Strategy corner:
Repeat after me:
Who ever got a job from a poor person?
Answer that one, you eco-hippie pagan monstrosities! The reason that nodoby gets jobs from poor people is because the poor are smelly urine-stained drug addicts, and whenever they try to hire people, the workers choose another employer in the marketplace. Just look at what happened in December 1995:
As Rush Limbaugh dutifully pointed out, the feds had to lower the prime interest rate - proof that the economy was slowing down. Rush is far better predictor than those stupid liberal psychic stanist friends networks! I bet those hippies expected the economy to keep going through into this millenium!
Not only that, he also knew what caused the late 90's recession. In 1993 the Deficit Reduction Act increased taxes on the wealthy. The instant result was the downturn in December 1995. When they say Rush is right, they aren't just saying it for the pun.
We need recessions to blame the liberals for
The best way to create a depression worhty of pinning on the liberals, we need to do do demand-side economics - we've got to limit the amount of goods and services that the workers and poor can hog away from us. Without enough consumer spending (or government spending) there's no reason to produce, so workers get laid off - and look for someone to blame. With our think tanks ready to point, all we have to worry about is how we can cut down spending.
Some things we can do:
But does it really work?
In a word, 1929 - I mean, in a word, yes. This was what worked so well in 1929 to turn the hienious bolshevik masses of marxist workers into tame sheep, begging us for jobs.
But how did it work?
During the high of the 1920's economic boom, over 60% of them didn't have enough money to support a family of four - and remember, the women didn't work, and families were bigger. So in short, the workers were well contained - and since they couldn't even spend enough to buy what they made in their own factories, there was no point in building more stuff and hireing more people.
The number of millionaires tripled, as they did in the 1980's.
Also, like today, mergers helped dispose of over 6,000 useless medium-sized business. Half the economy was under the enlightened leadership of 200 corporations. Since this is the same strategy we're using today, you can see we're on the right track.
What should you do?
Obviously, you shouldn't invest in a factory that sells things nobody buys, (unless it's in Singapore, we really should do all we can to support such a wonderful country). In the 1920's, we bought land in Floridia, as well as bankrupt farms destroyed by lazy hillbillies.
So, what every smart conservative should do is buy houses from wimpy small-fry landlords and raise the rent to a fair rate. Or buy treasury bills. Whatever you do, don't through away your money on businesses that employ people.
Get ready for resession and depression
Repeat after me:
Who ever got a job from a poor person?
Answer that one, you eco-hippie pagan monstrosities! The reason that nodoby gets jobs from poor people is because the poor are smelly urine-stained drug addicts, and whenever they try to hire people, the workers choose another employer in the marketplace. Just look at what happened in December 1995:
As Rush Limbaugh dutifully pointed out, the feds had to lower the prime interest rate - proof that the economy was slowing down. Rush is far better predictor than those stupid liberal psychic stanist friends networks! I bet those hippies expected the economy to keep going through into this millenium!
Not only that, he also knew what caused the late 90's recession. In 1993 the Deficit Reduction Act increased taxes on the wealthy. The instant result was the downturn in December 1995. When they say Rush is right, they aren't just saying it for the pun.
We need recessions to blame the liberals for
The best way to create a depression worhty of pinning on the liberals, we need to do do demand-side economics - we've got to limit the amount of goods and services that the workers and poor can hog away from us. Without enough consumer spending (or government spending) there's no reason to produce, so workers get laid off - and look for someone to blame. With our think tanks ready to point, all we have to worry about is how we can cut down spending.
Some things we can do:
- Reward investment overseas instead of in our own country (this is why God created the WTO)
- Pit American union-slave workers against union-free workers in the third world (Mexico is nice, but Haiti also holds promise)
- Destroy the power of running-dog labor unions which help them extort murderously high wages from their helpless employers
- Rebuild the courts with conservative judges (who in contract disputes find in favor of companies and against workers who just want to hoard more of our hard-earned money)
- Sell 'em credit cards and easy loans to get consumer debt up to a reasonable level
But does it really work?
In a word, 1929 - I mean, in a word, yes. This was what worked so well in 1929 to turn the hienious bolshevik masses of marxist workers into tame sheep, begging us for jobs.
But how did it work?
During the high of the 1920's economic boom, over 60% of them didn't have enough money to support a family of four - and remember, the women didn't work, and families were bigger. So in short, the workers were well contained - and since they couldn't even spend enough to buy what they made in their own factories, there was no point in building more stuff and hireing more people.
The number of millionaires tripled, as they did in the 1980's.
Also, like today, mergers helped dispose of over 6,000 useless medium-sized business. Half the economy was under the enlightened leadership of 200 corporations. Since this is the same strategy we're using today, you can see we're on the right track.
What should you do?
Obviously, you shouldn't invest in a factory that sells things nobody buys, (unless it's in Singapore, we really should do all we can to support such a wonderful country). In the 1920's, we bought land in Floridia, as well as bankrupt farms destroyed by lazy hillbillies.
So, what every smart conservative should do is buy houses from wimpy small-fry landlords and raise the rent to a fair rate. Or buy treasury bills. Whatever you do, don't through away your money on businesses that employ people.
| Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! Email us! |
|
|
|
|