the comprehensive notes in the form of a booklet. There is also a one-cd- thickness box minus the notes. Try and buy the liner notes, if possible). And I also believe that "Bessie Smith" and "Ain't No More Cane" are some of the best things The Band have ever committed to tape. Basement Tapes is an incredible document. Patchy, yes. But a patchwork of many subtle hues and shades and colours. It sounds corny, but Dylan and The Band sing with a passion and an honesty rarely found on record.
Year Of Release: 1968
Record rating = 9
Overall rating = 14
An amazingly sincere excourse into the 19th century. Heaven-like
country music.
Best song: ALL ALONG THE WATCHTOWER
Along with Blonde On Blonde, this is probably the most intimate,
spirit-uplifting listening experience that I ever get out of Dylan. I suppose
that on some level the album's a solid ten, more so than, say, Highway
61; but then again, this is due to specific stellar moments, or to
the general atmosphere. If taken on a song-by-song basis, there are a couple
weaker numbers on here that don't really allow me to count JWH as
Dylan's finest hour. Also, the length of the album - just thirty friggin'
minutes in all - might be a bit off-putting for fans of the earlier period.
(At least, it is so in the financial sense). I'll just content myself with
saying that out of all the albums I've ever heard and reviewed, this is
the most easy-going, smooth, gladly-attributed nine I've ever given out.
No collection of 20th century music is complete without a copy of this
record; and no rock or folk lovers' taste may be called acceptable if it
can't adapt itself to its humble glory. And you all know I'm not the one
who goes around giving out praises like these to just about any record
that's immediately likeable. On the contrary, JWH, as nearly every
Dylan album, takes some getting used to. It should never be listened to
in an angry mood, and it should never be listened to as simply background
music, like you listen to an average country or country-rock album. It
doesn't 'kick ass' or 'rule supreme'. It's just genius.
On a 'historical' level, JWH opens a completely new trend for Bob
- probably the greatest artistic revolution he's ever undergone. Even today,
on latest albums like Time Out Of Mind, you can still see faint
echoes of the same vibe, dimmed and subdued by the lengthy years, but not
spent altogether. JWH was the first album that saw the light of
the day after Bob did likewise after his infamous accident, missing the
'Summer Of Love' in the process, and it shows the man completely rejecting
his past and adopting an altogether new style: hitting the country. But
'hitting the country' does not imply he adopted the well-known, banal,
Band-style country. Just as well this does not mean the slightly cheesy,
luvvly country style that Bob developed a year later, with Nashville
Skyline, and went on to 'globalize' on Selfportrait. Both of
these records were good and charming in their own way, but, after all,
straightforward country is just plain straightforward country, independent
of the player's originality, professional skills or emotional state. JWH,
however, is different.
Difference number one is made by the incredible production of the record.
Dylan dismisses all the lush arrangements he excelled in on Blonde
and strips everything down, once again limiting himself to plain acoustic
guitar and harmonica. And yet, this is not a return to the trusty folkie
days of old: there is a rhythm section present on this record, with Charles
McCoy on bass and Kenny Buttrey on drums. It might not be a great combo,
but it sounds nothing like The Freewheelin', anyway. And when you
listen to any selected song, you really get the impression that the guitar
doesn't matter all that much: Bob rarely plays any interesting fills like
he used to, for the most part sticking to simple, unadorned rhythm. The
main accent is placed on his voice and harmonica playing, and this is where
detailed attention should be paid. Now I don't know if the motorcycle accident
really messed poor Mr Zimmerman's vocal chords, but fact is, he sounds
far more whiny and pitiful than he did before - and I don't attribute that
exclusively to the style he adopted; his voice was certainly changing,
be it due to the accident or heavy smoking. But where it had lost in force
and, perhaps, tolerability from the casual listener, it has more than gained
in expressivity. With just a single line, any single line that starts any
of the tracks on here, he's able to set a unique and mind-blowing mood,
whether it be a depressive one, an angry one, a funny one, a romantic one
or a preachy one.
And the harmonica? Mark Prindle once complained about its 'ugliness' and
the fact that it was mixed way too loud, but I certainly can't share his
feelings here, nor would I ever want to. To put it short, Bob's harmonica
playing has never been better - before or since. While I always loved his
harmonica solos, I must say that this is the first album where a harmonica
solo is not treated simply as performing the function of an obligatory
instrumental break. Instead, the harmonica sound brilliantly complements
the song - it's as if the harmonica were taking on the function of Bob's
voice for a while, agreeing to substitute whatever mood he was trying to
set with the actual singing while Bob himself was taking a rest. And in
that sense, the production is awesome: bringing the instrument out to the
same level of loudness as Bob's voice only serves to accentuate the friendly
'competition' between the singer and the instrument.
The second difference is even grander, though: Bob completely changes his
attitude. Where he once sang angry, protesting anthems, or brain-muddling,
psycho songs that were still rooted in being in complete disagreement with
the ways of modern society, he now sings about 19th century America and
its problems, churning out most of the songs in a humble, almost self-deprecating,
tone. Dylan the Protest Singer and Dylan the Trippy Freak now gives way
to Dylan the Humble Preacher. In a certain way, that's the image he's had
ever since; but on JWH, he combines it with such important elements
as intriguing mystery, compelling storytelling, and visions of the country's
past life, so that the preachiness never comes out boring or banal. Instead,
it's as addictive as can be.
The very first song on the album, the title track, in which Bob slyly recalls
the deeds of a notorious outlaw, stylizing it in the form of a traditional
'heroic ballad', has something downright captivating about it. Maybe it's
the massive shock - try to put this on right after 'Sad Eyed Lady Of The
Lowlands' and you'll know what I mean. It's the total, almost defiant simplicity
and unpretentiousness of the song that makes it such a treat: the lyrics
are pretty straightforward, the melody as simple as can be (some say it's
ripped-off of his own single 'Positively 4th Street', but it certainly
isn't, as both songs can be independently traced to some obscure folkish
originals), and Bob's voice humble and nonchalant. Every time I listen
to it, I can't but get the feeling of this transformation - a teenage cult
figure like Bob suddenly metamorphosing into an old, ruffled country minstrel
singing a primitive, yet strangely deep and affectable ode to a bandit
of days gone by. It's so strange and unique, this feeling, that I'm tempted
to see 'John Wesley Harding' as an absolute classic - of course, taken
out of context, it doesn't really mean all that much.
And yet, even this newly-found straightforwardness has its limits: Dylan
immediately throws us into the illogical, absurd world of 'As I Went Out
One Morning', a song in which the protagonist goes to visit Tom Paine,
gets caught by a seductive girl and is only rescued from her clutches by
Mr Paine himself at the very last moment. And hoopla, suddenly the mystery
is right there in the air, and even Bob's voice descends from a happy whiny
tone into a deeper, grumblier, prophetic tone as he tells the story of
his misery: 'I offered her my hand - She took me by the arm - I knew that
very instant - She meant to do me harm'. Notice the utmost care that Bob
inserts into every single word, especially at the end of each line - the
magic is stunning. Till this very day, the song remains a complete mystery
to me, as I don't really get the message, nor do I get any particular mood
or general idea from it; but hey, we all need a little mystery in our lives.
