7 White Horse7 White HorseAccording to end-time theories, an evil power will first go, but I do not agree. My spirit and my
mind do not agree.
To actualize the Heavenly Book will be a significant moment for all Heavenly inhabitants. We
do not have to think they did not know about what the Book speaks. People of God can know
what will happen (Amos 3:7); therefore, Heavenly inhabitants might know about future things
because they brought messages from Heaven to us.
All await good things. They rejoice before its opening. The Holy Spirit and the archangels with
musical instruments sound a new song. (5:8-10) The angels rejoice and sing. (5:11-12)
Therefore, the gathering must be about good news.
Consider! The Lord opens the Heavenly Book, and evil powers start to act. If this could happen,
it had to shock them. Immediately their euphoria would disappear.log94
Is this possible for a king to be a perverse king? All cheer him for being the big king, the victor
and he would give them under their enemy. If this still would happen among humans but never
among Heavenly beings.
God's servants cheered the Trinity. Do you think to show evil forces in power is a good reward
for applause? I think it is distorted, and therefore, impossible in God's kingdom. We know who
does so, and we went away from him. Therefore, if God cannot be perverted, then neither
should a teacher be.log95
The Tabernacle pictured the GOSPEL. This was because the Sanctuary represented God's
territory and the people who entered it. To be saved means to come onto God's territory, to enter
the Heaven. We know that only people saved by Christ Jesus could live eternal life with God in
the Heaven. Therefore, the Most Holy Place first showed our atonement.
This is the Gospel message, the good news about Jesus' sacrifice for people. From it, the
Tabernacle was called the Tabernacle of the Testimony or the Tent of Meeting. After Jesus died
and was risen, we have to praise God because He is our Savior (the Altar of Incense). This would
change our inner spiritual beings to be alive with God again. We are spiritually newborn. Empty
wine jars on the table in the Sanctuary was the symbolic picture of this.
The Gospel speaks of having eternal flesh then, which symbolized the Resurrection (bread on
the table in the Sanctuary).
The Tabernacle furnishings also spoke when the hour of the Resurrection came (the menorah).
If the Tabernacle of the Testimony showed the Gospel then for that reason, the Gospel must be
in front of the biblical crusade.bib130
Sometimes only the Ark of the Testimony went first. For instance, when Israel crossed the Jordan River to enter the Promised Land, the ark led them. (Joshua 3:14-17) The Gospel (Jesus died to save) must come first. Certainly it must also be at the last crusade.bib131
Men from the tribe Levi carried the Tabernacle. Surrounding nations noticed it was the tent of
mighty God, and He was in the Ark of Testimony. (I Samuel 5-6)
Priests were consecrated men, pleading to God for the people. They sacrificed what people
brought for their sin-offerings. The occupation of priests was to bring salvation from God to people.
Only priests had the right to come before God. They were the ones whom God called.
Today Christians represent the tribe of Levi in the Old Testament.
Then, when priests started a crusade from Moses that evangelists and other Christians would
preach the Gospel in the beginning of the crusade for the Messiah.bib132
If theorists exclude them because they say the Church was already raptured before the opening the Heavenly Book then shall others carry it to end as the Philistines? (I Samuel 5-6)
Moses showed the Judah brigade marched with the Tabernacle and the tribe of Levi. (Numbers 2:3-9) Together, they were four tribes; 2/3 of the tribe of Levi, Judah, Issachar, and Zebulon. This is missing in theories about the end times.bib133
If I consider the time needed to cross to a camp's gate, for instance, more tribes would need more
time than one tribe. If a tribe needs a time unit for the end times, as Gabriel introduced it, then
seven years may be the unit for a tribe. We also have 2/3 Levites, but because they carried the
Tabernacle, it would take more room in a march.
Hence I conclude the first army to enter the crusade in our world could march four times seven
to equal twenty-eight years. Maybe these four tribes led Moses to put four "cup flowers" on the
central lamp.log96
Army leader documents the role of each troop in detail. Perhaps God did the same. (We get such ability from Him.) Then tribes equaled the number of small scrolls, looked like cups.log97
People distinguish armed forces as navy, air, foot soldiers, marines, and other large military.
The Judah brigade was different from others. In Judah, a garrison Issachar was different from
Zebulon and Judah, etc. so, as Jacob introduced them. (Genesis 49) Then if we knew who was
fighting, we knew what kind of crusade was going on.log98
Each tribe had its own territory it defended. Therefore, if people heard about tribal fights, they indicated a land afflicted by a war and where the battlefield was.log99
So, the evil power going first is contrary to the Scripture. What was opposite, we called an anti-one. Then why not to call those authors of such theories "anti-Moses."
Appearance had its purpose. The army's purpose was to gain victory, depending on its strength in the numbers of its soldiers. The victory for God meant to realize His Word. Then the army's value for Him was the ability to reflect His Words and His Light.
We know that an object reflecting all light is seen white. (Maybe, therefore, scholars call the sunlight by white light, although it is colorless.) If some matter absorbs light wholly, we see it as black.
