Contradictions
in the Quran?
Critic:-
Though the Quran asserts that it is free of
contradictions, there are many contradictions in it, showing that it cannot be
from God. To prove this here are 12 of them.
Comment:-
We already know that you are a hostile
unbeliever and will, therefore, seek and find things that you can interpret as
contradictory. But even you should know that Muslims do not interpret things as
you do. Nor is it a very intelligent way of interpreting the verses.
Such a lot of confusion and such great
desperate effort to establish your own negativity, having learnt nothing at all
on the way!!! It only shows naive literalism without understanding of what is
being conveyed!
Do you really think these criticisms are
likely to impress us or do your reputation any good?
Do you not know that one can prove anything
one likes by selected bits out of context? Does the Quran not tell you that it
makes some people worse when they do not read it as it should be read?.
Lets look at these supposed contradictions:-
(1) UNBELIEVERS ARE RAISED FROM THE GRAVE
BLIND
[20.124] And whoever turns away from My
reminder, his shall be a straitened life, and We will raise him on the day of
resurrection, blind.
YET THEY SEE
[37.19] So it shall only be a single cry,
when lo! they shall see.
Comment:-
The verses are speaking about understanding.
In 20:124, (look at the following verses)
they were blind in that they had ignored or forgotten the revelations. In 37:19
(look at the next verse) they understood that it was the Day of Judgement.
"But he who turns away from Remembrance of Me,
verily, for him shall be a narrow life; and I shall bring him blind to the
assembly on the Day of Resurrection. He shall say: My Lord! Wherefore have you
gathered me blind when I used to see? He shall say: Our revelations came to
you, and you did forget them; In like manner are you forgotten this Day!"
20:124
And
"So it shall only be a single Shout, when lo!
They shall see. And they shall say: O woe to us! This is the Day of Judgment.
(A voice will say,) This is the Day of the Judgment which you called a
lie." 37:19-21
Do you not see that
they were brought blind to the Day of Judgement but that on the Day of
Judgement they did see - their eyes were opened. Do you not see that the
blindness refers to their denial of the Day of Judgement BEFORE they came to it
and when they came to it they could not deny it.
(2) THEIR MOUTHS ARE SEALED
[36:65] On that day We will set a seal upon
their mouths, and their hands shall speak to Us, and their feet shall bear
witness of what they earned.
YET THEY SPEAK
[20:125] He shall say: My Lord! why hast Thou
raised me blind and I was a seeing one indeed?
Comment:-
In 36:65, the verse tells us their hands
shall speak and their feet shall bear witness. How does it contradict 20:125.
The contradiction appears to be in the critics mind. Speak is not to be taken
literally.
(3) THIS IS AN ADMONITION, SO TAKE HEED IF
YOU WILL
[74.55] So whoever pleases may mind it.
AS IF YOU CAN
[74.56] And they will not mind unless Allah
please.
Comment:-
74:55 says "let any who will pay heed
(or remember)." 74:56 says "None will pay heed (or remember) unless
Allah wills." I cannot see any contradiction. In Islam God is not a man.
It is Allah who gives us all the abilities. If you want to lift your arm, this
depends on whether the muscles are healthy or damaged. Is there a contradiction
between saying: lift your arm if you can and you will not be able to do this
unless your arm muscles work.
(4) GOD ASSISTS PROPHETS, SAVES THEM AND
DESTROYS UNBELIEVERS, AD, THAMUD, NOAH, ETC, ETC, KORAN IS FULL OF THEIR
STORIES
[37.172] Most surely they (THE PROPHETS)
shall be the assisted ones
[67.18] And certainly those before them
rejected (the truth), then how was My disapproval.
[43.25] So We inflicted retribution on them, then
see how was the end of the rejecters.
YET NOT ALL
[2.91] .. Why then did you kill Allah's
Prophets ... ?
Comment:-
Allah assists Prophets in spreading His Word.
He verse does not say that He prevents people from killing them. If 37:172 (that
God helps his servants) and 43:25 (that those who oppose him are defeated)
contradict 2:91 (that Prophets were killed), would you say that God did not
help Jesus or that he was not persecuted or that those who persecuted him were
not defeated and his mission did not triumph?
(5) GOD DOES NOT ACCUSE ANYONE OF THE CRIME
OF ANOTHER SOUL, HE IS JUST
[53.38] That no bearer of burden shall bear
the burden of another-
YET THE JEWS AT THE TIME OF MUHAMAD ARE
GUILTY OF PROPHET KILLING THAT HAPPENED CENTURIES AGO
[2.91] And when it is said to them, Believe
in what Allah has revealed, they say: We believe in that which was revealed to
us; and they deny what is besides that, while it is the truth verifying that
which they have. Say: Why then did you kill Allah's Prophets before if you were
indeed believers?
