Copyright 1994 by the Christian Research Institute.
COPYRIGHT/REPRODUCTION LIMITATIONS:
This data file is the sole property of the Christian Research Institute. It may not be altered or edited in any way. It may be reproduced only in its entirety for circulation as "freeware," without charge. All reproductions of this data file must contain the copyright notice (i.e., "Copyright 1994 by the Christian Research Institute"). This data file may not be used without the permission of the Christian Research Institute for resale or the enhancement of any other product sold. This includes all of its content with the exception of a few brief quotations not to exceed more than 500 words.
If you desire to reproduce less than 500 words of this data file for resale or the enhancement of any other product for resale, please give the following source credit: Copyright 1994 by the Christian Research Institute, P.O. Box 500-TC, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693.
"The Modern World of Witchcraft: Part Two" (an article from the Christian Research Journal, Summer 1990, page 22) by Craig S. Hawkins.
The Editor-in-Chief of the
Christian Research Journal is Elliot Miller.
-------------
In Part One of this series
we briefly examined modern and contemporary witchcraft, discussing
some of the major beliefs of this syncretistic movement. The present
article will further expound on witchcraft, and also critique
it from a biblical, metaphysical, epistemological, and ethical
basis.
It is essential to keep in
mind that this movement encompasses a wide range of practices
and beliefs. Consequently some of the critiques presented in this
article may require some adaptation or modification in order to
be applicable to certain variations of belief within the broader
system of witchcraft and neopaganism. Nonetheless, the body of
critiques presented here apply substantially to most witches
and neopagans.
Glossary
epistemology:
The study of the origin and nature of knowledge. Deals with questions
like: What can we know? How do we know it? How do we know it is
true? To what extent can we know it? And so forth.
ontology:
As used here ontology is a branch of metaphysics (which in turn
is a branch of philosophy -- see Part One) and, more specifically,
is the study of the nature or essence of Being -- the One -- and
its relationship to creation and vice versa.
panentheism:
The view that the world is contained in and is a manifestation
of the divine. Although the divine is immanent in and
to the world, it still transcends the universe to some degree.
As the human body is to the soul or mind, so the universe is to
the divine.
problem of evil:
The origin and existence of evil in the world. Traditionally,
there are three main categories of evil: metaphysical, moral,
and physical or natural. Blindness, deafness, and lameness are
examples of metaphysical evil; cruelty and malevolence
are examples of moral evil; and earthquakes, droughts,
and tornados are examples of physical evil. All moral evil
is the direct or indirect result of moral agents' free wills or
ability to choose. Physical and metaphysical evil may or may not
be the result of moral agents' choices.
syncretism:
The combining or merging and synthesizing of religions or religious
beliefs, practices, and philosophies. This results in new or hybrid
religions that are composed of diverse elements of the religions
from which they were derived.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MAGICAL MANIPULATION
Many witches do not believe
in spirits, and most if not all reject belief in a literal Devil
or demons. Naturally, therefore, they reject the idea that sorcery
and divination are accomplished by the agency of evil spirits.
Many offer naturalistic explanations for the working of magic
and divination and other "psychic technologies." On
the whole, the occult community today has expanded its definition
of "the natural" to incorporate elements that were earlier
considered supernatural, placing them in the category of the super-
or paranormal instead. Yet, they are still involved in the "old
ways" -- that is, the occult.
Now You See it, Now You
Don't
What has happened in the occult
world in the past two or more decades is just what C. S. Lewis
described in his classic work, see The Screwtape Letterssee
-- which portrays an experienced demon (Screwtape) writing letters
of advice to a novice demon (Wormwood):
I have great hopes that we
shall learn in due time how to emotionalize and mythologize their
science to such an extent that what is, in effect, a belief in
us, (though not under that name) will creep in while the human
mind remains closed to belief in the Enemy [i.e., God]. The "Life
Force," the worship of sex, and some aspects of Psychoanalysis,
may here prove useful. If once we can produce our perfect work
-- the Materialist Magician, the man, not using, but veritably
worshipping, what he vaguely calls "Forces" while denying
the existence of "spirits" -- then the end of the war
will be in sight.[1]
Lewis's insights on the insidious
strategy of Satan -- the archenemy of our souls -- appear to have
been right on target in regard to modern occultism.[2]
When observations like Lewis's
are made, however, it is not uncommon to hear remarks to the effect
that Christians attribute to the supernatural everything they
cannot comprehend -- if it cannot be understood, it see mustsee
be the Devil. However, this charge is unwarranted.
While it is unfortunately
true that some Christians tend to hyperspiritualize events and
exclaim "the Devil did it," or "the Devil made
me do it," this is certainly see notsee the case with
all. Many Christians have pointed out alleged demonic (or divine)
occurrences which were -- in fact -- instances of fraud, anomalies,
psychosomatic phenomena, auto- or heterosuggestion, and so forth.[3]
Such Christians have demystified baffling occurrences and accounted
for them by their natural causes.