Then the mystery goes away, and is replaced by utter despair and a song
so tragic and gorgeous in its essence that it brings me to tears every
time I hear it. This is my second favourite on the album, and a number
that you should always pplay if you want to convince somebody of Bob's
greatness: 'I Dreamed I Saw St Augustine', a song where Bob narrates exactly
the very fact. I am somewhat puzzled by the lines 'I dreamed I was amongst
the ones that put him out to death', as I'm pretty sure St Augustine died
his own death; therefore, the line should either be understood in a metaphorical
sense or just attributed to Bob's unstoppable fantasy, as I can't really
suspect him of simple ignorance. Nevertheless, this is one of his most
effective and influential Biblical stylizations: slowly, moodily and with
somber majesty he tells us how St Augustine tells all the kings and queens
to 'go on your way accordingly but know you're not alone'. And the desperate
ending - 'Oh I awoke in anger/So alone and terrified/I put my fingers against
the glass/And bowed my head and cried' - is such a cathartic moment that
only a person without a heart could hold back the tears while listening
to it. Poor, poor St Augustine. Poor, poor kings and queens. Why the hell
is this number so irresistible? I guess it has a lot to do with the vocals,
as usual: they are not angry or preachy or reproaching, by any means, just
so humble and so soft and so meek that they seduce you from the very first
moment. It's like with the servants of the Church, you know: I don't feel
that good about organized religion, usually, but I always feel a deep respect
for soft-hearted, intelligent and understanding priests who not only know
the words 'mercy' and 'tolerance' but know their true meanings as well.
This is more or less the equivalent of Bob's expressivity on this track.
And the harmonica blows away everything in the world, too.
Now the next song, the soaring anthem 'All Along The Watchtower', you're
bound to know this one. Unfortunately, you probably know it due to the
Hendrix cover which gets tons of airplay and has already equalled its position
as one of the most overplayed 'classic rock' numbers, along with 'Stairway
To Heaven' and 'Pinball Wizard' and suchlike. Now don't get me wrong: I
like the Hendrix cover good as anybody. But I don't feel it is correct
to really compare the two numbers, as Hendrix essentially took a Dylan
number and edited the 'Dylan' out of it: the lyrics are the same, of course
(if you neglect the fact that Jimi often contended himself with just one
verse in concert, forgetting the others), but the overall feel, the message,
the mood, everything else is completely different. The Dylan song in question
is all built around that soft silky mystical aura that overfills JWH,
and the beautiful, almost bewitching harmonica solos in between the verses
set a mood full of little medieval charms: it isn't even about America,
it's about the Dark Ages. 'Country-goth', I'd call it, a style never reproduced
after. The Hendrix version is more of a regular psychedelic tune with wild
guitar heroics, quite typical of Jimi; there's nothing mysterious or so
vastly compelling there, except the soloing techniques... but wait, didn't
I just promise not to compare the two songs. Stop stop stop and on we go.
Now the fifth song, 'The Ballad Of Frankie Lee And Judas Priest', which
is also the lengthiest on here - the only number that goes well over five
minutes, is the one I could easily live without. I'll be the first to admit
that the story that Bob tells during these five minutes is fascinating,
but more so as a poem than an actual song. In that respect, I might just
as well be enjoying the hilarious 'preface' to the album about Frank and
the three kings that's present there in the liner notes. But the melody
is non-existent (just Bob blandly strumming his acoustic for accompaniment),
Bob's intonations are intentionally devoid of any expression - he acts
as if he were simply reciting poetry with little or no feeling, and even
the harmonica doesn't really work; and five minutes of this stuff is somewhat
hard to take. Same problem, only worse, would later be represented by 'Lily,
Rosemary & The Jack Of Hearts' off Blood On The Tracks. For
some perverse reason, the song often occupies the other reviewers' favourite
spot - I still have trouble trying to figure out why. Probably has a lot
to do with the lyrics; but in my humble opinion, Dylan has never been able
to get away with lyrics and lyrics alone. And there's little but the lyrics
to be lauded on here.
'Drifter's Escape', which opens the second side, is an obvious improvement,
though. The story here is far less compelling as it is more straightforward;
it's simply a tale of a 'drifter' sentenced to death or something worse
('the jury cried for more') and how he managed to escape punishment during
the panic created by a lightning bolt. But the melody is somewhat more
upbeat and involving, more or less in the style of the title track, and
Dylan's funny impression of a bleating folk singer is enough to redeem
all the straightforwardness. Not a highlight, but solid and a good distraction
from all the emotional uplift and torment of the other numbers. It's also
interesting that Hendrix (obviously a great fan of the album, too) did
a not uninteresting electric version of this tune as well, recently unearthed
and issued on South Saturn Delta.
'Dear Landlord' introduces the first significant change in sound - it's
piano-based instead of guitar-based, and this significantly influences
the mood. This is the kind of sound that would be much more typical for
Dylan's subsequent releases (Selfportrait and especially New
Morning), a sound that's far more cozy, relaxed and homely than the
dangerous mystery of the guitar/harmonica interplay on the previous cuts.
The song is structured as a leaseholder's plea to his landlord not to sell
off his property or something like that, and Bob's self-humiliating intonations
are again at work. While the song is never 'sharp' enough to bring me to
tears (how long can one cry over such a short album, anyway?), it's still
unbelievably sincere and heartfelt: the lyrics might be a bit witty for
the occasion ('I do hope you receive it well/Depending on the way you feel
that you live'), but the general feel can't be argued about.
Ah, but then comes one of the three definite highlights on side two - the
sneering, sarcastic 'I Am A Lonesome Hobo'. The opening bloozy harmonica
suggests you're in for something special, and that's exactly what you get:
this time Dylan impersonates a hobo, indeed, but it's not a hobo that simply
sits there and whines about his misery. It's not a hobo that's ready to
take up a gun and shoot off every rich capitalist swine's nuts, either.
It's a hobo with a devastating, cynical view on the world - as a place
where everything is so bad in the first place that it can simply never
be repaired. 'Kind ladies and kind gentlemen/Soon I'll be gone', he says,
and it's obvious that he's more like a wandering poor philosopher than
a simple feeble person. This is also a 'lesson against jealousy', but that's
another matter. Again, the sneering intonations, the sardonic blues of
the harmonica and the society-bashing lyrics combine to produce a true
classic.
'I Pity The Poor Immigrant'. What can be said about that one? Suffice it
to say that it's hard to believe the song was written in twentieth-century
America, at a stage when the hardship and toil of immigration, while still
existing, were far from the hardship and toil the poor immigrants were
suffering a hundred years ago. I have not the least doubt that, were it
penned sometime around 1840 or so, it would have without a doubt turned
into the most popular 'Immigrant Workin' Song'. Lyrics like 'I pity the
poor immigrant/Who tramples through the mud,/Who fills his mouth with laughing/And
who builds his town with blood/Whose visions in the final end/Must shatter
like the glass/I pity the poor immigrant/When his gladness comes to pass'
hit the bulls' eye so precisely it's a real wonder. Add to this the slow,
stuttering, almost senile delivery (Dylan's heartfelt impersonation of
the poor immigrant), and you'll simply never be the same again after hearing
this song. Humanism breathes through every pore of it, even through the
trusty harmonica break.
The two next numbers - 'The Wicked Messenger' and 'Down Along The Cove'
- are relative throwaways. Even so, 'Messenger' probably has the most elaborate
melody on the whole record, with brilliantly constructed descending guitar
lines replacing simplistic rhythm strumming; and the story that Bob tells
is, once again, quite fascinating, though the idea is unclear, and that's
a problem - where the idea is unclear, it's difficult to tell what kind
of emotions or feelings the song should stimulate in you. And on 'Down
Along The Cove' Bob suddenly turns to primitive love thematics, with somewhat
off-putting, close-to-banal lyrics - a thing which doesn't work very well,
considering that the song itself is just a generic fast blues number. The
piano and occasional steel guitar, contributed by Nashville star Pete Drake,
don't help that much.
However, I have no objections at all to the 'primitive love thematics'
on the album closer - the luxurious, strangely sexual country number 'I'll
Be Your Baby Tonight'. Honestly, Bob could hardly come up with a better
album closer - telling us all goodbye not on a disturbing, mysterious note,
as he'd done previously, but on a heart-warming, friendly, loving one.
This is one of the best country songs in existence, with a melody close
to brilliant and blistering embellishments all over the place: melodic
harmonica fills abound, and Drake adds more steel guitar parts, this time
completely in their needed place. The harmonica solos on that one are,
in fact, more worthy than a dozen tranquilizers: my only complaint is that
the song fades out almost in a blink of an eye, and right in the middle
of one of these solos. Dammit, Bob. Why the hell did he have to extend
that 'Frankie Lee' borefest, while at the same time cutting the best songs
on the album to the point of practical non-existence? What an irrational
kind of guy.
