NATURE OF THE NEUTRON

Background
Neutrons have caused and continue to cause mankind big social problems. They are at once sort of helpful (they make nuclear power plants possible) and dangerous. Neutrons make atom bombs work. There is a special kind of atom bomb, called a neutron bomb that is extremely lethal, but causes minimum damage to property. With all this power for good and evil, mankind fools around with neutrons like a kid with matches, while no one knows what they are. Their nature has remained a mystery. There are those who claim that a neutron is a compound particle, containing a proton and an electron. These worthies would have it that a neutron is a proton with an electron somehow "stuck" on it. If this were so, then a neutron would be a dipole and react as one. A neutron does not act as a dipole. No experiment shows that an electron is ever "stuck" on a proton, or that dipole reaction ever takes place. With our newfound knowledge of the nature of atomic particles, it is obvious that electrons and protons do not cuddle together. Neither atomic particle has any place to adhere to.

As a neutron has no electric field, it is not an ordinary atomic particle. As neutron stars are well known astronomical objects, we know that neutrons can be packed together, cheek to jowl so to speak. This probably would not occur if the particles were not symmetrical. As is well known, neutron stars can eventually become black holes. There is the intriguing possibility that the Primordial Singularity was a Super Neutron. Perhaps IF two Primordial Singularities collided, one was an atomic particle and the other a neutron. It would provide another possible scenario as to why the Primordial Black Hole blew up. However, we have no observation of a neutron and a proton annihilating each other.

Neutrons are very stable particles. Even if the Primordial Singularity were a neutron (at least part of it), the compound structure would have annihilated in the Big Bang, creating a myriad of micro neutrons. No one has ever claimed that the Plasma Ball contained neutrons. At the outset, the Plasma Ball was solely composed of high-energy photons (by present standards of "high energy"), streaming outward from the primal event at the speed of light. The logical scenario was the precipitation from the plasma ball first of protons and then electrons as has been described elsewhere. Neutrons seemingly being compound particles of protons and electrons could only have formed subsequent to the creation of protons and electrons. After the Plasma Ball had expanded to the point that electrons had been created, the energy density necessary to create neutrons probably did not exist, as the energy density of neutrons is greater than that of protons. Though the energy density necessary to create neutrons from protons and electrons is less than that required to either a proton or electron, in order for the fusion to take place, a proton and electron must be in close proximity, as in the center of a star. While neutron fusion may have taken place at this time of plasma ball activity, it doesn't feel elegant.

Rather it would seem that neutrons are the first creation of solar "blast furnace" activity, being created in the interior of relatively massive stars, as have been all other compound particles from the helium nuclei to the most massive atomic nuclei. It would seem though that neutrons are formed in solar blast furnaces before helium, a state of affairs not generally touted. This information is important as background to the nature of neutrons. The neutron is the simplest compound atomic particle in the Universe. It is composed of the mass of an electron plus the mass of a proton. This fact has led everyone to the conclusion that a neutron is two separate particles stuck together somehow. From our Inductive Analysis of single photon atomic particles, we can see that there is no way that an electron and proton can be "stuck together". There is nothing to adhere to. No one to date has a solution as to how a proton and electron can be fused without one being stuck on the other.

The appearance of neutrons in the Universe was a creative act. Neutrons are seemingly the first compound particles to be created after the Big Bang. Helium nuclei seemingly contain two protons and two neutrons. Obviously helium was not possible before neutrons. Before neutrons, there were only protons and electrons, both single photon particles. The creation of neutrons can be compared to the first creation of living cells of more than member. Without the creation of multi-celled creatures, there would be nothing but amoebas. Similarly without the creation of compound particles, the Universe would contain nothing but hydrogen, by itself a very boring substance. The creation of a neutron, the first multi-photon atomic particle ever created, paved the way for the creation of the Universe as we know it. The neutron is the fundamental building block of complex matter. Without this building block, the 92 plus elements and life would be impossible. So you see, the creation of the neutron was a landmark in the creation of the Universe as we know it. The neutron is the foundation from which all complex atomic particles evolved. The laws created to control the existence of a neutron were expanded to cover all multi-particle bodies, such as atomic nuclei. The creative process that created neutrons (in stellar furnaces) was used redundantly to create all the nuclei of the 92 elements.

Understanding the nature of the neutron is one of the fundamental concepts of the new physics. We will achieve this understanding through Inductive Analysis and in the same manner we discovered the nature of electrons and protons. We will begin at the beginning.

- Stanley Fay White