Comment:-
53:38 tells us that no bearer of burdens
shall bear the burden of another. 2:91 tells us that people killed the
Prophets. Where does it say that others will be punished for this? What the
verse points out is that though they profess to believe what Allah sent them
yet they killed the Prophets Allah sent. They were contradicting themselves.
Critic:-
[3.181] Allah has certainly heard the saying
of those who said: Surely Allah is poor and we are rich. I will record what
they say, and their killing the prophets unjustly, and I will say: Taste the
chastisement of burning. As you can see from 3:181, "God" deems all
Jews guilty of the crime of a few. It sounds to me that all Jews earned hell
because of the guilt of prophet killers, whenever they supposedly lived.
[2.61] And abasement and humiliation were
brought down upon them, __AND THEY BECAME DESERVING OF ALLAH'S WRATH__; this
was so because they Disbelieved in the communications of Allah and killed the
prophets unjustly; this is so because they disobeyed and exceeded the limits.
Comment:-
3:181 says: "Those who said...
Sometimes whole groups or communities are
addressed because they all believe the same thing or act in the same way - that
is what identifies them. This in no way flouts the principle that each person
will be judged according to their own deeds and faith. It is also necessary to
understand that there is a difference between the consequences on earth and the
judgement on the Day of Judgement. Nations have certainly been destroyed in
this world and the Jews were certainly expelled from Israel
and Judah.
Critic:-
Then it appears that Jews told Muhammad that
according to their religion they must see a certain kind of miracle to know a
prophet, and Muhammad's response is "There were prophets before me who had
such miracles that you demand, WHY DID YOU KILL THEM THEN IF YOU ARE
TRUTHFUL?"
[3.183] (Those are they) who said: Surely
Allah has enjoined us that we should not believe in any apostle until he brings
us an offering which the fire consumes. Say: Indeed, there came to you apostles
before me with clear arguments and with that which you demand; why then did you
kill them if you are truthful?
How does that make any sense?
Comment:-
I do not see what you are puzzled by. It
seems clear enough to me. The verses tell us that the Jews were demanding
miracles or other signs, but when they came those miracles and signs did not
convince them. In fact, they were probably hypocrites making excuses and unnecessary
difficulties. Something like you, in fact. Such miracles and signs are not
proofs. What is required is insight and the desire and ability to understand.
(6) MUHAMAD ASKS OF NO MONEY
[12.104] And you do not ask them for a reward
for this; it is nothing but a reminder for all mankind.
YET HE DOES
[47.38] Behold! you are those who are called
upon to spend in Allah's way, but among you are those who are niggardly.
Comment:-
12:104 tells us that Muhammad takes no fee
for conveying the revelations. 47:38 requires us to spend our wealth in the
cause of Allah, usually as charity. Nothing is said about paying the Prophet
for his services.
(7) IDOLATERS ADMIT THEY WORSHIPPED IDOLS,
BUT IDOLS CLAIM IDOLATERS WERE NOT WORSHIPPING THEM, EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE,
WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE GOING TO HELL
[16.86] And when those who associate (others
with Allah) shall see their associate-gods, they shall say: Our Lord, these are
our associate-gods on whom we called besides Thee. But they will give them back
the reply: Most surely you are liars.
IDOLATERS DENY THEY WERE WORSHIPPING IDOLS
EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE, WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE GOING TO HELL (THIS CONTRADICTS
THE ONE ABOVE FOR IDOLATERS SAY TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, ALSO IT CONTRADICTS THE
VERSE WHERE IT SAYS THEY CANNOT SPEAK ON THE JUDGEMENT DAY)
[40.74] Besides Allah? They shall say: They
are gone away from us, nay, we used not to call upon anything before. Thus does
Allah confound the unbelievers.
BOTH IDOLATERS AND IDOLS LIE EVEN THOUGH
LYING IS NOT POSSIBLE ON THAT DAY (THIS CONTRADICTS BOTH OF THE ABOVE)
[78.38] The day on which the spirit and the
angels shall stand in ranks; they shall not speak except he whom the Beneficent
God permits and who speaks the right thing.
Comment:-
16:86 says the idolaters assert that the
idols they worshiped were partners of God, but the idols deny that they were
partners. 40:74 states that the idols they worshipped failed them. 78:38 tells
us that those who are permitted speak the truth. Where is the lie? Where is the
contradiction?
(8) GOD HAS NO PARTNER IN HIS KINGDOM
[17.111] And say: (All) praise is due to
Allah, Who has not taken a son and Who has not a partner in the kingdom, and
Who has not a helper to save Him from disgrace; and proclaim His greatness
magnifying (Him).
SO EITHER THE ANGEL SPEAKING HERE TO ABRAHAM
IS GOD, OR THERE IS A CONTRADICTION.
