Freedom of Speech: 1st Amend.
Intro
- Theories
- Instrumental Theories
- Self govt 2 disc. all
- Human prog. & mkt place of ideas
- Toleration in heterogenous soc.
- Other Theories
- Self exp. / end theory
- Default princ. of inability 2 check govt
- Positions
- 1st is pref'ed rt
- Value of Speech
- Political
- Social
- Scientific
- Commercial
- Sexual / vulgar
- Libelous, obscene, crim., fraud, / fighting (unprotected)
- Appellate Rev. in Free Speech Area
- Indep. Appellate Rev. of Facts 4
- Speaker's intent
- Inciting charact. of speech
- Likelihood of disorder from speech
Unlawful Advocacy
- Clear & Present Dang. No Longer the Test
- Dif. Types of Advocacy
- Abstract
- Only theory so not dir'ed @ anybody
- Specif.
- Imm. sit. w/specif. axn described, indiv. ID'ed, etc.
- Communist Party Cases
- Unprotected Advocacy Rules
- Gravity of evil - improbability = justif. 4 infring. speech
(Dennis)
- Advocacy of imm. overthrow
- Creating & teaching disciplined group 4 viol. overthrow
in future
- Protected Advocacy Rules
- Advocacy of abstract doc. even if think about future illegal
axn (Yates)
- For Org. & Membership
- Can't advocate viol. overthrow by illegal axn, imm'ly / in
future
- Mere membership is protected
- Knowing / active membership w/knowledge + specif. intent 2
further illegal aim isn't protected
- Evid. of Illegal Advocacy
- Teaching viol. overthrow, w/specificity 4 illegal axn in future
- Teaching viol. overthrow w/legal present axn, specif'ly aimed
2 make later illegal axn effective
- Can convict membership of Communist Party, need present advocacy
of viol. overthrow imm'ly / in future b/c intent 2 advocate in
future / conspiracy insuff.
- Govt Can't Outlaw Belief / Doc. By Leg.
Obj'able Speech
- Categories
- Inciting Speech
- Fighting words
- Provocative speech
- Injurious speech
- Offensive
- Taboo
- Insults
- Harassing
- Context dep. offensive
- Libel & group libel
- Unwanted discl.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress
- Inciting Speech
- Brandenburg Rule: Not Gen. Utility Test
- Can't forbid advocacy of force / viol. unless dir'ed 2 incite
/ prod. imm. lawless axn
- Speaker's intent 2 incite / prod. imm. lawless axn
- Conseq. of words / words likely 2 incite lawless axn in imm.
future
- If can see stmt as lawful advocacy, assume that unless contrary
evid.
- Need imm. which is dif. from communist party sit's
- Fighting Words
- Unprotected
- Chaplinsky Rule (Undermined by later cases but not overruled)
- Dir. pers'al insults aimed 2 partic. listener such that
- Likely 2 cause disturbance of peace / inflict injury by just
saying them
- Context indep. & content insensitive rule
- Libel
- Pub. Officials & Pub. Figures in Pub. Concern: Media &
Nonmedia D's
- P must prove D publ'ed w/actual malice / knowledge of falsity
/ reckless disregard of truth (NY X Case)
- Reckless disregard if publ'er had doubts about truth but publ'ed
anyway
- Pub. figures can B gen. fame / ones in controv.
- Damage of actual, presumed & punitive damages
- Priv. Party in Pub. Concern (Gertz)
- States can create neg. based axn 4 priv. parties defamed when
invol'ly involved in pub. concern
- Can't impose liab. w/o fault 4 libel
- Damage only 4 actual injury
- Priv. Party in Priv. Concern (Greenmoss)
- Can have libel liab. w/o fault
- Damage 4 presumed & punitive damages
- Invasion of Pvcy: Truth But Private Stuff
- Pub. Officials & Figures
- Probably can publ. something true if can publ. false by NY
X
- Priv. Parties
- Should have invasion of pvcy axn 4 truthful & priv. concern
- But no axn if priv. info available in pub. record
- False Light Axn: True But Mislead 2 Wrong Concl.
- Two Ways
- Invasion of pvcy
- Libel through false impression
Obscenity & Child Pornography
- Obscenity: Unprotected Speech
- Miller Test: 3 Part Test
- Dom. theme of material as whole appeals 2 prurient int. 2
av. person in contemp. comm. stand.,
- Prurient int. is beyond normal 2 morbid int. 4 sexual stimulation
- Avg person can B avg person in subclass
- Ad can make it obscene
- Jury det's comm. stand.
- Work depicts in patently offensive way, sexual conduct specif'ly
def'ed by stt. as unlawful,
- True hard core porno & depict graphically sex, excretory
fns, / genitals
- Jury det's comm. stand.
- Work as whole lack serious lit., artistic, polit., / scientific
value
- Obj. rsbl person stand., not jury stand.