So I don't think I've yet mentioned it explicitly - fact is, most of these
songs are just as short as your average punk number, a significant change
of style for Bob who was the legit father of eleven-minute epics. He'd
stay close to this pattern for all of his 'country' period, which would
last for at least five more years. The good news is that, while this period
is vastly underrated in general, he still managed to produce a great deal
of genre classics. The bad news is that none of his further output from
the period ever comes close to matching the beauty, mystery, inscrutability,
and, at the same time, humble simplicity of JWH. The album still
stands as one of the most obvious manifestations of the man's genius. And
if you need some further proof, let me tell you that I just discovered
I've even made this here review a lengthier one than my review of Blonde
On Blonde without actually noticing it. Hmm, don't you think I oughta
go and switch the ratings of these two albums? Well, probably not; I did
point out a couple of flaws here that Blonde On Blonde misses completely.
But buy this album today; tomorrow might be late.
And hey - I think I just figured out the meaning of the Blonde On Blonde
moniker! Hint: what do you get if you try it as an anagram...?
I pity the poor immigrant who is not on the Web to mail his ideas
Your worthy comments:
Brian Blacklow <blacklow@applepark.com> (05.12.99)
I'm not eaxctly sure what you mean when refer to the Band's banal country
style when review JWH... the band pretty much invented that sound
your describing one year later with Music from big Pink....
[Special author note: yeah,
a little chronological inaccuracy on here. I apologize. What I really meant
to say was that Dylan's 'country approach' on here has a weird, mystical
flavour, which the Band never managed, or wanted to, have.]
Fredrik Tydal <f_tydal@hotmail.com> (13.03.99)
I agree completely with you on this one, George. But it sure took a while to get into this album; unlike Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde On Blonde which I both liked immediately. It's kind of Neil Young's After The Goldrush - which also leaves one unimpressed after the first listen. But it grows on you. I agree with you on most of the songs except "The Ballad Of Frankie Lee And Judas Priest". I don't know what to say, I love that one. The guitar playing is great - that lead-in sets the mood for the song. It tells an intriguing story (which I still don't fully understand) and Bob narrates it good; his voice is in such good shape on this album. I tell you; lie down comfortably, put on your headphones, close your eyes and listen to the five and a half minutes that is "The Ballad Of Frankie Lee And Judas Priest" and you will get into the mood to even appreciate the harmonica part at the end. And "All Along The Watchtower" is of course superior to the Hendrix cover - that goes without saying. A solid nine out of ten.
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
From the first time I heard this album, the first Dylan Album I bought without knowing what I was getting myself into, I thought this is Bob Dylan. This is a Genius. When I play guitar for people I always plays one if not two song from this album. This album really recaptured me after hearing the basement tapes.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7 - A very good, rather than a great, Dylan album. As you say, it’s a little on the short side, and even the best track, “All Along The Watchtower”, is over in a flash. However, I do love “Frankie Lee”.
Year Of Release: 1969
Record rating = 7
Overall rating = 12
Dylan goes hardcore country. Lightweight and short, but unexpectedly
enjoyable.
Best song: LAY LADY LAY
Oh oh oh. For some, the going really gets rough here. Taking one step
further, Bob has immersed himself in Nashville, quit smoking (some say
that's the main reason of his odd whine-free tone on this and the followibng
album) and recorded some straightforward country songs. Whatever you might
say, this was certainly the true beginning of his long-time plan to rid
himself of his huge fan following; even more strange, he failed - it took
him one more album, and a double one at that, to achieve his goal (even
though it still really doesn't work with your humble servant). The only
major drawback of this album is that it's way too short. Twenty-nine minutes,
for Chrissake! Highway 61 was more than fifty minutes long! It's
not worth my money!
On the good side, though, he suddenly displays a charming singing voice
as if he's been singing country songs all his life; writes some nice songs
with perfectly understandable lyrics; and teams up with a host of Nashville
thugs who managed to destroy Ringo Starr's second solo album the following
year, but here they sound quite all right 'cos old Bob probably controlled
the situation and, after all, he's the only songwriter on here. Out of
the twenty nine minutes, there ain't even a single one that's not well
worth your attention; just like every genre he'd previously engaged in,
Bob personifies his country and brings it closer to the listener.
Everybody knows the classic ballad 'Lay Lady Lay' (sorry, the word 'ballad'
is superfluous for this album: every song is a ballad, except the dispensable
instrumental 'Nashville Skyline Rag'), with its mystical nighttime atmosphere,
perfectly balanced by the tinkling percussion, floating organs, and gentle
slide guitars. Unfortunately, the song is so intricate and subtle that
Bob never really mastered a successful live version of it, and no rearranging
tricks could ever recreate that same atmosphere on stage or even at least
make a decent substitute for it. So the only way to enjoy the number is
in its original version found here. The other more or less well-known number
is that pragmatic bit of preachery, 'I Threw It All Away', very similar
in tone to 'Lay Lady Lay' but without the slide guitar, so it's a 'daytime'
song as opposed to the duskiness of 'Lady'.
But not everybody has heard the fairly interesting remake of 'Girl From
The North Country' which Bob sings in a duet with Johnny Cash. The change
of scenery results in a fascinating change of stylistics: the original
number on Freewheelin' was just a sad tired Bob, here it's like
two traveling minstrels or something, which elevates the song on a high
romantic pedestal. Doesn't Johnny have one of the greatest voices in existence?
Too bad I don't really have much else to say about him at this point...
All the more interesting is its contrast with Bob's own - the Humble Intelligent
Dude vs. the Respectable Country Giant.
A couple of the songs are just funny grooves (although that point would
later be explored better on Selfportrait) - but 'Country Pie' with
its sharp lead guitar lines truly rocks and when it fizzles out so unexpectedly
after just one and a half minutes it's almost like an insult. Meanwhile,
'Peggy Day' is pleasant and bouncy - so pleasant and bouncy that it was
later borrowed by Ray Davies who reworked the groove into his magnificent
'Holiday' (unless, of course, the groove is also borrowed by Dylan himself
- quite a highly probable issue, too). Plus there's 'Nashville Skyline
Rag', of course; it's pleasant, but highly generic - Bob would learn to
make more intriguing country instrumentals later on (like 'Turkey Chase',
for instance), but one shouldn't be too hard on the poor man: he was learning,
after all. In any case, I love these charming little guitar melodies just
as well.
The rest of the songs mainly recycle the balladeering theme, though. Such
pretty numbers like 'One More Night' and the fascinatingly straightforward
'Tell Me That It Isn't True', for instance, should hardly rank below the
'classics' from this album. What's even less understandable to me is that
most people love these numbers, yet they sound exactly like some
stuff from Selfportrait which the same people hate. Talk about unfair
biases...
The final rating is a seven, not because the songs suck but because it's
actually a serious stylistic letdown after Harding. Well, after
all Bob did want it to be a letdown, and there's no need to pretend that
it isn't. It's still a wonderful record, though - which might seem like
a paradox, but actually isn't. Take it this way: if a great painter suddenly
quits painting masterpieces and turns himself to decorating wallpaper,
does that mean that his wallpaper sucks? It's something on a different
level - it's an intentional dropping of the 'high value' principle. The
odds are that his wallpaper will still be better than ordinary wallpaper.
Same with Bob: compared to Blonde On Blonde, Nashville Skyline
is a throwaway, but out of all the pure country albums I've ever heard
in my life this is, and undeniably will always be one of my favourites.
Hope it will be the same way with you, too.
Although I can hardly hope for the reader to share my devotion for the
following record...