[15.58] They said: Surely we are sent towards
a guilty people,
[15.59] Except Lut's followers: We will most
surely deliver them all,
[15.60] Except his wife; We ordained that she
shall surely be of those who remain behind.
AND THIS MYSTERIOUS WISE MAN, (IDENTIFIED AS
KHIDHR TRADITIONALLY) SPEAKS IN ROYAL WE, AS IF HE IS GOD
[18.80] And as for the boy, his parents were
believers and we feared lest he should make disobedience and ingratitude to
come upon them:
[18.81] So we desired that their Lord might
give them in his place one better than him in purity and nearer to having
compassion.
Comment:-
17:111 tells us God has no partner. 15:57-60 tells
us about what the angelic messengers said. 18:79-81 tells us what the servant
of God said. This person is described in 18:66. "Then they found a servant
of Ours, to whom We had given mercy from Ourselves, and had taught him
knowledge from Our Presence." Where does it say God has a partner? But
Prophets and angels can speak on behalf of God.
(9) THE UNBELIEVER'S BOOK IS GIVEN FROM HIS
LEFT HAND, ON THE JUDGMENT DAY, AS OPPOSED TO THOSE WHO GET THEIR BOOKS GIVEN
FROM THEIR RIGHT (THE BELIEVERS)
[69.25] And as for him who is given his book
in his left hand he shall say: O would that my book had never been given me:
MAYBE THOSE ARE MORE UNBELIEVERS, THEIR BOOK
IS GIVEN FROM THEIR BACK
[84.10] And as to him who is given his book
behind his back.
Comment:-
In 69:19-25 The righteous are given their
record in their right hand, but the unrighteous receive their record in the
left hand.
In 84:7-10 the righteous are also given their
record in their right had, but the unrighteous receive their record behind
their back. Right/left hand and front/back are obviously symbolic, the right
hand being equated with the front and left with the back. The left hand can be
thought of as being tied behind the back.
(10) THE KORAN IS THE WORD OF GOD ALONE (AND
IT IS CLEAR WHEN GOD QUOTES OTHER CHARACTERS)
[41.42] Falsehood shall not come to it from
before it nor from behind it; a revelation from the Wise, the Praised One.
YET SOME OF IT IS GABRIEL'S WORDS DIRECTLY,
NO QUOTING
[19.64] And we do not descend but by the
command of your Lord; to Him belongs whatever is before us and whatever is
behind us and whatever is between these, and your Lord is not forgetful.
AND YET SOME ARE MUHAMAD'S
[6.114] Shall I then seek a judge other than Allah?
And He it is Who has revealed to you the Book (which is) made plain; and those
whom We have given the Book know that it is revealed by your Lord with truth,
therefore you should not be of the disputers.
Comment:-
41:42 tells us that the Quran is true, a
revelation from God.
19:64 tells us that the angels do not descend
except by the command of God. 6:113-115 tells us that unbelievers should also
listen to the Quran and gain from it what they can, and that the Book was sent
to Muhammad. The verses can be understood as God speaking on behalf of Muhammad
and the Angels or telling us what they should say. It is understood that 6:115
starts "Say (O Muhammad):" and that 19:64 starts "(The Angels
say:)" Allah is quoting Muhammad and the Angels. The critic understand who
is speaking, but still thinks that there is a contradiction between saying that
the Quran is a revelation from God, that it comes through the medium of Gabriel
and that it is recited by Muhammad. Why does he think so? If an apple comes
from a Tree and is transported by a train and sold by a grocer, does it cease
to be an apple?
(11) IT IS NOT POSSIBLE THAT MUHAMMAD COULD
HAVE FORGED THE KORAN
[17.88] Say: If men and jinn should combine
together to bring the like of this Quran, they could not bring the like of it,
though some of them were aides of others.
[29.48] And you did not recite before it any
book, nor did you transcribe one with your right hand, for then could those who
say untrue things have doubted.
YET IT IS POSSIBLE
[11.35] Or do they say: He has forged it?
Say: If I have forged it, on me is my guilt, and I am clear of that of which
you are guilty.
Comment:-
17:88 The Quran is inimitable. 29:48 - The
Prophet did not recite any other scripture nor write the Quran himself.
11:35 "Do they say, He has invented it?
Say: If I have devised it, then on me be my crime, but I am clear (innocent) of
all that you commit." The critic interprets this as an admission that
Muhammad invented the Quran when in fact he denies it. What the verse tells us
is that the Prophet was fully aware that inventing something and claiming that
it came from God was a grave sin for which he would be punished, therefore, he
did not do it.
So, if as you say it is NOT possible, why do
you interpret it as "he could have written it"
Critic:-
Maybe because one verse says it is not
possible for him to have written it, and the other implies that he could have
written it? And that's why it's a contradiction?