If people have an ability to distinguish light, the originality came from God. God also makes
differences about objects that reflect His Light. For instance, He sent Gabriel to reveal
something to Daniel from His Words (intention). If Gabriel had not given it to Daniel, God
would have seen him as black. Because he gave (reflected) all he had received, Gabriel appeared
to God as a white servant. God saw him in white. Or, if Gabriel absorbed all he had received
from God, but nothing reflected to Daniel, then Daniel could not have seen any of God's Word.
Gabriel came with God's light; God's Word was reflected, given to Daniel, who appeared in
God's white outgoing light.log100
God is also fire and energy. Fire gives heat energy, plus light. Light usually means there is fire,
so light is the appearance of any fire.
Men can change fire in work. Engineers build engines for that purpose. Sometimes we call
engines horses, or their power is measured in horses. Horsepower can measure the power of
engines (horse).
We know no engine that can reproduce whole burnt energy (fire). If its efficiency is not 100%, it
cannot transmit all light, and therefore, this fire in work is not cast white. It is not a white horse,
and therefore, an Antichrist cannot be seen in white.log101
However, it should not be so with God. He is equipped with better (living) instruments than we
are. God would have horses changing God's power in full efficiency.
The Bible says, "In speaking of the angels he says, He makes his angels winds, his servants
flames of fire." (Hebrews 1:7) Look at Habakkuk 3:8. We understand that God does His work
through angels. Those working in full efficiently for God should be cast white.
Only the best angels (archangels) come close to God's Throne. Therefore, biblical witnesses
always saw God's angels coming from God the Father in white. (Also see 24 elders in white at
the Heavenly Throne.)bib134
Suppose, Christians would set an own army. They go to fight a communist army. Thus two armies are on the battlefield. How does God recognize them, or in which color they are seen? I think that communists would be a red army and so red horse. And, if I suppose, all soldiers in the Christian army are newborn, then they are seen white (Isaiah 1:18). And so, the white horse could be also the army set on the Christian side.log102
The conclusion is that the white horse means the angelic powers are able to realize God's Word fully. Those not in Heaven are unable to be white; therefore, any white horse could not mean Satanic power. According to the Atonement, God can see the white army also on the earth if its soldiers are newborn Christians.
Satan cannot come to God's Throne from when Christ Jesus won. If God the Holy Spirit
commanded Satan, then leading any battle against him and his servants was meaningless. For
instance, God commands His army to fight with Satan's powers but this is senseless if He could
command Satan to retreat for instance in the war described in Revelation 12:7-9.
Let us say a third is under a dragon, serving Satan. Another third of the angels are under
Michael, serving God the Son. Another third of the angels are under Gabriel to secure Heaven.
The archangel Michael operates on Earth and the archangel Gabriel in Heaven. The Bible speaks
that Gabriel was coming from Heaven.
If that is so, then Gabriel's fighters could not determine if Satan would mobilize all his angels
against him. Their power was one-to-one. In order to win, Michael's army had to be called for
support. (Daniel 10:13) The powers were two-to-one, and therefore, Gabriel, with the help of
Michael, won the angelic war in Heaven.bib135
Because Michael went into Heaven, our Earth had the Dark Ages. More lost angels came on
Earth, (Revelation 12:3) and Michael was not here.
Then the powers would be again one-to-one as Michael returned to Earth. He restrained many
evil tactics, and no one was victorious in the religious wars. See the Thirty Years' War
(1618-48). That was the last major European religious war. It had divided the Holy Roman
Empire because of the Protestant Reformation had ended in compromise with the Peace of
Augsburg.
Therefore, the next main angelic war must be on Earth, and Gabriel is helping. Angelic powers
on Earth are reinforced and therefore Christians are not persecuted. This should be written in
John's Revelation in the Bible. log103
If God commanded Satan and his angels along with God's angels, then we consider God as a
player on both sides to see a battle.
Why did Michael's army or Gabriel's angels fought when it was enough just to command
Gabriel's adversaries to support his way to Daniel (Daniel 10)? We see that God could not
command an Antichrist.log104
Some teachers of the end times do not want to be so foolish. They say God did not command an Antichrist to go. The command was for the apostle John. However, John had already received the command to come and see. (Revelation 4:1) Where did the vision end that John was called again into Heaven to see? This command from the Holy Spirit was repeated in the next scrolls after a seal was broken. Then, could John have seen the Lamb to open a seal? log105
Meanwhile, was John on Earth? And how long was he among the next vision and the next . . . ? Were they months or years in length? If this command was for John, it would have come from the Lord Jesus Christ. (chapter one) However, the Being with the Four Faces commanded, and it was not for him.bib136
If commands are not for John neither for an Atichrist, then for whom?
The logic speaks, Commands are for those who are in presence of the Commander. And there
are on the Throne Beings which action are described (God the Father gives the Heavenly Book to
God the Son. He opens It and God the Holy Spirit commands.) Only angels and archangels left,
and therefore the commands are for angels and their leaders. (Chapter five does not mention
either a crystal sea.)log106
If the apostle John had just seen an Antichrist's start, then also all in the Heaven would have seen.
If it would be so, the Heavenly gathering was the doing of the Antichrist, not because God the
Father's will but because the will (doing) of the Antichrist. Is something like this acceptable?log107
Christian teachers say no one knows the hour of the Lord's coming. No one knows when the First
Seal is to be broken. If Christians do not know when the First Seal will be broken, for that
reason, could any unbeliever and any Antichrist know it?