Tell me that it isn't true and mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
This too is an Album I can't help but cover all the time. mostly because these tunes are so simple, I can do anything with them. 'I threw it all away', 'Staying Here With YOu', 'To be Alone With YOu', and on and on all good.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
6.5 - The history of this is well known, I guess. “Lay Lady Lay” was written for the film “Midnight Cowboy”, but wasn’t finished in time. Then, Dylan wanted to record a duet with Johnny Cash (heaven knows why?!), and that was one more song. And, suddenly, Dylan found he had just enough material to put out an album, so he did. And it’s good, but not really essential listening for Dylan fans.
Year Of Release: 1970
Record rating = 7
Overall rating = 12
A terribly understated quiet, modest album. Groovy and utterly un-serious.
Remember that.
Best song: MIGHTY QUINN (QUINN THE ESKIMO)
Oh boy, here we go. Now just look here: most people consider this album
to be not just a HUGE letdown for old Bob, but one of the most loathsome,
sordid and pitiful collection of songs he's ever done, if not ever recorded.
By 'most people' I mean the general public and critical opinion
as well: as far as I know, the record never gets more than one and a half
stars or 2 or 3 points out of 10 even in the hands of the most generous
reviewers. OK, now that being said and the warning for everybody being
done, ... not to offend 'most people': you guys are nuts. In other words,
this record rules. There ain't a single song of the twenty-three
tracks on here that I dislike, and I wouldn't trade it in for a whole kingdom.
First of all, whoever disses it but has the nerve to praise Nashville
Skyline needs to have a little part of his brain replaced. The moods
of both records are almost similar - they're both 'country-rock' excursions,
the only difference being that the Skyline material is more or less
original and here we have more or less covers of 'classic' or 'obscure'
country songs. As far as I understand, people just hate the songs for being
covers, and they probably miss Bob's lyrics. But lemme just consider the
background, ladies and gentlemen, lemme just consider the background! The
idea was by no means make a bad album (which some people seriously
think he did - they just say: 'Bob went and made one bad album intentionally!',
that's what they say, and they miss the mark completely); but the idea
was to make something different. And by different I don't
mean revolutionary or groundbreaking or even original.
In fact, by 1970 Bob was tired of revolutions, groundbreaking and originality,
and he had enough of being called God and the fans endlessly waiting for
that messianistic definite statement of Blonde On Blonde quality
or even higher. So he thought he should do something simple instead - something
ingenious, easily understandable and accessible which would shatter his
'superhuman' reputation intentionally. And, since he'd already stepped
on country ground, the choice was obvious: he covered a great deal of rather
banal country songs and wrote some more country songs in exactly the same
styles, so sometimes it's very hard to make a difference. But I reiterate
one more time: 'ordinary' doesn't equal 'bad', which so many people tend
to forget.
As a result, most people hate all of this stuff, saying it's too gross,
banal, and elementary. But I dunno, I enjoy it. I mean, it isn't serious
at all, but hell, if you wanna tell me that my beloved 'Just Like Tom Thumb's
Blues' is serious and this stuff is not, well I'll just have to
smack you. You can consider it a 'parody' album, which would be close to
the truth; or consider it a 'groove' album, which would be even closer;
but consider it a 'bad' album? Never in my sweet short life!
Let's just jump to another level of apperception - the level on which I
see, for instance, that the playing is great, with tons of professional
country musicians joining Bob in the studio and producing creative, tasteful
arrangements which I completely dig (and that's considering my usual disrespect
for slow, boring country music in general). Even more important, on some
of the tracks he continues to display that charming voice of his that he
first discovered on Skyline (which shows that he could sing, after
all, if he wanted to: esp. on 'Blue Moon', 'Take A Message To Mary', 'Take
Me As I Am' and suchlike).
Some of the cover versions are admirable: Simon & Garfunkel's 'Boxer',
for example, with Dylan singing a duet with Dylan (double-tracked, of course),
or the abovementioned 'Take A Message To Mary' (which has nothing in common
with 'Absolutely Sweet Marie', but is charming nevertheless); some old
folk cowboy tale called 'Days Of '49', on which Bob shines with his inimitable
talent to make a verse seem completely out of tune and then suddenly dive
out again and put it out straight; another kinda golden oldie called 'Copper
Kettle' about 'lying there by the juniper while the moon is bright'; some
others I can't recall right now, but I like them all. And there's at least
a dozen on here.
His self-penned material, though, is even better: the brilliant 'Mighty
Quinn' is a standing out ferocious and humorous rocker, quite unlike anything
he's ever done before or after; 'Belle Isle' is the lyrical opposite of
'As I Went Out One Morning', but musically they are both par; 'Minstrel
Boy' drags at a very slow pace, but has a very strong melody; the instrumentals
'Woogie Boogie' and 'Wigwam' are maybe nothing special, but certainly nice;
the two versions of 'Alberta' which open and close the album are good country
blues, and the two versions of 'Little Sadie' are just good country.
Repeating it one more time: none of these or other songs from Selfportrait
range among Bob's best work (except maybe 'Mighty Quinn'), but all of them
are nice and pleasant to listen to, especially if you're in a lazy, relaxed
mood. In fact, it's one of my favourite 'relaxation' albums of all time:
it's particularly great to put on late in the evening when you come home
all tired and pissed off after a day's toil. And no piece of music can
set you in a good mood better than the opening tune 'All The Tired Horses',
with just two lines repeated over and over, beautiful string arrangements,
and no Dylan at all - just female choruses. Even the two live versions
found on this CD ('Like A Rolling Stone', 'She Belongs To Me', from Bob's
1969 so-so Isle of Wight performances), sung in Dylan's most nasty voice,
are not enough to spoil the picture.
So cheer up, folks - get this album (especially since it's a double LP
on one CD) and dig it as Bob's 'groove' album. Seriously - it's one of
the biggest puzzles in my life as to how people can really hate this stuff.
Maybe being an American gives you the advantage of dismissing it? Well
then, from an international point of view it still looks great. No, I still
think that it mainly has to do with a 'crumble of expectations', as this
is truly the oddest piece in Bob's catalog. Where were you when he was
recording Skyline? What's the difference people? There ain't none.
And of course Self-Portrait can't even hope to rank along the true
Dylan classics, but hey, it's adequate - it doesn't actually pretend to,
like some of his worst Eighties' albums do. I easily count it as one of
the best, exemplary unpretentious, 'non-statement' albums ever recorded.
Take me as I am or mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Mike Zupan <viktoria@siol.net> (11.11.99)
I agree with you, this album is not THAT bad! The only problem is, that Bob Dylan could do a whole lot better!
Dave <dave@film-center.com> (20.01.2000)
I agree with your review of self-portrait-as would even the most avid Dylan fans. The only song that I could really ever put up with is 'Alberta #2'. But of all my cds, that one's got to be the one I listen to the least. Actually, I'm surprised that it's still in stores. It's a pretty poor album....even his beard looks bad!
Kelly Laabs <laabsk@southwestern.edu> (22.04.2000)
The cheese factory strikes again... and somehow makes a nice album.
<TylerDurden900@aol.com> (06.07.2000)
I agree with you 100 percent on this album. Actually, I think I like the album more than you do. You see, I can find merit in everything Dylan does. I mean, come on, it's Dylan! No, but seriously, this album kicks ass. As a matter of fact, I listen to this album just as much, and maybe more, than some of Dylan's acknowledged "masterpiece." Why? Because it's damn relaxing, chilled, always fun and interesting, and surprisingly melodical and beautiful. I love Self Portrait. Why the bad reviews? An issue of Rolling Stone I have calls it easily the worst double album released by a major artists. Come on now. "Days of 49," "Alberta," "The Mighty Quinn," "Copper Kettle," both "Little Sadies," "Minstrel Boy,"...these are great songs, regardless of who wrote them or who's playing them. They're highly listenable and.....accesible! Hell, I would call this one of Bobbie's most accesible albums. I don't know. This is an underrated gem and I just wanted speak it.
