Before starting on the subject of this article, I must apologise most sincerely for the content of the previous one. It was merketed as an important discussion on the disgraceful business of smuggling elephant tusk (for the ivory, don't you know it?), an industry which stil persists in countries where they have elephants, despite its illegality. Mind you, smuggling is by definition illegal, wouldn't you agree? I for one doubt that it's possible to have legal smuggling. Smuggling may sometimes be tacitly approved by governments of more disreputable countries, but I have never yet come across a country where smuggling is legal and still referred to as smuggling. Sometimes, when smuggling is legal, it is called importing instead, which just gives it that edge and proves that it isn't illegal at all - in fact, it's perfectly legal and it gives a boost to that country's economy. Well, actually, it doesn't. Importing is only good so long as you're exporting more than you're importing, otherwise the money in your country will swiftly be spent on buying things from abroad, which is, as any rudimentary economist knows, a sure fire ticket to Bankruptcy City. That isn't, as far as I know, how they refer to it in Economist School, but the meaning is almost exactly the same. So I'll leave you there, with a heart-rendering screech of "Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerks! Bye bye, Bramble Brain!" Bye!