Namely, an Antichrist is a man. If angels do not know the hour the Seal of the Scroll will be
broken, can any spirit, even an evil spirit of an Antichrist know about it? (Mark 13:32)
An Antichrist is a man supported by evil angels. If an evil angel could not initiate any of God's
new intentions can any Antichrist? You must see that this makes no sense.log108
The fighting of God's angels as those under Michael, meant to restrain enemies. So do
adversaries not under God's will. God just restrained their deeds.
The Holy Spirit finds what they intended and then gives commands to God's angels as "come" to
restrict them. The Holy Spirit, the Being of Four Faces being also in the middle of God's Throne,
commands only angels on God's side, angels connected to the Throne. Therefore, He could not
command the Antichrist or Satan's forces.bib137
The character of Christian teaching is that everything is based on God the Son. He initiates
everything good risen in our world. He was the first in the Eden. Jacob fought with Him and
received a blessing, that made him the father of God's nation in flesh. (Genesis 32:22-31)
God the Son as the man became the first man (if we do not consider Adam before his fall)
having the eternal spirit in his flesh and is called the last or the second Adam. (I Corinthians 15:45)
He is the first resurrected man into the eternal flesh. Then He is also the first name God wrote in
the Heavenly Book. Consequently, the first writing must be His, and so the first horseman is His
rider. The Bible says He is Alpha and Omega. "I am the First and the Last, says the Lord God
who is and was and is to come, the Ruler of all." (Revelation 1:8) bib138 Christ Jesus must be
behind the Heavenly forces moving in the world to help spread the Gospel. Finally, He must
move personally. He could not come without any Heavenly support. These forces would be the
same as these having power over Heavenly Book. They will be reinforced by these who marched
for the Lord in flesh during the first six Scrolls but now uniformed into heavenly uniform.
The apostle John confirmed the theory because he saw "a white horse, and he who was seated
on it was named Faithful and True; and he is judging and making war in righteousness.
And his eyes are a flame of fire, and crowns are on his head; and he has a name in writing,
of which no man has knowledge but himself. And he is clothed in a robe washed with blood:
and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven were following him, riding on white
horses, and dressed in fine linen, white and clean." (Revelation 19:11-14) John confirmed that
beside the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, are added new forces. He used the plural form of
the word a white horse.bib139
It is logical that who sat on the white horse in faith during their preaching the Gospel should return riding on white horses. Or if he is returning on the white horse then he had already to use it. The change is unlogical. Taken from our lives, only those who ride horseback are accustomed to it and may be an equestrian in an army. Anyone who does not ride horseback could fall. He might hurt himself in a fall. From it, every preacher forcing an Antichrist on the horse might fall.log109
Logically, those who said the Antichrist sits on the white horse at the opening of the Heavenly Book should not sit on the white horse at the closing of the Heavenly Book. It should be against any law to scorn or despise something and then to use it. So, preachers rejecting their right to sit on the white horse now might not be among those coming on the white horses to establish the Millennium. But the Lord does not want them so and therefore God's hand is stretch up against them in order they may repent till are on the way. I am serious, because it is the Heavenly Book of God the Father.log110
If Christ Jesus will finish everything as the end of the Heavenly Book describes, He must start it. If He like the Head is Heaven then His body should.bib140
If He will enter our world riding on the white horse from Heaven then He must also initiate this and send white horses, or at least a white horse in the beginning of the crusade. He must show that His time is coming, that His forerunner has ridden to prepare the way for Him. The forerunner could not be from the other armylog111
Any runner (the first one) must be in contact with him who sets out on a race of a journey.
Everyone knows that everything for the end times depends on the Lord. When He breaks the
First Seal is the start of the movement on which many have waited for centuries.
For that reason if an Antichrist knows the hour of his race, he must cooperate with the Lord.log112
Teachers also say that an Antichrist will forerun Christ Jesus. He should appear seven years or
3.5 years before the Second Coming of the Messiah. Then an Antichrist has to start seven years
earlier than the opening of the Heavenly Book.
If he starts exactly on Christ's time (the breaking the First Seal), then he could not appear before
Christ Jesus and would overrun Him. Therefore, whoever starts on the opening the First Seal
cannot be any Antichrist. Or, an Antichrist must start seven years before the opening the
Heavenly Book.log113
An Antichrist tries to win a race with Christ Jesus and overcomes Him. I do not understand that. The Christ will "kick" an Antichrist in order that the Antichrist will forerun Him. Isn't that strange and illogical?log114
The Lord said the Father has in His power the time for establishing the Kingdom in Israel. (Acts 1:7) If an Antichrist waits for God the Father to pass the Heavenly Book to Christ Jesus, he competes and tries to overrun God the Father. The teachers of the end times should call him also AntiGod the Father.log115
Teachers saying an Antichrist will rise on the Lord's breaking of the First Seal probably take
courage to say this from Jesus' words to Judah. Jesus said him, "Do quickly what you have to
do." (John 13:27)
If a man thinks the Lord Jesus Christ intended Judah to betray Him, still that situation cannot be
compared to the Lord's Second Coming.