John McFerrin <stoo@imsa.edu> (15.08.2000)
George, I think I've figured out why it is that people hate SP
so much but mostly enjoy NS. See, when people first hear NS,
they think, "hmm, a hard-core country album. Different, and hey, I
don't really much like country, but what the heck, Dylan's doing it, and
he wrote the stuff himself, so it must be good." When they hit SP,
though, it finally hits the listener - "holy shit, Dylan's doing _country_.
EEEEEWWW! And they're covers! YUCK!"
Of course, these people are idiots. I bet that if I combined the NS
and SP tracks into one playlist and randomized the tracks, I couldn't
tell the difference, and neither could anybody else.. Both are enjoyable
background music with good playing. They're not amazing, but they're good.
I'd give each an 11 or so on the overall.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
5 - This was a disappointment. For me, there’s nothing better than an average song anywhere here. I like his version of Elmore James’s “It Hurts Me Too”, and some of his other ‘covers’ are interesting, but let’s face it, this was Dylan being self-indulgent, recording some of his favorite songs, and not doing anything that special with them.
<QUINN1856@aol.com> (21.10.2000)
It never ceases to amaze me how many avid Dylan listeners can dislike this album so much. It's filled to the brim with tasty little country grooves, and the live versions of "Rolling Stone" and "She Belongs To Me" are nothing short of fantastic. There's nothing wrong with Dylan letting loose and making a free-flowing album such as this, regardless as to whether or not he writes most of the songs. Besides, a lot of the cuts on this album are better than his original material from the mid-seventies.
Year Of Release: 1970
Record rating = 8
Overall rating = 13
A short venture into the life of piano chords. Quiet and introspective,
with just a tiny ounce of religion.
Best song: NEW MORNING
This is much more of a serious album than Selfportrait,
and also much more short: Bob cuts down the format and returns to the principle
of 'ultra-short' record which would stick around for most of his 'country
period'. Stylistics-wise, it is not entirely in another genre or anything:
he is still working in the patented quiet, stripped down country style.However,
by now he relies much more heavily on piano than on anything else, basing
song after song on rather vague, watery, rambling chord sequences and disregarding
carefully-structured riffs. Not that it's a problem: chaotic as this record
seems to be, it somehow manages to be incredibly catchy. I'm not exactly
sure if you'll like it if you hated Selfportrait, but if you didn't
hate that one, you'll really find New Morning a major highlight
in Bobster's career. Catchy, quiet and introspective - and also humble
and philosophical, this time finding Bob in a somewhat toss-off, melancholy
mood. But hey, that was probably the real mood he was in at the time, and
everything about the album feels utterly sincere and moving.
Unless, of course, you're a piano hater, in which case this record is definitely
not for you. In fact, the only real guitar-driven number on the whole record
is the opening beautiful ballad 'If Not For You', also recorded by George
Harrison the same year (see All Things
Must Pass). This is a rare case when I actually prefer the cover
to the original, but I have an excuse: George and Bob were really working
together at the time (Bob also wrote, or co-wrote, I don't remember which,
'I'd Have You Anytime' for George's album), and George's version is just
more polished, while Bob's take on it sounds kinda sloppy and too nonchalant.
It's still cute, though, with wonderful guitar licks and a homely, cozy
feel... eh, well, all of this album has a homely, cozy feel, I guess that
was a rather superfluous remark.
But guitar or no guitar, it doesn't really matter: most of the piano numbers
are extremely enjoyable, and much of them set entirely different moods
- it never feels like the record is just chewing on one style. Some of
the tunes are rather bizarre and unpredictable, like the extravagant waltz
'Winterlude': a bit in the Selfportrait vein with the formulaicness
of its melody and somewhat banal love lyrics, it's not exactly a highlight,
but I find its occasional roughness and straightforwardness defiant and
attractive. Some, on the other hand, are utterly gorgeous: 'The Man In
Me', on an amazing note, completely rejects Bob's frequently observed misogynistic
attitudes with its refrain - 'takes a woman like you to get through to
the man in me' - and, while some might find the 'la la la' chanting in
the song cheesy and repetitive, I find it really heartwarming.
The album also sports an evident religious attitude - for the first time
in Bob's career, really; one might say that in certain ways New Morning
predicts Bob's 'born again' period, albeit only its strong sides and none
of its weak ones. I'm mostly talking about the last three minutes on the
album: 'Three Angels' is a solemn, creepy, organ-based piece, with Bob
reciting a certain kind of apocalyptic vision that gives me the creeps;
and 'Father Of Night' is just a very short, catchy, simplistic, childish
ditty to round out the record. Unimaginable on any earlier album, but never
spoiling the picture.
Religious, cozy and friendly; what other characteristics I still haven't
mentioned? Oh yeah. Overall, this album produces a very 'lazy' impression
as well, although it's not the 'laziness' of Selfportrait: the latter
showed signs of tiredness (Bob tired of his fame and success), while New
Morning displays signs of obvious boredom. Tracks like 'Time Passes
Slowly' really set a unique mood that makes me imagine Bob as a lazy sluggard
lying on his bed and staring at the ceiling. It does have a melody, because
I'm able to remember it; but it creeps along at such a snail pace, and
it sounds so blatantly minimalistic - one finger on a piano, eh? - that
you will certainly be tempted to deny its very existence. Do not. It's
just an Intentionally Boring (And Bored) Melody.
However, while it's indeed an intriguing and even haunting kind of boredom,
it's not a creative boredom - it's rather his being stuck in one
place and desperately searching for something new but never finding it,
or simply not being sure whether IT has really been found or not.
And although the title track, with its optimism and call for a renewal
of values, tries to hint at some kind of a spiritual rebirth for old Bob,
you hardly believe that from listening to other songs here: 'Went To See
The Gypsy' is still the same search for spiritual perfection, while 'Sign
On The Window' is as pessimistic and depressing as anything ("Sign
on the window says "lonely"/ Sign on the door said "no company
allowed"/Sign on the street says/"y' don't own me"/Sign
on the porch says "three's a crowd" - ooohh, that's sick...).
I'd bet you anything that Bob was in a terrible depression at this time,
which unfortunately came to pass only five years after - with his return
onto the big stage (Before The Flood) and his next period of creativity
(Blood On The Tracks).
Nevertheless, his melody- and lyrics-generating motor was still in perfect
form: if you can get through the somewhat uniform sound of this record
(initially - you'll be amazed at how diverse it really is after a few listens),
and a couple occasional misfires like the stupid beatnik rant 'If Dogs
Run Free' which doesn't really fit anywhere on here, you'll dig almost
every song. YES, including even the stupid blues 'One More Weekend' which
doesn't fit in with the general mood here either. Stupid, but hooky-hook-filled.
It is. Together with Selfportrait, the most blatantly overlooked
album in Zimmy's catalog. And mind you, there ain't a single cover on here!
If you thought I was a jerk for defending Selfportrait, do not extrapolate
that principle on the other records!
Time passes slowly when you're not mailing your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Dave <dave@film-center.com> (24.01.2000)
I've always loved this album. Although, it does have it's flaws like the stupid "One More Weekend" blues song. Equally weak is annoying guitar work on "Time Passes Slowly" and those corny "la la la's" at the beginning of "Man In Me."
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
6.5 - Not a complete return to form, but some good stuff, and 2 very good ones in “If Not For You” and “New Morning”.
Year Of Release: 1973
Record rating = 6
Overall rating = 11
Possibly the best bunch of instrumental soundtrack music I've ever
heard. Period.
Best song: FINAL THEME (and not 'Knockin' On Heaven's Door'!)
Hey, another good Dylan album! You may ask: how can a good Dylan album
only earn a 6? Well, actually, this is just a soundtrack for a film of
the same name, starring Mr Bob Dylan, too, under the name of 'Alias' (sic!)
