Why
an organisation should take up this approach? In a highly
competitive environment, quality improvement at a revolutionary
pace is now becoming just good management practice. The
mechanisms for improvements are several. Some are simple
ideas or suggestions by individuals. Some are by way of
implemented Kaizen; many could be by intra-sectional or
intra-departmental improvements through Quality Circles
or small group activities, all aimed at continuous improvements
that are useful and many in number. But large-scale improvements
are usually the result of inter-departmental and cross-functional
Quality Improvement Teams (QITs).
Managers
and supervisors need to have mandated annual improvements
in quality and productivity and annual reduction in cost
as part of policy management. Instead of mainly fighting
fire, they need to tackle chronic problems, project-by-project
in an organized and systematic manner to achieve beneficial
change. Thus quality improvement teams impact company’s
economics by reducing cost of poor quality and customer
dissatisfaction. This approach expands the scope for participation
of all level, of managerial and supervisory employees
in improvements, empowers them and increases due recognition
for their contribution. The opportunity to acquire new
knowledge and skills is quite attractive for the participants.
Some organisations have of late explored Six Sigma as
a goal for very significant improvement in quality that
result in benefit to the company as also the customer
(increased profitability to the former). Six Sigma vision
and goals achievement also call for project-by-project
approach through various teams - without restriction
as to the level or position or function from which team
members are drawn. The only difference is that the project
teams have contribution from full time Master/Black
Belts who have the responsibility for the Measure-Analyse-Implement-Control
(MAIC) phases, while the Define phase is taken care
of by the top management in terms of Six Sigma strategy,
principles, goals, time frame, benchmarks, etc.
Roadmap
recommended and used by qcfi for this process.
Awareness
Programme on QI process to Senior Management with brief
outline on methodology adopted. Three days workshop
to Middle Management in batches of 25, which will include
brief idea on elementary statistical systems, Brain
Storming and Flow Diagram. Formation of groups in all
departments and using brainstorming for identification
of problems. Compilation of problems in an area, circulation
and second round of brainstorming to further identification
of problems. Categorisation of problems and creation
of problem bank. Formation of expert Committee to review
and prioritize the problems. · Identification of persons
in middle management level and impart knowledge on
* Process to be used by QITs.
* Elementary Statistical Systems. · Selection of persons
for intensive training on Intermediary and Advanced Statistical
System to be used as resource person by all groups as
and when needed. Selection of 4-6 problems and identification
of leaders for the problem solving · Selection of Team
members in consultation with leaders. · Meeting for problem
solving · Periodical progress review · Formation of more
teams Monthly Council Meeting for review - Attending every
month for first 6 months and afterwards bi-monthly.
|