God the Son in Jesus first had to offer Himself for the people. His First Coming showed the
Christ as God's Lamb.
However, the Second Coming does not mean any sacrifice. Therefore, they will not be subduing
or cooperating with Satan's servants. log116
God the Father once had given the victory to Christ Jesus over Satan by resurrected Him.
(Zechariah 3) Jesus Christ before the Heavenly Throne could be the deciding factor of who will
stay and who must leave. God the Father decided in favor of Jesus, which meant Satan had to
leave God's Presence.
Since God the Father decided once who won and lost, He cannot decide again about it. If He did,
we could doubt about all His decisions.
To say that Satan and his servants act at Jesus Christ's breaking Seal means that they start from
the Heavenly Throne or are close to it. This places Satan in Heaven. Satan in Heaven could lead
to another court in order him to expel again? Should God the Father decide again between Satan
and Christ? That also means someone does not accept the first decision and appeals for a new
court.log117
An appealed being should be he who lost. Also an appeal is possible if someone higher exists. Is
some higher than God the Father? No, and therefore, it is hard to appeal.
Appeal means to doubt. Every teacher who says Satan still acts on God's command is doubting
God's first decision.
The experts for the end times say resurrected people are already in Heaven before the Heavenly
Book was open. If it is true, then we have Satan and the resurrected ones in Heaven. Do they
have to be again in Satan's presence after the Resurrection and the Rapture? Does Christ Jesus
have to die again to redeem us from a presence of Satan in Heaven? This is impossible and all
theories that place resurrected people in Heaven and Satan's man on the white horse are
nonsense.
An Antichrist should be a man living at the Second Coming of the Messiah. The Bible describes
this Antichrist in the Seventh Scroll and in the last woe. This is identical with Daniel's last
"seven" from the "seventy."
If he had to emerge from the First Scroll, why isn't the Antichrist described here and also not
after the Seventh Seal is broken? They should be two persons. (Revelation 13) If I would accept
the first horseman is still the Antichrist, where is the second Beast?log118
The white horse led by the rider will throw him into the sea of burning fire. (Revelation 19:20)
Or the rider on the white horse will destroy another rider also on a white horse.
Is it possible to have such a biblical disagreement?log119
Each fighting army must be dressed differently so the soldiers can recognize the enemies and not fight among themselves. Does the Bible not do that also?log120
People placed a wager on a horse to win a race. Suppose Christians should stake their lives on a
horse. The Bible speaks that we should "bet" on the white horse. (Revelation 19:11 and 22:17)
Yet, on which white horse do you bet? The person who puts an Antichrist on the white horse
can ask such a question only. Immediately when a Christian hears the question and has already
heard about an Antichrist on the white horse, he doubts.
Hence, the teachers lead Christians to doubts. They do the same as a snake did to Eve in the
Eden. They are doing the serpents' job.bib141
If writers use a symbol in some statement, they must stay with the symbol. Therefore, if they picture an Antichrist symbolically as a rider on the white horse, they must use the same in Revelation 19. Otherwise, they confuse the words in Revelation.log121
If we have a symbol (the white horse) in Revelation, only a person can sit on its back. If anyone puts two riders on the white horse, then he adds one more word to Revelation. (Revelation 22:18) Therefore, if the Bible writes the white horse belongs to the Lord Jesus Christ/Word of God in one topic about the Heavenly Book, it must not say otherwise in another Bible section. Doesn't it matter that God the Father wrote the Heavenly Book?bib142
The Heavenly Being of Four Faces gives the command "come" to the first army. If the theories
say that they are Antichrist's ones, then the Heavenly Being commands them. Jesus says that
"there is nothing outside the man which, going into him, is able to make him unclean: but
the things which come out of the man are those which make the man unclean." (Mark 7:15)
An Antichrist is unholy. (See the chapter 13.) For that reason, the outgoing word "come" makes
the Heavenly Being unclean, especially if an Antichrist has to be successful.bib143
If Jesus says the things coming out of the person make him unclean, is he who (speaks) puts an
Antichrist on the Heavenly power clean? If an Antichrist rides in accord with the Heavenly
Book, it could be considered that he touched the Book. The Bible says if an unclean one touches
something sacred, the sacred become unclean. (Haggai 2:13) Especially for an Antichrist is it
spoken that anyone who touches his image by eyes (worships) or puts his mark on the forehead
or hand will be so unclean that he must be punished. (Revelation 14:9-11)
The Heavenly Book is on the Heavenly Throne. For that reason, God's Throne should be unclean
if an Antichrist touches the Heavenly Book. Likewise, everyone on the Throne, the Trinity,
should be unclean according to Haggai's words.bib144
If the Heavenly Being of Four Faces commands evil powers, the Heavenly Throne commands them. The Heavenly Throne means the Trinity: God the Father, God the Holy Spirit, and God the Son, which is Christ Jesus and Seven Spirits. This contradicts to the Lord's prayer, "Our Father in Heaven, may your name be kept holy. Let your kingdom come. Let your pleasure be done, as in Heaven, so on earth . . . keep us safe from the evil one."bib145
To command an Antichrist successfully mean to hurt Christ Jesus or His body, the Christians. (I Corinthians 12:12) But Holy Spirit is to help the Church (John 14:16).bib146
If the Heavenly Throne commands an Antichrist, who hurts God the Son, then he also hurts God's Throne and the Trinity. In this way the Heavenly Being of Four Faces hurts Himself. Even could a man command to another man to hurt him? This is strange. log122
The Lord said, "Every kingdom in which is division is made waste; and a house in which there is division comes to destruction." (Luke 11:17) If they divide the Heavenly Throne, it should be ruined.bib147
If you want to know why four commands are needed for an victorious army, ask someone who knows war tactics.log124
If four commands are in the New Testament, Revelation then the Old testament ought to show them. They should be in wars and clue wars led Joshua.bib148 The Bible knows four army commands. God commanded Joshua. (3-10)
God commanded four times to angelic army and Joshua's army to get the Promised Land. Joshua
won by these commands, and the people of God obtained Canaan.