To that extent, it contains no more than two real songs (one of
them reprised thrice, plus a fourth time in an instrumental version),
while all the others are just instrumental themes. You may ask: how can
two songs and a bunch of instrumentals even earn a 6? Well, easily, because
they're that good! If anything, Pat Garrett is a very good
place for anybody doubting Dylan's composing skills to come and see that
there was really no ground for that. Still working strictly within the
limits of country-rock where Bob had driven himself six years ago and which
he was not yet intending to leave, he managed to bring together an ounce
of creativity, an ounce of his usual humbleness and introspection, a handful
of cute musical ideas, a bunch of excellent backing musicians, including
Booker T, Roger McGuinn, and Jim Keltner on drums, and a delicious relaxing
atmosphere, and all this resulted in a minor masterpiece. Very minor,
but as far as soundtracks to country westerns go, it hardly gets any better
than this.
For instance, because one of these songs is the super-greatest-mega-hit
'Knockin' On Heaven's Door', worth every penny and sounding a hell of a
deal better than Eric Clapton's feeble reggae reproduction (which I rather
like, too, but it completely lacks the stately Dylan majesty of the original);
here it is set to a much more appropriate gospel backing, although it's
much too short for (probably) everybody's tastes. What can be said about
the song other than it denotes absolute, tear-inducing perfection? Only
that, amazing as it may seem, it's not the best composition on here...
so read on. The other "full song" is really called 'Billy' (or
'Billy 1', 'Billy 4', 'Billy 7', and 'Main Title Theme' if you prefer some
details). The lyrics deal with matters which I can't really discuss here,
since they all refer to the film I've never seen, but the melody is perfect:
its only flaw is its being reprised four times throughout the album, and
in the form of the six-minute long 'Main Title Theme' it can really
get on your nerves unless you just treat it as soothing background music,
which is actually the only way it should be treated. That said, the arrangement
of 'Billy 7' that closes the album is rather weird - far more dark, ominous
and disturbing than the other three versions, with Dylan adopting a very
gloomy, slow intonation and then even going off into a somewhat faster
'boogie' before fading out.
And theother instrumentals? Why, as a matter of fact, our friend Bob made
a surprisingly strong effort and made them as lovely as possible. Both
'Cantina Theme' and 'Bunkhouse Theme' coulda been some fine songs if set
to lyrics, but apparently this fate was not theirs. So they just roll along
slowly, gracefully, excellent mood music that does not rely on synthesizers;
proof enough that you don't really need no keyboards to do ambient stuff.
But it's really two other instrumentals that stand out above everything.
The banjo-and-fiddle-driven 'Turkey Chase' is just enthralling, hilarious
and a bit sad all at once, with fiddle genius Byron Berline and banjo genius
"Jolly Roger" driving it forward. The fiddle is an absolutely
genial, unparalleled touch here: where most of the country western soundtracks
would simply contend themselves with a generic fast banjo-driven instrumental,
this one receives a blistering, innovative piece of music that might not
seem a lot to an unexperienced eye, but is in reality genre-breaking. At
least, that's how it seems to me: I'm no big country expert, but I have
seen quite a few movies and am quite familiar with the type of country
music contained therein.
But the album's major moment of glory, of course, is the absolutely haunting
'Final Theme'. I don't know if it was actually Dylan who invented that
beautiful, tearful flute/recorder part (played by Gary Foster), but if
yes, forget all my complaints about Dylan's musical limitations: this is
one of the most emotionally rich, haunting themes I ever witnessed. (And
note that it also came out in 1973 - a year so full of similar cathartic
experiences, like Townshend's solo on 'Quadrophenia' or Steve Hackett's
solo on 'Firth Of Fifth'. Apparently, God came down on Earth that year
and spent some time in Anglo-Saxon countries). The number alone is worth
your buying this album; you'll easily find 'Knockin' On Heaven's Door'
on any reasonable compilation, but no way you'll ever witness a compilation
with 'Final Theme': if you ever find one, mail me the name of its compiler
so I can write it in big letters here on the site. Anyway, thanks God it
is not the last track on the album - otherwise I'd just have to listen
to it again and again. Instead, the album closes off with two more versions
of 'Billy' which really make the idea of saying goodbye to the record far
more endurable.
So there you are, folks - a mighty soundtrack, that one. I guess if every
movie soundtrack were this CLASSY, the world woulda run out of rock bands
a good deal earlier than it did (I mean, good rock bands). If you
really enjoy this awkward lot of noise made by silly people by means of
weird magical objects which they sometimes call MUSIC - buy it, you won't
regret it.
Knockin' on heaven's door already? Wait up and mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Ward <Wardo68@aol.com> (19.08.2000)
Good call on 'Final Theme'! I don't listen to this album as much as it's so, well, repetitive. But 'Final Theme's variations on the other theme does have a yearning, keening quality to it that truly PULLS. It is the best song on the album.
Year Of Release: 1974
Record rating = 5
Overall rating = 10
A disappointingly flaccid album. Maybe teaming up with The Band wasn't
such a good idea after all.
Best song: FOREVER YOUNG
The first serious effort in the studio in four years, and overall it's
a disaster - of course, it's still an album that many bands would kill
for, but judging by Bob's standards, this is indeed a crying shame
where previous records such as Self-Portrait were just a lightweight
distraction. In fact, this is one of the few Dylan albums I have serious
trouble to concentrate on. It marks the end of Dylan's country-rock period
- and not too soon, as the formula is starting to run painfully dry. For
the last time on a studio record, he is being backed by The Band, and even
though Bob holds the writing credits for every song alone, they manage
to spoil a lot of the fun. While Mr Zimmerman had never been the greatest
of melody-writers, his songs always had melodies - some derivative,
some simplistic, but essentially solid and memorable. Planet Waves
lives up to its title - it sounds like dreamy, soft waves of sound rolling
over the listener and luring him with their subtle moodiness so that he
could forget there are so few melodies on here. I must say that at times
I'm wooed over by such an approach: more than half of the songs do manage
to somewhat get by on atmosphere alone, and the patented Dylan atmosphere
ain't the worst atmosphere in the world. But the instrumentation is way
too generic, no "thin mercury sound" of the days of yore, and
The Band's playing is surprisingly mediocre - at times, they do please
my ear, like with the sharp 'popping' guitar licks on 'Going Going Gone',
but most of the time, it's... pretty ehhh, as I don't really find anything
more appropriate to say.
In fact, on Planet Waves Bob hardly sounds any better than one of
his most notorious (and most obnoxious) rip-offs - Bruce Springsteen, who,
coincidentally, was just emerging on the scene at the time. Same loungey
jammy stuff with little substance, and a strange self-pitying, preachy
atmosphere. Did I yet mention how tired and gloomy Bob sounds on that one?
Emotion-wise, Planet Waves is the legitimate predecessor to Blood
On The Tracks; but where the latter was sharp, at times angry and at
times with a scent of sad irony, this one is just blunt, bleak, and depressing
without a particular reason, and as such hearkens more to Bob's painfully
pessimistic Eighties period.
Still, it starts off just fine - with a tight, compact and funny fast country
number called 'On A Night Like This' where Dylan's voice really stands
out of the packs of guitars and keyboards. Sounds almost as if the song
had been carried over from Selfportrait and the like (and, of course,
everybody who hates Selfportrait loves it - how could it be otherwise?).
Then the fun ends - once and for all; but never mind, it's immediately
followed by one of his most bitter and tear-bringing ballads ('Going Going
Gone'); in fact, everybody who bought the record on its release must have
been shocked seeing Dylan go from such a hilarious and lightweight groove
into such an overkill depression, the likes of which nobody had yet witnessed;
maybe a little on John Wesley Harding, but that album had a bit
of theatricality about it, with Dylan more of an 'impersonator' than a
person telling a sincere confession. 'Going Going Gone' is autobiographical,
and it sounds like a death sentence to himself: 'I've just reached a place/Where
the willow don't bend/There's not much more to be said/It's the top of
the end/I'm going, I'm going, I'm gone'. Masterful words - Dylan might
have been "gone", with the depressive moods settling down forever,
but he sure was still "going"...