Comment:-
You are required to understand the Quran as a
whole, not taking verses in isolation. It is not generally possible to get the
whole meaning into one sentence. Apart from that you are taking literally an
English translation of an Arabic text. The verse states:- "Say: If I have
forged it, on me is my guilt, and I am clear of that of which you are
guilty." This is an argument that denies the guilt of forging it. That is:
you make a hypothesis and show it is wrong. The negation of a negation is also
a positive.
(12) THE KORAN IS UNDENIABLE PROOF THAT THERE
IS GOD AND MUHAMAD IS A PROPHET
[2.23] And if you are in doubt as to that
which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a chapter like it and call
on your witnesses besides Allah if you are truthful.
[2.24] But if you do (it) not and never shall
you do (it), then be on your guard against the fire of which men and stones are
the fuel; it is prepared for the unbelievers.
[4.82] Do they not then meditate on the
Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have found in it
many a discrepancy.
[17.88] Say: If men and jinn should combine
together to bring the like of this Quran, they could not bring the like of it,
though some of them were aides of others.
YET IT IS NOT REALLY
[29.50] And they say: Why are not signs sent
down upon him from his Lord? Say: The signs are only with Allah, and I am only
a plain warner.
[20.133] And they say: Why does he not bring
to us a sign from his Lord? Has not there come to them a clear evidence of what
is in the previous books?
[10.20] And they say: Why is not a sign sent to
him from his Lord? Say: The unseen is only for Allah; therefore wait-- surely I
too, with you am of those who wait.
THE KORAN IS UNDENIABLE PROOFOF GOD'S
EXISTENCE YET IN IT GOD SPENDS HOURS TRYING TO PROVE HIS EXISTENCE
[30.22] And one of His signs is the creation
of the heavens and the earth and the diversity of your tongues and colours;
most surely there are signs in this for the learned.
[45.3] Most surely in the heavens and the
earth there are signs for the believers.
[15.75] Surely in this are signs for those
who examine.
[15.77] Most surely there is a sign in this
for the believers.
Comment:-
2:23-24- asks doubters to bring a chapter
like the Quran, but tells us that it is not possible to do this. If they do not
then they should fear the fire of Hell. In other words they should repent.
4:82 tells us there are no contradictions in
the Quran - the Quran should be read that way.
17:88 tells us men and jinn together could
not create a Quran.
29:49. tells us "Nay, but it (the Quran)
is a clear revelation in the heart of those who are endowed with knowledge, and
none deny Our revelations save the wrongdoers (or unjust)."
29:50 tells us that people still demand other
signs from God. But signs are with Allah, he provides what he wills. The
Prophet is simply a Warner.
20:133 tells us that they will not believe
until a sign is sent down from God when in fact former scriptures were sent
down as proof and they do not accept the signs. Obviously for unbelievers signs
are not signs, miracles are not miracles.
The Critic says:- The Quran is undeniably
proof of God's existence, yet in it God spends hours trying to prove his
existence. He finds this to be a contradiction!!! When, in fact, these proofs
are contained in the Quran which he himself quotes. Are additional proofs
contradictions or corroborations, needed particularly for those who deny the
Quran as proof? Nor has he understood a much deeper significance that lies in
the idea that the same Word by which the Universe was created is also that
which created the Quran. It is also a phenomena. It has had a transforming
affect on this planet.
It is obvious that the interpretation of what
people read depends on their mentality and that is what it reveals. Nothing can
be done about a person who does not want to understand or does not have the
capability to understand.
Critic:-
So far I concede only two points. 10
contradictions remain.
Comment:-
It cannot matter to us what you concede or
not. We do not read the Quran in the negative way as you do, as that prevents
understanding. Where we find difficulties we make efforts to understand rather
than simply succumb to personal egotism.
Critic:-
You read the Koran in a positive way then?
With an assumption that it is the Word of God, so when you see an error you
will look for ways to interpret it to fit your assumption? Is that more honest
than what you accuse me of? How?
Comment:-
If you go to college or read any subject with
a negative attitude or hostile assumptions you will not understand anything.
You will have a closed mind. You will make negative efforts to shut things out
or positive efforts to reject. This is the direct opposite of what we do. You
are assuming that your subjective prejudices are correct. We try to avoid this
kind of arrogance. It is obvious to us that knowledge and capacity for
understanding are limited and efforts are required. That is why schools and
colleges exist.
We first realise that the Quran is the Word
of God and then if we come to something we do not immediately understand, we
make efforts to understand it.
We also know that the Quran tells us how it
should be read. It tells us a lot about itself. If those instructions are not
followed then obviously you are not reading the Quran as it is written.
Nothing can be explained to someone who does
not want to or cannot understand. You need to make some efforts to understand.
Spoon feeding does not work.
----------<O>----------
Contents