Nevertheless, some enemies stayed in Canaan. The Israelites led local wars where enemies could
not push them from Canaan.
Certainly this is the picture to the Lord Jesus Christ because Joshua means Jesus. If Joshua led Crusade then Jesus should also. If Joshua were led by God then Jesus should be lead by God the Father and that is why he took the Heavenly Book from God the Father. bib149
It is also the picture for Christians to capture the Earth, so it is the Christian crusade.
It was also the crusade of the Heavenly forces (the angels). (See Joshua 5:14, 6:20, 10:11,14.)
and so they are in action also now.bib150
It should be logically so:
This message spoke in favor of the first horseman. Therefore, to whom is it addressed?
We take such a message in consideration addressed to us. For instance, many statements exist in
the world, but we do not consider them because they are not addressed to us. Many blueprints
exist, but we do not consider their existence until we work with them.
Then, if the Heavenly Book is God's project not addressed to us or in which we do not
participate, we do not need it. If commands and the crown not also for us then Heavenly Book as
would not exist for us.log125
Because Revelation was based on the Heavenly Scrolls, the teachers took almost the entire book of Revelation from the Bible, not a verse or chapter. The Lord Jesus said, "If any man takes away from the words of this book, God will take away from him his part in the tree of life and the holy town, even the things which are in this book." (Revelation 22:19)bib151
Satan lied because he is the father of lies. Therefore, only he could have talked about his servants' victorious job to encourage them (so thinks every Christian not dissuaded by false teachers of Revelation). Clearly, this was the belief of everyone who belonged to him. (John 8:44) Today books about the Antichrist's victory exist in satanic and church libraries. Why do Christians allow them?bib152
God writes about victors in Christ and losers in Satan. If He wrote otherwise, could He still be the Father of Jesus and our Father? To consider Christians as losers and their enemies victorious would only be from Satan.log126
God the Son was put in the Creation to create. This was God's intention before the first day of
the Creation. All creation days went to win, though according to evolutionists, to evolve. Since
God the Son was in it, God's creative energy (Seven Spirits) worked.
Then He went into the angelic world to win. Because Satan was the first among the angels, God
needed to take the angels from him. Therefore, He used God the Son as the mighty angel to
persuade the angels to His side. Jude told of the archangel Michael to leave Satan. (Jude 9)
Then God the Son won the people. That started by substituting the first man, Adam. As the other
Adam, the eternal being in earthly flesh, He won people for God.
The Lord's victory went from the Heavenly Throne to the Earth. Today evil forces are losers, not
winners. The Lord defeated Satan. The Christ is determined to win totally over Satan.
In the first victory He restrained him at God's Throne in the Heaven. Zechariah 3 and Revelation
12 described his fall after Jesus' ascension into Heaven.
The second victory is when He restrains all Satan's servants from entering Heaven (Revelation
12:7-11) and so prepares places for us. (John 14:2)
The third victory should be that Satan will be restrained on Earth, and the Messiah will rule.
Christians and Israelites await this.
Then the fourth victory will come and end Satan. (Revelation 20:7-10)
This also pictures the four crusade steps.bib153
Therefore, if God the Father put that an Antichrist will conquer as the first words in the Heavenly Book, He has seized God the Son's appointment as victor.bib154
Revelation began with the description of God the Son as victor (won over death). Then could the Heavenly Book be in Revelation if its first words favor Christ's enemies?log127
The Old Testament showed God's people victorious if they were on God's side.
