References
Cesarean Section in the U.S.

1. Goer, H. Obstetrical Myths Versus Realities, Bergin & Garvey, 1995.
2. Gabay, M., Wolfe, S. Unnecessary Cesarean Sections: Curing a national epedemic. Public Citizen's Health Research Group, May 1994.
3. WHO Consensus Conference on Appropriate Technology for Birth, Fortaleza, Brazil. 22-26 April 1985.
4. Hurst, M. and Summey, P. S. "Childbirth and social class: the case of cesarean delivery," Soc Sci Med 1984; 18(8):621-631.
5. Haynes de Regt, R. et al. "Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate." N Engl J Med 1984; 315(10):619-624
6. Gould, J. B., Davey, B. and Stafford, R. S. "Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section." N Engl J Med 1989; 321(4):233-239.
7. Stafford, R. S. "Cesarean section and use of source payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts." Am J Public Health 1990; 80(3):313-315.
8. Petitti, D. B. et al. "In-hospital mortality in the United States; time trends and relation to method of delivery." Obstet & Gynecol 1982; 59:6-11.
9. Durand, A. M. "The safer\ty of home birth: the Farm study." Am J Public Health 1992; 82(3):450-3.
10. Rooks, J. et al. "Outcomes of care in birth centers: the national birth center study." N Engl J Med 1990; 321(26):1804-11.
11. Pel, M. and Heres, M. H. B. "OBINT: A Study of Obstetric Intervention." The Hague: CIP-Koninklihke Bibliotheek.
12. Porrecto, R. P. "Meeting the challenge of the rising cesarean birth rate." Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75(1):133-136.
13. Lomas, J. et al. "Do prcatice guidelines practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians." N Engl J Med 1989; 321(19):1306-1311.
14. Dillon, W. P. et al. "Obstetric care and cesarean birth rates: a program to monitor quality of care." Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80(5):731-737.