Black, White, or Neutral?
The critical question is,
What is the actual source or causal agent(s) of the occult (i.e.,
of divination, sorcery, and spiritism)? Some witches like to make
a distinction between black and white magic/sorcery and divination.
They claim that sorcery or divination performed for unselfish
and/or "benevolent" purposes (to help others) is good.
Thus, magic done with good intentions and desired results is classified
as white magic. Conversely, sorcery performed with selfish
and/or malevolent motives and means (to harm others) is classified
as black magic.
Other witches deny the validity
of this distinction or find it useless. Since they regard magic
as a natural force they view it as morally neutral
(i.e., not intrinsically good or evil). Like electricity, some
say, magic can be used for good or evil -- but just as
one would not speak of black or white electricity, one should
not do so with magic either.
Christians too deny the validity
of a distinction between black and white magic or divination,
albeit for entirely different reasons. Whether called black, white,
negative, or positive -- any such distinction is illegitimate.
Where the Christian and all witches disagree is on the ultimate
source, the actual identity, the who or what behind the scenes
of the occult.
It is the Christian's conviction
that despite all their magical theories, witches (and all other
occultists) have failed to grasp the true source of the occult.
I therefore offer the following biblical perspective on their
beliefs and practices.
WHAT SAYS THE WORD?
Since witches do not generally
accept the teachings of the Bible, we will not spend much time
on a biblical critique.[4] However, even a cursory review of Scripture
is enough to demonstrate that the beliefs and practices of witches
are utterly incompatible with the Bible. Witches who honestly
examine the Scriptural testimony will have no choice but to admit
that the Bible condemns their beliefs and practices.
In fact, Scripture gives a
blanket condemnation of all forms of the occult -- divination,
sorcery, and spiritism -- in diverse passages throughout the Old
and New Testaments. For instance, in Deuteronomy 18:10-12 God's
view of occultism is expressed in the following warning: "Let
no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in
the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens,
engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or
spiritist or who consults the dead. Anyone who does these things
is detestable to the LORD..."
If this were the only biblical
passage dealing with this issue, it would be clear that all forms
of the occult are denounced by God. Yet, this is only one of many
condemnatory references (see, e.g., Lev. 19:26, 31; 20:6; 2 Kings
17:10-17; 21:1-6; 23:4-7, 24-25; 2 Chron. 33:6; Acts 13:6-12;
16:18; Gal. 5:20; Rev. 9:21).
Moreover, numerous forms of
god and goddess worship are explicitly condemned in Scripture.
There are, for example, a multitude of denunciatory references
to worshipping or invoking the various gods and goddesses of the
Near Eastern religions: the Assyrian and Babylonian Ishtar, the
Ashtoreths of the Canaanites (e.g., the Sidonians and Phoenicians),
and so forth (e.g., Deut. 16:21; Judg. 2:10-14; 10:6-16; 1 Sam.
7:3-4; 12:10; 1 Kings 11:33; 2 Kings 23:13-15). Ashtoreth is described
in 2 Kings 23:13 as "the vile goddess of the Sidonians"
(NIV), or -- as the KJV and NASB translate it -- "the abomination
of the Sidonians." The Bible speaks out not only against
worshipping, invoking, and consulting pagan gods, but also against
the idea that human beings -- individually or collectively --
are divine.
In one sense, witches are
right about the antiquity of some of their beliefs and practices.
The belief that human beings are or can become divine is a good
example. In the first book of the Bible (Gen. 3:5) we find the
original proposal -- made by the serpent -- of the idea that we
could become "like God." But Scripture emphatically
states that there is only one being who is God (Deut. 6:4; 32:39;
Isa. 43:10-11; 44:6-8; 45:5-6, 14, 22; 46:9; Jer. 10:10-11; Mark
12:29-31; 1 Tim. 2:5; James 2:19). Though there are many so-called
gods or goddesses -- in the sense that people worship entities
conceived by their imaginations -- there is only one God by
nature (1 Cor. 8:4-5; 10:20; Gal. 4:8). As one astute observer
remarked: "There are two foundational facts of human enlightenment:
(1) There is a God; and (2) You are not He."
Humankind has not only demonstrated
a great proclivity towards self-deification, it has also been
strongly inclined to confuse God's creation (or His creative
process) for the Creator Himself (Rom. 1:21-25). This is certainly
the case with those entangled in the teachings of modern witchcraft.
Some witches have actually
tried to reconcile the above passages and others with their own
practices. Nonetheless, the Bible -- particularly in the original
languages -- renders any such maneuvering futile.[5] We therefore
ask that witches at least acknowledge that the Bible in no sense
condones their practices, but rather expressly condemns them.