Moses started all and won the victory over Egypt. Then Joshua was victorious in Canaan. Next
the judges led wars to defend their forefathers' land. Then David finally came. Thus four kinds of
historical wars were, four kinds of historical periods: to leave Egypt and slavery (Moses), to get
the land (Joshua), to defend land(Judges), and finally to receive victory over all the world (King
David).bib155
David led victorious wars. His Kingdom was not the kingdom of peace. They fought many battles and were victorious to win a crown passed to Solomon. If we consider Solomon's Kingdom as a picture for the Millennium, David's victories could be the picture for the crusade before the Millennium. And so, since Old testament Israel was the picture of Christianity, David's Kingdom was the picture for Christians before the Millennium. Therefore, Christians are victorious during the later rain.bib156
The Millennium also fulfills all prophesy and wisdom. It is primarily for the Israelites. Therefore, Jews are victorious in the end times.bib157
God's prophets foretold about a victorious job for Judah, not for the Antichrist. Jacob said, "Judah, your brothers will praise you: your hand will be on the neck of your enemies." (Genesis 49:8-12) Judah had to march as the first in God's crusades. That is why he should be applied for our Crusade on Earth. Did Jacob say enemies (an Antichrist) be praised? Should an Antichrist's hand be on Christians?bib158
"Judah is a young lion; like a lion full of meat you have become great, my son; now he takes his rest like a lion stretched out and like an old lion; by whom will his sleep be broken?" The Bible called Jesus "the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David. (Revelation 5:5) Therefore, an Antichrist could not be a lion who overomes.bib159
Young lion's power was in the Early Church. Many had courage to rise against a lion's cub there.bib160
The old lions' power should return so the enemies will not be victorious over the Christians. No one will be victorious over them, and we can sleep in peace.bib161
The Lord Jesus Christ promised the Church would be victorious. (Matthew 16:18-19) Early
Church Christians started by preaching the Gospel. Because Jesus Christ was cleaning Heaven,
the angels could not support the Church. Therefore, the persecution in flesh prevailed. This went
into the Dark Ages. The Church awaited victory for centuries. That was their belief. Therefore,
that would happen once.
Now it is the Christ's turn to win over Earth. The goal of Revelation is to hope for victorious acts
that Christianity can leave our present world victorious. The Church believes so.log128
Consequently, to make an Antichrist victorious means to assault Christianity. Namely, if God set Christianity in the world then it must end with Glory.log129
Such a saying brings doubts about the New Testament message and consequently, it declines missionaries' jobs.130
The Lord foretold "repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached to all nations." (Luke 24:47) Clearly, the Gospel will be victorious according to these words. Missionaries' work is victoriousbib162
The best proof is life. The Law said that God's people would be blessed more than others and not
be childless if they did not allow their enemies to be victorious. (Deuteronomy 7:1-14)
Look at their blessing. When a preacher talks about an Antichrist for the First Seal, he has lost
God's blessing immediately. I noticed a few preachers had to stop preaching because of family
or church problems. I wonder why Christianity did not forbid them to teach that they'd be
blessed more and not childless.
Judas was considered the Lord's disciple. That means he believed Jesus to be victorious. When problems started (big oppositions), he doubted Jesus was victorious. This led to his betrayal of Jesus Christ. Desertion from the victorious job for Christ Jesus and the Gospel must be avoided. Otherwise, the person will not be victorious!log130
Those who spoke of the Antichrist's victory, have not sat on white horse's back but on Judah's
bench. The Lord spoke about the end times, where brother will betray a brother. (Mark
13:12-13)
A teacher of the end times who says evil powers are victorious betrays his brethren. James, the
brother of Jesus, said that everything that comes from God is good. (1:17) However, another
brother said what comes from Heaven (the first white power) is evil.
A father betrays his child. The old theories of fathers in accordance with the flesh, for instance Anderson's one, are considered correct, more than the new theories based on the spirit of God the Son and new revelations from history.
Children will rebel against their parents. New theories rebel against the sermons of forefathers such as the apostles'. They preached Christ Jesus and Christianity are victorious and awaited the Christ on the white horse. New theories say otherwise. Their teachers preach: "people await an Antichrist riding on white horse".
All men will hate you because of me. Churches always hated people who came with the Lord's revealing. That is also my testimony.log131
But he who stands firm to the end will be saved. Those standing firm in their faith, no one can take them from their Savior. They are in Him. The apostle Paul wrote, "Even if we, or an angel from Heaven, were to be a preacher to you of good news other than that which we have given you, let there be a curse on him." (Galatians 1:8)
Would God the Father write in the Heavenly Book that a crown would be given to any Antichrist? I do not believe so. I believe the crown is for Christ Jesus and some of His followers (coronets).
