Avery's theory is not only a rebuttal to Darwin's theory, but also a well factored belief in other possibilities for the past. This theory has been formulated from fact as well as so-called myths. Are they really myths? Are they the truth? For many years, Darwin's theory has been brain washed into our knowledge, because the theorists have just given the benefit of the doubt to Darwin. I believe this was their biggest mistake. As Darwin was wrong ,We did not evolve from apes, but, in fact, we were created by some higher power, i.e. God. The description of how God made Eve sounds very much like cloning. If it were explained in the terms of today, we would say, "And, God gave Adam a general anesthetic, took a rib from Adam and cloned Eve from it with a few genetic changes to make her a woman." This is not blasphey, as I am, myself, a Christian. I am just one with an open mind. And, as for the dinosaurs, well, it was modern man that gave them the term "dinosaur", when, in fact, right through our recorded history in every culture there is talk of dragons and monsters. If you lived in the dark ages, and a dirty, big tyrannosaurus rex was chasing you down a track, you would most probably go home and tell the king of a dragon or monsters.As all the the descriptions of these events sound very similar to dinosaurs to me. It's just that, with the transformation of the term "dinosaur" from "dragons", the link was lost.

This is, in fact, Is The

MISSING LINK

WE HAVE SEARCHED FOR ALL THESE YEARS,

And not some genetic difference in man. It was under our noses all the time. When I was researching dragons, all descriptions led me back to this theory. So, it was not a meteor that wiped out the dinsosaurs, but, in fact, it was man who slayed them. For example, right throughout history up until the not-so-distant past, there are records of knights slaying dragons. With the discoveries of dinosaur bones all over the world that are not fossilized and that have Been found on the surface and some that where not buried to far under the Surface. Makes you wonder is the earth really millions of years old as even Carbon dating is only another theory a good one but it is wrong as we don't have Anything marked made in the year 20 million BC. As to make fossilized wood You only have to wait one-maybe two thousand years and as for the skeletons Buried deep under the surface that one is very easy a cave collapsed on them And you can ask any scientist who will confirm that if the earth was compressing A skeleton for some years it would have the same effect well as to where rock Has formed well I make rock any time I want I just add heat in a kiln. So Darwin the truth is finally here, we did not evolve form monkeys, as to this Day the only proof Darwin had was one horse bone and that can be rebutted As it was nothing more than a different species. And if we examine the bones In England more closely we mite find that some of the marks that we thought Where teeth where in fact spear marks from a knights lance. And this Might also explain the need for the heavy amour as well as the need for such A long Lance to protect the knight it would also be the most effective weapon Against dinosaurs of such proportions.

Copyright

Anthony James Avery Artist / Inventor / Theorist

Bridges rd New Lambton

For permission to reproduce this theory in the general press

contact Anthony Avery at tonyavery@bigpond.com for interview arrangements