Dear Mr Bresnahan,

Please don't get defensesive but I read WND every day and save quite a few articles to disk as I have often quoted info I find in WND in my own writing. I look forward to the commentary of Farah, Dougherty, yourself, and others.

I also have both WND and your site listed on mine as sites in which one can usually get truth and unbiased commentary (but not always in reference to WND).

However, in regards to the truth concerning the Internal Rrip-off Scheme, the foreign owned Federal Reserve Bank, and federal jurisdiction, I searched WND's site for articles stating the facts and could not find one. Perhaps I overlooked one but I don't think so.

I tried to find an article which exposed the truth that the US Government hasn't any power to make any law concerning firearms, alcohol, and tobacco except when these are involved in interstate or import commerce but could not.

I also looked for an article explaining that the United States in 26 USC, Chapter 1, Tax Imposed, is the District of Columbia only and that State is defined as the District of Columbia. The code never places tax liability on citizens of the 50 States since the 50 States are not under it's jurisdiction except as stated in Article I, Section 8.

I tried to find articles concerning the relation between the IRS and BATF (actually one and the same) and mention of 31 USC, Chapter 3, which clearly shows the IRS (and, hence, the BATF) is not an agency.

I even tried to find an article that stated the W-4 form is not a 26 USC, Subtitle A form (listed in I believe 602.101). The W-4 is a social security form (Subtitle C, Chapters 21-24) which is just another income tax that is not required of citizens of the 50 States.

I wanted to find mention of the fact that the US Supreme Court in a plethora of cases have determined that the 16th Amendment did not change anything and does not give Congress the power to lay a direct tax on citizens of the 50 States. It can, however, in the District of Columbia, the possessions, and on federal properties since it has plenary power over these "sources" which, in the Code, are geographic areas, not means of trading one's labor for earnings.

The truth is that very few laws passed by past congressional legislators are Constitutional. That includes nearly every law affecting the 2nd, 4th, 5th, 10th, 13th, and 14th in reference to jurisdiction, taxes, firearms, privacy, etc.

I would like to see a popular publication take on telling the people of this nation of these facts rather than debating about issues concerning different topics when the basis for the topic is unconstitutional in the first place.

I would even like to see a publication that recognizes that every member of the current Congress have violated their oaths of office. Violating the oath and legislating outside federal jurisdiction is as treasonous to this nation as any threat currently faced.

Actually, it is quite probable that unconstitutional actions, including the use of the military as a world police force, of this Congress and the past 54 during my life have led to many of our problems concerning global issues.

Just as an example of the federal government running rampant over the people, how is it possible for the federal government to tell me I may not grow tobacco? I have the constitutional right to grow any plant I wish, to market it to others in my state, and, if willing to pay excise tax, to people in other states. It is a right to grow any product, not a privilege granted by government.

But, the federal government controls the amount of land in each state that may grow tobacco. I believe it was going to be cut from 2500 to 1500 acres in Missouri in the early 1980s. Don't you find it rather strange that if I did grow my own, the feds will come in armed and I would be imprisoned even though tobacco isn't supposed to be a controlled substance.

So, what is the real tie between the tobacco industry and the federal government? It has passed laws that have fooled people into believing they can't grow or market their own tobacco as they can with other agricultural plants.

And, as far as controlled substances go, where in Article I, Section 8, does it give the federal government the power to make any drug illegal? Alcohol control was proved unconstutional with the result the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th.

So, how have drug control laws stayed around? Could part of it be the tremendous income for the federal govenment in fighting a bogus war while it sells "illegal" drugs itself? And, there was the fear created by "revenuers" shooting to kill people who made their own alcohol. This is nothing less than federal murder to coerce people into compliance.

Which brings up the truth concerning justice from the screwed up system in this nation. It has been screwed up by attorneys, judges who rule unconstitutionally and in opposition to the Supreme Court; judges who interpret the law against their power to do so; judges who rule on case law when case law is in contradiction to the Constitution and the rights of MAN - and on and on.

So, yes, I do include WND in reference to the exclusion of the truth concerning these three major topics. But, no problem since my articles do not focus on any one publication except in cases in which the publication completely falsifies information.

Plus, there is this - WND doesn't use my articles. I occassionally send in copies of articles from which I have gotten great positive response but only in the hope that it will stimulate a staff writer or regular contributor to investigate whatever facts I have stated.