Could God in His mind hold a crown for His Son and the second crown for an Antichrist? That is like holding two contradictory tasks in your mind. Weak persons doing contrary deeds have contrary thoughts and could lose their sanity. Who are the people who force God the Father to bear such contradictory qualities for ages? That is like having two minds in one body, Could God be of two minded?log132
If we hold something long enough in our minds, that will be written in our consciousness. We help our brain by putting our thoughts on papers. Hence, two different of God's writings should exist, according to the theorists. One writing, the paper for Christ Jesus about His coronation and another paper for an Antichrist about his coronation. If one is sealed, then the other should also be.log133
Which book did Moses see in Heaven and picture in the Sanctuary? Which book was Revelation in? Was the Bible the contrary book? If an Antichrist is crowned in Revelation, who is crowned in Psalms 21? "For you go before him with the blessings of good things: you put a crown of fair gold on his head."bib163
If the Bible does not bring contradictory parts, then an Antichrist would live forever because the next verse (five) says, "He made request to you for life, and you gave it to him, long life for ever and ever." bib164
If theorists are right, then they should say: the Heavenly Book dictated Christ Jesus to give a crown to an Antichrist and to destroy him afterwards. (Revelation 19:19-21) Who could agree Christ would accept such a job from God the Father? God or any from His people could not. Such a deceitful tactic is used by Islam. That disagrees with the spirit of Christ Jesus. If a man is an author of such a thought, he is dead in his spirit. The apostle Paul said, "the mind to be given up to earthly things means death; but for it to be given up to spiritual things means Life and peace. Abandonment to earthly things is a state of enmity to God. Such a mind does not submit to God's Law, and indeed cannot do so." (Romans 8:6-9) I believe that many Christians are in the spirit not in the flesh; then, please, do not accept that idea if is contrary to the spirit of Christ Jesus. Paul wrote, "If any man has not the spirit of Christ, he is not his!"bib165
God created our world that a man would be a crown of all that lives in the world. Adam was a crown of life. He felt and lost his crown. Therefore, the other Adam had to come. If we suggest that Adam's fall led God to write the Heavenly Book, giving the lost crown to someone else would be in its beginning.log134
The psalm said, "What is man, that you keep him in mind? The son of man, that you take him into account? For you have made him only a little lower than the gods, crowning him with glory and honor. You have made him ruler over the works of your hands; you have put all things under his feet; All sheep and oxen, and all the beasts of the field; The birds of the air and the fish of the sea, and whatever goes through the deep waters of the seas." (Psalms 8:4-8) Today godless people rule in the world. They do not praise God as, "O Lord, our Lord, how noble is your name in all the Earth!" (verse 9) The time has come when we should take the crown from men enforcing Adam's practices. The time should come to give this crown to righteous men.
A crown should to be given to the Christians. It is against our creation that Christians (John 1:3) were persecuted, thus not crowned to the end of their history. To wear a crown means to be a ruler over some territory. If Christians had crowns, for instance, in the Roman Empire, pagans could not persecute them. We see this partly when Constantine, considered a Christian, became the emperor in 311. Immediately Christians were not persecuted.
Christians from the Early Church awaited freedom and the crown for a land. Could it be they will never get a crown? (Revelation 19)
Jacob said: "The rod of authority will not be taken from Judah, and he will not be without a
Law-giver, till he comes who has the right to it, and the peoples will put themselves under
his rule." (Genesis 49:10)
The scepter, the rod of authority, means the same as a crown. "But of the Son he says, Your
seat of power, O God, is for ever and ever; and the rod of your kingdom is a rod of
righteousness." (Hebrews 1:8)
The scepter was first Jacob's power to rule the world. Jacob and Moses predicted Judah would
march first and act by the authority of him, to whom the scepter would then be given.bib166
If they gave the rulers' staff to whom it belongs, He also has His crown because he acts under that crown. In the Old Testament, Joab fought under David's crown against the Ammonites in the city Rabbah. As Joab grew victorious, David finished the battle so the land would be his. David received the crown of his enemies. (II Samuel 12:26-30) bib167
The New Testament spoke that Jesus Christ, invited on God's Throne, received the authority. That means He received it according to the ancient terminology of His coronation. He became the King of Kings. "But we see him who was made a little lower than angels, even Jesus, crowned with glory and honor." (Hebrews 2:9) He came on the Heavenly Throne. Everyone around the Throne recognized Him as their ruler. The seven horns distinguished Him from the others. (Revelation 5:6) All doing is in the sign of His crown. And therefore, men and women preaching the Gospel are like crowned since Christ Jesus has come on the Throne. To them is crown given.log135
The apostle John did not see the rider already having a crown. Important is that
When a head is crowned then the rest of man's body is promoted also. The body follows the head and step up. When Christ Jesus is the Head of the Church, so the Church is His Body in symbolic meaning then, when the Head (Christ Jesus) was crowned then His Body is promoted also. That is why Christians could not be persecuted in the end timeslog136
Then Old Testament words
"The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until
Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." mean
The Authority shall not depart from Christian(s), nor a world power from between his feet, until
Christ Jesus comes; and unto him shall the rapturing of the people be.bib169
The New Testament says we who understand life's victory (to be resurrected) would receive a
crown of life. Yet we said the word crown meant authority.
The apostle John saw the "woman" as the symbol of newborn people with a crown of twelve
stars on her head. (Revelation 12:1) The task of the white horse is to secure the "woman" so they
would not persecute her, and she might give birth to new followers of Christ. (See Revelation
12.) We could consider her bearing crowns for our twelve princes. Therefore, I believe, the
Lord's authority will be on some leaders in Christianity in times when the "woman is not
persecuted.bib170
Some angels have crowns. (Revelation 12:3) I believe the lost angels had twelve crowns, and the people should have them. Perhaps the lost angels persecuted the "woman" because those lost crowns. Anyway, by God's order a crown (or crowns) will be taken from the evil one and given to the Christians.
Could someone in our world believe God crowned evil power? If we speak of an Antichrist, we
think in connection to Satan. Did a coronation of Satan exist in God's plan? No. Satan had
already been crowned. He was the first among the angels. That happened before the Creation.
