|
by Pandit Madan LaI Gupta
According to 1991 census (1981- 1991) the population increased at the alarming rate of
23.71, Hindus increased 22.8% which is less than the national increase, Muslims increased at the rate 32.8%. The reason cited for this increase is lack of education among the Muslim community, which may not be true. Kerala a state dominated by Muslims has the highest literacy rate, where the Muslim population increase is 25.41% (higher than the Total national population increase) as compared to the Hindus, which is 12.62%.
According to the survey conducted by Organization of Research Group of Baroda in the
year 1970-1971 only 8.8% Muslim and 13.8% Hindu couples used the facility of family planning respectively. The survey conducted in 1980-1981 reported 22.8% Muslim and 36.1% Hindu couples respectively. Among the Scheduled/backward classes the population increase rate was 31% showing a decrease of 1.8% as com- pared to the Muslims. It is not true that the rate of increase among the Muslims is due to lack of education or poverty.
It is believed that the rate of population increase among the Muslims is higher than other
religions in India. If this process continued then in 2161, the population of Muslims will be higher than the Hindus in India. The state of Kerala has 100% literacy rate, but the rate of Muslim population increase is 25.49% as compared to Hindus, which is 12.62%. Taking the base year 2001 into consideration and the present rate of growth of Muslim population, the following table will definitely confirm the above fact.
Population In Crores (10 Mi1lion)
|
|
Read Also: Future of Hindus in India
|
|
According to present rate of increase, the Hindu population will be 82.90 and the Muslim 13.30
crores respectively in the year 2001. When the Hindus will be reduced to minority in India, they will certainly be treated like third class citizens as in Pakistan and Bangladesh, not to speak of Arabic Countries. |
|
Poor India! Every time it looks as if thy head is coming above water, that at last
your are accorded some breathing space, after having suffered so much for centuries at the hands of bloody invasions, pernicious colonisers, or secular enemies from within, you are plunged back into darkness, by some unexpected twist of fate, some unheralded, unnecessary, perverse, unfair setback, such as the Sabamarti Express killings.
Poor India! At Independence you were robbed of one fifth of your territory, courtesy
her Majesty's Service; in 1962, the ever smiling, but treacherous Chinese, humiliated you and stole another chunk of thy blessed land, thanks to Nehruâs blind hindi-chinni-bhai-bhai policy; finally, the Pakistanis, who lost all the wars they initiated against you, understood that proxy conflicts were the cheapest, safest (and most cowardly) way to hurt you. And indeed, your soldiers were bled in Punjab, and they are bled today in Kashmir and the North-East, while the world looks the other way and Amnesty International even praises the perpetrators.
Poor India!: Nobody will ever understand the harm that has been done to thy
social, religious and cultural fabric by nearly ten centuries of bloody Muslim invasions. Muslim invaders looted thy country, they killed thy men, raped thy women, razed thy temples, broke thy statues and enslaved thy children. This onslaught was so intense, so bloody, so terrifying -- remember Hindu Kush - India - that it has left a permanent scar on thy psyche: thy sons and daughters have become - as Mahatma Gandhi aptly said -- cowards; they shy away from confrontation, panic easily, stay indoors at the least sign of trouble, lack total civic sense and let India's New Barbarians still defy and defile thee.
Poor India: The British made sure they fashioned a class of Indians who were
brown in skin, but white in their thoughts. They were made up to dress British, eat British, think British and even dream British in their sleep. Today their descendants, the journalists of the English press, are thy worse enemies. They dress Western, eat Western, think Western and even dream Western in their sleep. What matters to them is not what might utter India's sages, avatars, gurus, wise men and yogis, who dress Indian, eat Indian, think Indian and even dream Indian, but what the western media, or Amnesty International will think about India. They are not interested at all by what the Bhagavad Gita, probably the world's most revelatory, most comprehensive, most relevant sacred book has to say, or how Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, India's 21st century avatar, could help. No, they would rather turn to Gustave Thoreau, Marx or Jean-Paul Sartre, people who have even lost relevance in he West, for a solution to thy immense problems.