The Source of the Force
Like a drunkard who continually
returns to the bottle, so mankind's bent toward self-deification
and creation worship has been irrepressible, as has been its blindness
towards its own deplorable predicament due to the ravaging effects
of sin. To wit, witches are deceived not only about
the inherent falsity of their often sincerely held beliefs (see
Prov. 14:12), but as well about the source of their misguided
belief system. Despite what witches claim, witchcraft originates
from Satan -- the "father of lies" and the "god
of this world," and from man's corrupt nature. Thus, though
witches do not acknowledge the Devil's existence, they are nonetheless
(all the more so) trapped in the talons of his tyrannical grip
(2 Tim. 2:25-26).
To witches who believe that
magic is a natural, neutral force or power, Christians reply that
it is rather empowered by "the prince of the power of the
air that now works in the children of disobedience" (Eph.
2:2).
As such, whether witches acknowledge
it or not, all occultism involves interaction and trafficking
with demonic spirits (see Lev. 17:7; 20:6; Deut. 32:17;
Ps. 106:36-39; 1 Cor. 10:20-21; Rev. 9:20-21).[6] As W. Foerster
comments, "For Paul witchcraft is meddling with demons....But
there can also be intercourse with demons in the normal heathen
cultus (1 C. 10:20f.)....While idols are nothing...demons stand
behind paganism."[7] Or, as Bietenhard informs us, "Since
dealing with demons lies behind sorcery...it is rejected (Gal.
5:20)....Heathen worship brings men into contact with demons (1
Cor. 10:20f.), for demons stand behind paganism in general (Rev.
9:20)."[8]
This is why occultism in all
its forms is condemned in the Bible. Occultists therefore fall
under the judgment of God for participating in such inexcusable
activities (Rom. 1:18-25; Eph. 4:18-19; Rev. 21:8; 22:15).
Since witches generally do
not accept the Bible, and because there are other inherent weaknesses
and failings in their world view -- metaphysical, epistemological,
and ethical -- we can and should critique witchcraft in these
areas as well. This I shall do in the remainder of this article.
METAPHYSICAL MALADIES
In Part One I discussed the
importance of polytheism as understood by witches and the related
concept of an "open" metaphysic -- that is, the position
that there are multiple levels of and meanings to reality. This
is expressed in the belief that there is "no one way or right
religion for all," and no "one truth."[9] We are
told by witches that all religions lead in the same direction;
they simply take different paths to get there.
Existential Essence
Witches further believe that
everything one experiences is in some sense real and therefore
true. Since reality is multiple and diverse, and since the possible
levels or planes of meaning are infinite, there is always more
to experience. We should therefore remain open-minded and tolerant
of differing views.[10]
Witches who think along these
lines hold that everyone has a part of the truth,
for every person operates from a limited subjective perspective
of the world.[11] And since no one has an absolute knowledge or
perspective of reality (ultimate reality is inaccessible to us),
all views and experiences must be seen as equally valid. One view
is as good or true as another (minimally, it is true for that
individual). Reality, then, is a matter of perspective -- and
everyone has a different one.
Romantic Rationalizations
Christians certainly grant
that witches have the right to believe whatever they choose, as
much as we might disagree with their views. However, we reject
that logic and reason should be ignored when we encounter two
different views that are obviously incompatible.
We also grant that life is
complicated and diverse, and that people can and do have an incalculable
number of experiences. However, this does not prevent us from
knowing many significant truths and facts about ultimate reality.
We need to distinguish between knowing all about life or
ultimate reality, which no human being is capable of, and knowing
some true things about it. These are two different issues.
Without this distinction, we could not make any meaningful
statements about reality.
Experience and Truth
Many witches fail to recognize
a key distinction regarding the validity of experiences. Over
and over again, one finds a failure on the witches' part to distinguish
between real experiences that people actually have versus
experiences that are true. For instance, a man could have
an experience or sensation of falling. The feeling might be quite
intense. Upon awakening from his sleep, however, he realizes that
he was not falling at all but lying on his bed. Did he have the
experience of feeling like he was falling? Yes. Was he
really falling? No! The latter question is not "Did
he have this experience?" but "was he really
falling?" These are two entirely different issues. To confuse
the two is to commit the fallacy of equivocation.
We do not dispute that witches
have many experiences that may appear to support their
religion, but we must ask: Do these experiences really prove their
assertions or only prove that they had some type of experience?
Appealing to experience only establishes that one might have had
one, not that one's world view is true.