But once the original shock passes and one gets accustomed to the dreariness
of the mood, from then on it gets more and more mediocre, with track after
track lacking true hooks and mainly just repeating the same mood over and
over again. The only real highlight is the classic tune 'Forever Young',
whose lyrics are kinda optimistic (which is why it has since become such
a notorious anthem), but once again, I feel more like it's Dylan "passing
the baton" to the younger generation - go ahead and be forever young,
do what you like and be what you want, and I'll just sit here in the gutter
and quietly die away. This makes the song more of yet another personal
statement than of a cheerful anthem, and I'd also like to mention Bob's
marvelous singing in the chorus; together with a few more tunes like 'One
More Cup Of Coffee', it's a clear demonstration of his exquisitely talented
style of singing. Don't believe me? Try hitting the notes he is and you'll
see. But even so, the second, faster, more "upbeat" version of
the song that immediately follows the first one, sounds like nothing more
than a self-parody: it's as if Bob was intentionally "deflating"
the original, transforming a powerful personal revelation into a mock-dance
tune that seems horrendously out of place.
Most of the other tracks feature Dylan singing weak, uncertain lines and
feeling almost lost in the woods of The Band's instruments. Or was it 'bogged
in the marshes'? Feeling the necessity to squeeze at least a couple of
good words about the album, I'd say that 'Hazel' is at least moody; 'Dirge'
is at least, er, well, dirgey; and 'Something There Is About You'
points the way to the far superior 'Idiot Wind', but the other songs are
just one huge embarrassment (particularly the stupid 'Wedding Song' that
closes the album - Bob singing straightforward love lyrics in an overemoting
voice? This kind of stuff wouldn't even be acceptable from Bob Seger).
The only explanation I have is that either a four year break temporarily
affected Dylan's songwriting skills or else the same effect was produced
by the presence of assorted Band members in the neighbourhood. Or both.
Plus, there's an ugly album cover which, strange enough, totally fits in
with the music: impressionistic pictures of several persons (Bob and the
Gang?), looking just as degraded as the songs themselves. Sorry, Bob.
Something there is about YOU! Mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Brian Blacklow <blacklow@applepark.com> (05.12.99)
While I agree that Planet Waves isn't a perfect album (mainly because of 'Wedding Song'), I think Bob's most underrated song ever (okay, tied with 'Black Diamond Bay' and the last song on Street Legal) is on this album: 'Dirge'. Beyond the fact that Bob manages to use the word "fiberglass" in a song (a feat I don't think any other artist has ever acehived), it mixes that Blonde and Blonde era wordplay ("like a slave in orbit"), with New Morning lonliness and the stubborn insitence that everything will be okay that he had in 1961 (you can draw a straight line from "when i leave New York I'll still be on my feet" to "I've paid the price of solitude, but at least I'm out of debt").... Furthermore, it perfectly foreshadows BOTT....
Eric-Scott Bloom <MODERNARTIST@webtv.net> (30.12.99)
“Embarrassing?”
Let's hear some of YOUR songs!
This review is such monumental bullshit.
[Special author note: please
be sure to visit one
of Eric-Scott's pages after you had enough of this here site. He is
indeed an important, and often fascinating, modern artist with a lot of
wit and talent.
(You couldn't tell it judging by the above comment, though. But believe
me, so it is.)]
Steve Knowlton <knowltos@co.washtenaw.mi.us> (03.02.2000)
The big problem with this album is that Bob didn't give the Band enough time to rehearse. From what I understand, he'd run through the songs once or twice and then record 'em, and it shows. For instance, on "You Angel You" there's a terrific bass line in the making, but Danko fluffs it at the end. One more take probably would have fixed it, but they didn't do one more take. The under-rehearsed feeling spoils a lot of these songs for me.
<TylerDurden900@aol.com>(16.02.2000)
I've always loved 'Tough Mama'...it's really driving, melodious, and fun.
Richard James <rowleyt@supanet.com> (07.08.2000)
I've got a soft spot for 'Wedding Song.' I know it's not too great and
probably sounds better for following a lot of dross, but I think it has
something that other good Dylan lyrics have: a mixture of the personal
and the spiritual. Like most of Blood on the Tracks, Bob equates
his own suffering in relationships with that of Christ on the Cross. Bob
does this because he grew up with Judaeo-Christian imagery and
because he's a bit of a drama queen. The closest song to 'Wedding Song'
I can think of is 'I Believe in You', which is similarly good-but-not-good-enough.
[His explicit 'religious' stuff does nothing for me usually, though 'Foot
Of Pride' is fun.]
Incidentally, Bob is clearly quite interested in song types at this period;
he must have gone to the dictionary for dirge, but ironically the song
'Dirge' is not a dirge at all. 'Wedding Song' he chose, I believe, because
such songs are called hymnals in English and Ancient Greek literature and
share the same word origins as 'hymn'. Bob mistakenly, or ingeniously,
puts the two together and comes up with God-as-wife (which he does ad nauseam
on BOTT and Desire; 'Shelter From the Storm' or 'Oh Sister,'
anyone?).
<Blade421@aol.com> (29.08.2000)
Disappointingly flaccid? A disaster? Did you give this album a 5 or a 1? This is arguably Dylan's most underrated album (I only have 10 of his albums, mind you...so be careful, I might end up liking Self Portrait), and concerning the quality of the songs, his most misunderstood. There was only one song on this album that I didn't like ('Dirge'---gasp, that must mean I like 'Wedding Song'!!!), but first of all, let's concentrate on what you said, George (the comments in parantheses are my personal opinions). You spoke good about 'Forever Young' (both versions, I'm guessing...both are real highlights of this album), 'On a Night Like This' (a pleasant song, though the only song in Bob's catalouge where I can't stand his voice at times), 'Going Going Gone' (a pretty, moody number), 'Hazel' (which sounds suspiciously like 'Going Going Gone', but who cares, two for the price of one), 'Something there is about You' (one of Bob's most beautiful love songs), and suprisingly, you had something good to say about 'Dirge' (overlong and pointless...a real disappointment). So that leaves three songs that you didn't like...'Wedding Song' (a nice acoustic number, believe it or not), 'You Angel You' (pure filler, but nevertheless enjoyable) and I'm guessing, since you didn't mention it, 'Tough Mama'. In my opinion, not only is 'T.M.' the best song on the album (surprised?) being an irresistable, spectacular rocker, it may be one of his meanest songs ever (not coming close to 'Idiot Wind' of course). This album is not one of Dylan's worst...instead, one of his best.
Phillip Joy <philljoy@philljoy.worldonline.co.uk> (01.10.2000)
Every comment made here about 'Wedding Song' seems to me to be totally pre-school. I've never heard a more heart-felt expression of love than on that song, and to think that it is on the same album as 'Dirge' just makes the whole thing all the more amazing. He captures both sides of one emotion perfectly. But, having said this, I know nothing, you know nothing. Let's stop trying to gain personal glory by second guessing someone who is so clearly our intelectual senior. Shut up.
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
Actually, this is a decent album. Dylan’s voice is shot, and the Band are less than at their best, but there are some real charmers on here, particularly “On A Night Like This”, and “You Angel You”, even though Dylan gets one of the verses wrong! It’s a real shame that “Nobody But You” was excluded!
Sergey Zhilkin <sergey_jilkin@mail.ru> (10.12.2000)
I bought this record today morning. My first Dylan's album (you may
laugh but it was really hard to find ANY Dylan's albums in my favourite
shops and as for this one I'd rather buy some 10/10 albums but there was
only Planet waves). I don't know much about Dylan's albums so I
comment on this album without any bias.
I liked this one very much, really. Ther's no bad (and even mediocre) songs
and I insist on it. Such songs as 'Tough mama', 'Something there's about
you', 'Forever young' (both versions), pretty 'On a night like this' and
'Going, going, gone' are real highlights and there's nothing you can do.
Other song are listenable and most of them are enjoyable. Plus, why don't
you like cover? Or do you prefer cover with all members of the band stupidly
(angrily, mysteriously, cruely, winsomely - choose what you want) smiling?
