It seems this is not clear to the Supreme Court. So, to clear it up, here is the pecking order, an order the Supreme Court does not have the power to decide against as they have done to the State of Florida.

First and foremost the Constitution is written to protect the unalienable rights of the People. The People are sovereign when it comes to God-given rights. The People have the power to control their own destinies within the confines of not infringing upon the rights of their fellow law-abiding citizens.

Second in the order is the sovereignty of the many States making up the Union. As Article X of the Amendments states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States respectfully, or to the People."

In support of this is Amendment IX, which states: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People."

Thus, the rights of People are sovereign over the States in that no State may make any law in violation of the Constitution of the united States of America. States' power to legislate is sovereign over the United States (in the Constitution the home of the federal government, the District of Columbia) and are prevented from making any law repugnant to the Constitution.

The purpose of the Supreme Court is only to determine whether or not a law in constitutional, not to interpret the law as such. Laws are written to mean what they say and say what they mean whether it is a layman or a "professional" reading the law. If the law does not do that, then the law is null and void for vagueness (from rulings by the Supreme Court).

If interpretation is needed, it may only come from the People (also from Supreme Court rulings). Judge Scalia stated that the Article II of the Constitution does not give the people the right to vote. He is correct - it doesn’t.

What is correct is that Article II gives the States the power to determine how Electors are elected and the means of carrying out the election of those Electors. To quote the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct..."

Thus, the sovereignty of the 50 States over the United States, the federal government, including every branch of the government, in establishing the power of the State to determine its method of determining Electors, whether legislatively appointed or voted on by the People.

If the State determines Electors by the vote, then that power to vote for Electors cannot be affected by any ruling of the Supreme Court since it hasn’t the power granted by the People to do so. In fact, Article XI of the Amendments, it is stated: "The Judicial Power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State."

Thus, the Supreme Court does not have the jurisdictional power to make a ruling against the Florida Supreme Court in this case. Both Gore and Bush are from States other than Florida. No other State may enter the fray since each State is sovereign in and of itself. In addition, the Supreme Court cannot set any time limits on vote counts since the Constitution doesn’t.

Now, some so-called ‘legal expert’ is going to state I am not a trained attorney, nor a constitutional expert. But, you see, that is the beauty of it. I am free to interpret the Constitution based on the language in it, determine what is lawful, and actually have more power to do so than any court, including the Supreme Court. So, let’s see what is unconstitutional.

The Federal Election Commission is unconstitutional. The method of electing the president now barely resembles what is in the Constitution and the 12th Amendment (which made just a slight change}. If you don’t believe it, then read Article. II. Clause. 3: of the Constitution. Don’t rely on what the federal government says it may do - Go To The Source.

The Supreme Court has made an unconstitutional ruling in that the power to legislate the method of determining Electors is left up to the States. States do not have to establish time limits and, under the rules of law established by the Constitution, must assure each person free to vote and each person’s vote to be counted.

Under the Freedom of Information Act, the ballots must be left available to the People. The Supreme Court does not have the power to lock up and hide away ballots. Ballots are a State’s property, and, hence, the People’s property.

Each vote belongs to each citizen making the vote, not the federal government since there is not any provision in the Constitution nor its Amendments which give the power to do otherwise to the Supreme Court. Therefore, it is unconstitutional to do so as is any power not specifically given the federal government (includes the Judicial Branch which includes the Supreme Court) by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

Here is what the ruling really means, the powers you have allowed the federal government to assume. The United States established as the central government in Clause 17 of Article I of the Constitution has the power to have supremacy over any State.

It may, at will, change any State law determined by the People to be accurate and just.

The ruling has also clearly shown the Supreme Court may ignore the Constitution and, hence, the unalienable rights of the People. It may usurp any of the Bill of Rights expressed in the first ten amendments. It may usurp any right whether written or not, such as the right to build model airplanes, to work, to travel freely, to say what you want as long as it isn’t slander, to convene in groups, and so on until every right every citizen of the 50 States held as unalienable has been circumvented.

You, Folks, by allowing it, have subjected yourself to increased tyranny and domination by an organization, a corporation under contract to defend those very rights it is instead intent on removing, the federal government established in the Constitution and known as the United States (government).

This Republic has essentially been destroyed.

The ruling itself is Unconstitutional and the Supreme Court ruling is telling every citizen of this nation of States: "It doesn’t matter how you voted or what you intended - you are our subjects and you will do as we say."

Funny each took an oath of office to defend the Constitution but now show the Supreme Court’s true colors, to make determinations it hasn’t the power make based solely on politics, not the rule of common law as established by the Constitution. By doing so, each justice who voted to do away with the sovereignty of Florida committed a treasonous act against the 50 States making up this union of States.

For that, they should be removed from the appointment and prosecuted by the federal government as treason is one of the crimes the United States may prosecute.

Some people believe that taking rights from a State or citizens isn't an act of treason. That is not true and is a dumb statement for any person to make. It doesn't matter whether an invasion is a physical one or not; an act of war is ANY overt or covert act against the People's liberty making up this union of States.