The Earth went to Satan's hand only because of Adam's fall. Adam obeyed Satan and thus
admitted his authority. "The Evil One said, 'I will give you authority over all these, and the
glory of them, for it has been given to me, and I give it to anyone at my pleasure.'" (Luke
4:6) If Satan had a crown. Should the second crown be given to Satan.log137
God would not give him a crown. If God would not give him, then neither to one of his servants. I do not believe in a god who has restrained an evil being and then coronate him.log138
It is logical that as God expelled Satan from His Throne, He first dishonored him. Satan's degradation was taking his crown. The Biblical conclusion is in that direction: to take a crown from the evil one, not give him. If you say otherwise then you must have a different Bible than me.log139
The Bible said that everything was created by God the Son. Because we make a bow from created things, the bow could be based on Him when the bow was used for a good purpose. From it, Christians would first have a bow.log141
A bow very quickly became an Israeli army's weapon. Jacob's sons already used one. (Genesis
27:3) David fought with a sword and a bow. He also named a song that. "David lamented with
this lamentation over Saul and over Jonathan his son: (Also he bade them teach the
children of Judah the use of the bow: behold, it is written in the book of Jasher.)" (II Samuel
1:17-18)
The prophet Elizeus was well known for using a bow in his calling. (II Kings 13:15-19)
Therefore a bow belonged to the hands of God's fighters. It was not just an enemy's weapon.bib171
Prophets predicted we would bear a bow. Isaiah spoke, "He made my mouth like a sharpened sword, in the shadow of his hand he hid me; he made me into a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver. He said to me, 'You are my servant, Israel, in whom I will display my splendor.'" (Isaiah 49:2-3) if it were appointed for Jesus Christ (see next verses), then it would also be for His servants.bib172
God's Word is able to fly through space directly to humans' hearts. God's arrows hit many persons at once. If Billy Graham, American world-wide evangelist, had used a sword to triumph over so many people, that would be illogical. We say that God's Word (in the form of arrows) shot from his mouth and hit the people.log142
The Lord commanded, "But now, he who has a money-bag, or a bag for food, let him take it:
and he who has not, let him give his coat for money and get a sword." (Luke 22:36) The
apostle Peter did not first understand its meaning and used his sword against a servant of a high
priest. However, the Lord rebuked him for using a sword for such a purpose. (John 18:10-11)
We understand a sword was the first fighting tool against evil spirits.
The Early Church used a sword in spreading the Gospel. The first Christians were persecuted,
and therefore, Christians had to speak privately person-to-person.
The apostles Peter or Paul were used a bow in their initial preaching. Peter preached the Gospel,
and three thousand were added to Christ Jesus. (Acts 2) Still, this was because the government
(Romans) did not first persecute the apostles.
The apostle Paul spoke for the Church. "For our fight is not against flesh and blood, but against
authorities and powers, against the world-rulers of this dark night, against the spirits of evil in
the heavens. For this reason take up all the arms of God, so that you may be able to be strong in
the evil day, and, having done all, to keep your place. Take your place, then, having your body
clothed with the true word, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness; Be ready with the
good news of peace as shoes on your feet; And most of all, using faith as a cover to keep off all
the flaming arrows of the Evil One." (Ephesians 6:12-16)
We should put on all the armaments of God to be strong. We should understand a sword and a
bow. Although Paul did not use the word bow, a bow can be deducted. Using a shield to ward off
evil arrows, one means fighting off spiritual arrows. If evil ones use arrows, we must use them,
also, if we want to be in Paul's power. Such are the rules of wars. Paul commands so; otherwise,
we cannot win.bib173
As I started to show, they said a rider on the white horse had no arrows, and the rider could not relate to Christ Jesus. If a soldier carried a bow with arrows, would we have said he had a bow and arrows? No. We simply say he has a bow. We assume the one word includes arrows. Otherwise, a bow is not a weapon. Arrows were hidden in a quiver. If people looked at a soldier fighting with arrows, they might see only his bow. If someone said that a fighter had - shot arrows, others understand he used a bow. Otherwise, he would bear useless weapons.log143
Every Bible reader understood Isaiah's words, "He made me into a polished arrow and concealed me in his quiver" that God might use the arrow, but for the time, it waited in His quiver. If He would not be equipment for a tool, the arrow was useless. Can God have useless things?log144
The Bible had to serve for all times. Prophets foresaw many tools and equipment that did not
exist in their world. For instance, John described an airplane as a great eagle with two wings.
(Revelation 12:14)
Today we use a gun instead a bow. It is possible that Isaiah's quiver was a gun. If we said
someone attacked us with arrows or shots, we could understand that he used a bow or a gun.
Therefore, such an argument does not prove anything.
Our age is the modern age. We do not live in ancient times when primitive weapons like for instance bows were used. Therefore, when John saw the weapon of the rider, he could not identify it according today weapons. Let us say that he saw weapons used by USA. They hold power in the world thanks to "arrows" or bow according John's terminology. Their new bombers look like arrows.log145
What about rockets and missiles. They do not need any cannon because the engine is in the bullet, they even do not need to be guided by rifle man.log146
When you use a horse to picture an army then a victorious army which is on God's side must be a
white horse. If their weapons are airplanes looked like arrows or bows then you come to the
picture: "and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given
unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer."
The Gospel uses this horse's power to go wherever he leads it. Or the Lord uses this horse's power to go wherever He leads it, because He is first coming like Word and then He (John 1:1,14)bib174