- Can Poss In Own Home But Not View In Pub. Theatre
- Child Pornography: Unprotected
- Ferber Rule
- Even if not meet Miller test, states can ban use of ch. in
porno
- Can't Poss Priv'ly of Child Porno
- Pornography
- Subord. Def. of Porno UnConst'al
- Idea that msg of women as sexually subord. det's porno
Reg'ing Protected Speech
- Indecent & Offensive Speech
- Protected B/C Not Obscene
- Pub Forum
- Can't ban speech b/c offends sensibilities of listerners unless
can show specif. harm (Cohen)
- Can't reg. content
- Zoning
- If content neutral & there's adeq. alt. place, can desig.
areas 4 sexually explicit speech whether dispersed / concentrated
- Theories
- Sexually explicit speech is lwr value
- Zoning land w/incidental effect on speech
- 2ndary effect theory of trying 2 reg. effects assoc'ed w/speech
- Broadcast & Ch
- Can channel indecent / profane b/c
- Captive audience
- Ch in audience
- Can't ban altogether
- Comm'l Speech
- Truthful Comm'l Speech Protected
- So state can ban / req. discl. of misleading, deceptive, false
/ illegal info
- Lwr value than polit. speech so can reg. by interm. scrutiny
- Interm. Scrutiny Test (Central Hudson)
- Truthful & lawful so protected
- Subst'l govt'al int.
- Reg. dir'ly serve govt int.
- Reg. narrowly tailored / rsbly nec.
- Def. of Comm'l Speech
- Does no more than propose comm'l trxn
- Ad / econ. motivation not by itself make it comm'l speech
- Ad that promote / refer 2 partic. prod. 4 sale may B comm'l
speech even if also has noncomm'l speech
- Misc Rules
- No chilling impact rubric applied
- No vague & overbreadth protections
- Govt can supervise 4 truthfulness
- Prior restraint not apply
- Trade names can B prohibited if deceptive
- Vice Activites
- Posadas Case says state might B able 2 suppress ad even if
truthful (like gambling)
- But 44 Liquor Mart seems 2 say no
- Attys & Solicitation
- Can reg. ads 4 quality of serv. but not ban 4 routine true
legal serv's ads
- Can reg. overreaching on atty's part
- Can reg. direct face 2 face solicitation
- But cna't 4 direct mail solicitation
- Can req. discl.
- Ideological firms not under comm'l speech so protection higher
- Could ban comm'l billbds as long as other venues exist
1st Amend. Variables
- Vagueness & Overbreadth
- Vagueness: If person must guess 2 its meaning & differ
4 applic.
- Can construe so more def.
- Prob's of no notice, discretion 2 interp., & chilling
effect
- Overbroad: If applies 2 both protected & unprotected speech
- Can construe 2 reach only unprotected
- 3rd party standing 4 those who did unprotected stuff on ground
applic. 2 people who do protected things will B unConst'al 2 strike
entire stt
- Only allow 4 subst'ly overbroad 2 sig'ly affect 3rd party
& will chill
- If protected speaker raises overbreadth, then only excise
unConst'al part
- All Vague Stt's R Overbroad But Not All Overbroad R Vague
- Prior Restraint
- Gen'ly
- Strong presumption against prior restraint / preventing from
publ'ing until approval
- Rule 4 Prior Restraint: Obscene Movies, Adult Bkstore, etc.
- State has b/p 2 show exp. unprotected
- Rev. must B fast & delays on publ'ing is brief
- After rev., censor must license / go 2 ct
- Ct order restraining publ'ing must B shortest per. of X possible
- Proced. must guarantee prompt, final jud. dec.
- Collateral Bar
- Can't refuse 2 obey ct even if unConst'al ruling
- Licensing & Permit Sys.
- Ok if not confer discretion & it's X, place, & manner
reg.
- UnConst'al if official can use discretion 2 refuse by content
/ viewpt
- Facially invalid, then speaker can ignore
- But if facially valid, must seek legal rev.
- Content Neutrality
- Want Subj. Matter & Viewpt Neutrality
- Format neutrality isn't content but mode of exp neutrality
- X , Place, Manner Reg OK
- Content neutral & govt has subst'l int. in X, manner,
& place of speech
- Defect is that govt must permit all / ban all
- Captive Audience
- If @ home / office so can't escape from speech
- Unprotected Speech Reg.
- Rsn 4 reg'ing unprotected speech must B b/c it's unprotected
not 4 content
- So either ban whole categ. / neutral ban on subset
- Symbollic Speech
- Level of Rev: If Govt Reg's Conduct Which Is Protected Expression
- SS if aimed @ reg'ing expression (unless unprotected exp)
- Interm. scrutiny if aimed @ conduct unrel'ed 2 exp
- O'Brien Gen Utility Test
- Govt must have imp. int. unrel'ed 2 suppressing speech
- Restriction on exp. is no greater than req'ed 2 serve int.
- Applic. of O'Brien
- Only when govt reg. sig. protected exp. activity / single
out exp. activity
- Flag Desecration
- SS
- If flag desecration creates breach of peace threatening imm.
riot / viol. some other law unrel'ed 2 suppression of exp., then
can reg.