Poor India ! Thy journalists are indeed thy worst enemies: they have proved it
again after the Sabamarti episode. Here you have fifty eight innocent people, thirty of them being women and children, who are savagely murdered in the most horrific manner, only because they are Hindus. They have killed nobody, whatever the rightfulness or wrongfulness of their cause, they have burnt nobody; they have insulted nobody. And yet, the whole grisly episode was turned against them: instead of being victims of the most horrendous premeditated murder, thy journalists made them responsible for their own deaths. Why? Because they were "fanatics", who want to build a temple, dedicated to the most cherished of Hindu Gods, Ram, on a site, which has been held sacred by Hindus for three thousand years? What a terrible crime! But Spanish Christians retook the Mosques which had been built by the invading Moors and reconverted them into churches. Turks too grabbed the beautiful Byzantine basilicas! in Istanbul, erstwhile Constantinople and made them into mosques - and nobody today finds anything to say. But look how the Indian Media also keeps throwing the blame on the VHP which is "forcing" the temple issue and "provoking" Muslims. Then, when the rioting started and Hindu anger at the terrible manner in which their brothers and sisters were killed, was directed at Muslims, it became "communal rioting"; and of course, people like M.J. Akbar put the entire blame on Hindu "fundamentalism". Yet, it is the Hindus who have always been the target of Muslim killings, whether it is in Kashmir, Bangladesh, or Pakistan. But when they dare to hit back, they are labelled as "fanatics", forgetting that India has been a land of refuge for centuries, thanks to Hindu tolerance.
Poor India! When a Graham Staines is burnt alive, all of India's English press goes
overboard in condemning his killers, but when 58 Graham Staines are murdered, they keep silent. Why? What is wrong with Indian journalists? This is plain common sense, logic, the most basic of human intelligence: people who kill in the name of God, can be called fundamentalists; people who ram planes full of innocent people on buildings full of other innocent people, should be called terrorists. But why should people who want to peacefully build a temple be also called fundamentalists? Even those Hindus, who brought down the Babri Masjid, after millions of temples were razed by Muslim invaders, did not kill a single soul in the process, whether it was right or wrong to do it. Yet, Islam's vengeance, which planted bombs in the heart of Bombay, with the help of the ISI and the tacit backing of Saudi Arabia, and killed hundreds of innocent people, was acceptable to India's "secular" journalist! s and was also labelled as "communal rioting". Today, Star News' anti-Hindu and pro-Muslim bias is so gross, that it should be laughed at. Unfortunately, it does damage by confusing India's middle and upper middle class, who are unsure of their moorings and on top of that, it gives India such a bad image in the eyes of the world.
Poor India! Not only thy own journalists always run thee down, but most of the
western press ignores thee, when it is not debasing thee: "a train full of Hindu 'extremists' was burnt", said an Agence France Presse dispatch dated Saturday 2d March, which went around the world. Full of Hindu "extremists"? Do they mean to say that the forty innocent women and children who were burnt were "extremists"? No self-respecting Government should allow such bias in foreign reporting: in China, these press outfits would be immediately thrown out. But the worse is that this piece was probably written by an Indian stringer - and a Hindu at that - who wants to prove to his or her White Masters, that she is Whiter than the White, more Secular than the Secular.
Oh, poor India. Poor India! Do thy Oxford-speaking, pipe-smoking, Scotch-
drinking journalists understand that post 11th September and December 13th, there has been a shift in the Pakistani strategy vis a vis India. After the intense American pressure to give-up terrorism, they have resorted to triggering a communal war here: the Godhra killings were the first such example of this new strategy, as reports speak of Pakistani illegally leading the mob (as well as Congress Muslim local leaders). Foreign funds for the Islamic cause in South Asia have also dried-up, as the United States has frozen many accounts, and part of the new scheme is to generate local funds in India via the madrasas, by creating a feeling of insecurity amongst the Muslim minority and then say: "look what happened to us in Ahmedabad, we need funds to protect ourselves". Do Indian journalists know that madrasas in UP get 33 crores from the government per year and in Bengal 135 ? If they do, they make sure it is never publicized.
Poor India ! If we allow this to unfold, then the unrest and killings which have been
happening for the last 15 years in Kashmir, will spread to many parts of India, wherever there are important Muslim communities and the dream of Hindu-Muslim brotherhood will forever vanish. Arise again ï India, in this hour of need. Let thy sons and daughters prove again to the world that they are the worthy sons of one of the most ancient and greatest civilisation, which has still so much to give to the world. |
|
by François Gauthier
|