Here's Nicole's letter sent in rebuttal to the editorial, published in the San Francisco Examiner, titled: "Fight Over Adoption Secrecy!"
   Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:36:36 PST
Subject: SF Examiner Article Dated 2/22/99
I mailed this to the editor of the SF Examiner.
  Reading the article 
made me sick to my stomach.  
I had to respond.  I urge others to read 
and respond as well. 
 If we hope to have any sort of reform in adoption 
laws, 
we should do our best to redirect the misinformation
 and 
inaccurate perception surrounding all of our circumstances. 
(Bmothers/Adoptees/Bfamilies)
Dear Editor, 
I think that your article, “Fight over adoption secrecy” written 
February 22
 is grossly misleading and a far cry from the truth. 
 While 
adoption laws as they currently stand in 47 states
 do not allow adoptees 
access to the original birth certificates, 
they never guaranteed secrecy 
for the birth parents. 
 And to say that adoptees are “angry, dangerous 
children” 
who want nothing more than “to confront our birth mother” 
is 
merely more proof positive of the inaccurate perception that adoptees 
are just that,
 children incapable of managing their own rights or making 
rational decisions. 
 As an adult adoptee, I feel that my history is my 
right. 
 To deny me access to my history is to deny me the same rights 
and privileges as every other first class citizen.
  I am not angry, nor 
am I searching for my birth parents to confront them or interfere in 
their life. 
 I am a human being, with normal questions about who I am or 
where I came from. 
 I was a person before I was adopted 
and though I was 
not of an age to have legal say in my adoption proceedings, I am now. 
  
And I believe I should have every right to know.
 
Respectfully, 
Nicole 
Bayer
![]()  | 
![]()  | 
![]()  | 
![]()  |