- Nude Dancing
- Can prohibit 4 morality & decency
- Pub. Forum
- Rts in Pub. Forum
- Assemble
- Display sign from home
- Gather
- Loudspeaker
- Picket
- Can reg. focused picketing
- Parade
- Rt of ass'n 2 def. whatever msg 4 parade
- Solicit
- Speak
- Even controversial stuff (Edwards Rule)
- Officer must control crowd, not speaker unless insuff. # of
officer then can stop speaker
- Trad'al Pub. Forum
- Places
- St & sidewalk
- Pub. Parks
- Places around pub. monument
- Pub. theatre by designation
- State fair
- Charact's
- Guaranteed access / = access so can't shut down
- Gen'ly alt. forum irrelev. 2 whether can reg. / not
- Det by
- History / obj. by looking @ ref. 2 history & trad. 4 fn.
/ princ. use
- Designation where govt open up nontrad'al place
- Must B intentional
- Rsbl X, Place & Manner Reg. As Long As Consistent w/Competing
Use
- Content neutral
- Balancing harm from speech v. harm 2 sig. pub. int. w/more
wt 2 speech + less restrctive alt. analysis
- Sig. pub. int. is like traffic control, accomodation of competing
use, / plus of speech plus
- Rigorous vagueness & overbreadth analysis / key on precision
- License & permit sys. ok if nondiscrim. / content neutral
- Specif. Pub. Forum Can Have Restriction
- Limited Pub. Fora
- Limited / spec'ed use 4 pub.
- Zoo
- Mailbox
- Open 4 communication rel'ed 2 fn
- Govt gen'ly has no pwr 2 excl exp. activity compatible w/forum's
purpose but can proscribe what's incompatible by content neutral
reg. & alt. fora's existence
- Non Pub. Fora Places
- Pub'ly owned prop's, facilities, / institutions 4 spec'ed
pub. busi. conducted but not gen'ly open 2 pub. like cts
- Content neutral reg. & alt. fora's existence may B imp.
- Broadcasting v. Print Media
- In broadcasting, rt 2 reply ok
- In print media, editorial rts strong so rt 2 reply unConst'al
- Dif. editorial & access rts 4 2 mediums
Free Speech in Polit. Sys.
- Polit. Campaign
- Buckley Rule 4 Candidate Campaign
- Protect party's polit. expenditure
- If coord. expenditure from other indiv. / org., then treated
as contrib.
- Contrib. can B limited 4 actual / apparent corruption rsns
- Reports & discl. ok but might exempt min. party candidates
- Ballot Meas's
- Contrib. can't B limited
- Reporting & discl. ok
- Seg'ed Funds 4 Profit Making Corp, Union, & Gen. Busi.
4 Candidate Campaign
- Govt can req. seg'ed funds 4 indep. campaign expenditure
- For ideological, nonprofit, / no busi. int. org's, govt can't
prevent vol. ass'n org'ed 4 polit. purpose from using gen. ass'al
funds 4 polit.
- Political Axn Committees
- Can't reg. indep. expenditures supporting candidate / campaign
- Can limit expenditure which candidate controls / PAC coord.
w/candidate
- Can limit contrib's parties make 2 PAC
- Pub. Ee Speech
- Can't Do Active Polit. Stuff
- If Pub. Concern & Not Interfere w/Working Rel, Free Speech
So Can't Fire
- Look @ content, form, & context of communication 2 det.
pub. concern
- Even if pub. concern, if destroy working rel, can B fired
- If discharged, then govt has opp. 2 show would've discharged
anyway
- Civil & Non-Civil Serv. Ee
- Can't Discharge
- Civil serv. ee by Act
- Non civil can't B discharged from job / improperly transferred
4 polit. affiliation rsn unless req'ed by job
Freedom of Ass'n & Press
- Freedom of Ass'n
- Two Types of Rts
- Org. rt of ass'n
- Indiv. rt of ass'n
- Ass'al Freedom 4 Litig.
- Full protected 1st amend. activity whether polit. / ideological
/ not
- Two Types of Ass'al Rts
- Rt of intimate ass'n which is pers'al
- Rt of expressive rel.
- Large org.
- Can't force 2 accept members if trample on ass'n msg
- Msg can B def'ed by excl. of members
- Freedom of Press
- Govt Has High Burden Before Getting Prior Restraint
- Some level of dang. can justify prior restraint
- No Spec. Priv's 4 Being Press
- No priv. 4 GJ subpoena, srch warr., prison access, etc.
- When allowed access, allowed 2 use tools of trade / camera
- Gag Order of Press 4 Fair Trial Only In Extreme Case
This material is copyrighted by the author. Use of this material
for profit is strictly prohibited without written consent
from author.
12/7/1996
Ms. Haeji Hong
Go Back to Law School Notes
Go Back to Con Law Outlines