The idea that each world view
is like one more flower in the garden of life is a nice sentiment,
but it does not fit the real world. In fact, it is nothing short
of metaphysical madness. To paraphrase and adapt a quip by Edgar
Sheffield Brightman, "In a world where Christianity and witchcraft
are both true, we do not have a universe, but a cosmic nut house!"
As we shall see presently,
the metaphysical framework of the witches' world has important
implications in the realm of testing truth claims.
EPISTEMOLOGY
With their emphasis on experience
and their belief in the intuitive and existential nature of truth,
witches fall into diverse epistemological sinkholes on the road
to truth. One finds a consistent appeal to "knowing"
not by the intellect but by experience and "intuition."
One also finds an implicit or explicit depreciation or denial
of the principles or laws of thought.
For example, Starhawk -- a
popularizer of the witchcraft/neopagan world view -- disdains
what she terms "any beliefs which would...deny the authority
of experience...," thus reinforcing what she calls "the
lie that there is only one truth."[12] In the same way, Margot
Adler -- another popular neopagan writer -- argues for the superiority
of experience over dogma, and metaphor and myth over theology,
doctrine, and creed.[13]
Although one often hears witches
downplay or outright deny doctrines, dogma, and beliefs -- still,
they too vehemently champion their beliefs.[14] To say
that experience and ritual are more important than doctrine is
itself a doctrine. Besides, how is it possible to have rituals
in the first place if there are no beliefs to give them meaning?
In short: no beliefs, then no rituals. Additionally, one must
assert doctrines or beliefs and use logic to even refute the idea
of doctrine.
Is Logic Necessary?
Many people berate the use
of logic and talk as if they could think and do without it. The
fact is, however, that it is impossible not to use logic.
Should a person attempt to refute logic, he or she must use logic
in the very process of refuting it -- thereby refuting his or
her own argument. Let us be clear on this: one must use
logic to disprove logic. For instance, suppose someone
asserts that magic and experience are beyond logic and reason
(i.e., logic does not apply to these realms). The person making
this assertion has failed to note that this statement is itself
predicated upon the use of logic -- that is, logic had to be utilized
to even formulate it. Logic therefore does apply.
Due to limited space, we will
consider just one of the primary laws of thought -- the law of
non-contradiction.[15] This principle affirms that a statement
cannot both be true and false (A cannot be non-A) at the same
time and in the same sense. For example, it cannot be the case
that one both can and cannot (at the same time and in the
same manner) safely cross a busy street. It is one or the other,
but not both. If one says it is both and attempts
to keep his (or her) actions consistent with his words, he will
end up being run over. When people fail to yield to logic, they
will also end up being run over by their own arguments (i.e.,
they assert false, self-defeating, and/or meaningless statements).
Some (many?) witches try to
avoid the anvil of logic, but to no avail.[16] A case in point
is Stewart Farrar, who approvingly quoted C. G. Jung's assertion
that "everything human is relative."[17] To which we
respond: Is this statement relative too, since it was uttered
by a human? If it is not relative, then the statement is
not true. But if the statement itself is relative, that
would mean there are times when it is not true -- when some things
human are not relative, and are hence absolute.
But this would contradict Jung's original statement. Thus, it
is both false and self-defeating. Clearly, the sword of logic
cuts both ways.
Magical Immunity
Witches often attempt to defend
their magic castle from the battering rams of logic by erecting
supposedly impenetrable walls.[18] Different explanations and
rationalizations are offered to protect their views. These include
the aforementioned depreciation, denial, or alleged inapplicability
of logic and objective standards for discerning truth; postulating
diverse planes or levels of reality and meaning; dichotomizing
between emotions and the intellect, or between normal versus altered
states of consciousness; and a number of other distinctions. To
be fair, many of these attempts are simply sincere efforts to
understand the mysterious world of the occult. Nonetheless, such
attempts appear to be cases of special pleading and of employing
double standards -- resulting in an assumed immunity from the
normal criteria of truth-testing used to verify or refute a world
view.[19]
No matter what explanations
and defenses are used, however, experience and intuitive feelings
are often an essential element of the witches' world view validation
-- "It feels right; I have truly experienced it." Witches
"know" via powerful spiritual and emotional experiences
that their views are true. Therefore, they can at times affirm
apparently contradictory assertions.
Again, regardless of which
of the above distinctions are used to advance or protect the witches'
world view, the distinctions themselves are based upon the
validity of logic. Try as they may, witches simply cannot
not use logic.
Our pagan friends are, so
to speak, "up the metaphysical creek," without a trustworthy
epistemological "paddle" -- and are caught in a whirlpool
of subjective circularity that makes one's head spin. Witches
cannot appeal to logic when it suits them and ignore it when it
refutes them and still expect to be taken seriously.
As we shall now see, the use
of logic in the categories of "both/and" as opposed
to "either/or" have implications not just for thinking
but for ethics as well.
Continue