Seven minute game
Opening: "Sicilian: Canal-Sokolsky Attack, 3...Bd7"
White seriously underestimated 22...a4 and should have played 23.bxa4 instead of continuing his attack. After 23...axb3, White is unable to take the pawn or else it's mate-in-two with 24...Ra1+.
White again blunders when he continues his attack and plays 24.f4?. True, it also removes the mate threat given above. But 24...exf4 and my formerly bad Bishop now has control over the important a1-h8 diagonal!
Earlier in the game, I got into trouble whien I played 16...Nd7? without thinking--focusing instead on bringing my Knight over for a Queenside attack. I then had to make an important decision. Either save my Rook but give up two central, key pawns; or give up the Rook and continue my original plan. I estimated that giving up the central pawns (with an exchange) was better for White and would likely cost me the game; that going an exchange down with an attack would probably be better.