Nah, I don't like it. Planet waves cover surely isn't masterpiece
but it's still better than photo with the members of the band. My rating
is 9/10 (well, maybe I'll change it after listening to some of 'never to
be topped' albums)
Year Of Release: 1975
Record rating = 6
Overall rating = 11
A happy concert album. The playing is awful, of course, but everybody's
having a good time.
Best song: I SHALL BE RELEASED
Signalizes the return of Bob to the big scene, to the big game, and
to real life. If those Waves were as country-boring to your ears
as to mine and you thought Bob'd been firmly grounded in that country rubbish
for ever, well then - here's something new for you. This is the first of
Bob's live albums (if we don't count the much later-released Live 1966),
and, although certainly not the best, it does inspire some interest.
So what's up? Bob's on the road with The Band again, and this is good and
bad news at the same time. The bad news is that, while in 1966 the Band
were just the Hawks backing up a superior performer, by now they have finally
matured to a real self-sufficient band and so have earned the right to
sing their own songs - a good third of the album, if not more, is just
The Band and no Bob Dylan (who was probably having a joint or two backstage
during their performance). For any Band fan this will probably be a pleasant
surprise; but me, I'm not excited about the fact. I don't have anything
against the Band, as I consider them one of the more interesting American
(okay, Canadian. Does that really make a hell of a difference?) "roots
rock" bands in existence, never fearing to experiment within the genre
and coming up with some of its most intelligent and endurable classics,
some of which are actually performed on this here record. I mean - most
of these songs are good (except for the totally idiotic, way too repetitive
and straightforward 'The Shape I'm In'), but they don't fit with the general
atmosphere of a Dylan album, they don't fit with it at all. I'd rather
have a separate Dylan live album and a separate Band album; when Robbie
Robertson and his gang disrupt the steady flow of the album - and they
do it two times, on each of the two CDs that constitute it! - I just have
to cringe.
That said, classics are classics, and who can deny the Band the right to
perform a classic? After all, the performance and the album are
billed to 'Bob Dylan/The Band', so this shouldn't come as a nasty surprise.
Taken on their own, 'Up On Cripple Creek' and 'The Night They Drove Old
Dixie Down' are among the most enjoyable country-rock tunes ever written;
unlike some of their more mindless imitators like Free, The Band actually
knew a thing or two about hooks. I can't say I'm in deep love with any
other Band originals - some actually put me off to sleep before I can really
appreciate them ('When You Awake?' When you stop singing!), and some sound
painfully similar (I still can't quite tell 'Endless Highway' from 'Stage
Fright' even if I kinda enjoy both). Still, I'd better discuss all this
stuff in more details on a Band page, if I ever get around to doing one.
Maybe someday...
Oh, well, at least they do old Bob a favour by covering 'I Shall Be Released'.
Whoever is singing (Rick Danko, probably? Or that Manuel guy? I'm just
not too familiar with their voices), his voice is great - that's how this
song should be done, on any occasion. The original, only available on selected
compilations now (originally a single, I suppose), always sounded a little
bit bleak to me - and this live performance, more closely following the
Band's own studio version, brings out the best in the plaintive, confessional
lyrics that gotta rank among Dylan's most personal and inspired.
Now, about Bob's own numbers. After all these years of seclusion and crisis,
he turns out to be in a surprisingly energetic form, shouting out the lyrics
like there's no tomorrow, and although some people say he lacks emotions,
he's compensating it with a strange "vocal electrification" of
numbers like 'Highway 61 Revisited' (roaring '...on Highway Sixty-OOOOOONE!')
or 'Most Likely You Go Your Way' ('And I go MIIIIIIIINE!') The drive and
the tension can be heard on a supreme version of 'Ballad Of A Thin Man',
too, and 'Lay Lady Lay' is deprived of its countryish sissyass intonations
with an all-out rockin' interpretation. While none of the songs are actually
superior to the studio versions, it's very nice to hear these 'ragged',
slightly clumsy, but powerful live renditions to hear them take on a different
life. The Band actually plays in a way that's similar to their style on
Live 1966, but for some reason the "wall-of-live-sound"
is not so apparent on here; maybe it has something to do with Hudson and
Manuel's appreciation for synthesizers, which don't sound bad, but significantly
thin out the sound. Still, 'different' doesn't necessarily mean "worse",
now does it?
Well, in some cases, it does. Unfortunately, the same "vocal electrification"
results in a total ruining of several 'softer' tracks - 'Knockin' On Heaven's
Door' loses ninety percent of its former emotional power (by the way, I
have never heard Bob doing a decent live version of this one) and 'Just
Like A Woman' during Bob's short acoustic set, deprived of all of its vocal
subtlety, suddenly stands out wretched and miserable. Not to mention that
the closing 'Blowin' In The Wind' is a disaster, 'Rainy Day Women' is a
trillion times inferior to the original studio version, and the obligatory
'Like A Rolling Stone' just doesn't make things seem better - the final
crowd-pleasing numbers just go off as obligatory performances, with hardly
an ounce of true passion displayed.
Apparently, Bob was too intent on showing the audiences his still being
alive and all, and so decided to put all the different styles into one
bag (skipping ahead once again: his later live albums suffer from just
the opposite problem), which is called 'energetic gimmickry'. I just hope
he wasn't breaking his guitar after concerts. Still, while Before The
Flood certainly doesn't deserve its 2-CD price (cut out at least half
of the Band's set, 'Just Like A Woman' and the crowd-pleasers and you have
a near-masterpiece), I can't imagine a hardcore Dylan fan intentionally
skipping it - after all, its importance is at least historical,
as the album heralds the beginning of Dylan's "revival".
When you awake, be sure to mail your ideas
Your worthy comments:
Steve Knowlton <knowltos@co.washtenaw.mi.us> (03.02.2000)
That's Richard Manuel singing "I Shall Be Released."
Ryan Mulligan <pxpres@idt.net> (05.03.2000)
I just got this yesterday, and i'm pretty much satisfied by it. You
forgot to mention the great 'It's Alright, Ma' version on here. I get bored
by the band's playing here too, but the Dylan parts more than make up for
it. I don't care for 'Knockin' On Heaven's Door', but i enjoy 'Rainy Day
Women' with it's funny, new lyrics. I'll give it a 7. I'd also like to
know who's singing on some of those band songs. One voice is pretty scary!
BTW, Dylan sounds angry here to me, but it still rules.
I'll just throw this in here.....Bringing It All Back Home deserves
a 9, because there's NO WAY that Rubber Soul is better. Be honest,
George :) I also noticed you gave With The Beatles a higher rating
than Physical Graffiti....as Dylan would say, "wow-ee, pretty
scary"
Brent McNeal <bmcneal@hsc.usf.edu> (14.03.2000)
Hey, I love your site, but you really need to give The Band a lot more credit than you do, I think. I have just recently come to fully appreciate them myself. Their self-titled album is a complete masterpiece. btw, "i shall be released" was co-written by manuel and dylan. calling their playing "awful" is just not accurate! they have a great, loose feel that's almost impossible to achieve. anytime you hear that really high falsetto, that's manuel...
Sean Hutchinson <hutchilj@aramco.com.sa> (04.10.2000)
7 - I’ve always liked this album, and I think that most of the versions of the Dylan, and Band, songs are done well. Dylan tends to re-invent songs on stage, and most of the time it works. Worth getting for Side 4, as it was on the record, starting with a great “Watchtower,” played as a tribute to Hendrix. Ever since that 1974 tour, Dylan has preferred to play Hendrix’s version, and Robbie Robertson does a fine job. And how can anyone not like the version of “Like A Rolling Stone” here?! Can’t you feel that emotion? There were people at those concerts, old farts like us, who stood there with the streaming down their faces, hearing Dylan sing “Rolling Stone” and “Blowin’ In The Wind”, and I can understand why. Don’t forget, Dylan had made only 2 live performances in the United States since 1965, and these guys were there! It really is an emotional event - and that’s why Live 1966 isn’t great - it’s perfunctory.